drm/i915: Refine VT-d scanout workaround

VT-d may cause overfetch of the scanout PTE, both before and after the
vma (depending on the scanout orientation). bspec recommends that we
provide a tile-row in either directions, and suggests using 168 PTE,
warning that the accesses will wrap around the ends of the GGTT.
Currently, we fill the entire GGTT with scratch pages when using VT-d to
always ensure there are valid entries around every vma, including
scanout. However, writing every PTE is slow as on recent devices we
perform 8MiB of uncached writes, incurring an extra 100ms during resume.

If instead we focus on only putting guard pages around scanout, we can
avoid touching the whole GGTT. To avoid having to introduce extra nodes
around each scanout vma, we adjust the scanout drm_mm_node to be smaller
than the allocated space, and fixup the extra PTE during dma binding.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221130235805.221010-5-andi.shyti@linux.intel.com

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 24 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
index 0292937e0925..cf9b153f6f66 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
@@ -376,27 +376,6 @@ static void nop_clear_range(struct i915_address_space *vm,
 {
 }
 
-static void gen8_ggtt_clear_range(struct i915_address_space *vm,
-				  u64 start, u64 length)
-{
-	struct i915_ggtt *ggtt = i915_vm_to_ggtt(vm);
-	unsigned int first_entry = start / I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE;
-	unsigned int num_entries = length / I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE;
-	const gen8_pte_t scratch_pte = vm->scratch[0]->encode;
-	gen8_pte_t __iomem *gtt_base =
-		(gen8_pte_t __iomem *)ggtt->gsm + first_entry;
-	const int max_entries = ggtt_total_entries(ggtt) - first_entry;
-	int i;
-
-	if (WARN(num_entries > max_entries,
-		 "First entry = %d; Num entries = %d (max=%d)\n",
-		 first_entry, num_entries, max_entries))
-		num_entries = max_entries;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < num_entries; i++)
-		gen8_set_pte(&gtt_base[i], scratch_pte);
-}
-
 static void bxt_vtd_ggtt_wa(struct i915_address_space *vm)
 {
 	/*
@@ -968,8 +947,6 @@ static int gen8_gmch_probe(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt)
 	ggtt->vm.cleanup = gen6_gmch_remove;
 	ggtt->vm.insert_page = gen8_ggtt_insert_page;
 	ggtt->vm.clear_range = nop_clear_range;
-	if (intel_scanout_needs_vtd_wa(i915))
-		ggtt->vm.clear_range = gen8_ggtt_clear_range;
 
 	ggtt->vm.insert_entries = gen8_ggtt_insert_entries;
 
@@ -1131,7 +1108,7 @@ static int gen6_gmch_probe(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt)
 	ggtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
 
 	ggtt->vm.clear_range = nop_clear_range;
-	if (!HAS_FULL_PPGTT(i915) || intel_scanout_needs_vtd_wa(i915))
+	if (!HAS_FULL_PPGTT(i915))
 		ggtt->vm.clear_range = gen6_ggtt_clear_range;
 	ggtt->vm.insert_page = gen6_ggtt_insert_page;
 	ggtt->vm.insert_entries = gen6_ggtt_insert_entries;