summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorWaiman Long <longman@redhat.com>2021-03-18 13:28:11 -0400
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>2021-03-19 12:13:09 +0100
commit2ea55bbba23e9d36996299664d618393c8602646 (patch)
treefb0fbeefffcfe8eda7c27e77fa5bc2d91d77030f /kernel/locking/locktorture.c
parent01438749e36bfe53ea25c91568019be775a9782e (diff)
locking/locktorture: Fix false positive circular locking splat in ww_mutex test
In order to avoid false positive circular locking lockdep splat when runnng the ww_mutex torture test, we need to make sure that the ww_mutexes have the same lock class as the acquire_ctx. This means the ww_mutexes must have the same lockdep key as the acquire_ctx. Unfortunately the current DEFINE_WW_MUTEX() macro fails to do that. As a result, we add an init method for the ww_mutex test to do explicit ww_mutex_init()'s of the ww_mutexes to avoid the false positive warning. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210318172814.4400-3-longman@redhat.com
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/locking/locktorture.c')
-rw-r--r--kernel/locking/locktorture.c17
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
index 0ab94e1f1276..3c27f43ab3e8 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
@@ -357,10 +357,20 @@ static struct lock_torture_ops mutex_lock_ops = {
};
#include <linux/ww_mutex.h>
+/*
+ * The torture ww_mutexes should belong to the same lock class as
+ * torture_ww_class to avoid lockdep problem. The ww_mutex_init()
+ * function is called for initialization to ensure that.
+ */
static DEFINE_WD_CLASS(torture_ww_class);
-static DEFINE_WW_MUTEX(torture_ww_mutex_0, &torture_ww_class);
-static DEFINE_WW_MUTEX(torture_ww_mutex_1, &torture_ww_class);
-static DEFINE_WW_MUTEX(torture_ww_mutex_2, &torture_ww_class);
+static struct ww_mutex torture_ww_mutex_0, torture_ww_mutex_1, torture_ww_mutex_2;
+
+static void torture_ww_mutex_init(void)
+{
+ ww_mutex_init(&torture_ww_mutex_0, &torture_ww_class);
+ ww_mutex_init(&torture_ww_mutex_1, &torture_ww_class);
+ ww_mutex_init(&torture_ww_mutex_2, &torture_ww_class);
+}
static int torture_ww_mutex_lock(void)
__acquires(torture_ww_mutex_0)
@@ -418,6 +428,7 @@ __releases(torture_ww_mutex_2)
}
static struct lock_torture_ops ww_mutex_lock_ops = {
+ .init = torture_ww_mutex_init,
.writelock = torture_ww_mutex_lock,
.write_delay = torture_mutex_delay,
.task_boost = torture_boost_dummy,