Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
The TCON binding mandates a dmas phandle to the DMAengine channel used for
that controller. However, since it's not used in the driver, some device
trees have been missing it. Let's add it.
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
|
|
The V3s mixer node has an assigned clocks property, while the driver also
enforces it.
Since assigned-clocks is pretty fragile anyway, let's just remove it.
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
|
|
While this is functional, it's a best practice to always have the clocks
and reset lines in order, in case we ever need to have compatibility code.
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
|
|
Exynos5422 Odroids
Hardkernel's Odroid XU3/XU4/HC1 boards use bootloader, which configures
top PLLs to the following values: MPLL: 532MHz, CPLL: 666MHz and DPLL:
600MHz.
Adjust all bus related OPPs to the values that are possible to derive
from the top PLL configured by the bootloader. Also add a comment for
each bus describing which PLL is used for it.
The most significant change is the highest rate for wcore bus. It has
been increased to 532MHz as this is the value configured initially by
the bootloader. Also the voltage for this OPP is changed to match the
value set by the bootloader.
This patch finally allows the buses to operate on the rates matching the
values set for each OPP and fixes the following warnings observed on
boot:
exynos-bus: new bus device registered: soc:bus_wcore ( 84000 KHz ~ 400000 KHz)
exynos-bus: new bus device registered: soc:bus_noc ( 67000 KHz ~ 100000 KHz)
exynos-bus: new bus device registered: soc:bus_fsys_apb (100000 KHz ~ 200000 KHz)
...
exynos-bus soc:bus_wcore: dev_pm_opp_set_rate: failed to find current OPP for freq 532000000 (-34)
exynos-bus soc:bus_noc: dev_pm_opp_set_rate: failed to find current OPP for freq 111000000 (-34)
exynos-bus soc:bus_fsys_apb: dev_pm_opp_set_rate: failed to find current OPP for freq 222000000 (-34)
The problem with setting incorrect (in some cases much lower) clock rate
for the defined OPP were there from the beginning, but went unnoticed
because the only way to observe it was to manually check the rate of the
respective clocks. The commit 4294a779bd8d ("PM / devfreq: exynos-bus:
Convert to use dev_pm_opp_set_rate()") finally revealed it, because it
enabled use of the generic code from the OPP framework, which issues the
above mentioned warnings.
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently the only Exynos5422-based boards that support bus frequency
scaling are Hardkernel's Odroid XU3/XU4/HC1. Move the bus related OPPs
to the boards DTS, because those OPPs heavily depend on the clock
topology and top PLL rates, which are being configured by the board's
bootloader.
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
|
|
This patch is to build the coresight topology structure of zynq-7000
series according to the docs of coresight and userguide of zynq-7000.
Signed-off-by: Zumeng Chen <zumeng.chen@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Quanyang Wang <quanyang.wang@windriver.com>
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
|
|
On am57xx-beagle-x15, 5V0 is connected to P16, P17, P18 and P19
connectors. On am57xx-evm, 5V0 regulator is used to get 3V6 regulator
which is connected to the COMQ port. Model 5V0 regulator here in order
for it to be used in am57xx-evm to model 3V6 regulator.
Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
This activates the device tree-based cpufreq driver that
Ux500 is using and enables the schedutil and ondemand
governors with schedutil as default. This works fine in
the setups I have tested.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191217202648.23206-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org
Cc: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
|
|
commit d23f3839fe97d8dce03d ("ARM: dts: DRA7: Add pcie1 dt node for
EP mode") while adding the dt node for EP mode for DRA7 platform,
added rc node for am571x-idk and populated gpios property with
"gpio3 23". However the GPIO_PCIE_SWRST line is actually connected
to "gpio5 18". Fix it here. (The patch adding "gpio3 23" was tested
with another am57x board in EP mode which doesn't rely on reset from
host).
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.14+
Fixes: d23f3839fe97d8dce03d ("ARM: dts: DRA7: Add pcie1 dt node for EP mode")
Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
PERST# line in the PCIE connector is driven by the host mode and not
EP mode. The gpios property here is used for driving the PERST# line.
Remove gpios property from all endpoint device tree nodes.
Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-stericsson into arm/dt
First set of Ux500 DTS changes for the v5.6 kernel:
- Add the GPADC IIO channels
- Factor out generic pin configuration
- Add the gpio_in_nopull configuration
- Tighten up I2C and SPI buses
- Clean up some compatibles
- Extract a generic DB8500 DTSI
- Add HREF520 DTS and the associated DB8520 DTSI
- Split TVK R2 and R3 to separate DTSI files
* tag 'ux500-armsoc-v5.6-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-stericsson:
ARM: dts: ux500: Add devicetree for HREF520
ARM: dts: ux500: Split TVK DTSI files in two
ARM: dts: ux500: Break out DB8500 DTSI
ARM: dts: ux500: Drop pulls on I2C buses
ARM: dts: ux500: Use "arm,pl031" compatible for PL031
ARM: dts: ux500: Add "simple-bus" compatible to soc node
ARM: dts: ux500: Remove ux500_ prefix from ux500_serial* labels
ARM: dts: ux500: Move serial aliases to ste-dbx5x0.dtsi
ARM: dts: ux500: Add aliases for I2C and SPI buses
ARM: dts: ux500: Disable I2C/SPI buses by default
ARM: dts: ux500: nomadik-pinctrl: Add &gpio_in_nopull
ARM: dts: ux500: Add pin configs for UART1 CTS/RTS pins
ARM: dts: ux500: Add alternative SDI pin configs
ARM: dts: ux500: Rename generic pin configs according to pin group
ARM: dts: ux500: Move generic pin configs out of ste-href-family-pinctrl.dtsi
dt-bindings: arm: Document compatibles for Ux500 boards
ARM: dts: ux500: snowball: Remove unused PRCMU cpufreq node
ARM: dts: ux500: declare GPADC IIO ADC channels
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CACRpkdYfqJ=VXkP3Qm5Lw63AuR=1ChxbUW+Y-nhw5gCX6sYfDw@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
|
|
The IPU1 MMU has been using common IOMMU pdata quirks defined and
used by all IPU IOMMU devices on OMAP4 and beyond. Separate out the
pdata for IPU1 MMU with the additional .set_pwrdm_constraint ops
plugged in, so that the IPU1 power domain can be restricted to ON
state during the boot and active period of the IPU1 remote processor.
This eliminates the pre-conditions for the IPU1 boot issue as
described in commit afe518400bdb ("iommu/omap: fix boot issue on
remoteprocs with AMMU/Unicache").
NOTE:
1. RET is not a valid target power domain state on DRA7 platforms,
and IPU power domain is normally programmed for OFF. The IPU1
still fails to boot though, and an unclearable l3_noc error is
thrown currently on 4.14 kernel without this fix. This behavior
is slightly different from previous 4.9 LTS kernel.
2. The fix is currently applied only to IPU1 on DRA7xx SoC, as the
other affected processors on OMAP4/OMAP5/DRA7 are in domains
that are not entering RET. IPU2 on DRA7 is in CORE power domain
which is only programmed for ON power state. The fix can be easily
scaled if these domains do hit RET in the future.
3. The issue was not seen on current DRA7 platforms if any of the
DSP remote processors were booted and using one of the GPTimers
5, 6, 7 or 8 on previous 4.9 LTS kernel. This was due to the
errata fix for i874 implemented in commit 1cbabcb9807e ("ARM:
DRA7: clockdomain: Implement timer workaround for errata i874")
which keeps the IPU1 power domain from entering RET when the
timers are active. But the timer workaround did not make any
difference on 4.14 kernel, and an l3_noc error was seen still
without this fix.
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
Convert omap2 iommu platform code to use ti-sysc instead of legacy
omap-device / hwmod interfaces.
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
Errata Title:
i879: DSP MStandby requires CD_EMU in SW_WKUP
Description:
The DSP requires the internal emulation clock to be actively toggling
in order to successfully enter a low power mode via execution of the
IDLE instruction and PRCM MStandby/Idle handshake. This assumes that
other prerequisites and software sequence are followed.
Workaround:
The emulation clock to the DSP is free-running anytime CCS is connected
via JTAG debugger to the DSP subsystem or when the CD_EMU clock domain
is set in SW_WKUP mode. The CD_EMU domain can be set in SW_WKUP mode
via the CM_EMU_CLKSTCTRL [1:0]CLKTRCTRL field.
Implementation:
This patch implements this workaround by denying the HW_AUTO mode
for the EMU clockdomain during the power-up of any DSP processor
and re-enabling the HW_AUTO mode during the shutdown of the last
DSP processor (actually done during the enabling and disabling of
the respective DSP MDMA MMUs). Reference counting has to be used to
manage the independent sequencing between the multiple DSP processors.
This switching is done at runtime rather than a static clockdomain
flags value to meet the target power domain state for the EMU power
domain during suspend.
Note that the DSP MStandby behavior is not consistent across all
boards prior to this fix. Please see commit 45f871eec6c0 ("ARM:
OMAP2+: Extend DRA7 IPU1 MMU pdata quirks to DSP MDMA MMUs") for
details.
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
IOMMU driver will be using ti-sysc bus driver for power management control
going forward, and the pdata quirks are not needed for anything anymore.
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
The parent clockdomain for reset must be in force wakeup mode, otherwise
the reset may never complete. Add pdata quirks for this purpose for PRM
driver.
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
IOMMUs are now supported via ti-sysc, so the legacy hwmod data can be
removed.
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
IOMMUs are now supported via ti-sysc, so the legacy hwmod data can be
removed.
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
|
|
Convert omap5 IOMMUs to use ti-sysc instead of legacy omap-hwmod based
implementation. Enable the IOMMUs also while doing this.
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
Convert omap4 IOMMUs to use ti-sysc instead of legacy omap-hwmod based
implementation. Enable the IOMMUs also while doing this.
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
Convert dra74x IOMMUs to use ti-sysc instead of legacy omap-hwmod based
implementation. Enable the IOMMUs also while doing this.
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
Convert dra7 IOMMUs to use ti-sysc instead of legacy omap-hwmod based
implementation. Enable the IOMMUs also while doing this.
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@ti.com>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@ti.com>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@ti.com>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@ti.com>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@ti.com>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|