| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
In preparation of splitting off the pin-init crate from the kernel
crate, move all pin-init API code (including proc-macros) into
`rust/pin-init`.
Moved modules have their import path adjusted via the `#[path = "..."]`
attribute. This allows the files to still be imported in the kernel
crate even though the files are in different directories.
Code that is moved out of files (but the file itself stays where it is)
is imported via the `include!` macro. This also allows the code to be
moved while still being part of the kernel crate.
Note that this commit moves the generics parsing code out of the GPL-2.0
file `rust/macros/helpers.rs` into the Apache-2.0 OR MIT file
`rust/pin_init/internal/src/helpers.rs`. I am the sole author of that
code and it already is available with that license at [1].
The same is true for the entry-points of the proc-macros `pin_data`,
`pinned_drop` and `derive_zeroable` in `rust/macros/lib.rs` that are
moved to `rust/pin_data/internal/src/lib.rs`. Although there are some
smaller patches that fix the doctests.
Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pinned-init [1]
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Fiona Behrens <me@kloenk.dev>
Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250308110339.2997091-3-benno.lossin@proton.me
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
|
|
Now that we got the kernel `Box` type in place, convert all existing
`Box` users to make use of it.
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241004154149.93856-13-dakr@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
|
|
In Rust, it is possible to `allow` particular warnings (diagnostics,
lints) locally, making the compiler ignore instances of a given warning
within a given function, module, block, etc.
It is similar to `#pragma GCC diagnostic push` + `ignored` + `pop` in C:
#pragma GCC diagnostic push
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wunused-function"
static void f(void) {}
#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
But way less verbose:
#[allow(dead_code)]
fn f() {}
By that virtue, it makes it possible to comfortably enable more
diagnostics by default (i.e. outside `W=` levels) that may have some
false positives but that are otherwise quite useful to keep enabled to
catch potential mistakes.
The `#[expect(...)]` attribute [1] takes this further, and makes the
compiler warn if the diagnostic was _not_ produced. For instance, the
following will ensure that, when `f()` is called somewhere, we will have
to remove the attribute:
#[expect(dead_code)]
fn f() {}
If we do not, we get a warning from the compiler:
warning: this lint expectation is unfulfilled
--> x.rs:3:10
|
3 | #[expect(dead_code)]
| ^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: `#[warn(unfulfilled_lint_expectations)]` on by default
This means that `expect`s do not get forgotten when they are not needed.
See the next commit for more details, nuances on its usage and
documentation on the feature.
The attribute requires the `lint_reasons` [2] unstable feature, but it
is becoming stable in 1.81.0 (to be released on 2024-09-05) and it has
already been useful to clean things up in this patch series, finding
cases where the `allow`s should not have been there.
Thus, enable `lint_reasons` and convert some of our `allow`s to `expect`s
where possible.
This feature was also an example of the ongoing collaboration between
Rust and the kernel -- we tested it in the kernel early on and found an
issue that was quickly resolved [3].
Cc: Fridtjof Stoldt <xfrednet@gmail.com>
Cc: Urgau <urgau@numericable.fr>
Link: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2383-lint-reasons.html#expect-lint-attribute [1]
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/54503 [2]
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114557 [3]
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu>
Tested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904204347.168520-18-ojeda@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
|
|
In Rust 1.76.0, Clippy added the `check-private-items` lint configuration
option. When turned on (the default is off), it makes several lints
check private items as well.
In our case, it affects two lints we have enabled [1]:
`missing_safety_doc` and `unnecessary_safety_doc`.
It also seems to affect the new `too_long_first_doc_paragraph` lint [2],
even though the documentation does not mention it.
Thus allow the few instances remaining we currently hit and enable
the lint.
Link: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/clippy/lint_configuration.html#check-private-items [1]
Link: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#/too_long_first_doc_paragraph [2]
Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Tested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904204347.168520-16-ojeda@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
|
|
Rust 1.82.0's Clippy is introducing [1][2] a new warn-by-default lint,
`too_long_first_doc_paragraph` [3], which is intended to catch titles
of code documentation items that are too long (likely because no title
was provided and the item documentation starts with a paragraph).
