diff options
| author | Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com> | 2024-06-21 20:23:23 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> | 2025-05-09 13:22:05 -0700 |
| commit | f4818881c47fd91fcb6d62373c57c7844e3de1c0 (patch) | |
| tree | 8fcd27d55000dfab445bb8412af95deae2011257 /drivers/base/cpu.c | |
| parent | a75bf27fe41abe658c53276a0c486c4bf9adecfc (diff) | |
x86/its: Enable Indirect Target Selection mitigation
Indirect Target Selection (ITS) is a bug in some pre-ADL Intel CPUs with
eIBRS. It affects prediction of indirect branch and RETs in the
lower half of cacheline. Due to ITS such branches may get wrongly predicted
to a target of (direct or indirect) branch that is located in the upper
half of the cacheline.
Scope of impact
===============
Guest/host isolation
--------------------
When eIBRS is used for guest/host isolation, the indirect branches in the
VMM may still be predicted with targets corresponding to branches in the
guest.
Intra-mode
----------
cBPF or other native gadgets can be used for intra-mode training and
disclosure using ITS.
User/kernel isolation
---------------------
When eIBRS is enabled user/kernel isolation is not impacted.
Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier (IBPB)
-----------------------------------------
After an IBPB, indirect branches may be predicted with targets
corresponding to direct branches which were executed prior to IBPB. This is
mitigated by a microcode update.
Add cmdline parameter indirect_target_selection=off|on|force to control the
mitigation to relocate the affected branches to an ITS-safe thunk i.e.
located in the upper half of cacheline. Also add the sysfs reporting.
When retpoline mitigation is deployed, ITS safe-thunks are not needed,
because retpoline sequence is already ITS-safe. Similarly, when call depth
tracking (CDT) mitigation is deployed (retbleed=stuff), ITS safe return
thunk is not used, as CDT prevents RSB-underflow.
To not overcomplicate things, ITS mitigation is not supported with
spectre-v2 lfence;jmp mitigation. Moreover, it is less practical to deploy
lfence;jmp mitigation on ITS affected parts anyways.
Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/base/cpu.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/base/cpu.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c index a7e511849875..50651435577c 100644 --- a/drivers/base/cpu.c +++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c @@ -600,6 +600,7 @@ CPU_SHOW_VULN_FALLBACK(spec_rstack_overflow); CPU_SHOW_VULN_FALLBACK(gds); CPU_SHOW_VULN_FALLBACK(reg_file_data_sampling); CPU_SHOW_VULN_FALLBACK(ghostwrite); +CPU_SHOW_VULN_FALLBACK(indirect_target_selection); static DEVICE_ATTR(meltdown, 0444, cpu_show_meltdown, NULL); static DEVICE_ATTR(spectre_v1, 0444, cpu_show_spectre_v1, NULL); @@ -616,6 +617,7 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(spec_rstack_overflow, 0444, cpu_show_spec_rstack_overflow, NU static DEVICE_ATTR(gather_data_sampling, 0444, cpu_show_gds, NULL); static DEVICE_ATTR(reg_file_data_sampling, 0444, cpu_show_reg_file_data_sampling, NULL); static DEVICE_ATTR(ghostwrite, 0444, cpu_show_ghostwrite, NULL); +static DEVICE_ATTR(indirect_target_selection, 0444, cpu_show_indirect_target_selection, NULL); static struct attribute *cpu_root_vulnerabilities_attrs[] = { &dev_attr_meltdown.attr, @@ -633,6 +635,7 @@ static struct attribute *cpu_root_vulnerabilities_attrs[] = { &dev_attr_gather_data_sampling.attr, &dev_attr_reg_file_data_sampling.attr, &dev_attr_ghostwrite.attr, + &dev_attr_indirect_target_selection.attr, NULL }; |