summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDoug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>2014-04-30 10:44:09 -0700
committerLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>2014-06-03 08:11:49 +0100
commit9d230c9e4f4e67cb1c1cb9e0f6142da16b0f2796 (patch)
tree92a9a0a098a25f9b779bc22f8b47e01464860d94 /Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.txt
parent5271db29d7199fe0ffb303ca4bbbb1485bba28c3 (diff)
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver
On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.txt')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.txt39
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..898f030eba62
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+I2C bus that tunnels through the ChromeOS EC (cros-ec)
+======================================================
+On some ChromeOS board designs we've got a connection to the EC (embedded
+controller) but no direct connection to some devices on the other side of
+the EC (like a battery and PMIC). To get access to those devices we need
+to tunnel our i2c commands through the EC.
+
+The node for this device should be under a cros-ec node like google,cros-ec-spi
+or google,cros-ec-i2c.
+
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: google,cros-ec-i2c-tunnel
+- google,remote-bus: The EC bus we'd like to talk to.
+
+Optional child nodes:
+- One node per I2C device connected to the tunnelled I2C bus.
+
+
+Example:
+ cros-ec@0 {
+ compatible = "google,cros-ec-spi";
+
+ ...
+
+ i2c-tunnel {
+ compatible = "google,cros-ec-i2c-tunnel";
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ google,remote-bus = <0>;
+
+ battery: sbs-battery@b {
+ compatible = "sbs,sbs-battery";
+ reg = <0xb>;
+ sbs,poll-retry-count = <1>;
+ };
+ };
+ }