Merge tag 'locking-core-2021-08-30' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull locking and atomics updates from Thomas Gleixner:
 "The regular pile:

   - A few improvements to the mutex code

   - Documentation updates for atomics to clarify the difference between
     cmpxchg() and try_cmpxchg() and to explain the forward progress
     expectations.

   - Simplification of the atomics fallback generator

   - The addition of arch_atomic_long*() variants and generic arch_*()
     bitops based on them.

   - Add the missing might_sleep() invocations to the down*() operations
     of semaphores.

  The PREEMPT_RT locking core:

   - Scheduler updates to support the state preserving mechanism for
     'sleeping' spin- and rwlocks on RT.

     This mechanism is carefully preserving the state of the task when
     blocking on a 'sleeping' spin- or rwlock and takes regular wake-ups
     targeted at the same task into account. The preserved or updated
     (via a regular wakeup) state is restored when the lock has been
     acquired.

   - Restructuring of the rtmutex code so it can be utilized and
     extended for the RT specific lock variants.

   - Restructuring of the ww_mutex code to allow sharing of the ww_mutex
     specific functionality for rtmutex based ww_mutexes.

   - Header file disentangling to allow substitution of the regular lock
     implementations with the PREEMPT_RT variants without creating an
     unmaintainable #ifdef mess.

   - Shared base code for the PREEMPT_RT specific rw_semaphore and
     rwlock implementations.

     Contrary to the regular rw_semaphores and rwlocks the PREEMPT_RT
     implementation is writer unfair because it is infeasible to do
     priority inheritance on multiple readers. Experience over the years
     has shown that real-time workloads are not the typical workloads
     which are sensitive to writer starvation.

     The alternative solution would be to allow only a single reader
     which has been tried and discarded as it is a major bottleneck
     especially for mmap_sem. Aside of that many of the writer
     starvation critical usage sites have been converted to a writer
     side mutex/spinlock and RCU read side protections in the past
     decade so that the issue is less prominent than it used to be.

   - The actual rtmutex based lock substitutions for PREEMPT_RT enabled
     kernels which affect mutex, ww_mutex, rw_semaphore, spinlock_t and
     rwlock_t. The spin/rw_lock*() functions disable migration across
     the critical section to preserve the existing semantics vs per-CPU
     variables.

   - Rework of the futex REQUEUE_PI mechanism to handle the case of
     early wake-ups which interleave with a re-queue operation to
     prevent the situation that a task would be blocked on both the
     rtmutex associated to the outer futex and the rtmutex based hash
     bucket spinlock.

     While this situation cannot happen on !RT enabled kernels the
     changes make the underlying concurrency problems easier to
     understand in general. As a result the difference between !RT and
     RT kernels is reduced to the handling of waiting for the critical
     section. !RT kernels simply spin-wait as before and RT kernels
     utilize rcu_wait().

   - The substitution of local_lock for PREEMPT_RT with a spinlock which
     protects the critical section while staying preemptible. The CPU
     locality is established by disabling migration.

  The underlying concepts of this code have been in use in PREEMPT_RT for
  way more than a decade. The code has been refactored several times over
  the years and this final incarnation has been optimized once again to be
  as non-intrusive as possible, i.e. the RT specific parts are mostly
  isolated.

  It has been extensively tested in the 5.14-rt patch series and it has
  been verified that !RT kernels are not affected by these changes"

* tag 'locking-core-2021-08-30' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (92 commits)
  locking/rtmutex: Return success on deadlock for ww_mutex waiters
  locking/rtmutex: Prevent spurious EDEADLK return caused by ww_mutexes
  locking/rtmutex: Dequeue waiter on ww_mutex deadlock
  locking/rtmutex: Dont dereference waiter lockless
  locking/semaphore: Add might_sleep() to down_*() family
  locking/ww_mutex: Initialize waiter.ww_ctx properly
  static_call: Update API documentation
  locking/local_lock: Add PREEMPT_RT support
  locking/spinlock/rt: Prepare for RT local_lock
  locking/rtmutex: Add adaptive spinwait mechanism
  locking/rtmutex: Implement equal priority lock stealing
  preempt: Adjust PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET for RT
  locking/rtmutex: Prevent lockdep false positive with PI futexes
  futex: Prevent requeue_pi() lock nesting issue on RT
  futex: Simplify handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup()
  futex: Reorder sanity checks in futex_requeue()
  futex: Clarify comment in futex_requeue()
  futex: Restructure futex_requeue()
  futex: Correct the number of requeued waiters for PI
  futex: Remove bogus condition for requeue PI
  ...

1 files changed, 590 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5c9299aaabae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
@@ -0,0 +1,590 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * rtmutex API
+ */
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/export.h>
+
+#define RT_MUTEX_BUILD_MUTEX
+#include "rtmutex.c"
+
+/*
+ * Max number of times we'll walk the boosting chain:
+ */
+int max_lock_depth = 1024;
+
+/*
+ * Debug aware fast / slowpath lock,trylock,unlock
+ *
+ * The atomic acquire/release ops are compiled away, when either the
+ * architecture does not support cmpxchg or when debugging is enabled.
+ */
+static __always_inline int __rt_mutex_lock_common(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+						  unsigned int state,
+						  unsigned int subclass)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	might_sleep();
+	mutex_acquire(&lock->dep_map, subclass, 0, _RET_IP_);
+	ret = __rt_mutex_lock(&lock->rtmutex, state);
+	if (ret)
+		mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+void rt_mutex_base_init(struct rt_mutex_base *rtb)
+{
+	__rt_mutex_base_init(rtb);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_mutex_base_init);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+/**
+ * rt_mutex_lock_nested - lock a rt_mutex
+ *
+ * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
+ * @subclass: the lockdep subclass
+ */
+void __sched rt_mutex_lock_nested(struct rt_mutex *lock, unsigned int subclass)
+{
+	__rt_mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, subclass);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock_nested);
+
+#else /* !CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
+
+/**
+ * rt_mutex_lock - lock a rt_mutex
+ *
+ * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
+ */
+void __sched rt_mutex_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+{
+	__rt_mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, 0);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock);
+#endif
+
+/**
+ * rt_mutex_lock_interruptible - lock a rt_mutex interruptible
+ *
+ * @lock:		the rt_mutex to be locked
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *  0		on success
+ * -EINTR	when interrupted by a signal
+ */
+int __sched rt_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+{
+	return __rt_mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, 0);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock_interruptible);
+
+/**
+ * rt_mutex_trylock - try to lock a rt_mutex
+ *
+ * @lock:	the rt_mutex to be locked
+ *
+ * This function can only be called in thread context. It's safe to call it
+ * from atomic regions, but not from hard or soft interrupt context.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *  1 on success
+ *  0 on contention
+ */
+int __sched rt_mutex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES) && WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_task()))
+		return 0;
+
+	ret = __rt_mutex_trylock(&lock->rtmutex);
+	if (ret)
+		mutex_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_trylock);
+
+/**
+ * rt_mutex_unlock - unlock a rt_mutex
+ *
+ * @lock: the rt_mutex to be unlocked
+ */
+void __sched rt_mutex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+{
+	mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
+	__rt_mutex_unlock(&lock->rtmutex);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_unlock);
+
+/*
+ * Futex variants, must not use fastpath.
+ */
+int __sched rt_mutex_futex_trylock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
+{
+	return rt_mutex_slowtrylock(lock);
+}
+
+int __sched __rt_mutex_futex_trylock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
+{
+	return __rt_mutex_slowtrylock(lock);
+}
+
+/**
+ * __rt_mutex_futex_unlock - Futex variant, that since futex variants
+ * do not use the fast-path, can be simple and will not need to retry.
+ *
+ * @lock:	The rt_mutex to be unlocked
+ * @wqh:	The wake queue head from which to get the next lock waiter
+ */
+bool __sched __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
+				     struct rt_wake_q_head *wqh)
+{
+	lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock);
+
+	debug_rt_mutex_unlock(lock);
+
+	if (!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) {
+		lock->owner = NULL;
+		return false; /* done */
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * We've already deboosted, mark_wakeup_next_waiter() will
+	 * retain preempt_disabled when we drop the wait_lock, to
+	 * avoid inversion prior to the wakeup.  preempt_disable()
+	 * therein pairs with rt_mutex_postunlock().
+	 */
+	mark_wakeup_next_waiter(wqh, lock);
+
+	return true; /* call postunlock() */
+}
+
+void __sched rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
+{
+	DEFINE_RT_WAKE_Q(wqh);
+	unsigned long flags;
+	bool postunlock;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
+	postunlock = __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(lock, &wqh);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
+
+	if (postunlock)
+		rt_mutex_postunlock(&wqh);
+}
+
+/**
+ * __rt_mutex_init - initialize the rt_mutex
+ *
+ * @lock:	The rt_mutex to be initialized
+ * @name:	The lock name used for debugging
+ * @key:	The lock class key used for debugging
+ *
+ * Initialize the rt_mutex to unlocked state.
+ *
+ * Initializing of a locked rt_mutex is not allowed
+ */
+void __sched __rt_mutex_init(struct rt_mutex *lock, const char *name,
+			     struct lock_class_key *key)
+{
+	debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)lock, sizeof(*lock));
+	__rt_mutex_base_init(&lock->rtmutex);
+	lockdep_init_map_wait(&lock->dep_map, name, key, 0, LD_WAIT_SLEEP);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rt_mutex_init);
+
+/**
+ * rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked - initialize and lock a rt_mutex on behalf of a
+ *				proxy owner
+ *
+ * @lock:	the rt_mutex to be locked
+ * @proxy_owner:the task to set as owner
+ *
+ * No locking. Caller has to do serializing itself
+ *
+ * Special API call for PI-futex support. This initializes the rtmutex and
+ * assigns it to @proxy_owner. Concurrent operations on the rtmutex are not
+ * possible at this point because the pi_state which contains the rtmutex
+ * is not yet visible to other tasks.
+ */
+void __sched rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
+					struct task_struct *proxy_owner)
+{
+	static struct lock_class_key pi_futex_key;
+
+	__rt_mutex_base_init(lock);
+	/*
+	 * On PREEMPT_RT the futex hashbucket spinlock becomes 'sleeping'
+	 * and rtmutex based. That causes a lockdep false positive, because
+	 * some of the futex functions invoke spin_unlock(&hb->lock) with
+	 * the wait_lock of the rtmutex associated to the pi_futex held.
+	 * spin_unlock() in turn takes wait_lock of the rtmutex on which
+	 * the spinlock is based, which makes lockdep notice a lock
+	 * recursion. Give the futex/rtmutex wait_lock a separate key.
+	 */
+	lockdep_set_class(&lock->wait_lock, &pi_futex_key);
+	rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, proxy_owner);
+}
+
+/**
+ * rt_mutex_proxy_unlock - release a lock on behalf of owner
+ *
+ * @lock:	the rt_mutex to be locked
+ *
+ * No locking. Caller has to do serializing itself
+ *
+ * Special API call for PI-futex support. This just cleans up the rtmutex
+ * (debugging) state. Concurrent operations on this rt_mutex are not
+ * possible because it belongs to the pi_state which is about to be freed
+ * and it is not longer visible to other tasks.
+ */
+void __sched rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
+{
+	debug_rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(lock);
+	rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, NULL);
+}
+
+/**
+ * __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() - Start lock acquisition for another task
+ * @lock:		the rt_mutex to take
+ * @waiter:		the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
+ * @task:		the task to prepare
+ *
+ * Starts the rt_mutex acquire; it enqueues the @waiter and does deadlock
+ * detection. It does not wait, see rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() for that.
+ *
+ * NOTE: does _NOT_ remove the @waiter on failure; must either call
+ * rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() or rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock() after this.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *  0 - task blocked on lock
+ *  1 - acquired the lock for task, caller should wake it up
+ * <0 - error
+ *
+ * Special API call for PI-futex support.
+ */
+int __sched __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
+					struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
+					struct task_struct *task)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock);
+
+	if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, task, NULL))
+		return 1;
+
+	/* We enforce deadlock detection for futexes */
+	ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task, NULL,
+				      RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK);
+
+	if (ret && !rt_mutex_owner(lock)) {
+		/*
+		 * Reset the return value. We might have
+		 * returned with -EDEADLK and the owner
+		 * released the lock while we were walking the
+		 * pi chain.  Let the waiter sort it out.
+		 */
+		ret = 0;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() - Start lock acquisition for another task
+ * @lock:		the rt_mutex to take
+ * @waiter:		the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
+ * @task:		the task to prepare
+ *
+ * Starts the rt_mutex acquire; it enqueues the @waiter and does deadlock
