summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2017-09-06 14:45:08 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2017-09-06 14:45:08 -0700
commitaae3dbb4776e7916b6cd442d00159bea27a695c1 (patch)
treed074c5d783a81e7e2e084b1eba77f57459da7e37 /kernel
parentec3604c7a5aae8953545b0d05495357009a960e5 (diff)
parent66bed8465a808400eb14562510e26c8818082cb8 (diff)
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next
Pull networking updates from David Miller: 1) Support ipv6 checksum offload in sunvnet driver, from Shannon Nelson. 2) Move to RB-tree instead of custom AVL code in inetpeer, from Eric Dumazet. 3) Allow generic XDP to work on virtual devices, from John Fastabend. 4) Add bpf device maps and XDP_REDIRECT, which can be used to build arbitrary switching frameworks using XDP. From John Fastabend. 5) Remove UFO offloads from the tree, gave us little other than bugs. 6) Remove the IPSEC flow cache, from Florian Westphal. 7) Support ipv6 route offload in mlxsw driver. 8) Support VF representors in bnxt_en, from Sathya Perla. 9) Add support for forward error correction modes to ethtool, from Vidya Sagar Ravipati. 10) Add time filter for packet scheduler action dumping, from Jamal Hadi Salim. 11) Extend the zerocopy sendmsg() used by virtio and tap to regular sockets via MSG_ZEROCOPY. From Willem de Bruijn. 12) Significantly rework value tracking in the BPF verifier, from Edward Cree. 13) Add new jump instructions to eBPF, from Daniel Borkmann. 14) Rework rtnetlink plumbing so that operations can be run without taking the RTNL semaphore. From Florian Westphal. 15) Support XDP in tap driver, from Jason Wang. 16) Add 32-bit eBPF JIT for ARM, from Shubham Bansal. 17) Add Huawei hinic ethernet driver. 18) Allow to report MD5 keys in TCP inet_diag dumps, from Ivan Delalande. * git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next: (1780 commits) i40e: point wb_desc at the nvm_wb_desc during i40e_read_nvm_aq i40e: avoid NVM acquire deadlock during NVM update drivers: net: xgene: Remove return statement from void function drivers: net: xgene: Configure tx/rx delay for ACPI drivers: net: xgene: Read tx/rx delay for ACPI rocker: fix kcalloc parameter order rds: Fix non-atomic operation on shared flag variable net: sched: don't use GFP_KERNEL under spin lock vhost_net: correctly check tx avail during rx busy polling net: mdio-mux: add mdio_mux parameter to mdio_mux_init() rxrpc: Make service connection lookup always check for retry net: stmmac: Delete dead code for MDIO registration gianfar: Fix Tx flow control deactivation cxgb4: Ignore MPS_TX_INT_CAUSE[Bubble] for T6 cxgb4: Fix pause frame count in t4_get_port_stats cxgb4: fix memory leak tun: rename generic_xdp to skb_xdp tun: reserve extra headroom only when XDP is set net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Configure IMP port TC2QOS mapping net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Advertise number of egress queues ...
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/Makefile8
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/arraymap.c33
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.h3
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/core.c61
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/devmap.c409
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/hashtab.c60
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c9
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/sockmap.c873
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/stackmap.c8
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/syscall.c129
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/tnum.c180
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/verifier.c2448
-rw-r--r--kernel/events/core.c10
-rw-r--r--kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c53
14 files changed, 3249 insertions, 1035 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/Makefile b/kernel/bpf/Makefile
index e1e5e658f2db..897daa005b23 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/kernel/bpf/Makefile
@@ -1,7 +1,13 @@
obj-y := core.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += syscall.o verifier.o inode.o helpers.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += syscall.o verifier.o inode.o helpers.o tnum.o
obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += hashtab.o arraymap.o percpu_freelist.o bpf_lru_list.o lpm_trie.o map_in_map.o
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_NET),y)
+obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += devmap.o
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_STREAM_PARSER),y)
+obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += sockmap.o
+endif
+endif
ifeq ($(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS),y)
obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += stackmap.o
endif
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
index d771a3872500..98c0f00c3f5e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
@@ -49,13 +49,15 @@ static int bpf_array_alloc_percpu(struct bpf_array *array)
static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
{
bool percpu = attr->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY;
+ int numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
struct bpf_array *array;
u64 array_size;
u32 elem_size;
/* check sanity of attributes */
if (attr->max_entries == 0 || attr->key_size != 4 ||
- attr->value_size == 0 || attr->map_flags)
+ attr->value_size == 0 || attr->map_flags & ~BPF_F_NUMA_NODE ||
+ (percpu && numa_node != NUMA_NO_NODE))
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
if (attr->value_size > KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE)
@@ -77,7 +79,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
/* allocate all map elements and zero-initialize them */
- array = bpf_map_area_alloc(array_size);
+ array = bpf_map_area_alloc(array_size, numa_node);
if (!array)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
@@ -87,6 +89,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
array->map.value_size = attr->value_size;
array->map.max_entries = attr->max_entries;
array->map.map_flags = attr->map_flags;
+ array->map.numa_node = numa_node;
array->elem_size = elem_size;
if (!percpu)
@@ -603,6 +606,31 @@ static void *array_of_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
return READ_ONCE(*inner_map);
}
+static u32 array_of_map_gen_lookup(struct bpf_map *map,
+ struct bpf_insn *insn_buf)
+{
+ u32 elem_size = round_up(map->value_size, 8);
+ struct bpf_insn *insn = insn_buf;
+ const int ret = BPF_REG_0;
+ const int map_ptr = BPF_REG_1;
+ const int index = BPF_REG_2;
+
+ *insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, map_ptr, offsetof(struct bpf_array, value));
+ *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, ret, index, 0);
+ *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, ret, map->max_entries, 5);
+ if (is_power_of_2(elem_size))
+ *insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, ret, ilog2(elem_size));
+ else
+ *insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MUL, ret, elem_size);
+ *insn++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, ret, map_ptr);
+ *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, ret, ret, 0);
+ *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, ret, 0, 1);
+ *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1);
+ *insn++ = BPF_MOV64_IMM(ret, 0);
+
+ return insn - insn_buf;
+}
+
const struct bpf_map_ops array_of_maps_map_ops = {
.map_alloc = array_of_map_alloc,
.map_free = array_of_map_free,
@@ -612,4 +640,5 @@ const struct bpf_map_ops array_of_maps_map_ops = {
.map_fd_get_ptr = bpf_map_fd_get_ptr,
.map_fd_put_ptr = bpf_map_fd_put_ptr,
.map_fd_sys_lookup_elem = bpf_map_fd_sys_lookup_elem,
+ .map_gen_lookup = array_of_map_gen_lookup,
};
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.h b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.h
index 5c35a98d02bf..7d4f89b7cb84 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.h
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.h
@@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ static inline void bpf_lru_node_set_ref(struct bpf_lru_node *node)
/* ref is an approximation on access frequency. It does not
* have to be very accurate. Hence, no protection is used.
