summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/crypto/arm64/sha512.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-07-04lib/crypto: sha256: Remove sha256_blocks_simd()Eric Biggers
Instead of having both sha256_blocks_arch() and sha256_blocks_simd(), instead have just sha256_blocks_arch() which uses the most efficient implementation that is available in the calling context. This is simpler, as it reduces the API surface. It's also safer, since sha256_blocks_arch() just works in all contexts, including contexts where the FPU/SIMD/vector registers cannot be used. This doesn't mean that SHA-256 computations *should* be done in such contexts, but rather we should just do the right thing instead of corrupting a random task's registers. Eliminating this footgun and simplifying the code is well worth the very small performance cost of doing the check. Note: in the case of arm and arm64, what used to be sha256_blocks_arch() is renamed back to its original name of sha256_block_data_order(). sha256_blocks_arch() is now used for the higher-level dispatch function. This renaming also required an update to lib/crypto/arm64/sha512.h, since sha2-armv8.pl is shared by both SHA-256 and SHA-512. Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630160645.3198-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
2025-06-30lib/crypto: arm64/sha512: Migrate optimized SHA-512 code to libraryEric Biggers
Instead of exposing the arm64-optimized SHA-512 code via arm64-specific crypto_shash algorithms, instead just implement the sha512_blocks() library function. This is much simpler, it makes the SHA-512 (and SHA-384) library functions be arm64-optimized, and it fixes the longstanding issue where the arm64-optimized SHA-512 code was disabled by default. SHA-512 still remains available through crypto_shash, but individual architectures no longer need to handle it. To match sha512_blocks(), change the type of the nblocks parameter of the assembly functions from int or 'unsigned int' to size_t. Update the ARMv8 CE assembly function accordingly. The scalar assembly function actually already treated it as size_t. Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630160320.2888-9-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>