arm64: Abstract syscallno manipulation

The -1 "no syscall" value is written in various ways, shared with
the user ABI in some places, and generally obscure.

This patch attempts to make things a little more consistent and
readable by replacing all these uses with a single #define.  A
couple of symbolic helpers are provided to clarify the intent
further.

Because the in-syscall check in do_signal() is changed from >= 0 to
!= NO_SYSCALL by this patch, different behaviour may be observable
if syscallno is set to values less than -1 by a tracer.  However,
this is not different from the behaviour that is already observable
if a tracer sets syscallno to a value >= __NR_(compat_)syscalls.

It appears that this can cause spurious syscall restarting, but
that is not a new behaviour either, and does not appear harmful.

Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
index de774805f672..28619b5b6746 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -1363,7 +1363,7 @@ static void tracehook_report_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs,
 	if (dir == PTRACE_SYSCALL_EXIT)
 		tracehook_report_syscall_exit(regs, 0);
 	else if (tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs))
-		regs->syscallno = ~0;
+		forget_syscall(regs);
 
 	regs->regs[regno] = saved_reg;
 }