*/
- node->ref = 1;
+ if (!node->ref)
+ node->ref = 1;
}
int bpf_lru_init(struct bpf_lru *lru, bool percpu, u32 hash_offset,
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index ad5f55922a13..917cc04a0a94 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -595,9 +595,13 @@ static int bpf_jit_blind_insn(const struct bpf_insn *from,
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JEQ | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JNE | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JGT | BPF_K:
+ case BPF_JMP | BPF_JLT | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JGE | BPF_K:
+ case BPF_JMP | BPF_JLE | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGT | BPF_K:
+ case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLT | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGE | BPF_K:
+ case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLE | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSET | BPF_K:
/* Accommodate for extra offset in case of a backjump. */
off = from->off;
@@ -833,12 +837,20 @@ static unsigned int ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn,
[BPF_JMP | BPF_JNE | BPF_K] = &&JMP_JNE_K,
[BPF_JMP | BPF_JGT | BPF_X] = &&JMP_JGT_X,
[BPF_JMP | BPF_JGT | BPF_K] = &&JMP_JGT_K,
+ [BPF_JMP | BPF_JLT | BPF_X] = &&JMP_JLT_X,
+ [BPF_JMP | BPF_JLT | BPF_K] = &&JMP_JLT_K,
[BPF_JMP | BPF_JGE | BPF_X] = &&JMP_JGE_X,
[BPF_JMP | BPF_JGE | BPF_K] = &&JMP_JGE_K,
+ [BPF_JMP | BPF_JLE | BPF_X] = &&JMP_JLE_X,
+ [BPF_JMP | BPF_JLE | BPF_K] = &&JMP_JLE_K,
[BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGT | BPF_X] = &&JMP_JSGT_X,
[BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGT | BPF_K] = &&JMP_JSGT_K,
+ [BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLT | BPF_X] = &&JMP_JSLT_X,
+ [BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLT | BPF_K] = &&JMP_JSLT_K,
[BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGE | BPF_X] = &&JMP_JSGE_X,
[BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGE | BPF_K] = &&JMP_JSGE_K,
+ [BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLE | BPF_X] = &&JMP_JSLE_X,
+ [BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLE | BPF_K] = &&JMP_JSLE_K,
[BPF_JMP | BPF_JSET | BPF_X] = &&JMP_JSET_X,
[BPF_JMP | BPF_JSET | BPF_K] = &&JMP_JSET_K,
/* Program return */
@@ -1073,6 +1085,18 @@ out:
CONT_JMP;
}
CONT;
+ JMP_JLT_X:
+ if (DST < SRC) {
+ insn += insn->off;
+ CONT_JMP;
+ }
+ CONT;
+ JMP_JLT_K:
+ if (DST < IMM) {
+ insn += insn->off;
+ CONT_JMP;
+ }
+ CONT;
JMP_JGE_X:
if (DST >= SRC) {
insn += insn->off;
@@ -1085,6 +1109,18 @@ out:
CONT_JMP;
}
CONT;
+ JMP_JLE_X:
+ if (DST <= SRC) {
+ insn += insn->off;
+ CONT_JMP;
+ }
+ CONT;
+ JMP_JLE_K:
+ if (DST <= IMM) {
+ insn += insn->off;
+ CONT_JMP;
+ }
+ CONT;
JMP_JSGT_X:
if (((s64) DST) > ((s64) SRC)) {
insn += insn->off;
@@ -1097,6 +1133,18 @@ out:
CONT_JMP;
}
CONT;
+ JMP_JSLT_X:
+ if (((s64) DST) < ((s64) SRC)) {
+ insn += insn->off;
+ CONT_JMP;
+ }
+ CONT;
+ JMP_JSLT_K:
+ if (((s64) DST) < ((s64) IMM)) {
+ insn += insn->off;
+ CONT_JMP;
+ }
+ CONT;
JMP_JSGE_X:
if (((s64) DST) >= ((s64) SRC)) {
insn += insn->off;
@@ -1109,6 +1157,18 @@ out:
CONT_JMP;
}
CONT;
+ JMP_JSLE_X:
+ if (((s64) DST) <= ((s64) SRC)) {
+ insn += insn->off;
+ CONT_JMP;
+ }
+ CONT;
+ JMP_JSLE_K:
+ if (((s64) DST) <= ((s64) IMM)) {
+ insn += insn->off;
+ CONT_JMP;
+ }
+ CONT;
JMP_JSET_X:
if (DST & SRC) {
insn += insn->off;
@@ -1378,6 +1438,7 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_ktime_get_ns_proto __weak;
const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_current_pid_tgid_proto __weak;
const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_current_uid_gid_proto __weak;
const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_current_comm_proto __weak;
+const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sock_map_update_proto __weak;
const struct bpf_func_proto * __weak bpf_get_trace_printk_proto(void)
{
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ecf9f99ecc57
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
@@ -0,0 +1,409 @@
+/* Copyright (c) 2017 Covalent IO, Inc. http://covalent.io
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of version 2 of the GNU General Public
+ * License as published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
+ * WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
+ * General Public License for more details.
+ */
+
+/* Devmaps primary use is as a backend map for XDP BPF helper call
+ * bpf_redirect_map(). Because XDP is mostly concerned with performance we
+ * spent some effort to ensure the datapath with redirect maps does not use
+ * any locking. This is a quick note on the details.
+ *
+ * We have three possible paths to get into the devmap control plane bpf
+ * syscalls, bpf programs, and driver side xmit/flush operations. A bpf syscall
+ * will invoke an update, delete, or lookup operation. To ensure updates and
+ * deletes appear atomic from the datapath side xchg() is used to modify the
+ * netdev_map array. Then because the datapath does a lookup into the netdev_map
+ * array (read-only) from an RCU critical section we use call_rcu() to wait for
+ * an rcu grace period before free'ing the old data structures. This ensures the
+ * datapath always has a valid copy. However, the datapath does a "flush"
+ * operation that pushes any pending packets in the driver outside the RCU
+ * critical section. Each bpf_dtab_netdev tracks these pending operations using
+ * an atomic per-cpu bitmap. The bpf_dtab_netdev object will not be destroyed
+ * until all bits are cleared indicating outstanding flush operations have
+ * completed.
+ *
+ * BPF syscalls may race with BPF program calls on any of the update, delete
+ * or lookup operations. As noted above the xchg() operation also keep the
+ * netdev_map consistent in this case. From the devmap side BPF programs
+ * calling into these operations are the same as multiple user space threads
+ * making system calls.
+ *
+ * Finally, any of the above may race with a netdev_unregister notifier. The
+ * unregister notifier must search for net devices in the map structure that
+ * contain a reference to the net device and remove them. This is a two step
+ * process (a) dereference the bpf_dtab_netdev object in netdev_map and (b)
+ * check to see if the ifindex is the same as the net_device being removed.
+ * When removing the dev a cmpxchg() is used to ensure the correct dev is
+ * removed, in the case of a concurrent update or delete operation it is
+ * possible that the initially referenced dev is no longer in the map. As the
+ * notifier hook walks the map we know that new dev references can not be
+ * added by the user because core infrastructure ensures dev_get_by_index()
+ * calls will fail at this point.
+ */
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <linux/filter.h>
+
+struct bpf_dtab_netdev {
+ struct net_device *dev;
+ struct bpf_dtab *dtab;
+ unsigned int bit;
+ struct rcu_head rcu;
+};
+
+struct bpf_dtab {
+ struct bpf_map map;
+ struct bpf_dtab_netdev **netdev_map;
+ unsigned long __percpu *flush_needed;
+ struct list_head list;
+};
+
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(dev_map_lock);
+static LIST_HEAD(dev_map_list);
+
+static u64 dev_map_bitmap_size(const union bpf_attr *attr)
+{
+ return BITS_TO_LONGS(attr->max_entries) * sizeof(unsigned long);
+}
+
+static struct bpf_map *dev_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
+{
+ struct bpf_dtab *dtab;
+ u64 cost;
+ int err;
+
+ /* check sanity of attributes */
+ if (attr->max_entries == 0 || attr->key_size != 4 ||
+ attr->value_size != 4 || attr->map_flags & ~BPF_F_NUMA_NODE)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
+ dtab = kzalloc(sizeof(*dtab), GFP_USER);
+ if (!dtab)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+ /* mandatory map attributes */
+ dtab->map.map_type = attr->map_type;
+ dtab->map.key_size = attr->key_size;
+ dtab->map.value_size = attr->value_size;
+ dtab->map.max_entries = attr->max_entries;
+ dtab->map.map_flags = attr->map_flags;
+ dtab->map.numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
+
+ /* make sure page count doesn't overflow */
+ cost = (u64) dtab->map.max_entries * sizeof(struct bpf_dtab_netdev *);
+ cost += dev_map_bitmap_size(attr) * num_possible_cpus();
+ if (cost >= U32_MAX - PAGE_SIZE)
+ goto free_dtab;
+
+ dtab->map.pages = round_up(cost, PAGE_SIZE) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+
+ /* if map size is larger than memlock limit, reject it early */
+ err = bpf_map_precharge_memlock(dtab->map.pages);
+ if (err)
+ goto free_dtab;
+
+ /* A per cpu bitfield with a bit per possible net device */
+ dtab->flush_needed = __alloc_percpu(dev_map_bitmap_size(attr),
+ __alignof__(unsigned long));
+ if (!dtab->flush_needed)
+ goto free_dtab;
+
+ dtab->netdev_map = bpf_map_area_alloc(dtab->map.max_entries *
+ sizeof(struct bpf_dtab_netdev *),
+ dtab->map.numa_node);
+ if (!dtab->netdev_map)
+ goto free_dtab;
+
+ spin_lock(&dev_map_lock);
+ list_add_tail_rcu(&dtab->list, &dev_map_list);
+ spin_unlock(&dev_map_lock);
+
+ return &dtab->map;
+free_dtab:
+ free_percpu(dtab->flush_needed);
+ kfree(dtab);
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+}
+
+static void dev_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
+{
+ struct bpf_dtab *dtab = container_of(map, struct bpf_dtab, map);
+ int i, cpu;
+
+ /* At this point bpf_prog->aux->refcnt == 0 and this map->refcnt == 0,
+ * so the programs (can be more than one that used this map) were
+ * disconnected from events. Wait for outstanding critical sections in
+ * these programs to complete. The rcu critical section only guarantees
+ * no further reads against netdev_map. It does __not__ ensure pending
+ * flush operations (if any) are complete.
+ */
+
+ spin_lock(&dev_map_lock);
+ list_del_rcu(&dtab->list);
+ spin_unlock(&dev_map_lock);
+
+ synchronize_rcu();
+
+ /* To ensure all pending flush operations have completed wait for flush
+ * bitmap to indicate all flush_needed bits to be zero on _all_ cpus.
+ * Because the above synchronize_rcu() ensures the map is disconnected
+ * from the program we can assume no new bits will be set.
+ */
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ unsigned long *bitmap = per_cpu_ptr(dtab->flush_needed, cpu);
+
+ while (!bitmap_empty(bitmap, dtab->map.max_entries))
+ cpu_relax();
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < dtab->map.max_entries; i++) {
+ struct bpf_dtab_netdev *dev;
+
+ dev = dtab->netdev_map[i];
+ if (!dev)
+ continue;
+
+ dev_put(dev->dev);
+ kfree(dev);
+ }
+
+ free_percpu(dtab->flush_needed);
+ bpf_map_area_free(dtab->netdev_map);
+ kfree(dtab);
+}
+
+static int dev_map_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *next_key)
+{
+ struct bpf_dtab *dtab = container_of(map, struct bpf_dtab, map);
+ u32 index = key ? *(u32 *)key : U32_MAX;
+ u32 *next = next_key;
+
+ if (index >= dtab->map.max_entries) {
+ *next = 0;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (index == dtab->map.max_entries - 1)
+ return -ENOENT;
+ *next = index + 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+void __dev_map_insert_ctx(struct bpf_map *map, u32 bit)
+{
+ struct bpf_dtab *dtab = container_of(map, struct bpf_dtab, map);
+ unsigned long *bitmap = this_cpu_ptr(dtab->flush_needed);
+
+ __set_bit(bit, bitmap);
+}
+
+/* __dev_map_flush is called from xdp_do_flush_map() which _must_ be signaled
+ * from the driver before returning from its napi->poll() routine. The poll()
+ * routine is called either from busy_poll context or net_rx_action signaled
+ * from NET_RX_SOFTIRQ. Either way the poll routine must complete before the
+ * net device can be torn down. On devmap tear down we ensure the ctx bitmap
+ * is zeroed before completing to ensure all flush operations have completed.
+ */
+void __dev_map_flush(struct bpf_map *map)
+{
+ struct bpf_dtab *dtab = container_of(map, struct bpf_dtab, map);
+ unsigned long *bitmap = this_cpu_ptr(dtab->flush_needed);
+ u32 bit;
+
+ for_each_set_bit(bit, bitmap, map->max_entries) {
+ struct bpf_dtab_netdev *dev = READ_ONCE(dtab->netdev_map[bit]);
+ struct net_device *netdev;
+
+ /* This is possible if the dev entry is removed by user space
+ * between xdp redirect and flush op.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(!dev))
+ continue;
+
+ __clear_bit(bit, bitmap);
+ netdev = dev->dev;
+ if (likely(netdev->netdev_ops->ndo_xdp_flush))
+ netdev->netdev_ops->ndo_xdp_flush(netdev);
+ }
+}
+
+/* rcu_read_lock (from syscall and BPF contexts) ensures that if a delete and/or
+ * update happens in parallel here a dev_put wont happen until after reading the
+ * ifindex.
+ */
+struct net_device *__dev_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, u32 key)
+{
+ struct bpf_dtab *dtab = container_of(map, struct bpf_dtab, map);
+ struct bpf_dtab_netdev *dev;
+
+ if (key >= map->max_entries)
+ return NULL;
+
+ dev = READ_ONCE(dtab->netdev_map[key]);
+ return dev ? dev->dev : NULL;
+}
+
+static void *dev_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
+{
+ struct net_device *dev = __dev_map_lookup_elem(map, *(u32 *)key);
+
+ return dev ? &dev->ifindex : NULL;
+}
+
+static void dev_map_flush_old(struct bpf_dtab_netdev *dev)
+{
+ if (dev->dev->netdev_ops->ndo_xdp_flush) {
+ struct net_device *fl = dev->dev;
+ unsigned long *bitmap;
+ int cpu;
+
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ bitmap = per_cpu_ptr(dev->dtab->flush_needed, cpu);
+ __clear_bit(dev->bit, bitmap);
+
+ fl->netdev_ops->ndo_xdp_flush(dev->dev);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+static void __dev_map_entry_free(struct rcu_head *rcu)
+{
+ struct bpf_dtab_netdev *dev;
+
+ dev = container_of(rcu, struct bpf_dtab_netdev, rcu);
+ dev_map_flush_old(dev);
+ dev_put(dev->dev);
+ kfree(dev);
+}
+
+static int dev_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
+{
+ struct bpf_dtab *dtab = container_of(map, struct bpf_dtab, map);
+ struct bpf_dtab_netdev *old_dev;
+ int k = *(u32 *)key;
+
+ if (k >= map->max_entries)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /* Use call_rcu() here to ensure any rcu critical sections have
+ * completed, but this does not guarantee a flush has happened
+ * yet. Because driver side rcu_read_lock/unlock only protects the
+ * running XDP program. However, for pending flush operations the
+ * dev and ctx are stored in another per cpu map. And additionally,
+ * the driver tear down ensures all soft irqs are complete before
+ * removing the net device in the case of dev_put equals zero.
+ */
+ old_dev = xchg(&dtab->netdev_map[k], NULL);
+ if (old_dev)
+ call_rcu(&old_dev->rcu, __dev_map_entry_free);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int dev_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
+ u64 map_flags)
+{
+ struct bpf_dtab *dtab = container_of(map, struct bpf_dtab, map);
+ struct net *net = current->nsproxy->net_ns;
+ struct bpf_dtab_netdev *dev, *old_dev;
+ u32 i = *(u32 *)key;
+ u32 ifindex = *(u32 *)value;
+
+ if (unlikely(map_flags > BPF_EXIST))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (unlikely(i >= dtab->map.max_entries))
+ return -E2BIG;
+ if (unlikely(map_flags == BPF_NOEXIST))
+ return -EEXIST;
+
+ if (!ifindex) {
+ dev = NULL;
+ } else {
+ dev = kmalloc_node(sizeof(*dev), GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN,
+ map->numa_node);
+ if (!dev)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ dev->dev = dev_get_by_index(net, ifindex);
+ if (!dev->dev) {
+ kfree(dev);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ dev->bit = i;
+ dev->dtab = dtab;
+ }
+
+ /* Use call_rcu() here to ensure rcu critical sections have completed
+ * Remembering the driver side flush operation will happen before the
+ * net device is removed.
+ */
+ old_dev = xchg(&dtab->netdev_map[i], dev);
+ if (old_dev)
+ call_rcu(&old_dev->rcu, __dev_map_entry_free);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+const struct bpf_map_ops dev_map_ops = {
+ .map_alloc = dev_map_alloc,
+ .map_free = dev_map_free,
+ .map_get_next_key = dev_map_get_next_key,
+ .map_lookup_elem = dev_map_lookup_elem,
+ .map_update_elem = dev_map_update_elem,
+ .map_delete_elem = dev_map_delete_elem,
+};
+
+static int dev_map_notification(struct notifier_block *notifier,
+ ulong event, void *ptr)
+{
+ struct net_device *netdev = netdev_notifier_info_to_dev(ptr);
+ struct bpf_dtab *dtab;
+ int i;
+
+ switch (event) {
+ case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
+ /* This rcu_read_lock/unlock pair is needed because
+ * dev_map_list is an RCU list AND to ensure a delete
+ * operation does not free a netdev_map entry while we
+ * are comparing it against the netdev being unregistered.
+ */
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(dtab, &dev_map_list, list) {
+ for (i = 0; i < dtab->map.max_entries; i++) {
+ struct bpf_dtab_netdev *dev, *odev;
+
+ dev = READ_ONCE(dtab->netdev_map[i]);
+ if (!dev ||
+ dev->dev->ifindex != netdev->ifindex)
+ continue;
+ odev = cmpxchg(&dtab->netdev_map[i], dev, NULL);
+ if (dev == odev)
+ call_rcu(&dev->rcu,
+ __dev_map_entry_free);
+ }
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ return NOTIFY_OK;
+}
+
+static struct notifier_block dev_map_notifier = {
+ .notifier_call = dev_map_notification,
+};
+
+static int __init dev_map_init(void)
+{
+ register_netdevice_notifier(&dev_map_notifier);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+subsys_initcall(dev_map_init);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
index d11c8181f4c5..431126f31ea3 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
@@ -18,6 +18,9 @@
#include "bpf_lru_list.h"
#include "map_in_map.h"
+#define HTAB_CREATE_FLAG_MASK \
+ (BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC | BPF_F_NO_COMMON_LRU | BPF_F_NUMA_NODE)
+
struct bucket {
struct hlist_nulls_head head;
raw_spinlock_t lock;
@@ -138,7 +141,8 @@ static int prealloc_init(struct bpf_htab *htab)
if (!htab_is_percpu(htab) && !htab_is_lru(htab))
num_entries += num_possible_cpus();
- htab->elems = bpf_map_area_alloc(htab->elem_size * num_entries);
+ htab->elems = bpf_map_area_alloc(htab->elem_size * num_entries,
+ htab->map.numa_node);
if (!htab->elems)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -233,6 +237,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *htab_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
*/
bool percpu_lru = (attr->map_flags & BPF_F_NO_COMMON_LRU);
bool prealloc = !(attr->map_flags & BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
+ int numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
struct bpf_htab *htab;
int err, i;
u64 cost;
@@ -248,7 +253,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *htab_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
*/
return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
- if (attr->map_flags & ~(BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC | BPF_F_NO_COMMON_LRU))
+ if (attr->map_flags & ~HTAB_CREATE_FLAG_MASK)
/* reserved bits should not be used */
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
@@ -258,6 +263,9 @@ static struct bpf_map *htab_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
if (lru && !prealloc)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP);
+ if (numa_node != NUMA_NO_NODE && (percpu || percpu_lru))
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
htab = kzalloc(sizeof(*htab), GFP_USER);
if (!htab)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
@@ -268,6 +276,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *htab_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
htab->map.value_size = attr->value_size;
htab->map.max_entries = attr->max_entries;
htab->map.map_flags = attr->map_flags;
+ htab->map.numa_node = numa_node;
/* check sanity of attributes.
* value_size == 0 may be allowed in the future to use map as a set
@@ -346,7 +355,8 @@ static struct bpf_map *htab_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
err = -ENOMEM;
htab->buckets = bpf_map_area_alloc(htab->n_buckets *
- sizeof(struct bucket));
+ sizeof(struct bucket),
+ htab->map.numa_node);
if (!htab->buckets)
goto free_htab;
@@ -504,6 +514,29 @@ static void *htab_lru_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
return NULL;
}
+static u32 htab_lru_map_gen_lookup(struct bpf_map *map,
+ struct bpf_insn *insn_buf)
+{
+ struct bpf_insn *insn = insn_buf;
+ const int ret = BPF_REG_0;
+ const int ref_reg = BPF_REG_1;
+
+ *insn++ = BPF_EMIT_CALL((u64 (*)(u64, u64, u64, u64, u64))__htab_map_lookup_elem);
+ *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, ret, 0, 4);
+ *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, ref_reg, ret,
+ offsetof(struct htab_elem, lru_node) +
+ offsetof(struct bpf_lru_node, ref));
+ *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, ref_reg, 0, 1);
+ *insn++ = BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, ret,
+ offsetof(struct htab_elem, lru_node) +
+ offsetof(struct bpf_lru_node, ref),
+ 1);
+ *insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, ret,
+ offsetof(struct htab_elem, key) +
+ round_up(map->key_size, 8));
+ return insn - insn_buf;
+}
+
/* It is called from the bpf_lru_list when the LRU needs to delete
* older elements from the htab.
*/
@@ -704,7 +737,8 @@ static struct htab_elem *alloc_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, void *key,
atomic_dec(&htab->count);
return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
}
- l_new = kmalloc(htab->elem_size, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
+ l_new = kmalloc_node(htab->elem_size, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN,
+ htab->map.numa_node);
if (!l_new)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
}
@@ -1126,6 +1160,7 @@ const struct bpf_map_ops htab_lru_map_ops = {
.map_lookup_elem = htab_lru_map_lookup_elem,
.map_update_elem = htab_lru_map_update_elem,
.map_delete_elem = htab_lru_map_delete_elem,
+ .map_gen_lookup = htab_lru_map_gen_lookup,
};
/* Called from eBPF program */
@@ -1315,6 +1350,22 @@ static void *htab_of_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
return READ_ONCE(*inner_map);
}
+static u32 htab_of_map_gen_lookup(struct bpf_map *map,
+ struct bpf_insn *insn_buf)
+{
+ struct bpf_insn *insn = insn_buf;
+ const int ret = BPF_REG_0;
+
+ *insn++ = BPF_EMIT_CALL((u64 (*)(u64, u64, u64, u64, u64))__htab_map_lookup_elem);
+ *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, ret, 0, 2);
+ *insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, ret,
+ offsetof(struct htab_elem, key) +
+ round_up(map->key_size, 8));
+ *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, ret, ret, 0);
+
+ return insn - insn_buf;
+}
+
static void htab_of_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
{
bpf_map_meta_free(map->inner_map_meta);
@@ -1330,4 +1381,5 @@ const struct bpf_map_ops htab_of_maps_map_ops = {
.map_fd_get_ptr = bpf_map_fd_get_ptr,
.map_fd_put_ptr = bpf_map_fd_put_ptr,
.map_fd_sys_lookup_elem = bpf_map_fd_sys_lookup_elem,
+ .map_gen_lookup = htab_of_map_gen_lookup,
};
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
index b09185f0f17d..1b767844a76f 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
@@ -244,7 +244,8 @@ static struct lpm_trie_node *lpm_trie_node_alloc(const struct lpm_trie *trie,
if (value)
size += trie->map.value_size;
- node = kmalloc(size, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
+ node = kmalloc_node(size, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN,
+ trie->map.numa_node);
if (!node)
return NULL;
@@ -405,6 +406,8 @@ static int trie_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
#define LPM_KEY_SIZE_MAX LPM_KEY_SIZE(LPM_DATA_SIZE_MAX)
#define LPM_KEY_SIZE_MIN LPM_KEY_SIZE(LPM_DATA_SIZE_MIN)
+#define LPM_CREATE_FLAG_MASK (BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC | BPF_F_NUMA_NODE)
+
static struct bpf_map *trie_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
{
struct lpm_trie *trie;
@@ -416,7 +419,8 @@ static struct bpf_map *trie_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
/* check sanity of attributes */
if (attr->max_entries == 0 ||
- attr->map_flags != BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC ||
+ !(attr->map_flags & BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC) ||
+ attr->map_flags & ~LPM_CREATE_FLAG_MASK ||
attr->key_size < LPM_KEY_SIZE_MIN ||
attr->key_size > LPM_KEY_SIZE_MAX ||
attr->value_size < LPM_VAL_SIZE_MIN ||
@@ -433,6 +437,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *trie_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
trie->map.value_size = attr->value_size;
trie->map.max_entries = attr->max_entries;
trie->map.map_flags = attr->map_flags;
+ trie->map.numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
trie->data_size = attr->key_size -
offsetof(struct bpf_lpm_trie_key, data);
trie->max_prefixlen = trie->data_size * 8;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f6ffde9c6a68
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
@@ -0,0 +1,873 @@
+/* Copyright (c) 2017 Covalent IO, Inc. http://covalent.io
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of version 2 of the GNU General Public
+ * License as published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
+ * WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
+ * General Public License for more details.
+ */
+
+/* A BPF sock_map is used to store sock objects. This is primarly used
+ * for doing socket redirect with BPF helper routines.
+ *
+ * A sock map may have BPF programs attached to it, currently a program
+ * used to parse packets and a program to provide a verdict and redirect
+ * decision on the packet are supported. Any programs attached to a sock
+ * map are inherited by sock objects when they are added to the map. If
+ * no BPF programs are attached the sock object may only be used for sock
+ * redirect.
+ *
+ * A sock object may be in multiple maps, but can only inherit a single
+ * parse or verdict program. If adding a sock object to a map would result
+ * in having multiple parsing programs the update will return an EBUSY error.
+ *
+ * For reference this program is similar to devmap used in XDP context
+ * reviewing these together may be useful. For an example please review
+ * ./samples/bpf/sockmap/.
+ */
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <net/sock.h>
+#include <linux/filter.h>
+#include <linux/errno.h>
+#include <linux/file.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/net.h>
+#include <linux/skbuff.h>
+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
+#include <linux/list.h>
+#include <net/strparser.h>
+
+struct bpf_stab {
+ struct bpf_map map;
+ struct sock **sock_map;
+ struct bpf_prog *bpf_parse;
+ struct bpf_prog *bpf_verdict;
+};
+
+enum smap_psock_state {
+ SMAP_TX_RUNNING,
+};
+
+struct smap_psock_map_entry {
+ struct list_head list;
+ struct sock **entry;
+};
+
+struct smap_psock {
+ struct rcu_head rcu;
+ /* refcnt is used inside sk_callback_lock */
+ u32 refcnt;
+
+ /* datapath variables */
+ struct sk_buff_head rxqueue;
+ bool strp_enabled;
+
+ /* datapath error path cache across tx work invocations */
+ int save_rem;
+ int save_off;
+ struct sk_buff *save_skb;
+
+ struct strparser strp;
+ struct bpf_prog *bpf_parse;
+ struct bpf_prog *bpf_verdict;
+ struct list_head maps;
+
+ /* Back reference used when sock callback trigger sockmap operations */
+ struct sock *sock;
+ unsigned long state;
+
+ struct work_struct tx_work;
+ struct work_struct gc_work;
+
+ void (*save_data_ready)(struct sock *sk);
+ void (*save_write_space)(struct sock *sk);
+ void (*save_state_change)(struct sock *sk);
+};
+
+static inline struct smap_psock *smap_psock_sk(const struct sock *sk)
+{
+ return rcu_dereference_sk_user_data(sk);
+}
+
+static int smap_verdict_func(struct smap_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct bpf_prog *prog = READ_ONCE(psock->bpf_verdict);
+ int rc;
+
+ if (unlikely(!prog))
+ return SK_DROP;
+
+ skb_orphan(skb);
+ skb->sk = psock->sock;
+ bpf_compute_data_end(skb);
+ rc = (*prog->bpf_func)(skb, prog->insnsi);
+ skb->sk = NULL;
+
+ return rc;
+}
+
+static void smap_do_verdict(struct smap_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct sock *sk;
+ int rc;
+
+ /* Because we use per cpu values to feed input from sock redirect
+ * in BPF program to do_sk_redirect_map() call we need to ensure we
+ * are not preempted. RCU read lock is not sufficient in this case
+ * with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU enabled so we must be explicit here.
+ */
+ preempt_disable();
+ rc = smap_verdict_func(psock, skb);
+ switch (rc) {
+ case SK_REDIRECT:
+ sk = do_sk_redirect_map();
+ preempt_enable();
+ if (likely(sk)) {
+ struct smap_psock *peer = smap_psock_sk(sk);
+
+ if (likely(peer &&
+ test_bit(SMAP_TX_RUNNING, &peer->state) &&
+ !sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD) &&
+ sock_writeable(sk))) {
+ skb_set_owner_w(skb, sk);
+ skb_queue_tail(&peer->rxqueue, skb);
+ schedule_work(&peer->tx_work);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ /* Fall through and free skb otherwise */
+ case SK_DROP:
+ default:
+ if (rc != SK_REDIRECT)
+ preempt_enable();
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ }
+}
+
+static void smap_report_sk_error(struct smap_psock *psock, int err)
+{
+ struct sock *sk = psock->sock;
+
+ sk->sk_err = err;
+ sk->sk_error_report(sk);
+}
+
+static void smap_release_sock(struct smap_psock *psock, struct sock *sock);
+
+/* Called with lock_sock(sk) held */
+static void smap_state_change(struct sock *sk)
+{
+ struct smap_psock_map_entry *e, *tmp;
+ struct smap_psock *psock;
+ struct socket_wq *wq;
+ struct sock *osk;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
+ /* Allowing transitions into an established syn_recv states allows
+ * for early binding sockets to a smap object before the connection
+ * is established.
+ */
+ switch (sk->sk_state) {
+ case TCP_SYN_SENT:
+ case TCP_SYN_RECV:
+ case TCP_ESTABLISHED:
+ break;
+ case TCP_CLOSE_WAIT:
+ case TCP_CLOSING:
+ case TCP_LAST_ACK:
+ case TCP_FIN_WAIT1:
+ case TCP_FIN_WAIT2:
+ case TCP_LISTEN:
+ break;
+ case TCP_CLOSE:
+ /* Only release if the map entry is in fact the sock in
+ * question. There is a case where the operator deletes
+ * the sock from the map, but the TCP sock is closed before
+ * the psock is detached. Use cmpxchg to verify correct
+ * sock is removed.
+ */
+ psock = smap_psock_sk(sk);
+ if (unlikely(!psock))
+ break;
+ write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(e, tmp, &psock->maps, list) {
+ osk = cmpxchg(e->entry, sk, NULL);
+ if (osk == sk) {
+ list_del(&e->list);
+ smap_release_sock(psock, sk);
+ }
+ }
+ write_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
+ break;
+ default:
+ psock = smap_psock_sk(sk);
+ if (unlikely(!psock))
+ break;
+ smap_report_sk_error(psock, EPIPE);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
+ if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
+ wake_up_interruptible_all(&wq->wait);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
+static void smap_read_sock_strparser(struct strparser *strp,
+ struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct smap_psock *psock;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ psock = container_of(strp, struct smap_psock, strp);
+ smap_do_verdict(psock, skb);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
+/* Called with lock held on socket */
+static void smap_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
+{
+ struct smap_psock *psock;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ psock = smap_psock_sk(sk);
+ if (likely(psock)) {
+ write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
+ strp_data_ready(&psock->strp);
+ write_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
+static void smap_tx_work(struct work_struct *w)
+{
+ struct smap_psock *psock;
+ struct sk_buff *skb;
+ int rem, off, n;
+
+ psock = container_of(w, struct smap_psock, tx_work);
+
+ /* lock sock to avoid losing sk_socket at some point during loop */
+ lock_sock(psock->sock);
+ if (psock->save_skb) {
+ skb = psock->save_skb;
+ rem = psock->save_rem;
+ off = psock->save_off;
+ psock->save_skb = NULL;
+ goto start;
+ }
+
+ while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&psock->rxqueue))) {
+ rem = skb->len;
+ off = 0;
+start:
+ do {
+ if (likely(psock->sock->sk_socket))
+ n = skb_send_sock_locked(psock->sock,
+ skb, off, rem);
+ else
+ n = -EINVAL;
+ if (n <= 0) {
+ if (n == -EAGAIN) {
+ /* Retry when space is available */
+ psock->save_skb = skb;
+ psock->save_rem = rem;
+ psock->save_off = off;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ /* Hard errors break pipe and stop xmit */
+ smap_report_sk_error(psock, n ? -n : EPIPE);
+ clear_bit(SMAP_TX_RUNNING, &psock->state);
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ goto out;
+ }
+ rem -= n;
+ off += n;
+ } while (rem);
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ }
+out:
+ release_sock(psock->sock);
+}
+
+static void smap_write_space(struct sock *sk)
+{
+ struct smap_psock *psock;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ psock = smap_psock_sk(sk);
+ if (likely(psock && test_bit(SMAP_TX_RUNNING, &psock->state)))
+ schedule_work(&psock->tx_work);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
+static void smap_stop_sock(struct smap_psock *psock, struct sock *sk)
+{
+ if (!psock->strp_enabled)
+ return;
+ sk->sk_data_ready = psock->save_data_ready;
+ sk->sk_write_space = psock->save_write_space;
+ sk->sk_state_change = psock->save_state_change;
+ psock->save_data_ready = NULL;
+ psock->save_write_space = NULL;
+ psock->save_state_change = NULL;
+ strp_stop(&psock->strp);
+ psock->strp_enabled = false;
+}
+
+static void smap_destroy_psock(struct rcu_head *rcu)
+{
+ struct smap_psock *psock = container_of(rcu,
+ struct smap_psock, rcu);
+
+ /* Now that a grace period has passed there is no longer
+ * any reference to this sock in the sockmap so we can
+ * destroy the psock, strparser, and bpf programs. But,
+ * because we use workqueue sync operations we can not
+ * do it in rcu context
+ */
+ schedule_work(&psock->gc_work);
+}
+
+static void smap_release_sock(struct smap_psock *psock, struct sock *sock)
+{
+ psock->refcnt--;
+ if (psock->refcnt)
+ return;
+
+ smap_stop_sock(psock, sock);
+ clear_bit(SMAP_TX_RUNNING, &psock->state);
+ rcu_assign_sk_user_data(sock, NULL);
+ call_rcu_sched(&psock->rcu, smap_destroy_psock);
+}
+
+static int smap_parse_func_strparser(struct strparser *strp,
+ struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct smap_psock *psock;
+ struct bpf_prog *prog;
+ int rc;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ psock = container_of(strp, struct smap_psock, strp);
+ prog = READ_ONCE(psock->bpf_parse);
+
+ if (unlikely(!prog)) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return skb->len;
+ }
+
+ /* Attach socket for bpf program to use if needed we can do this
+ * because strparser clones the skb before handing it to a upper
+ * layer, meaning skb_orphan has been called. We NULL sk on the
+ * way out to ensure we don't trigger a BUG_ON in skb/sk operations
+ * later and because we are not charging the memory of this skb to
+ * any socket yet.