This lint does not currently trigger anywhere, but it does detect a couple
cases if checking for private items gets enabled (which we will do in
the next commit):
error: first doc comment paragraph is too long
--> rust/kernel/init/__internal.rs:18:1
|
18 | / /// This is the module-internal type implementing `PinInit` and `Init`. It is unsafe to create this
19 | | /// type, since the closure needs to fulfill the same safety requirement as the
20 | | /// `__pinned_init`/`__init` functions.
| |_
|
= help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#too_long_first_doc_paragraph
= note: `-D clippy::too-long-first-doc-paragraph` implied by `-D warnings`
= help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(clippy::too_long_first_doc_paragraph)]`
error: first doc comment paragraph is too long
--> rust/kernel/sync/arc/std_vendor.rs:3:1
|
3 | / //! The contents of this file come from the Rust standard library, hosted in
4 | | //! the <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust> repository, licensed under
5 | | //! "Apache-2.0 OR MIT" and adapted for kernel use. For copyright details,
6 | | //! see <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/COPYRIGHT>.
| |_
|
= help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#too_long_first_doc_paragraph
Thus clean those two instances.
In addition, since we have a second `std_vendor.rs` file with a similar
header, do the same there too (even if that one does not trigger the lint,
because it is `doc(hidden)`).
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129531 [1]
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/12993 [2]
Link: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#/too_long_first_doc_paragraph [3]
Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Tested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904204347.168520-15-ojeda@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
|
|
Checking that we are not missing any `// SAFETY` comments in our `unsafe`
blocks is something we have wanted to do for a long time, as well as
cleaning up the remaining cases that were not documented [1].
Back when Rust for Linux started, this was something that could have
been done via a script, like Rust's `tidy`. Soon after, in Rust 1.58.0,
Clippy implemented the `undocumented_unsafe_blocks` lint [2].
Even though the lint has a few false positives, e.g. in some cases where
attributes appear between the comment and the `unsafe` block [3], there
are workarounds and the lint seems quite usable already.
Thus enable the lint now.
We still have a few cases to clean up, so just allow those for the moment
by writing a `TODO` comment -- some of those may be good candidates for
new contributors.
Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/351 [1]
Link: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/#/undocumented_unsafe_blocks [2]
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/13189 [3]
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu>
Tested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904204347.168520-5-ojeda@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
|
|
Add a macro to statically check if a field of a struct is marked with
`#[pin]` ie that it is structurally pinned. This can be used when
`unsafe` code needs to rely on fields being structurally pinned.
The macro has a special "inline" mode for the case where the type
depends on generic parameters from the surrounding scope.
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Co-developed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240814-linked-list-v5-1-f5f5e8075da0@google.com
[ Replaced `compile_fail` with `ignore` and a TODO note. Removed
`pub` from example to clean `unreachable_pub` lint. - Miguel ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
|
|
The `{pin_}chain` functions extend an initializer: it not only
initializes the value, but also executes a closure taking a reference to
the initialized value. This allows to do something with a value directly
after initialization.
Suggested-by: Asahi Lina <lina@asahilina.net>
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230814084602.25699-13-benno.lossin@proton.me
[ Cleaned a few trivial nits. ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
|
|
Remove the blanket implementation of `PinInit<T, E> for I where I:
Init<T, E>`. This blanket implementation prevented custom types that
implement `PinInit`.
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230814084602.25699-12-benno.lossin@proton.me
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
|
|
Use hygienic identifiers for the guards instead of the field names. This
makes the init macros feel more like normal struct initializers, since
assigning identifiers with the name of a field does not create
conflicts.
Also change the internals of the guards, no need to make the `forget`
function `unsafe`, since users cannot access the guards anyways. Now the
guards are carried directly on the stack and have no extra `Cell<bool>`
field that marks if they have been forgotten or not, instead they are
just forgotten via `mem::forget`.
Suggested-by: Asahi Lina <lina@asahilina.net>
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230814084602.25699-5-benno.lossin@proton.me
[ Cleaned a few trivial nits. ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
|
|
The `stack_pin_init!` macro allows pin-initializing a value on the
stack. It accepts a `impl PinInit<T, E>` to initialize a `T`. It allows
propagating any errors via `?` or handling it normally via `match`.
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230408122429.1103522-11-y86-dev@protonmail.com
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
|
|
The `PinnedDrop` trait that facilitates destruction of pinned types.
It has to be implemented via the `#[pinned_drop]` macro, since the
`drop` function should not be called by normal code, only by other
destructors. It also only works on structs that are annotated with
`#[pin_data(PinnedDrop)]`.
Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230408122429.1103522-10-y86-dev@protonmail.com
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
|
|
Add the following initializer macros:
- `#[pin_data]` to annotate structurally pinned fields of structs,
needed for `pin_init!` and `try_pin_init!` to select the correct
initializer of fields.
- `pin_init!` create a pin-initializer for a struct with the
`Infallible` error type.
- `try_pin_init!` create a pin-initializer for a struct with a custom
error type (`kernel::error::Error` is the default).
- `init!` create an in-place-initializer for a struct with the
`Infallible` error type.
