summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>2013-08-14 19:38:24 +0530
committerRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>2013-10-31 00:11:08 +0100
commitd4019f0a92ab802f385cc9c8ad3ab7b5449712cb (patch)
treeebd06695585e457ae1bf219653452b111e7508db /drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c
parent7dbf694db6ac7c759599316d50d7050efcbd512a (diff)
cpufreq: move freq change notifications to cpufreq core
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines: struct cpufreq_freqs freqs; freqs.old = old freq... freqs.new = new freq... cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); /* Change rate here */ cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead. There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for doing this work, work/tasklet/etc.. They may continue doing notification from their own code as flag: CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION is already set for them. All drivers are also modified in this patch to avoid breaking 'git bisect', as double notification would happen otherwise. Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Tested-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c27
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c
index 183bc13f13e5..0a0f4369636a 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c
@@ -271,7 +271,6 @@ static int pxa_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int idx)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pxa_freqs_table;
pxa_freqs_t *pxa_freq_settings;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
unsigned long flags;
unsigned int new_freq_cpu, new_freq_mem;
unsigned int unused, preset_mdrefr, postset_mdrefr, cclkcfg;
@@ -282,24 +281,17 @@ static int pxa_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int idx)
new_freq_cpu = pxa_freq_settings[idx].khz;
new_freq_mem = pxa_freq_settings[idx].membus;
- freqs.old = policy->cur;
- freqs.new = new_freq_cpu;
if (freq_debug)
pr_debug("Changing CPU frequency to %d Mhz, (SDRAM %d Mhz)\n",
- freqs.new / 1000, (pxa_freq_settings[idx].div2) ?
+ new_freq_cpu / 1000, (pxa_freq_settings[idx].div2) ?
(new_freq_mem / 2000) : (new_freq_mem / 1000));
- if (vcc_core && freqs.new > freqs.old)
+ if (vcc_core && new_freq_cpu > policy->cur) {
ret = pxa_cpufreq_change_voltage(&pxa_freq_settings[idx]);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- /*
- * Tell everyone what we're about to do...
- * you should add a notify client with any platform specific
- * Vcc changing capability
- */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
/* Calculate the next MDREFR. If we're slowing down the SDRAM clock
* we need to preset the smaller DRI before the change. If we're
@@ -350,13 +342,6 @@ static int pxa_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int idx)
local_irq_restore(flags);
/*
- * Tell everyone what we've just done...
- * you should add a notify client with any platform specific
- * SDRAM refresh timer adjustments
- */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- /*
* Even if voltage setting fails, we don't report it, as the frequency
* change succeeded. The voltage reduction is not a critical failure,
* only power savings will suffer from this.
@@ -365,7 +350,7 @@ static int pxa_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int idx)
* bug is triggered (seems a deadlock). Should anybody find out where,
* the "return 0" should become a "return ret".
*/
- if (vcc_core && freqs.new < freqs.old)
+ if (vcc_core && new_freq_cpu < policy->cur)
ret = pxa_cpufreq_change_voltage(&pxa_freq_settings[idx]);
return 0;