+ */
+ skb->sk = psock->sock;
+ bpf_compute_data_end(skb);
+ rc = (*prog->bpf_func)(skb, prog->insnsi);
+ skb->sk = NULL;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return rc;
+}
+
+
+static int smap_read_sock_done(struct strparser *strp, int err)
+{
+ return err;
+}
+
+static int smap_init_sock(struct smap_psock *psock,
+ struct sock *sk)
+{
+ static const struct strp_callbacks cb = {
+ .rcv_msg = smap_read_sock_strparser,
+ .parse_msg = smap_parse_func_strparser,
+ .read_sock_done = smap_read_sock_done,
+ };
+
+ return strp_init(&psock->strp, sk, &cb);
+}
+
+static void smap_init_progs(struct smap_psock *psock,
+ struct bpf_stab *stab,
+ struct bpf_prog *verdict,
+ struct bpf_prog *parse)
+{
+ struct bpf_prog *orig_parse, *orig_verdict;
+
+ orig_parse = xchg(&psock->bpf_parse, parse);
+ orig_verdict = xchg(&psock->bpf_verdict, verdict);
+
+ if (orig_verdict)
+ bpf_prog_put(orig_verdict);
+ if (orig_parse)
+ bpf_prog_put(orig_parse);
+}
+
+static void smap_start_sock(struct smap_psock *psock, struct sock *sk)
+{
+ if (sk->sk_data_ready == smap_data_ready)
+ return;
+ psock->save_data_ready = sk->sk_data_ready;
+ psock->save_write_space = sk->sk_write_space;
+ psock->save_state_change = sk->sk_state_change;
+ sk->sk_data_ready = smap_data_ready;
+ sk->sk_write_space = smap_write_space;
+ sk->sk_state_change = smap_state_change;
+ psock->strp_enabled = true;
+}
+
+static void sock_map_remove_complete(struct bpf_stab *stab)
+{
+ bpf_map_area_free(stab->sock_map);
+ kfree(stab);
+}
+
+static void smap_gc_work(struct work_struct *w)
+{
+ struct smap_psock_map_entry *e, *tmp;
+ struct smap_psock *psock;
+
+ psock = container_of(w, struct smap_psock, gc_work);
+
+ /* no callback lock needed because we already detached sockmap ops */
+ if (psock->strp_enabled)
+ strp_done(&psock->strp);
+
+ cancel_work_sync(&psock->tx_work);
+ __skb_queue_purge(&psock->rxqueue);
+
+ /* At this point all strparser and xmit work must be complete */
+ if (psock->bpf_parse)
+ bpf_prog_put(psock->bpf_parse);
+ if (psock->bpf_verdict)
+ bpf_prog_put(psock->bpf_verdict);
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(e, tmp, &psock->maps, list) {
+ list_del(&e->list);
+ kfree(e);
+ }
+
+ sock_put(psock->sock);
+ kfree(psock);
+}
+
+static struct smap_psock *smap_init_psock(struct sock *sock,
+ struct bpf_stab *stab)
+{
+ struct smap_psock *psock;
+
+ psock = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct smap_psock),
+ GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN,
+ stab->map.numa_node);
+ if (!psock)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+ psock->sock = sock;
+ skb_queue_head_init(&psock->rxqueue);
+ INIT_WORK(&psock->tx_work, smap_tx_work);
+ INIT_WORK(&psock->gc_work, smap_gc_work);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&psock->maps);
+ psock->refcnt = 1;
+
+ rcu_assign_sk_user_data(sock, psock);
+ sock_hold(sock);
+ return psock;
+}
+
+static struct bpf_map *sock_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
+{
+ struct bpf_stab *stab;
+ int err = -EINVAL;
+ u64 cost;
+
+ /* check sanity of attributes */
+ if (attr->max_entries == 0 || attr->key_size != 4 ||
+ attr->value_size != 4 || attr->map_flags & ~BPF_F_NUMA_NODE)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
+ if (attr->value_size > KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE)
+ return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
+
+ stab = kzalloc(sizeof(*stab), GFP_USER);
+ if (!stab)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+ /* mandatory map attributes */
+ stab->map.map_type = attr->map_type;
+ stab->map.key_size = attr->key_size;
+ stab->map.value_size = attr->value_size;
+ stab->map.max_entries = attr->max_entries;
+ stab->map.map_flags = attr->map_flags;
+ stab->map.numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
+
+ /* make sure page count doesn't overflow */
+ cost = (u64) stab->map.max_entries * sizeof(struct sock *);
+ if (cost >= U32_MAX - PAGE_SIZE)
+ goto free_stab;
+
+ stab->map.pages = round_up(cost, PAGE_SIZE) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+
+ /* if map size is larger than memlock limit, reject it early */
+ err = bpf_map_precharge_memlock(stab->map.pages);
+ if (err)
+ goto free_stab;
+
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ stab->sock_map = bpf_map_area_alloc(stab->map.max_entries *
+ sizeof(struct sock *),
+ stab->map.numa_node);
+ if (!stab->sock_map)
+ goto free_stab;
+
+ return &stab->map;
+free_stab:
+ kfree(stab);
+ return ERR_PTR(err);
+}
+
+static void smap_list_remove(struct smap_psock *psock, struct sock **entry)
+{
+ struct smap_psock_map_entry *e, *tmp;
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(e, tmp, &psock->maps, list) {
+ if (e->entry == entry) {
+ list_del(&e->list);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+static void sock_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
+{
+ struct bpf_stab *stab = container_of(map, struct bpf_stab, map);
+ int i;
+
+ synchronize_rcu();
+
+ /* At this point no update, lookup or delete operations can happen.
+ * However, be aware we can still get a socket state event updates,
+ * and data ready callabacks that reference the psock from sk_user_data
+ * Also psock worker threads are still in-flight. So smap_release_sock
+ * will only free the psock after cancel_sync on the worker threads
+ * and a grace period expire to ensure psock is really safe to remove.
+ */
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ for (i = 0; i < stab->map.max_entries; i++) {
+ struct smap_psock *psock;
+ struct sock *sock;
+
+ sock = xchg(&stab->sock_map[i], NULL);
+ if (!sock)
+ continue;
+
+ write_lock_bh(&sock->sk_callback_lock);
+ psock = smap_psock_sk(sock);
+ smap_list_remove(psock, &stab->sock_map[i]);
+ smap_release_sock(psock, sock);
+ write_unlock_bh(&sock->sk_callback_lock);
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ if (stab->bpf_verdict)
+ bpf_prog_put(stab->bpf_verdict);
+ if (stab->bpf_parse)
+ bpf_prog_put(stab->bpf_parse);
+
+ sock_map_remove_complete(stab);
+}
+
+static int sock_map_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *next_key)
+{
+ struct bpf_stab *stab = container_of(map, struct bpf_stab, map);
+ u32 i = key ? *(u32 *)key : U32_MAX;
+ u32 *next = (u32 *)next_key;
+
+ if (i >= stab->map.max_entries) {
+ *next = 0;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (i == stab->map.max_entries - 1)
+ return -ENOENT;
+
+ *next = i + 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+struct sock *__sock_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, u32 key)
+{
+ struct bpf_stab *stab = container_of(map, struct bpf_stab, map);
+
+ if (key >= map->max_entries)
+ return NULL;
+
+ return READ_ONCE(stab->sock_map[key]);
+}
+
+static int sock_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
+{
+ struct bpf_stab *stab = container_of(map, struct bpf_stab, map);
+ struct smap_psock *psock;
+ int k = *(u32 *)key;
+ struct sock *sock;
+
+ if (k >= map->max_entries)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ sock = xchg(&stab->sock_map[k], NULL);
+ if (!sock)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ write_lock_bh(&sock->sk_callback_lock);
+ psock = smap_psock_sk(sock);
+ if (!psock)
+ goto out;
+
+ if (psock->bpf_parse)
+ smap_stop_sock(psock, sock);
+ smap_list_remove(psock, &stab->sock_map[k]);
+ smap_release_sock(psock, sock);
+out:
+ write_unlock_bh(&sock->sk_callback_lock);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* Locking notes: Concurrent updates, deletes, and lookups are allowed and are
+ * done inside rcu critical sections. This ensures on updates that the psock
+ * will not be released via smap_release_sock() until concurrent updates/deletes
+ * complete. All operations operate on sock_map using cmpxchg and xchg
+ * operations to ensure we do not get stale references. Any reads into the
+ * map must be done with READ_ONCE() because of this.
+ *
+ * A psock is destroyed via call_rcu and after any worker threads are cancelled
+ * and syncd so we are certain all references from the update/lookup/delete
+ * operations as well as references in the data path are no longer in use.
+ *
+ * Psocks may exist in multiple maps, but only a single set of parse/verdict
+ * programs may be inherited from the maps it belongs to. A reference count
+ * is kept with the total number of references to the psock from all maps. The
+ * psock will not be released until this reaches zero. The psock and sock
+ * user data data use the sk_callback_lock to protect critical data structures
+ * from concurrent access. This allows us to avoid two updates from modifying
+ * the user data in sock and the lock is required anyways for modifying
+ * callbacks, we simply increase its scope slightly.
+ *
+ * Rules to follow,
+ * - psock must always be read inside RCU critical section
+ * - sk_user_data must only be modified inside sk_callback_lock and read
+ * inside RCU critical section.
+ * - psock->maps list must only be read & modified inside sk_callback_lock
+ * - sock_map must use READ_ONCE and (cmp)xchg operations
+ * - BPF verdict/parse programs must use READ_ONCE and xchg operations
+ */
+static int sock_map_ctx_update_elem(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *skops,
+ struct bpf_map *map,
+ void *key, u64 flags)
+{
+ struct bpf_stab *stab = container_of(map, struct bpf_stab, map);
+ struct smap_psock_map_entry *e = NULL;
+ struct bpf_prog *verdict, *parse;
+ struct sock *osock, *sock;
+ struct smap_psock *psock;
+ u32 i = *(u32 *)key;
+ int err;
+
+ if (unlikely(flags > BPF_EXIST))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (unlikely(i >= stab->map.max_entries))
+ return -E2BIG;
+
+ sock = READ_ONCE(stab->sock_map[i]);
+ if (flags == BPF_EXIST && !sock)
+ return -ENOENT;
+ else if (flags == BPF_NOEXIST && sock)
+ return -EEXIST;
+
+ sock = skops->sk;
+
+ /* 1. If sock map has BPF programs those will be inherited by the
+ * sock being added. If the sock is already attached to BPF programs
+ * this results in an error.
+ */
+ verdict = READ_ONCE(stab->bpf_verdict);
+ parse = READ_ONCE(stab->bpf_parse);
+
+ if (parse && verdict) {
+ /* bpf prog refcnt may be zero if a concurrent attach operation
+ * removes the program after the above READ_ONCE() but before
+ * we increment the refcnt. If this is the case abort with an
+ * error.
+ */
+ verdict = bpf_prog_inc_not_zero(stab->bpf_verdict);
+ if (IS_ERR(verdict))
+ return PTR_ERR(verdict);
+
+ parse = bpf_prog_inc_not_zero(stab->bpf_parse);
+ if (IS_ERR(parse)) {
+ bpf_prog_put(verdict);
+ return PTR_ERR(parse);
+ }
+ }
+
+ write_lock_bh(&sock->sk_callback_lock);
+ psock = smap_psock_sk(sock);
+
+ /* 2. Do not allow inheriting programs if psock exists and has
+ * already inherited programs. This would create confusion on
+ * which parser/verdict program is running. If no psock exists
+ * create one. Inside sk_callback_lock to ensure concurrent create
+ * doesn't update user data.