- `try_init!` create an in-place-initializer for a struct with a custom
error type (`kernel::error::Error` is the default).
Also add their needed internal helper traits and structs.
Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230408122429.1103522-8-y86-dev@protonmail.com
[ Fixed three typos. ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
|
|
This API is used to facilitate safe pinned initialization of structs. It
replaces cumbersome `unsafe` manual initialization with elegant safe macro
invocations.
Due to the size of this change it has been split into six commits:
1. This commit introducing the basic public interface: traits and
functions to represent and create initializers.
2. Adds the `#[pin_data]`, `pin_init!`, `try_pin_init!`, `init!` and
`try_init!` macros along with their internal types.
3. Adds the `InPlaceInit` trait that allows using an initializer to create
an object inside of a `Box<T>` and other smart pointers.
4. Adds the `PinnedDrop` trait and adds macro support for it in
the `#[pin_data]` macro.
5. Adds the `stack_pin_init!` macro allowing to pin-initialize a struct on
the stack.
6. Adds the `Zeroable` trait and `init::zeroed` function to initialize
types that have `0x00` in all bytes as a valid bit pattern.
--
In this section the problem that the new pin-init API solves is outlined.
This message describes the entirety of the API, not just the parts
introduced in this commit. For a more granular explanation and additional
information on pinning and this issue, view [1].
Pinning is Rust's way of enforcing the address stability of a value. When a
value gets pinned it will be impossible for safe code to move it to another
location. This is done by wrapping pointers to said object with `Pin<P>`.
This wrapper prevents safe code from creating mutable references to the
object, preventing mutable access, which is needed to move the value.
`Pin<P>` provides `unsafe` functions to circumvent this and allow
modifications regardless. It is then the programmer's responsibility to
uphold the pinning guarantee.
Many kernel data structures require a stable address, because there are
foreign pointers to them which would get invalidated by moving the
structure. Since these data structures are usually embedded in structs to
use them, this pinning property propagates to the container struct.
Resulting in most structs in both Rust and C code needing to be pinned.
So if we want to have a `mutex` field in a Rust struct, this struct also
needs to be pinned, because a `mutex` contains a `list_head`. Additionally
initializing a `list_head` requires already having the final memory
location available, because it is initialized by pointing it to itself. But
this presents another challenge in Rust: values have to be initialized at
all times. There is the `MaybeUninit<T>` wrapper type, which allows
handling uninitialized memory, but this requires using the `unsafe` raw
pointers and a casting the type to the initialized variant.
This problem gets exacerbated when considering encapsulation and the normal
safety requirements of Rust code. The fields of the Rust `Mutex<T>` should
not be accessible to normal driver code. After all if anyone can modify
the fields, there is no way to ensure the invariants of the `Mutex<T>` are
upheld. But if the fields are inaccessible, then initialization of a
`Mutex<T>` needs to be somehow achieved via a function or a macro. Because
the `Mutex<T>` must be pinned in memory, the function cannot return it by
value. It also cannot allocate a `Box` to put the `Mutex<T>` into, because
that is an unnecessary allocation and indirection which would hurt
performance.
The solution in the rust tree (e.g. this commit: [2]) that is replaced by
this API is to split this function into two parts:
1. A `new` function that returns a partially initialized `Mutex<T>`,
2. An `init` function that requires the `Mutex<T>` to be pinned and that
fully initializes the `Mutex<T>`.
Both of these functions have to be marked `unsafe`, since a call to `new`
needs to be accompanied with a call to `init`, otherwise using the
`Mutex<T>` could result in UB. And because calling `init` twice also is not
safe. While `Mutex<T>` initialization cannot fail, other structs might
also have to allocate memory, which would result in conditional successful
initialization requiring even more manual accommodation work.
Combine this with the problem of pin-projections -- the way of accessing
fields of a pinned struct -- which also have an `unsafe` API, pinned
initialization is riddled with `unsafe` resulting in very poor ergonomics.
Not only that, but also having to call two functions possibly multiple
lines apart makes it very easy to forget it outright or during refactoring.
