diff options
author | Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com> | 2025-07-08 13:28:38 +0530 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> | 2025-07-11 20:19:55 +0200 |
commit | 0b075c011032f88d1cfde3b45d6dcf08b44140eb (patch) | |
tree | a03a3a30d8c464f9ac8ce54c4f19323af973500b /tools/perf/scripts/python | |
parent | ac51d04144433116948dcb22a315b89f96b219cb (diff) |
pinmux: fix race causing mux_owner NULL with active mux_usecount
commit 5a3e85c3c397 ("pinmux: Use sequential access to access
desc->pinmux data") tried to address the issue when two client of the
same gpio calls pinctrl_select_state() for the same functionality, was
resulting in NULL pointer issue while accessing desc->mux_owner.
However, issue was not completely fixed due to the way it was handled
and it can still result in the same NULL pointer.
The issue occurs due to the following interleaving:
cpu0 (process A) cpu1 (process B)
pin_request() { pin_free() {
mutex_lock()
desc->mux_usecount--; //becomes 0
..
mutex_unlock()
mutex_lock(desc->mux)
desc->mux_usecount++; // becomes 1
desc->mux_owner = owner;
mutex_unlock(desc->mux)
mutex_lock(desc->mux)
desc->mux_owner = NULL;
mutex_unlock(desc->mux)
This sequence leads to a state where the pin appears to be in use
(`mux_usecount == 1`) but has no owner (`mux_owner == NULL`), which can
cause NULL pointer on next pin_request on the same pin.
Ensure that updates to mux_usecount and mux_owner are performed
atomically under the same lock. Only clear mux_owner when mux_usecount
reaches zero and no new owner has been assigned.
Fixes: 5a3e85c3c397 ("pinmux: Use sequential access to access desc->pinmux data")
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250708-pinmux-race-fix-v2-1-8ae9e8a0d1a1@oss.qualcomm.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/scripts/python')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions