Merge tag 'bpf-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpfHEADmaster

Pull bpf fixes from Alexei Starovoitov:

 - Fix selftests/bpf (typo, conflicts) and unbreak BPF CI (Jiri Olsa)

 - Remove linux/unaligned.h dependency for libbpf_sha256 (Andrii
   Nakryiko) and add a test (Eric Biggers)

 - Reject negative offsets for ALU operations in the verifier (Yazhou
   Tang) and add a test (Eduard Zingerman)

 - Skip scalar adjustment for BPF_NEG operation if destination register
   is a pointer (Brahmajit Das) and add a test (KaFai Wan)

* tag 'bpf-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf:
  libbpf: Fix missing #pragma in libbpf_utils.c
  selftests/bpf: Add tests for rejection of ALU ops with negative offsets
  selftests/bpf: Add test for libbpf_sha256()
  bpf: Reject negative offsets for ALU ops
  libbpf: remove linux/unaligned.h dependency for libbpf_sha256()
  libbpf: move libbpf_sha256() implementation into libbpf_utils.c
  libbpf: move libbpf_errstr() into libbpf_utils.c
  libbpf: remove unused libbpf_strerror_r and STRERR_BUFSIZE
  libbpf: make libbpf_errno.c into more generic libbpf_utils.c
  selftests/bpf: Add test for BPF_NEG alu on CONST_PTR_TO_MAP
  bpf: Skip scalar adjustment for BPF_NEG if dst is a pointer
  selftests/bpf: Fix realloc size in bpf_get_addrs
  selftests/bpf: Fix typo in subtest_basic_usdt after merge conflict
  selftests/bpf: Fix open-coded gettid syscall in uprobe syscall tests

1 files changed, 52 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sha256.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sha256.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..604a0b1423d5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sha256.c
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/* Copyright 2025 Google LLC */
+
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "bpf/libbpf_internal.h"
+
+#define MAX_LEN 4096
+
+/* Test libbpf_sha256() for all lengths from 0 to MAX_LEN inclusively. */
+void test_sha256(void)
+{
+	/*
+	 * The correctness of this value was verified by running this test with
+	 * libbpf_sha256() replaced by OpenSSL's SHA256().
+	 */
+	static const __u8 expected_digest_of_digests[SHA256_DIGEST_LENGTH] = {
+		0x62, 0x30, 0x0e, 0x1d, 0xea, 0x7f, 0xc4, 0x74,
+		0xfd, 0x8e, 0x64, 0x0b, 0xd8, 0x5f, 0xea, 0x04,
+		0xf3, 0xef, 0x77, 0x42, 0xc2, 0x01, 0xb8, 0x90,
+		0x6e, 0x19, 0x91, 0x1b, 0xca, 0xb3, 0x28, 0x42,
+	};
+	__u64 seed = 0;
+	__u8 *data = NULL, *digests = NULL;
+	__u8 digest_of_digests[SHA256_DIGEST_LENGTH];
+	size_t i;
+
+	data = malloc(MAX_LEN);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(data, "malloc"))
+		goto out;
+	digests = malloc((MAX_LEN + 1) * SHA256_DIGEST_LENGTH);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(digests, "malloc"))
+		goto out;
+
+	/* Generate MAX_LEN bytes of "random" data deterministically. */
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_LEN; i++) {
+		seed = (seed * 25214903917 + 11) & ((1ULL << 48) - 1);
+		data[i] = (__u8)(seed >> 16);
+	}
+
+	/* Calculate a digest for each length 0 through MAX_LEN inclusively. */
+	for (i = 0; i <= MAX_LEN; i++)
+		libbpf_sha256(data, i, &digests[i * SHA256_DIGEST_LENGTH]);
+
+	/* Calculate and verify the digest of all the digests. */
+	libbpf_sha256(digests, (MAX_LEN + 1) * SHA256_DIGEST_LENGTH,
+		      digest_of_digests);
+	ASSERT_MEMEQ(digest_of_digests, expected_digest_of_digests,
+		     SHA256_DIGEST_LENGTH, "digest_of_digests");
+out:
+	free(data);
+	free(digests);
+}