summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8660.dtsi
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>2018-11-29 11:58:00 +0100
committerAndy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>2019-01-22 15:04:47 -0600
commit76c27054ebb90302eb819e7ae76f3a04ed70ae78 (patch)
tree20296c5a4a4e3a13f586cec9d093a5d4709f0559 /arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8660.dtsi
parentbfeffd155283772bbe78c6a05dec7c0128ee500c (diff)
ARM: dts: msm8660: Mark two GSBI blocks "disabled"
The GSBI module complains: gsbi 16500000.gsbi: missing mode configuration gsbi: probe of 16500000.gsbi failed with error -22 gsbi 16600000.gsbi: missing mode configuration gsbi: probe of 16600000.gsbi failed with error -22 gsbi 19800000.gsbi: GSBI port protocol: 2 crci: 0 So we should mark these GSBIs as "disabled" in the SoC file by default. If boards appear that make use of them, we can simply set status = "ok" in the DTS for them. Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8660.dtsi')
-rw-r--r--arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8660.dtsi2
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8660.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8660.dtsi
index 70698941f64c..9b1cf00d8ca3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8660.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8660.dtsi
@@ -133,6 +133,7 @@
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
ranges;
+ status = "disabled";
syscon-tcsr = <&tcsr>;
@@ -167,6 +168,7 @@
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
ranges;
+ status = "disabled";
syscon-tcsr = <&tcsr>;