summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/net/ipa/ipa_modem.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2021-08-05 11:05:48 +0100
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2021-08-05 11:05:48 +0100
commit1f52247ef840db6ddd727fb1bd1c38b7153120c3 (patch)
tree090c7dd94456f9b1cf39b7c3d08b9513608fdc56 /drivers/net/ipa/ipa_modem.c
parent0fd75f5760b6a7a7f35dff46a6cdc4f6d1a86ee8 (diff)
parent81d45898a59a5fb443406603b126a4d1856a1007 (diff)
Merge branch 'sja1105-H'
Vladimir Oltean says: ==================== NXP SJA1105 driver support for "H" switch topologies Changes in v3: Preserve the behavior of dsa_tree_setup_default_cpu() which is to pick the first CPU port and not the last. Changes in v2: Send as non-RFC, drop the patches for discarding DSA-tagged packets on user ports and DSA-untagged packets on DSA and CPU ports for now. NXP builds boards like the Bluebox 3 where there are multiple SJA1110 switches connected to an LX2160A, but they are also connected to each other. I call this topology an "H" tree because of the lateral connection between switches. A piece extracted from a non-upstream device tree looks like this: &spi_bridge { /* SW1 */ ethernet-switch@0 { compatible = "nxp,sja1110a"; reg = <0>; dsa,member = <0 0>; ethernet-ports { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; /* SW1_P1 */ port@1 { reg = <1>; label = "con_2x20"; phy-mode = "sgmii"; fixed-link { speed = <1000>; full-duplex; }; }; port@2 { reg = <2>; ethernet = <&dpmac17>; phy-mode = "rgmii-id"; fixed-link { speed = <1000>; full-duplex; }; }; port@3 { reg = <3>; label = "1ge_p1"; phy-mode = "rgmii-id"; phy-handle = <&sw1_mii3_phy>; }; sw1p4: port@4 { reg = <4>; link = <&sw2p1>; phy-mode = "sgmii"; fixed-link { speed = <1000>; full-duplex; }; }; port@5 { reg = <5>; label = "trx1"; phy-mode = "internal"; phy-handle = <&sw1_port5_base_t1_phy>; }; port@6 { reg = <6>; label = "trx2"; phy-mode = "internal"; phy-handle = <&sw1_port6_base_t1_phy>; }; port@7 { reg = <7>; label = "trx3"; phy-mode = "internal"; phy-handle = <&sw1_port7_base_t1_phy>; }; port@8 { reg = <8>; label = "trx4"; phy-mode = "internal"; phy-handle = <&sw1_port8_base_t1_phy>; }; port@9 { reg = <9>; label = "trx5"; phy-mode = "internal"; phy-handle = <&sw1_port9_base_t1_phy>; }; port@a { reg = <10>; label = "trx6"; phy-mode = "internal"; phy-handle = <&sw1_port10_base_t1_phy>; }; }; }; /* SW2 */ ethernet-switch@2 { compatible = "nxp,sja1110a"; reg = <2>; dsa,member = <0 1>; ethernet-ports { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; sw2p1: port@1 { reg = <1>; link = <&sw1p4>; phy-mode = "sgmii"; fixed-link { speed = <1000>; full-duplex; }; }; port@2 { reg = <2>; ethernet = <&dpmac18>; phy-mode = "rgmii-id"; fixed-link { speed = <1000>; full-duplex; }; }; port@3 { reg = <3>; label = "1ge_p2"; phy-mode = "rgmii-id"; phy-handle = <&sw2_mii3_phy>; }; port@4 { reg = <4>; label = "to_sw3"; phy-mode = "2500base-x"; fixed-link { speed = <2500>; full-duplex; }; }; port@5 { reg = <5>; label = "trx7"; phy-mode = "internal"; phy-handle = <&sw2_port5_base_t1_phy>; }; port@6 { reg = <6>; label = "trx8"; phy-mode = "internal"; phy-handle = <&sw2_port6_base_t1_phy>; }; port@7 { reg = <7>; label = "trx9"; phy-mode = "internal"; phy-handle = <&sw2_port7_base_t1_phy>; }; port@8 { reg = <8>; label = "trx10"; phy-mode = "internal"; phy-handle = <&sw2_port8_base_t1_phy>; }; port@9 { reg = <9>; label = "trx11"; phy-mode = "internal"; phy-handle = <&sw2_port9_base_t1_phy>; }; port@a { reg = <10>; label = "trx12"; phy-mode = "internal"; phy-handle = <&sw2_port10_base_t1_phy>; }; }; }; }; Basically it is a single DSA tree with 2 "ethernet" properties, i.e. a multi-CPU-port system. There is also a DSA link between the switches, but it is not a daisy chain topology, i.e. there is no "upstream" and "downstream" switch, the DSA link is only to be used for the bridge data plane (autonomous forwarding between switches, between the RJ-45 ports and the automotive Ethernet ports), otherwise all traffic that should reach the host should do so through the dedicated CPU port of the switch. Of course, plain forwarding in this topology is bound to create packet loops. I have thought long and hard about strategies to cut forwarding in such a way as to prevent loops but also not impede normal operation of the network on such a system, and I believe I have found a solution that does work as expected. This relies heavily on DSA's recent ability to perform RX filtering towards the host by installing MAC addresses as static FDB entries. Since we have 2 distinct DSA masters, we have 2 distinct MAC addresses, and if the bridge is configured to have its own MAC address that makes it 3 distinct MAC addresses. The bridge core, plus the switchdev_handle_fdb_add_to_device() extension, handle each MAC address by replicating it to each port of the DSA switch tree. So the end result is that both switch 1 and switch 2 will have static FDB entries towards their respective CPU ports for the 3 MAC addresses corresponding to the DSA masters and to the bridge net device (and of course, towards any station learned on a foreign interface). So I think the basic design works, and it is basically just as fragile as any other multi-CPU-port system is bound to be in terms of reliance on static FDB entries towards the host (if hardware address learning on the CPU port is to be used, MAC addresses would randomly bounce between one CPU port and the other otherwise). In fact, I think it is even better to start DSA's support of multi-CPU-port systems with something small like the NXP Bluebox 3, because we allow some time for the code paths like dsa_switch_host_address_match(), which were specifically designed for it, to break in, and this board needs no user space configuration of CPU ports, like static assignments between user and CPU ports, or bonding between the CPU ports/DSA masters. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/ipa/ipa_modem.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions