| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Both microcontrollers are part of the GT HW and are closely related to
GT operations. To keep all the files cleanly together, they've been
placed in their own subdir inside the gt/ folder
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
|
|
We originally added support, in some cases partial, for different modes
of operations via guc clients:
- proxy vs direct submission;
- variable engine mask per-client.
We only ever used one flow (all submissions via a single proxy), so the
other code paths haven't been exercised and are most likely
non-functional. The guc firmware interface is also in the process of
being updated to better fit the i915 flow and our client abstraction
will need to change accordingly (or possibly go away entirely), so these
old unused paths can be considered dead and removed.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Acked-by: Matthew Brost <Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190710005437.3496-3-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
|
|
Preemption via GuC submission is not being supported with its current
legacy incarnation. The current FW does support a similar pre-emption
flow via H2G, but it is class-based instead of being instance-based,
which doesn't fit well with the i915 tracking. To fix this, the
firmware is being updated to better support our needs with a new flow,
so we can safely remove the old code.
v2 (Daniele): resurrect & rebase, reword commit message, remove
preempt_context as well
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Acked-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190710005437.3496-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
|
|
The functions where internally already only using the structure, so we
need to just flip the interface.
v2: rebase
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190613232156.34940-7-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
|
|
Continuing the theme of separating out the GEM clutter.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190528092956.14910-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
In the next patch, we are introducing a broad virtual engine to encompass
multiple physical engines, losing the 1:1 nature of BIT(engine->id). To
reflect the broader set of engines implied by the virtual instance, lets
store the full bitmask.
v2: Use intel_engine_mask_t (s/ring_mask/engine_mask/)
v3: Tvrtko voted for moah churn so teach everyone to not mention ring
and use $class$instance throughout.
v4: Comment upon the disparity in bspec for using VCS1,VCS2 in gen8 and
VCS[0-4] in later gen. We opt to keep the code consistent and use
0-index naming throughout.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190305180332.30900-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Track the temporary wakerefs used within the selftests so that leaks are
clear.
v2: Add a couple of coarse annotations for mock selftests as we now
loudly warn about the errors.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190114142129.24398-14-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
The majority of runtime-pm operations are bounded and scoped within a
function; these are easy to verify that the wakeref are handled
correctly. We can employ the compiler to help us, and reduce the number
of wakerefs tracked when debugging, by passing around cookies provided
by the various rpm_get functions to their rpm_put counterpart. This
makes the pairing explicit, and given the required wakeref cookie the
compiler can verify that we pass an initialised value to the rpm_put
(quite handy for double checking error paths).
For regular builds, the compiler should be able to eliminate the unused
local variables and the program growth should be minimal. Fwiw, it came
out as a net improvement as gcc was able to refactor rpm_get and
rpm_get_if_in_use together,
v2: Just s/rpm_put/rpm_put_unchecked/ everywhere, leaving the manual
mark up for smaller more targeted patches.
v3: Mention the cookie in Returns
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190114142129.24398-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
commit e346a991f42c ("drm/i915/guc: drop negative doorbell alloc
selftest") removed the negative case from the selftest and left no
code between the goto from the positive case of the test and the label
itself, so we can get rid of it.
Reported-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181022230427.5616-5-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
|
|
The test requires driver tweaks to avoid causing error messages
on intentionally-triggered errors and to stop accessing non
existing register. However, this is a pure GuC FW interface test
and should be covered by FW validation, so it isn't really worth
tweaking the driver for it and we're better off dropping it instead.
Testing the driver running out of doorbells is already covered by
igt_guc_doorbells
Suggested-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181018004610.22895-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
|
|
GuC stores some data in there, which might be stale after a reset.
We already reset the WQ head and tail, but more things are being moved
to the descriptor with the interface updates. Instead of trying to track
them one by one, always memset and init the descriptors from scratch
after GuC is loaded.
