mmc: core: Use mrq.sbc in close-ended ffu

Field Firmware Update (ffu) may use close-ended or open ended sequence.
Each such sequence is comprised of a write commands enclosed between 2
switch commands - to and from ffu mode. So for the close-ended case, it
will be: cmd6->cmd23-cmd25-cmd6.

Some host controllers however, get confused when multi-block rw is sent
without sbc, and may generate auto-cmd12 which breaks the ffu sequence.
I encountered  this issue while testing fwupd (github.com/fwupd/fwupd)
on HP Chromebook x2, a qualcomm based QC-7c, code name - strongbad.

Instead of a quirk, or hooking the request function of the msm ops,
it would be better to fix the ioctl handling and make it use mrq.sbc
instead of issuing SET_BLOCK_COUNT separately.

Signed-off-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231129092535.3278-1-avri.altman@wdc.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

1 files changed, 43 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
index f9a5cffa64b1..892e74e611a0 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
@@ -400,6 +400,10 @@ struct mmc_blk_ioc_data {
 	struct mmc_ioc_cmd ic;
 	unsigned char *buf;
 	u64 buf_bytes;
+	unsigned int flags;
+#define MMC_BLK_IOC_DROP	BIT(0)	/* drop this mrq */
+#define MMC_BLK_IOC_SBC	BIT(1)	/* use mrq.sbc */
+
 	struct mmc_rpmb_data *rpmb;
 };
 
@@ -465,7 +469,7 @@ static int mmc_blk_ioctl_copy_to_user(struct mmc_ioc_cmd __user *ic_ptr,
 }
 
 static int __mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_blk_data *md,
-			       struct mmc_blk_ioc_data *idata)
+			       struct mmc_blk_ioc_data **idatas, int i)
 {
 	struct mmc_command cmd = {}, sbc = {};
 	struct mmc_data data = {};
@@ -475,10 +479,18 @@ static int __mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_blk_data *md,
 	unsigned int busy_timeout_ms;
 	int err;
 	unsigned int target_part;
+	struct mmc_blk_ioc_data *idata = idatas[i];
+	struct mmc_blk_ioc_data *prev_idata = NULL;
 
 	if (!card || !md || !idata)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	if (idata->flags & MMC_BLK_IOC_DROP)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (idata->flags & MMC_BLK_IOC_SBC)
+		prev_idata = idatas[i - 1];
+
 	/*
 	 * The RPMB accesses comes in from the character device, so we
 	 * need to target these explicitly. Else we just target the
@@ -532,7 +544,7 @@ static int __mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_blk_data *md,
 			return err;
 	}
 
-	if (idata->rpmb) {
+	if (idata->rpmb || prev_idata) {
 		sbc.opcode = MMC_SET_BLOCK_COUNT;
 		/*
 		 * We don't do any blockcount validation because the max size
@@ -540,6 +552,8 @@ static int __mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_blk_data *md,
 		 * 'Reliable Write' bit here.
 		 */
 		sbc.arg = data.blocks | (idata->ic.write_flag & BIT(31));
+		if (prev_idata)
+			sbc.arg = prev_idata->ic.arg;
 		sbc.flags = MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_AC;
 		mrq.sbc = &sbc;
 	}
@@ -557,6 +571,15 @@ static int __mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_blk_data *md,
 	mmc_wait_for_req(card->host, &mrq);
 	memcpy(&idata->ic.response, cmd.resp, sizeof(cmd.resp));
 
+	if (prev_idata) {
+		memcpy(&prev_idata->ic.response, sbc.resp, sizeof(sbc.resp));
+		if (sbc.error) {
+			dev_err(mmc_dev(card->host), "%s: sbc error %d\n",
+							__func__, sbc.error);
+			return sbc.error;
+		}
+	}
+
 	if (cmd.error) {
 		dev_err(mmc_dev(card->host), "%s: cmd error %d\n",
 						__func__, cmd.error);
@@ -1032,6 +1055,20 @@ static inline void mmc_blk_reset_success(struct mmc_blk_data *md, int type)
 	md->reset_done &= ~type;
 }
 
+static void mmc_blk_check_sbc(struct mmc_queue_req *mq_rq)
+{
+	struct mmc_blk_ioc_data **idata = mq_rq->drv_op_data;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 1; i < mq_rq->ioc_count; i++) {
+		if (idata[i - 1]->ic.opcode == MMC_SET_BLOCK_COUNT &&
+		    mmc_op_multi(idata[i]->ic.opcode)) {
+			idata[i - 1]->flags |= MMC_BLK_IOC_DROP;
+			idata[i]->flags |= MMC_BLK_IOC_SBC;
+		}
+	}
+}
+
 /*
  * The non-block commands come back from the block layer after it queued it and
  * processed it with all other requests and then they get issued in this
@@ -1059,11 +1096,14 @@ static void mmc_blk_issue_drv_op(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
 			if (ret)
 				break;
 		}
+
+		mmc_blk_check_sbc(mq_rq);
+
 		fallthrough;
 	case MMC_DRV_OP_IOCTL_RPMB:
 		idata = mq_rq->drv_op_data;
 		for (i = 0, ret = 0; i < mq_rq->ioc_count; i++) {
-			ret = __mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(card, md, idata[i]);
+			ret = __mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(card, md, idata, i);
 			if (ret)
 				break;
 		}