+ */
+ if (psock) {
+ if (READ_ONCE(psock->bpf_parse) && parse) {
+ err = -EBUSY;
+ goto out_progs;
+ }
+ psock->refcnt++;
+ } else {
+ psock = smap_init_psock(sock, stab);
+ if (IS_ERR(psock)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(psock);
+ goto out_progs;
+ }
+
+ set_bit(SMAP_TX_RUNNING, &psock->state);
+ }
+
+ e = kzalloc(sizeof(*e), GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
+ if (!e) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out_progs;
+ }
+ e->entry = &stab->sock_map[i];
+
+ /* 3. At this point we have a reference to a valid psock that is
+ * running. Attach any BPF programs needed.
+ */
+ if (parse && verdict && !psock->strp_enabled) {
+ err = smap_init_sock(psock, sock);
+ if (err)
+ goto out_free;
+ smap_init_progs(psock, stab, verdict, parse);
+ smap_start_sock(psock, sock);
+ }
+
+ /* 4. Place psock in sockmap for use and stop any programs on
+ * the old sock assuming its not the same sock we are replacing
+ * it with. Because we can only have a single set of programs if
+ * old_sock has a strp we can stop it.
+ */
+ list_add_tail(&e->list, &psock->maps);
+ write_unlock_bh(&sock->sk_callback_lock);
+
+ osock = xchg(&stab->sock_map[i], sock);
+ if (osock) {
+ struct smap_psock *opsock = smap_psock_sk(osock);
+
+ write_lock_bh(&osock->sk_callback_lock);
+ if (osock != sock && parse)
+ smap_stop_sock(opsock, osock);
+ smap_list_remove(opsock, &stab->sock_map[i]);
+ smap_release_sock(opsock, osock);
+ write_unlock_bh(&osock->sk_callback_lock);
+ }
+ return 0;
+out_free:
+ smap_release_sock(psock, sock);
+out_progs:
+ if (verdict)
+ bpf_prog_put(verdict);
+ if (parse)
+ bpf_prog_put(parse);
+ write_unlock_bh(&sock->sk_callback_lock);
+ kfree(e);
+ return err;
+}
+
+int sock_map_attach_prog(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 type)
+{
+ struct bpf_stab *stab = container_of(map, struct bpf_stab, map);
+ struct bpf_prog *orig;
+
+ if (unlikely(map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ switch (type) {
+ case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER:
+ orig = xchg(&stab->bpf_parse, prog);
+ break;
+ case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT:
+ orig = xchg(&stab->bpf_verdict, prog);
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+
+ if (orig)
+ bpf_prog_put(orig);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void *sock_map_lookup(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static int sock_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map,
+ void *key, void *value, u64 flags)
+{
+ struct bpf_sock_ops_kern skops;
+ u32 fd = *(u32 *)value;
+ struct socket *socket;
+ int err;
+
+ socket = sockfd_lookup(fd, &err);
+ if (!socket)
+ return err;
+
+ skops.sk = socket->sk;
+ if (!skops.sk) {
+ fput(socket->file);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ err = sock_map_ctx_update_elem(&skops, map, key, flags);
+ fput(socket->file);
+ return err;
+}
+
+const struct bpf_map_ops sock_map_ops = {
+ .map_alloc = sock_map_alloc,
+ .map_free = sock_map_free,
+ .map_lookup_elem = sock_map_lookup,
+ .map_get_next_key = sock_map_get_next_key,
+ .map_update_elem = sock_map_update_elem,
+ .map_delete_elem = sock_map_delete_elem,
+};
+
+BPF_CALL_4(bpf_sock_map_update, struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *, bpf_sock,
+ struct bpf_map *, map, void *, key, u64, flags)
+{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
+ return sock_map_ctx_update_elem(bpf_sock, map, key, flags);
+}
+
+const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sock_map_update_proto = {
+ .func = bpf_sock_map_update,
+ .gpl_only = false,
+ .pkt_access = true,
+ .ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
+ .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_CTX,
+ .arg2_type = ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR,
+ .arg3_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_KEY,
+ .arg4_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
+};
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
index 31147d730abf..135be433e9a0 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
@@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ static int prealloc_elems_and_freelist(struct bpf_stack_map *smap)
u32 elem_size = sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket) + smap->map.value_size;
int err;
- smap->elems = bpf_map_area_alloc(elem_size * smap->map.max_entries);
+ smap->elems = bpf_map_area_alloc(elem_size * smap->map.max_entries,
+ smap->map.numa_node);
if (!smap->elems)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -59,7 +60,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *stack_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
- if (attr->map_flags)
+ if (attr->map_flags & ~BPF_F_NUMA_NODE)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
/* check sanity of attributes */
@@ -75,7 +76,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *stack_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
if (cost >= U32_MAX - PAGE_SIZE)
return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
- smap = bpf_map_area_alloc(cost);
+ smap = bpf_map_area_alloc(cost, bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr));
if (!smap)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
@@ -91,6 +92,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *stack_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
smap->map.map_flags = attr->map_flags;
smap->n_buckets = n_buckets;
smap->map.pages = round_up(cost, PAGE_SIZE) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ smap->map.numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
err = bpf_map_precharge_memlock(smap->map.pages);
if (err)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 6c772adabad2..70ad8e220343 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -48,6 +48,47 @@ static const struct bpf_map_ops * const bpf_map_types[] = {
#undef BPF_MAP_TYPE
};
+/*
+ * If we're handed a bigger struct than we know of, ensure all the unknown bits
+ * are 0 - i.e. new user-space does not rely on any kernel feature extensions
+ * we don't know about yet.
+ *
+ * There is a ToCToU between this function call and the following
+ * copy_from_user() call. However, this is not a concern since this function is
+ * meant to be a future-proofing of bits.
+ */
+static int check_uarg_tail_zero(void __user *uaddr,
+ size_t expected_size,
+ size_t actual_size)
+{
+ unsigned char __user *addr;
+ unsigned char __user *end;
+ unsigned char val;
+ int err;
+
+ if (unlikely(actual_size > PAGE_SIZE)) /* silly large */
+ return -E2BIG;
+
+ if (unlikely(!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, uaddr, actual_size)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ if (actual_size <= expected_size)
+ return 0;
+
+ addr = uaddr + expected_size;
+ end = uaddr + actual_size;
+
+ for (; addr < end; addr++) {
+ err = get_user(val, addr);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ if (val)
+ return -E2BIG;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static struct bpf_map *find_and_alloc_map(union bpf_attr *attr)
{
struct bpf_map *map;
@@ -64,7 +105,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *find_and_alloc_map(union bpf_attr *attr)
return map;
}
-void *bpf_map_area_alloc(size_t size)
+void *bpf_map_area_alloc(size_t size, int numa_node)
{
/* We definitely need __GFP_NORETRY, so OOM killer doesn't
* trigger under memory pressure as we really just want to
@@ -74,12 +115,13 @@ void *bpf_map_area_alloc(size_t size)
void *area;
if (size <= (PAGE_SIZE << PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)) {
- area = kmalloc(size, GFP_USER | flags);
+ area = kmalloc_node(size, GFP_USER | flags, numa_node);
if (area != NULL)
return area;
}
- return __vmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL | flags, PAGE_KERNEL);
+ return __vmalloc_node_flags_caller(size, numa_node, GFP_KERNEL | flags,
+ __builtin_return_address(0));
}
void bpf_map_area_free(void *area)
@@ -268,10 +310,11 @@ int bpf_map_new_fd(struct bpf_map *map)
offsetof(union bpf_attr, CMD##_LAST_FIELD) - \
sizeof(attr->CMD##_LAST_FIELD)) != NULL
-#define BPF_MAP_CREATE_LAST_FIELD inner_map_fd
+#define BPF_MAP_CREATE_LAST_FIELD numa_node
/* called via syscall */
static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
{
+ int numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
struct bpf_map *map;
int err;
@@ -279,6 +322,11 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
if (err)
return -EINVAL;
+ if (numa_node != NUMA_NO_NODE &&
+ ((unsigned int)numa_node >= nr_node_ids ||
+ !node_online(numa_node)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
/* find map type and init map: hashtable vs rbtree vs bloom vs ... */
map = find_and_alloc_map(attr);
if (IS_ERR(map))
@@ -870,7 +918,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_inc(struct bpf_prog *prog)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_prog_inc);
/* prog_idr_lock should have been held */
-static struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_inc_not_zero(struct bpf_prog *prog)
+struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_inc_not_zero(struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
int refold;
@@ -886,6 +934,7 @@ static struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_inc_not_zero(struct bpf_prog *prog)
return prog;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_prog_inc_not_zero);
static struct bpf_prog *__bpf_prog_get(u32 ufd, enum bpf_prog_type *type)
{
@@ -1047,6 +1096,36 @@ static int bpf_obj_get(const union bpf_attr *attr)
#define BPF_PROG_ATTACH_LAST_FIELD attach_flags
+static int sockmap_get_from_fd(const union bpf_attr *attr)
+{
+ int ufd = attr->target_fd;
+ struct bpf_prog *prog;
+ struct bpf_map *map;
+ struct fd f;
+ int err;
+
+ f = fdget(ufd);
+ map = __bpf_map_get(f);
+ if (IS_ERR(map))
+ return PTR_ERR(map);
+
+ prog = bpf_prog_get_type(attr->attach_bpf_fd, BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB);
+ if (IS_ERR(prog)) {
+ fdput(f);
+ return PTR_ERR(prog);
+ }
+
+ err = sock_map_attach_prog(map, prog, attr->attach_type);
+ if (err) {
+ fdput(f);
+ bpf_prog_put(prog);
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ fdput(f);
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int bpf_prog_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr)
{
enum bpf_prog_type ptype;
@@ -1074,6 +1153,9 @@ static int bpf_prog_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr)
case BPF_CGROUP_SOCK_OPS:
ptype = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS;
break;
+ case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER:
+ case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT:
+ return sockmap_get_from_fd(attr);
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -1246,32 +1328,6 @@ static int bpf_map_get_fd_by_id(const union bpf_attr *attr)
return fd;
}
-static int check_uarg_tail_zero(void __user *uaddr,
- size_t expected_size,
- size_t actual_size)
-{
- unsigned char __user *addr;
- unsigned char __user *end;
- unsigned char val;
- int err;
-
- if (actual_size <= expected_size)
- return 0;
-
- addr = uaddr + expected_size;
- end = uaddr + actual_size;
-
- for (; addr < end; addr++) {
- err = get_user(val, addr);
- if (err)
- return err;
- if (val)
- return -E2BIG;
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
static int bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(struct bpf_prog *prog,
const union bpf_attr *attr,
union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
@@ -1393,17 +1449,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(bpf, int, cmd, union bpf_attr __user *, uattr, unsigned int, siz
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) && sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled)
return -EPERM;
- if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, uattr, 1))
- return -EFAULT;
-
- if (size > PAGE_SIZE) /* silly large */
- return -E2BIG;
-
- /* If we're handed a bigger struct than we know of,
- * ensure all the unknown bits are 0 - i.e. new
- * user-space does not rely on any kernel feature
- * extensions we dont know about yet.