The code is also reorganized so that the above operations and the
doorbell creation are grouped as "client enabling"
v2: add proc_desc_fini for symmetry (Daniele), remove unneeded var init,
add guc_is_alive() (Michal)
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181002215430.15049-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
|
|
As we emit requests or touch HW directly for some of the live tests, the
requirement is that we hold the rpm wakeref before doing so. We want a
mix of granularity since we will want to test runtime suspend, so try to
mark up only the critical sections where we need rpm for the live test.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108002
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180920144934.16611-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
We currently verify that all doorbells can be registered with GuC and
HW but don't check that all works as expected after a db ring.
Do a nop ring of all doorbells to make sure we haven't misprogrammed
any WQ or stage descriptor data. This will also help validating
upcoming changes in the db programming flow.
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Acked-by: Katarzyna Dec <katarzyna.dec@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180827223614.22789-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
|
|
Since:
0d4b78b3d2c0 ("drm/i915/guc: Assert we have the doorbell before setting it up")
We have asserts in GuC doorbell related functions, which is a good thing.
Unfortunately, we were using those to check whether GuC FW is refusing
to allocate invalid doorbell - which makes the test fail.
Well, it would make the test WARN, except we fumbled cleanup ordering
and eat the BUG_ON instead.
Let's keep the asserts and use the internal implementation in the test.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107186
Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180712112013.3253-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
|
|
In the next patch, we may only conditionally allocate the preempt-client
if there is a global preempt context and so we need to be prepared in
case the preempt-client itself is NULL.
v2: Grep for more preempt_client.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180207210544.26351-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
|
|
Full GPU reset causes GuC to be reset. This means that every time we're
doing a reset, we need to talk to GuC and tell it about doorbells.
Let's separate the communication part (create_doorbell) from our
internal bookkeeping (reserve_doorbell) so that we can cleanly separate
the initialization done at module load from reinitialization done at
reset in the following patch.
While I'm here, let's also add a proper (although slightly asymetric)
cleanup that doesn't try to communicate with GuC after it's already
gone, getting rid of "expected" warnings caused by GuC action failures
on module unload.
Note that I've also removed one of the tests (bitmap out of sync), since
it doesn't make much sense anymore - bitmaps are now not expected to
change during the lifetime of a client.
Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171213221352.7173-5-michal.winiarski@intel.com
|
|
In the upcoming patch we will change the way how to recognize
when GuC is in use. Using helper macros will minimize scope
of that changes. While here, update dev_info message.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171206135316.32556-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
|
|
Silence smatch over
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_guc.c:135 igt_guc_init_doorbell_hw() error: we previously assumed 'guc->execbuf_client' could be null (see line 123)
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_guc.c:142 igt_guc_init_doorbell_hw() error: we previously assumed 'guc->preempt_client' could be null (see line 123)
by asserting that we did succeed in creating the pair of clients for
testing.
References: 55bd6bd75717 ("drm/i915/selftests: Add a GuC doorbells selftest")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171120211907.1649-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
|
|
Make the private array used for stashing test clients static, to silence
sparse.
References: 55bd6bd75717 ("drm/i915/selftests: Add a GuC doorbells selftest")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171120132606.4254-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
|
|
The first test aims to check guc_init_doorbell_hw, changing the existing
guc clients and doorbells state before calling it.
The second test tries to create as many clients as it is currently possible
(currently limited to max number of doorbells) and exercise the doorbell
alloc/dealloc code.
Since our usage mode require very few clients/doorbells, this code has
been exercised very lightly and it's good to have a simple test for it.
As reference, this test already helped identify the bug fixed by
commit 7f1ea2ac3017 ("drm/i915/guc: Fix doorbell id selection").
v2: Extend number of clients; check for client allocation failure when
number of doorbells is exceeded; validate client properties; reuse
guc_init_doorbell_hw (Chris).
v3: guc_init_doorbell_hw test added per Chris suggestion.
v4: Try to explain why guc_init_doorbell_hw exist and comment some
details in the subtest.
v5: Remove redundant pr_info at the beginning of each subtest (Chris);
rebase (s/i915_guc_client/intel_guc_client/).
Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171116220632.1909-1-michel.thierry@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
|
