summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorYonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>2024-07-23 08:34:39 -0700
committerAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>2024-07-29 15:05:05 -0700
commit92de36080c93296ef9005690705cba260b9bd68a (patch)
tree2463bda13615838c7e437d86b35379555a8d9aee /kernel/bpf/verifier.c
parentf86601c3661946721e8f260bdd812b759854ac22 (diff)
bpf: Fail verification for sign-extension of packet data/data_end/data_meta
syzbot reported a kernel crash due to commit 1f1e864b6555 ("bpf: Handle sign-extenstin ctx member accesses"). The reason is due to sign-extension of 32-bit load for packet data/data_end/data_meta uapi field. The original code looks like: r2 = *(s32 *)(r1 + 76) /* load __sk_buff->data */ r3 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 80) /* load __sk_buff->data_end */ r0 = r2 r0 += 8 if r3 > r0 goto +1 ... Note that __sk_buff->data load has 32-bit sign extension. After verification and convert_ctx_accesses(), the final asm code looks like: r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 +208) r2 = (s32)r2 r3 = *(u64 *)(r1 +80) r0 = r2 r0 += 8 if r3 > r0 goto pc+1 ... Note that 'r2 = (s32)r2' may make the kernel __sk_buff->data address invalid which may cause runtime failure. Currently, in C code, typically we have void *data = (void *)(long)skb->data; void *data_end = (void *)(long)skb->data_end; ... and it will generate r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 +208) r3 = *(u64 *)(r1 +80) r0 = r2 r0 += 8 if r3 > r0 goto pc+1 If we allow sign-extension, void *data = (void *)(long)(int)skb->data; void *data_end = (void *)(long)skb->data_end; ... the generated code looks like r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 +208) r2 <<= 32 r2 s>>= 32 r3 = *(u64 *)(r1 +80) r0 = r2 r0 += 8 if r3 > r0 goto pc+1 and this will cause verification failure since "r2 <<= 32" is not allowed as "r2" is a packet pointer. To fix this issue for case r2 = *(s32 *)(r1 + 76) /* load __sk_buff->data */ this patch added additional checking in is_valid_access() callback function for packet data/data_end/data_meta access. If those accesses are with sign-extenstion, the verification will fail. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/000000000000c90eee061d236d37@google.com/ Reported-by: syzbot+ad9ec60c8eaf69e6f99c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 1f1e864b6555 ("bpf: Handle sign-extenstin ctx member accesses") Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240723153439.2429035-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf/verifier.c')
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/verifier.c5
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index c419005a29dc..2ab59db5837f 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -5626,12 +5626,13 @@ static int check_packet_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off,
/* check access to 'struct bpf_context' fields. Supports fixed offsets only */
static int check_ctx_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, int off, int size,
enum bpf_access_type t, enum bpf_reg_type *reg_type,
- struct btf **btf, u32 *btf_id, bool *is_retval)
+ struct btf **btf, u32 *btf_id, bool *is_retval, bool is_ldsx)
{
struct bpf_insn_access_aux info = {
.reg_type = *reg_type,
.log = &env->log,
.is_retval = false,
+ .is_ldsx = is_ldsx,
};
if (env->ops->is_valid_access &&
@@ -6945,7 +6946,7 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn
return err;
err = check_ctx_access(env, insn_idx, off, size, t, &reg_type, &btf,
- &btf_id, &is_retval);
+ &btf_id, &is_retval, is_ldsx);
if (err)
verbose_linfo(env, insn_idx, "; ");
if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) {