summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me>2021-05-17 12:39:06 -0700
committerKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>2021-05-29 11:13:27 -0700
commitddc473916955f7710d1eb17c1273d91c8622a9fe (patch)
tree8f61a3077ef4e5a4310c4d19731fc7daa522d7cf
parentaac902925ea646e461c95edc98a8a57eb0def917 (diff)
seccomp: Refactor notification handler to prepare for new semantics
This refactors the user notification code to have a do / while loop around the completion condition. This has a small change in semantic, in that previously we ignored addfd calls upon wakeup if the notification had been responded to, but instead with the new change we check for an outstanding addfd calls prior to returning to userspace. Rodrigo Campos also identified a bug that can result in addfd causing an early return, when the supervisor didn't actually handle the syscall [1]. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210413160151.3301-1-rodrigo@kinvolk.io/ Fixes: 7cf97b125455 ("seccomp: Introduce addfd ioctl to seccomp user notifier") Signed-off-by: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me> Acked-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.pizza> Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Tested-by: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@kinvolk.io> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210517193908.3113-3-sargun@sargun.me
-rw-r--r--kernel/seccomp.c30
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
index 6ecd3f3a52b5..9f58049ac16d 100644
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -1105,28 +1105,30 @@ static int seccomp_do_user_notification(int this_syscall,
up(&match->notif->request);
wake_up_poll(&match->wqh, EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM);
- mutex_unlock(&match->notify_lock);
/*
* This is where we wait for a reply from userspace.
*/
-wait:
- err = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&n.ready);
- mutex_lock(&match->notify_lock);
- if (err == 0) {
- /* Check if we were woken up by a addfd message */
+ do {
+ mutex_unlock(&match->notify_lock);
+ err = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&n.ready);
+ mutex_lock(&match->notify_lock);
+ if (err != 0)
+ goto interrupted;
+
addfd = list_first_entry_or_null(&n.addfd,
struct seccomp_kaddfd, list);
- if (addfd && n.state != SECCOMP_NOTIFY_REPLIED) {
+ /* Check if we were woken up by a addfd message */
+ if (addfd)
seccomp_handle_addfd(addfd);
- mutex_unlock(&match->notify_lock);
- goto wait;
- }
- ret = n.val;
- err = n.error;
- flags = n.flags;
- }
+ } while (n.state != SECCOMP_NOTIFY_REPLIED);
+
+ ret = n.val;
+ err = n.error;
+ flags = n.flags;
+
+interrupted:
/* If there were any pending addfd calls, clear them out */
list_for_each_entry_safe(addfd, tmp, &n.addfd, list) {
/* The process went away before we got a chance to handle it */