Here is an example of the current way of initializing a struct with two
synchronization primitives (see [3] for the full example):
struct SharedState {
state_changed: CondVar,
inner: Mutex<SharedStateInner>,
}
impl SharedState {
fn try_new() -> Result<Arc<Self>> {
let mut state = Pin::from(UniqueArc::try_new(Self {
// SAFETY: `condvar_init!` is called below.
state_changed: unsafe { CondVar::new() },
// SAFETY: `mutex_init!` is called below.
inner: unsafe {
Mutex::new(SharedStateInner { token_count: 0 })
},
})?);
// SAFETY: `state_changed` is pinned when `state` is.
let pinned = unsafe {
state.as_mut().map_unchecked_mut(|s| &mut s.state_changed)
};
kernel::condvar_init!(pinned, "SharedState::state_changed");
// SAFETY: `inner` is pinned when `state` is.
let pinned = unsafe {
state.as_mut().map_unchecked_mut(|s| &mut s.inner)
};
kernel::mutex_init!(pinned, "SharedState::inner");
Ok(state.into())
}
}
The pin-init API of this patch solves this issue by providing a
comprehensive solution comprised of macros and traits. Here is the example
from above using the pin-init API:
#[pin_data]
struct SharedState {
#[pin]
state_changed: CondVar,
#[pin]
inner: Mutex<SharedStateInner>,
}
impl SharedState {
fn new() -> impl PinInit<Self> {
pin_init!(Self {
state_changed <- new_condvar!("SharedState::state_changed"),
inner <- new_mutex!(
SharedStateInner { token_count: 0 },
"SharedState::inner",
),
})
}
}
Notably the way the macro is used here requires no `unsafe` and thus comes
with the usual Rust promise of safe code not introducing any memory
violations. Additionally it is now up to the caller of `new()` to decide
the memory location of the `SharedState`. They can choose at the moment
`Arc<T>`, `Box<T>` or the stack.
--
The API has the following architecture:
1. Initializer traits `PinInit<T, E>` and `Init<T, E>` that act like
closures.
2. Macros to create these initializer traits safely.
3. Functions to allow manually writing initializers.
The initializers (an `impl PinInit<T, E>`) receive a raw pointer pointing
to uninitialized memory and their job is to fully initialize a `T` at that
location. If initialization fails, they return an error (`E`) by value.
This way of initializing cannot be safely exposed to the user, since it
relies upon these properties outside of the control of the trait:
- the memory location (slot) needs to be valid memory,
- if initialization fails, the slot should not be read from,
- the value in the slot should be pinned, so it cannot move and the memory
cannot be deallocated until the value is dropped.
This is why using an initializer is facilitated by another trait that
ensures these requirements.
These initializers can be created manually by just supplying a closure that
fulfills the same safety requirements as `PinInit<T, E>`. But this is an
`unsafe` operation. To allow safe initializer creation, the `pin_init!` is
provided along with three other variants: `try_pin_init!`, `try_init!` and
`init!`. These take a modified struct initializer as a parameter and
generate a closure that initializes the fields in sequence.
The macros take great care in upholding the safety requirements:
- A shadowed struct type is used as the return type of the closure instead
of `()`. This is to prevent early returns, as these would prevent full
initialization.
- To ensure every field is only initialized once, a normal struct
initializer is placed in unreachable code. The type checker will emit
errors if a field is missing or specified multiple times.
- When initializing a field fails, the whole initializer will fail and
automatically drop fields that have been initialized earlier.
- Only the correct initializer type is allowed for unpinned fields. You
cannot use a `impl PinInit<T, E>` to initialize a structurally not pinned
field.
To ensure the last point, an additional macro `#[pin_data]` is needed. This
macro annotates the struct itself and the user specifies structurally
pinned and not pinned fields.
Because dropping a pinned struct is also not allowed to break the pinning
invariants, another macro attribute `#[pinned_drop]` is needed. This
macro is introduced in a following commit.
These two macros also have mechanisms to ensure the overall safety of the
API. Additionally, they utilize a combined proc-macro, declarative macro
design: first a proc-macro enables the outer attribute syntax `#[...]` and
does some important pre-parsing. Notably this prepares the generics such
that the declarative macro can handle them using token trees. Then the
actual parsing of the structure and the emission of code is handled by a
declarative macro.
For pin-projections the crates `pin-project` [4] and `pin-project-lite` [5]
had been considered, but were ultimately rejected:
- `pin-project` depends on `syn` [6] which is a very big dependency, around
50k lines of code.
- `pin-project-lite` is a more reasonable 5k lines of code, but contains a
very complex declarative macro to parse generics. On top of that it
would require modification that would need to be maintained
independently.
Link: https://rust-for-linux.com/the-safe-pinned-initialization-problem [1]
Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/tree/0a04dc4ddd671efb87eef54dde0fb38e9074f4be [2]
Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/blob/f509ede33fc10a07eba3da14aa00302bd4b5dddd/samples/rust/rust_miscdev.rs [3]
Link: https://crates.io/crates/pin-project [4]
Link: https://crates.io/crates/pin-project-lite [5]
Link: https://crates.io/crates/syn [6]
Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230408122429.1103522-7-y86-dev@protonmail.com
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
|