+ * detection. It does not wait, see rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() for that.
+ *
+ * NOTE: unlike __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock this _DOES_ remove the @waiter
+ * on failure.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *  0 - task blocked on lock
+ *  1 - acquired the lock for task, caller should wake it up
+ * <0 - error
+ *
+ * Special API call for PI-futex support.
+ */
+int __sched rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
+				      struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
+				      struct task_struct *task)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
+	ret = __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(lock, waiter, task);
+	if (unlikely(ret))
+		remove_waiter(lock, waiter);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() - Wait for lock acquisition
+ * @lock:		the rt_mutex we were woken on
+ * @to:			the timeout, null if none. hrtimer should already have
+ *			been started.
+ * @waiter:		the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
+ *
+ * Wait for the lock acquisition started on our behalf by
+ * rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(). Upon failure, the caller must call
+ * rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock().
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *  0 - success
+ * <0 - error, one of -EINTR, -ETIMEDOUT
+ *
+ * Special API call for PI-futex support
+ */
+int __sched rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
+				     struct hrtimer_sleeper *to,
+				     struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
+	/* sleep on the mutex */
+	set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+	ret = rt_mutex_slowlock_block(lock, NULL, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, to, waiter);
+	/*
+	 * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit unconditionally. We might
+	 * have to fix that up.
+	 */
+	fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock() - Cleanup failed lock acquisition
+ * @lock:		the rt_mutex we were woken on
+ * @waiter:		the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
+ *
+ * Attempt to clean up after a failed __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() or
+ * rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock().
+ *
+ * Unless we acquired the lock; we're still enqueued on the wait-list and can
+ * in fact still be granted ownership until we're removed. Therefore we can
+ * find we are in fact the owner and must disregard the
+ * rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() failure.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *  true  - did the cleanup, we done.
+ *  false - we acquired the lock after rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() returned,
+ *          caller should disregards its return value.
+ *
+ * Special API call for PI-futex support
+ */
+bool __sched rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
+					 struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
+{
+	bool cleanup = false;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
+	/*
+	 * Do an unconditional try-lock, this deals with the lock stealing
+	 * state where __rt_mutex_futex_unlock() -> mark_wakeup_next_waiter()
+	 * sets a NULL owner.
+	 *
+	 * We're not interested in the return value, because the subsequent
+	 * test on rt_mutex_owner() will infer that. If the trylock succeeded,
+	 * we will own the lock and it will have removed the waiter. If we
+	 * failed the trylock, we're still not owner and we need to remove
+	 * ourselves.
+	 */
+	try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, waiter);
+	/*
+	 * Unless we're the owner; we're still enqueued on the wait_list.
+	 * So check if we became owner, if not, take us off the wait_list.
+	 */
+	if (rt_mutex_owner(lock) != current) {
+		remove_waiter(lock, waiter);
+		cleanup = true;
+	}
+	/*
+	 * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit unconditionally. We might
+	 * have to fix that up.
+	 */
+	fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
+
+	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
+
+	return cleanup;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Recheck the pi chain, in case we got a priority setting
+ *
+ * Called from sched_setscheduler
+ */
+void __sched rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+	struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter;
+	struct rt_mutex_base *next_lock;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
+
+	waiter = task->pi_blocked_on;
+	if (!waiter || rt_mutex_waiter_equal(waiter, task_to_waiter(task))) {
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
+		return;
+	}
+	next_lock = waiter->lock;
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
+
