diff options
author | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2025-05-06 10:21:06 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2025-05-06 10:21:14 -0700 |
commit | 9fd060622cf9224fd36e6429545101b3ec56adb4 (patch) | |
tree | 8028502f766be88219e125a72a2c80ef3429fedd /tools | |
parent | 62e23f183839c3d718ab36ce1c0cf7cb4b9c05a4 (diff) | |
parent | 29318b4d5dc348367dee8ad0ad7b89350cf1161e (diff) |
Merge branch 'bpf-support-bpf-rbtree-traversal-and-list-peeking'
Martin KaFai Lau says:
====================
bpf: Support bpf rbtree traversal and list peeking
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
The RFC v1 [1] showed a fq qdisc implementation in bpf
that is much closer to the kernel sch_fq.c.
The fq example and bpf qdisc changes are separated out from this set.
This set is to focus on the kfunc and verifier changes that
enable the bpf rbtree traversal and list peeking.
v2:
- Added tests to check that the return value of
the bpf_rbtree_{root,left,right} and bpf_list_{front,back} is
marked as a non_own_ref node pointer. (Kumar)
- Added tests to ensure that the bpf_rbtree_{root,left,right} and
bpf_list_{front,back} must be called after holding the spinlock.
- Squashed the selftests adjustment to the corresponding verifier
changes to avoid bisect failure. (Kumar)
- Separated the bpf qdisc specific changes and fq selftest example
from this set.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250418224652.105998-1-martin.lau@linux.dev/
====================
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250506015857.817950-1-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools')
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_list.c | 6 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/rbtree.c | 6 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_list_peek.c | 113 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree_fail.c | 29 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree_search.c | 206 |
5 files changed, 346 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_list.c index 77d07e0a4a55..5266c7022863 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_list.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_list.c @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ #include "linked_list.skel.h" #include "linked_list_fail.skel.h" +#include "linked_list_peek.skel.h" static char log_buf[1024 * 1024]; @@ -805,3 +806,8 @@ void test_linked_list(void) test_linked_list_success(LIST_IN_LIST, true); test_linked_list_success(TEST_ALL, false); } + +void test_linked_list_peek(void) +{ + RUN_TESTS(linked_list_peek); +} diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/rbtree.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/rbtree.c index 9818f06c97c5..d8f3d7a45fe9 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/rbtree.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/rbtree.c @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ #include "rbtree_fail.skel.h" #include "rbtree_btf_fail__wrong_node_type.skel.h" #include "rbtree_btf_fail__add_wrong_type.skel.h" +#include "rbtree_search.skel.h" static void test_rbtree_add_nodes(void) { @@ -187,3 +188,8 @@ void test_rbtree_fail(void) { RUN_TESTS(rbtree_fail); } + +void test_rbtree_search(void) +{ + RUN_TESTS(rbtree_search); +} diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_list_peek.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_list_peek.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..264e81bfb287 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_list_peek.c @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* Copyright (c) 2025 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */ + +#include <vmlinux.h> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> +#include "bpf_misc.h" +#include "bpf_experimental.h" + +struct node_data { + struct bpf_list_node l; + int key; +}; + +#define private(name) SEC(".data." #name) __hidden __attribute__((aligned(8))) +private(A) struct bpf_spin_lock glock; +private(A) struct bpf_list_head ghead __contains(node_data, l); + +#define list_entry(ptr, type, member) container_of(ptr, type, member) +#define NR_NODES 16 + +int zero = 0; + +SEC("syscall") +__retval(0) +long list_peek(void *ctx) +{ + struct bpf_list_node *l_n; + struct node_data *n; + int i, err = 0; + + bpf_spin_lock(&glock); + l_n = bpf_list_front(&ghead); + bpf_spin_unlock(&glock); + if (l_n) + return __LINE__; + + bpf_spin_lock(&glock); + l_n = bpf_list_back(&ghead); + bpf_spin_unlock(&glock); + if (l_n) + return __LINE__; + + for (i = zero; i < NR_NODES && can_loop; i++) { + n = bpf_obj_new(typeof(*n)); + if (!n) + return __LINE__; + n->key = i; + bpf_spin_lock(&glock); + bpf_list_push_back(&ghead, &n->l); + bpf_spin_unlock(&glock); + } + + bpf_spin_lock(&glock); + + l_n = bpf_list_front(&ghead); + if (!l_n) { + err = __LINE__; + goto done; + } + + n = list_entry(l_n, struct node_data, l); + if (n->key != 0) { + err = __LINE__; + goto done; + } + + l_n = bpf_list_back(&ghead); + if (!l_n) { + err = __LINE__; + goto done; + } + + n = list_entry(l_n, struct node_data, l); + if (n->key != NR_NODES - 1) { + err = __LINE__; + goto done; + } + +done: + bpf_spin_unlock(&glock); + return err; +} + +#define TEST_FB(op, dolock) \ +SEC("syscall") \ +__failure __msg(MSG) \ +long test_##op##_spinlock_##dolock(void *ctx) \ +{ \ + struct bpf_list_node *l_n; \ + __u64 jiffies = 0; \ + \ + if (dolock) \ + bpf_spin_lock(&glock); \ + l_n = bpf_list_##op(&ghead); \ + if (l_n) \ + jiffies = bpf_jiffies64(); \ + if (dolock) \ + bpf_spin_unlock(&glock); \ + \ + return !!jiffies; \ +} + +#define MSG "call bpf_list_{{(front|back).+}}; R0{{(_w)?}}=ptr_or_null_node_data(id={{[0-9]+}},non_own_ref" +TEST_FB(front, true) +TEST_FB(back, true) +#undef MSG + +#define MSG "bpf_spin_lock at off=0 must be held for bpf_list_head" +TEST_FB(front, false) +TEST_FB(back, false) +#undef MSG + +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree_fail.c index dbd5eee8e25e..4acb6af2dfe3 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree_fail.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree_fail.c @@ -69,11 +69,11 @@ long rbtree_api_nolock_first(void *ctx) } SEC("?tc") -__failure __msg("rbtree_remove node input must be non-owning ref") +__retval(0) long rbtree_api_remove_unadded_node(void *ctx) { struct node_data *n, *m; - struct bpf_rb_node *res; + struct bpf_rb_node *res_n, *res_m; n = bpf_obj_new(typeof(*n)); if (!n) @@ -88,19 +88,20 @@ long rbtree_api_remove_unadded_node(void *ctx) bpf_spin_lock(&glock); bpf_rbtree_add(&groot, &n->node, less); - /* This remove should pass verifier */ - res = bpf_rbtree_remove(&groot, &n->node); - n = container_of(res, struct node_data, node); + res_n = bpf_rbtree_remove(&groot, &n->node); - /* This remove shouldn't, m isn't in an rbtree */ - res = bpf_rbtree_remove(&groot, &m->node); - m = container_of(res, struct node_data, node); + res_m = bpf_rbtree_remove(&groot, &m->node); bpf_spin_unlock(&glock); - if (n) - bpf_obj_drop(n); - if (m) - bpf_obj_drop(m); + bpf_obj_drop(m); + if (res_n) + bpf_obj_drop(container_of(res_n, struct node_data, node)); + if (res_m) { + bpf_obj_drop(container_of(res_m, struct node_data, node)); + /* m was not added to the rbtree */ + return 2; + } + return 0; } @@ -178,7 +179,7 @@ err_out: } SEC("?tc") -__failure __msg("rbtree_remove node input must be non-owning ref") +__failure __msg("bpf_rbtree_remove can only take non-owning or refcounted bpf_rb_node pointer") long rbtree_api_add_release_unlock_escape(void *ctx) { struct node_data *n; @@ -202,7 +203,7 @@ long rbtree_api_add_release_unlock_escape(void *ctx) } SEC("?tc") -__failure __msg("rbtree_remove node input must be non-owning ref") +__failure __msg("bpf_rbtree_remove can only take non-owning or refcounted bpf_rb_node pointer") long rbtree_api_first_release_unlock_escape(void *ctx) { struct bpf_rb_node *res; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree_search.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree_search.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..098ef970fac1 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree_search.c @@ -0,0 +1,206 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* Copyright (c) 2025 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */ + +#include <vmlinux.h> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> +#include "bpf_misc.h" +#include "bpf_experimental.h" + +struct node_data { + struct bpf_refcount ref; + struct bpf_rb_node r0; + struct bpf_rb_node r1; + int key0; + int key1; +}; + +#define private(name) SEC(".data." #name) __hidden __attribute__((aligned(8))) +private(A) struct bpf_spin_lock