diff options
author | Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> | 2024-09-16 13:31:58 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> | 2024-09-24 09:20:20 +0800 |
commit | aad0394e7a02fe933159be79d9d4595d2ad089dd (patch) | |
tree | 8efda70ffa009a106d0d2076c946b4c0b23987b6 /drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.c | |
parent | 72e9457c1954dc39a7059bd6d6346b60a24aa55e (diff) |
wifi: rtw89: tweak driver architecture for impending MLO support
The drv_priv hooked to mac80211 become as below.
(drv_priv) (instance-0)
+---------------+ +-----------+ +----------------+
| ieee80211_vif | <---> | rtw89_vif | -------> | rtw89_vif_link |
+---------------+ +-----------+ | +----------------+
|
| (instance-1)
| +----------------+
+---> | rtw89_vif_link |
+----------------+
(drv_priv) (instance-0)
+---------------+ +-----------+ +----------------+
| ieee80211_sta | <---> | rtw89_sta | -------> | rtw89_sta_link |
+---------------+ +-----------+ | +----------------+
|
| (instance-1)
| +----------------+
+---> | rtw89_sta_link |
+----------------+
The relation bewteen mac80211 link_id and our link instance is like below.
|\
(link_id) | \
0 -------- | |
1 -------- | | ------ instance-0 (link_id: X) -> work on HW band 0
2 -------- | |
... | | ------ instance-1 (link_id: Y) -> work on HW band 1
14 -------- | |
| /
|/
N.B. For cases of non-MLD connection, we set our link instance-0
active with link_id 0. So, our code flow can be compatible between
non-MLD connection and MLD connection.
Based on above, we tweak entire driver architecture first. But, we don't
dynamically enable multiple links here. That will be handled separately.
Most of the things changed here are changing flows to iterate all active
links and read bss_conf/link_sta data according to target link. And, for
cases of scan, ROC, WOW, we use instance-0 to deal with the request.
There are some things listed below, which work for now but need to extend
before multiple active links.
1. tx path
select suitable link instance among multiple active links
2. rx path
determine rx link by PPDU instead of always link instance-0
3. CAM
apply MLD pairwise key to any active links dynamically
Besides, PS code cannot easily work along with tweaking architecture. With
supporting MLO flag (currently false), we disable PS first and will fix it
by another commit in the following.
Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240916053158.47350-8-pkshih@realtek.com
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.c | 126 |
1 files changed, 98 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.c index 7efc6280feaf..8d140b94cb44 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.c @@ -211,24 +211,16 @@ static int rtw89_cam_get_addr_cam_key_idx(struct rtw89_addr_cam_entry *addr_cam, return 0; } -static int rtw89_cam_detach_sec_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, - struct ieee80211_vif *vif, - struct ieee80211_sta *sta, - const struct rtw89_sec_cam_entry *sec_cam, - bool inform_fw) +static int __rtw89_cam_detach_sec_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, + struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link, + struct rtw89_sta_link *rtwsta_link, + const struct rtw89_sec_cam_entry *sec_cam, + bool inform_fw) { - struct rtw89_sta_link *rtwsta_link = sta_to_rtwsta_safe(sta); - struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link; struct rtw89_addr_cam_entry *addr_cam; unsigned int i; int ret = 0; - if (!vif) { - rtw89_err(rtwdev, "No iface for deleting sec cam\n"); - return -EINVAL; - } - - rtwvif_link = (struct rtw89_vif_link *)vif->drv_priv; addr_cam = rtw89_get_addr_cam_of(rtwvif_link, rtwsta_link); for_each_set_bit(i, addr_cam->sec_cam_map, RTW89_SEC_CAM_IN_ADDR_CAM) { @@ -251,24 +243,16 @@ static int rtw89_cam_detach_sec_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, return ret; } -static int rtw89_cam_attach_sec_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, - struct ieee80211_vif *vif, - struct ieee80211_sta *sta, - struct ieee80211_key_conf *key, - struct rtw89_sec_cam_entry *sec_cam) +static int __rtw89_cam_attach_sec_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, + struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link, + struct rtw89_sta_link *rtwsta_link, + struct ieee80211_key_conf *key, + struct rtw89_sec_cam_entry *sec_cam) { - struct rtw89_sta_link *rtwsta_link = sta_to_rtwsta_safe(sta); - struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link; struct rtw89_addr_cam_entry *addr_cam; u8 key_idx = 0; int ret; - if (!vif) { - rtw89_err(rtwdev, "No iface for adding sec cam\n"); - return -EINVAL; - } - - rtwvif_link = (struct rtw89_vif_link *)vif->drv_priv; addr_cam = rtw89_get_addr_cam_of(rtwvif_link, rtwsta_link); if (key->cipher == WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_WEP40 || @@ -302,6 +286,92 @@ static int rtw89_cam_attach_sec_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, return 0; } +static int rtw89_cam_detach_sec_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, + struct ieee80211_vif *vif, + struct ieee80211_sta *sta, + const struct rtw89_sec_cam_entry *sec_cam, + bool inform_fw) +{ + struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta = sta_to_rtwsta_safe(sta); + struct rtw89_sta_link *rtwsta_link; + struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link; + struct rtw89_vif *rtwvif; + unsigned int link_id; + int ret; + + if (!vif) { + rtw89_err(rtwdev, "No iface for deleting sec cam\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + rtwvif = vif_to_rtwvif(vif); + + rtw89_vif_for_each_link(rtwvif, rtwvif_link, link_id) { + rtwsta_link = rtwsta ? rtwsta->links[link_id] : NULL; + if (rtwsta && !rtwsta_link) + continue; + + ret = __rtw89_cam_detach_sec_cam(rtwdev, rtwvif_link, rtwsta_link, + sec_cam, inform_fw); + if (ret) + return ret; + } + + return 0; +} + +static int rtw89_cam_attach_sec_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, + struct ieee80211_vif *vif, + struct ieee80211_sta *sta, + struct ieee80211_key_conf *key, + struct rtw89_sec_cam_entry *sec_cam) +{ + struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta = sta_to_rtwsta_safe(sta); + struct rtw89_sta_link *rtwsta_link; + struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link; + struct rtw89_vif *rtwvif; + unsigned int link_id; + int key_link_id; + int ret; + + if (!vif) { + rtw89_err(rtwdev, "No iface for adding sec cam\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + rtwvif = vif_to_rtwvif(vif); + + key_link_id = ieee80211_vif_is_mld(vif) ? key->link_id : 0; + if (key_link_id >= 0) { + rtwvif_link = rtwvif->links[key_link_id]; + rtwsta_link = rtwsta ? rtwsta->links[key_link_id] : NULL; + + if (!rtwvif_link || (rtwsta && !rtwsta_link)) { + rtw89_err(rtwdev, "No drv link for adding sec cam\n"); + return -ENOLINK; + } + + return __rtw89_cam_attach_sec_cam(rtwdev, rtwvif_link, + rtwsta_link, key, sec_cam); + } + + /* key_link_id < 0: MLD pairwise key */ + if (!rtwsta) { + rtw89_err(rtwdev, "No sta for adding MLD pairwise sec cam\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + rtw89_sta_for_each_link(rtwsta, rtwsta_link, link_id) { + rtwvif_link = rtwsta_link->rtwvif_link; + ret = __rtw89_cam_attach_sec_cam(rtwdev, rtwvif_link, + rtwsta_link, key, sec_cam); + if (ret) + return ret; + } + + return 0; +} + static int rtw89_cam_sec_key_install(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct ieee80211_vif *vif, struct ieee80211_sta *sta, @@ -708,10 +778,10 @@ void rtw89_cam_fill_addr_cam_info(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, const u8 *scan_mac_addr, u8 *cmd) { - struct ieee80211_vif *vif = rtwvif_to_vif(rtwvif_link); + struct ieee80211_vif *vif = rtwvif_link_to_vif(rtwvif_link); struct rtw89_addr_cam_entry *addr_cam = rtw89_get_addr_cam_of(rtwvif_link, rtwsta_link); - struct ieee80211_sta *sta = rtwsta_to_sta_safe(rtwsta_link); + struct ieee80211_sta *sta = rtwsta_link_to_sta_safe(rtwsta_link); struct ieee80211_link_sta *link_sta; const u8 *sma = scan_mac_addr ? scan_mac_addr : rtwvif_link->mac_addr; u8 sma_hash, tma_hash, addr_msk_start; |