+	/* gets dropped in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain()! */
+	get_task_struct(task);
+
+	rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(task, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, NULL,
+				   next_lock, NULL, task);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Performs the wakeup of the top-waiter and re-enables preemption.
+ */
+void __sched rt_mutex_postunlock(struct rt_wake_q_head *wqh)
+{
+	rt_mutex_wake_up_q(wqh);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES
+void rt_mutex_debug_task_free(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&task->pi_waiters.rb_root));
+	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(task->pi_blocked_on);
+}
+#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
+/* Mutexes */
+void __mutex_rt_init(struct mutex *mutex, const char *name,
+		     struct lock_class_key *key)
+{
+	debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)mutex, sizeof(*mutex));
+	lockdep_init_map_wait(&mutex->dep_map, name, key, 0, LD_WAIT_SLEEP);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__mutex_rt_init);
+
+static __always_inline int __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock,
+					       unsigned int state,
+					       unsigned int subclass,
+					       struct lockdep_map *nest_lock,
+					       unsigned long ip)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	might_sleep();
+	mutex_acquire_nest(&lock->dep_map, subclass, 0, nest_lock, ip);
+	ret = __rt_mutex_lock(&lock->rtmutex, state);
+	if (ret)
+		mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, ip);
+	else
+		lock_acquired(&lock->dep_map, ip);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+void __sched mutex_lock_nested(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int subclass)
+{
+	__mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, subclass, NULL, _RET_IP_);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mutex_lock_nested);
+
+void __sched _mutex_lock_nest_lock(struct mutex *lock,
+				   struct lockdep_map *nest_lock)
+{
+	__mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, 0, nest_lock, _RET_IP_);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(_mutex_lock_nest_lock);
+
+int __sched mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(struct mutex *lock,
+					    unsigned int subclass)
+{
+	return __mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, subclass, NULL, _RET_IP_);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mutex_lock_interruptible_nested);
+
+int __sched mutex_lock_killable_nested(struct mutex *lock,
+					    unsigned int subclass)
+{
+	return __mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_KILLABLE, subclass, NULL, _RET_IP_);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mutex_lock_killable_nested);
+
+void __sched mutex_lock_io_nested(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int subclass)
+{
+	int token;
+
+	might_sleep();
+
+	token = io_schedule_prepare();
+	__mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, subclass, NULL, _RET_IP_);
+	io_schedule_finish(token);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mutex_lock_io_nested);
+
+#else /* CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
+
+void __sched mutex_lock(struct mutex *lock)
+{
+	__mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, 0, NULL, _RET_IP_);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(mutex_lock);
+
+int __sched mutex_lock_interruptible(struct mutex *lock)
+{
+	return __mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, 0, NULL, _RET_IP_);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(mutex_lock_interruptible);
+
+int __sched mutex_lock_killable(struct mutex *lock)
+{
+	return __mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_KILLABLE, 0, NULL, _RET_IP_);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(mutex_lock_killable);
+
+void __sched mutex_lock_io(struct mutex *lock)
+{
+	int token = io_schedule_prepare();
+
+	__mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, 0, NULL, _RET_IP_);
+	io_schedule_finish(token);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(mutex_lock_io);
+#endif /* !CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
+
+int __sched mutex_trylock(struct mutex *lock)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES) && WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_task()))
+		return 0;
+
+	ret = __rt_mutex_trylock(&lock->rtmutex);
+	if (ret)
+		mutex_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(mutex_trylock);
+
+void __sched mutex_unlock(struct mutex *lock)
+{
+	mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
+	__rt_mutex_unlock(&lock->rtmutex);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(mutex_unlock);
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */