diff options
| author | Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> | 2019-10-11 23:20:30 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> | 2019-10-16 10:56:50 -0700 |
| commit | 0336ab580878f4c5663dfa2b66095821fdc3e588 (patch) | |
| tree | 9546d2f90efebf5c78dfbb17ff87fdf702d94da7 /drivers/gpu/drm/i915 | |
| parent | 128260a41eeba4dd8d4433eab96aeeb7192392a4 (diff) | |
drm/i915: Favor last VBT child device with conflicting AUX ch/DDC pin
The first come first served apporoach to handling the VBT
child device AUX ch conflicts has backfired. We have machines
in the wild where the VBT specifies both port A eDP and
port E DP (in that order) with port E being the real one.
So let's try to flip the preference around and let the last
child device win once again.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Tested-by: Masami Ichikawa <masami256@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Torsten <freedesktop201910@liggy.de>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111966
Fixes: 36a0f92020dc ("drm/i915/bios: make child device order the priority order")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191011202030.8829-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 41e35ffb380bde1379e4030bb5b2ac824d5139cf)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 22 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c index efb39f350b19..3250c1b8dcca 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c @@ -1270,7 +1270,7 @@ static void sanitize_ddc_pin(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, DRM_DEBUG_KMS("port %c trying to use the same DDC pin (0x%x) as port %c, " "disabling port %c DVI/HDMI support\n", port_name(port), info->alternate_ddc_pin, - port_name(p), port_name(port)); + port_name(p), port_name(p)); /* * If we have multiple ports supposedly sharing the @@ -1278,9 +1278,14 @@ static void sanitize_ddc_pin(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, * port. Otherwise they share the same ddc bin and * system couldn't communicate with them separately. * - * Give child device order the priority, first come first - * served. + * Give inverse child device order the priority, + * last one wins. Yes, there are real machines + * (eg. Asrock B250M-HDV) where VBT has both + * port A and port E with the same AUX ch and + * we must pick port E :( */ + info = &dev_priv->vbt.ddi_port_info[p]; + info->supports_dvi = false; info->supports_hdmi = false; info->alternate_ddc_pin = 0; @@ -1316,7 +1321,7 @@ static void sanitize_aux_ch(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, DRM_DEBUG_KMS("port %c trying to use the same AUX CH (0x%x) as port %c, " "disabling port %c DP support\n", port_name(port), info->alternate_aux_channel, - port_name(p), port_name(port)); + port_name(p), port_name(p)); /* * If we have multiple ports supposedlt sharing the @@ -1324,9 +1329,14 @@ static void sanitize_aux_ch(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, * port. Otherwise they share the same aux channel * and system couldn't communicate with them separately. * - * Give child device order the priority, first come first - * served. + * Give inverse child device order the priority, + * last one wins. Yes, there are real machines + * (eg. Asrock B250M-HDV) where VBT has both + * port A and port E with the same AUX ch and + * we must pick port E :( */ + info = &dev_priv->vbt.ddi_port_info[p]; + info->supports_dp = false; info->alternate_aux_channel = 0; } |