glock0; +private(A) struct bpf_rb_root groot0 __contains(node_data, r0); + +private(B) struct bpf_spin_lock glock1; +private(B) struct bpf_rb_root groot1 __contains(node_data, r1); + +#define rb_entry(ptr, type, member) container_of(ptr, type, member) +#define NR_NODES 16 + +int zero = 0; + +static bool less0(struct bpf_rb_node *a, const struct bpf_rb_node *b) +{ + struct node_data *node_a; + struct node_data *node_b; + + node_a = rb_entry(a, struct node_data, r0); + node_b = rb_entry(b, struct node_data, r0); + + return node_a->key0 < node_b->key0; +} + +static bool less1(struct bpf_rb_node *a, const struct bpf_rb_node *b) +{ + struct node_data *node_a; + struct node_data *node_b; + + node_a = rb_entry(a, struct node_data, r1); + node_b = rb_entry(b, struct node_data, r1); + + return node_a->key1 < node_b->key1; +} + +SEC("syscall") +__retval(0) +long rbtree_search(void *ctx) +{ + struct bpf_rb_node *rb_n, *rb_m, *gc_ns[NR_NODES]; + long lookup_key = NR_NODES / 2; + struct node_data *n, *m; + int i, nr_gc = 0; + + for (i = zero; i < NR_NODES && can_loop; i++) { + n = bpf_obj_new(typeof(*n)); + if (!n) + return __LINE__; + + m = bpf_refcount_acquire(n); + + n->key0 = i; + m->key1 = i; + + bpf_spin_lock(&glock0); + bpf_rbtree_add(&groot0, &n->r0, less0); + bpf_spin_unlock(&glock0); + + bpf_spin_lock(&glock1); + bpf_rbtree_add(&groot1, &m->r1, less1); + bpf_spin_unlock(&glock1); + } + + n = NULL; + bpf_spin_lock(&glock0); + rb_n = bpf_rbtree_root(&groot0); + while (can_loop) { + if (!rb_n) { + bpf_spin_unlock(&glock0); + return __LINE__; + } + + n = rb_entry(rb_n, struct node_data, r0); + if (lookup_key == n->key0) + break; + if (nr_gc < NR_NODES) + gc_ns[nr_gc++] = rb_n; + if (lookup_key < n->key0) + rb_n = bpf_rbtree_left(&groot0, rb_n); + else + rb_n = bpf_rbtree_right(&groot0, rb_n); + } + + if (!n || lookup_key != n->key0) { + bpf_spin_unlock(&glock0); + return __LINE__; + } + + for (i = 0; i < nr_gc; i++) { + rb_n = gc_ns[i]; + gc_ns[i] = bpf_rbtree_remove(&groot0, rb_n); + } + + m = bpf_refcount_acquire(n); + bpf_spin_unlock(&glock0); + + for (i = 0; i < nr_gc; i++) { + rb_n = gc_ns[i]; + if (rb_n) { + n = rb_entry(rb_n, struct node_data, r0); + bpf_obj_drop(n); + } + } + + if (!m) + return __LINE__; + + bpf_spin_lock(&glock1); + rb_m = bpf_rbtree_remove(&groot1, &m->r1); + bpf_spin_unlock(&glock1); + bpf_obj_drop(m); + if (!rb_m) + return __LINE__; + bpf_obj_drop(rb_entry(rb_m, struct node_data, r1)); + + return 0; +} + +#define TEST_ROOT(dolock) \ +SEC("syscall") \ +__failure __msg(MSG) \ +long test_root_spinlock_##dolock(void *ctx) \ +{ \ + struct bpf_rb_node *rb_n; \ + __u64 jiffies = 0; \ + \ + if (dolock) \ + bpf_spin_lock(&glock0); \ + rb_n = bpf_rbtree_root(&groot0); \ + if (rb_n) \ + jiffies = bpf_jiffies64(); \ + if (dolock) \ + bpf_spin_unlock(&glock0); \ + \ + return !!jiffies; \ +} + +#define TEST_LR(op, dolock) \ +SEC("syscall") \ +__failure __msg(MSG) \ +long test_##op##_spinlock_##dolock(void *ctx) \ +{ \ + struct bpf_rb_node *rb_n; \ + struct node_data *n; \ + __u64 jiffies = 0; \ + \ + bpf_spin_lock(&glock0); \ + rb_n = bpf_rbtree_root(&groot0); \ + if (!rb_n) { \ + bpf_spin_unlock(&glock0); \ + return 1; \ + } \ + n = rb_entry(rb_n, struct node_data, r0); \ + n = bpf_refcount_acquire(n); \ + bpf_spin_unlock(&glock0); \ + if (!n) \ + return 1; \ + \ + if (dolock) \ + bpf_spin_lock(&glock0); \ + rb_n = bpf_rbtree_##op(&groot0, &n->r0); \ + if (rb_n) \ + jiffies = bpf_jiffies64(); \ + if (dolock) \ + bpf_spin_unlock(&glock0); \ + \ + return !!jiffies; \ +} + +/* + * Use a spearate MSG macro instead of passing to TEST_XXX(..., MSG) + * to ensure the message itself is not in the bpf prog lineinfo + * which the verifier includes in its log. + * Otherwise, the test_loader will incorrectly match the prog lineinfo + * instead of the log generated by the verifier. + */ +#define MSG "call bpf_rbtree_root{{.+}}; R0{{(_w)?}}=rcu_ptr_or_null_node_data(id={{[0-9]+}},non_own_ref" +TEST_ROOT(true) +#undef MSG +#define MSG "call bpf_rbtree_{{(left|right).+}}; R0{{(_w)?}}=rcu_ptr_or_null_node_data(id={{[0-9]+}},non_own_ref" +TEST_LR(left, true) +TEST_LR(right, true) +#undef MSG + +#define MSG "bpf_spin_lock at off=0 must be held for bpf_rb_root" +TEST_ROOT(false) +TEST_LR(left, false) +TEST_LR(right, false) +#undef MSG + +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; |