summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorxuejiufei <xuejiufei@huawei.com>2016-03-25 14:21:38 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2016-03-25 16:37:42 -0700
commite5054c9aefd26ac2401f4b17eda82fab71796dca (patch)
tree0c2144747a0e63c075d9960823720dd7e523612f
parent584dca3440732afa84fbca07567bb66e1453936a (diff)
ocfs2/dlm: move lock to the tail of grant queue while doing in-place convert
We have found a bug when two nodes doing umount one after another. 1) Node 1 migrate a lockres that has 3 locks in grant queue such as N2(PR)<->N3(NL)<->N4(PR) to N2. After migration, lvb of the lock N3(NL) and N4(PR) are empty on node 2 because migration target do not copy lvb to these two lock. 2) Node 3 want to convert to PR, it can be granted in __dlmconvert_master(), and the order of these locks is unchanged. The lvb of the lock N3(PR) on node 2 is copyed from lockres in function dlm_update_lvb() while the lvb of lock N4(PR) is still empty. 3) Node 2 want to leave domain, it will migrate this lockres to node 3. Then node 2 will trigger the BUG in dlm_prepare_lvb_for_migration() when adding the lock N4(PR) to mres with the following message because the lvb of mres is already copied from lock N3(PR), but the lvb of lock N4(PR) is empty. "Mismatched lvb in lock cookie=%u:%llu, name=%.*s, node=%u" [akpm@linux-foundation.org: tweak comment] Signed-off-by: xuejiufei <xuejiufei@huawei.com> Acked-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-rw-r--r--fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmconvert.c6
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmconvert.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmconvert.c
index f90931335c6b..cdeafb4e7ed6 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmconvert.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmconvert.c
@@ -212,6 +212,12 @@ grant:
if (lock->lksb->flags & DLM_LKSB_PUT_LVB)
memcpy(res->lvb, lock->lksb->lvb, DLM_LVB_LEN);
+ /*
+ * Move the lock to the tail because it may be the only lock which has
+ * an invalid lvb.
+ */
+ list_move_tail(&lock->list, &res->granted);
+
status = DLM_NORMAL;
*call_ast = 1;
goto unlock_exit;