- */
err = check_uarg_tail_zero(uattr, sizeof(attr), size);
if (err)
return err;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/tnum.c b/kernel/bpf/tnum.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1f4bf68c12db
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/bpf/tnum.c
@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
+/* tnum: tracked (or tristate) numbers
+ *
+ * A tnum tracks knowledge about the bits of a value. Each bit can be either
+ * known (0 or 1), or unknown (x). Arithmetic operations on tnums will
+ * propagate the unknown bits such that the tnum result represents all the
+ * possible results for possible values of the operands.
+ */
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/tnum.h>
+
+#define TNUM(_v, _m) (struct tnum){.value = _v, .mask = _m}
+/* A completely unknown value */
+const struct tnum tnum_unknown = { .value = 0, .mask = -1 };
+
+struct tnum tnum_const(u64 value)
+{
+ return TNUM(value, 0);
+}
+
+struct tnum tnum_range(u64 min, u64 max)
+{
+ u64 chi = min ^ max, delta;
+ u8 bits = fls64(chi);
+
+ /* special case, needed because 1ULL << 64 is undefined */
+ if (bits > 63)
+ return tnum_unknown;
+ /* e.g. if chi = 4, bits = 3, delta = (1<<3) - 1 = 7.
+ * if chi = 0, bits = 0, delta = (1<<0) - 1 = 0, so we return
+ * constant min (since min == max).
+ */
+ delta = (1ULL << bits) - 1;
+ return TNUM(min & ~delta, delta);
+}
+
+struct tnum tnum_lshift(struct tnum a, u8 shift)
+{
+ return TNUM(a.value << shift, a.mask << shift);
+}
+
+struct tnum tnum_rshift(struct tnum a, u8 shift)
+{
+ return TNUM(a.value >> shift, a.mask >> shift);
+}
+
+struct tnum tnum_add(struct tnum a, struct tnum b)
+{
+ u64 sm, sv, sigma, chi, mu;
+
+ sm = a.mask + b.mask;
+ sv = a.value + b.value;
+ sigma = sm + sv;
+ chi = sigma ^ sv;
+ mu = chi | a.mask | b.mask;
+ return TNUM(sv & ~mu, mu);
+}
+
+struct tnum tnum_sub(struct tnum a, struct tnum b)
+{
+ u64 dv, alpha, beta, chi, mu;
+
+ dv = a.value - b.value;
+ alpha = dv + a.mask;
+ beta = dv - b.mask;
+ chi = alpha ^ beta;
+ mu = chi | a.mask | b.mask;
+ return TNUM(dv & ~mu, mu);
+}
+
+struct tnum tnum_and(struct tnum a, struct tnum b)
+{
+ u64 alpha, beta, v;
+
+ alpha = a.value | a.mask;
+ beta = b.value | b.mask;
+ v = a.value & b.value;
+ return TNUM(v, alpha & beta & ~v);
+}
+
+struct tnum tnum_or(struct tnum a, struct tnum b)
+{
+ u64 v, mu;
+
+ v = a.value | b.value;
+ mu = a.mask | b.mask;
+ return TNUM(v, mu & ~v);
+}
+
+struct tnum tnum_xor(struct tnum a, struct tnum b)
+{
+ u64 v, mu;
+
+ v = a.value ^ b.value;
+ mu = a.mask | b.mask;
+ return TNUM(v & ~mu, mu);
+}
+
+/* half-multiply add: acc += (unknown * mask * value).
+ * An intermediate step in the multiply algorithm.
+ */
+static struct tnum hma(struct tnum acc, u64 value, u64 mask)
+{
+ while (mask) {
+ if (mask & 1)
+ acc = tnum_add(acc, TNUM(0, value));
+ mask >>= 1;
+ value <<= 1;
+ }
+ return acc;
+}
+
+struct tnum tnum_mul(struct tnum a, struct tnum b)
+{
+ struct tnum acc;
+ u64 pi;
+
+ pi = a.value * b.value;
+ acc = hma(TNUM(pi, 0), a.mask, b.mask | b.value);
+ return hma(acc, b.mask, a.value);
+}
+
+/* Note that if a and b disagree - i.e. one has a 'known 1' where the other has
+ * a 'known 0' - this will return a 'known 1' for that bit.
+ */
+struct tnum tnum_intersect(struct tnum a, struct tnum b)
+{
+ u64 v, mu;
+
+ v = a.value | b.value;
+ mu = a.mask & b.mask;
+ return TNUM(v & ~mu, mu);
+}
+
+struct tnum tnum_cast(struct tnum a, u8 size)
+{
+ a.value &= (1ULL << (size * 8)) - 1;
+ a.mask &= (1ULL << (size * 8)) - 1;
+ return a;
+}
+
+bool tnum_is_aligned(struct tnum a, u64 size)
+{
+ if (!size)
+ return true;
+ return !((a.value | a.mask) & (size - 1));
+}
+
+bool tnum_in(struct tnum a, struct tnum b)
+{
+ if (b.mask & ~a.mask)
+ return false;
+ b.value &= ~a.mask;
+ return a.value == b.value;
+}
+
+int tnum_strn(char *str, size_t size, struct tnum a)
+{
+ return snprintf(str, size, "(%#llx; %#llx)", a.value, a.mask);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tnum_strn);
+
+int tnum_sbin(char *str, size_t size, struct tnum a)
+{
+ size_t n;
+
+ for (n = 64; n; n--) {
+ if (n < size) {
+ if (a.mask & 1)
+ str[n - 1] = 'x';
+ else if (a.value & 1)
+ str[n - 1] = '1';
+ else
+ str[n - 1] = '0';
+ }
+ a.mask >>= 1;
+ a.value >>= 1;
+ }
+ str[min(size - 1, (size_t)64)] = 0;
+ return 64;
+}
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 664d93972373..d690c7dd1f1a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -61,12 +61,12 @@
* (and -20 constant is saved for further stack bounds checking).
* Meaning that this reg is a pointer to stack plus known immediate constant.
*
- * Most of the time the registers have UNKNOWN_VALUE type, which
+ * Most of the time the registers have SCALAR_VALUE type, which
* means the register has some value, but it's not a valid pointer.
- * (like pointer plus pointer becomes UNKNOWN_VALUE type)
+ * (like pointer plus pointer becomes SCALAR_VALUE type)
*
* When verifier sees load or store instructions the type of base register
- * can be: PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE, PTR_TO_CTX, FRAME_PTR. These are three pointer
+ * can be: PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE, PTR_TO_CTX, PTR_TO_STACK. These are three pointer
* types recognized by check_mem_access() function.
*
* PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE means that this register is pointing to 'map element value'
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem {
struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem *next;
};
-#define BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_INSNS 98304
+#define BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_INSNS 131072
#define BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_STACK 1024
#define BPF_MAP_PTR_POISON ((void *)0xeB9F + POISON_POINTER_DELTA)
@@ -180,15 +180,12 @@ static __printf(1, 2) void verbose(const char *fmt, ...)
/* string representation of 'enum bpf_reg_type' */
static const char * const reg_type_str[] = {
[NOT_INIT] = "?",
- [UNKNOWN_VALUE] = "inv",
+ [SCALAR_VALUE] = "inv",
[PTR_TO_CTX] = "ctx",
[CONST_PTR_TO_MAP] = "map_ptr",
[PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE] = "map_value",
[PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL] = "map_value_or_null",
- [PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ] = "map_value_adj",
- [FRAME_PTR] = "fp",
[PTR_TO_STACK] = "fp",
- [CONST_IMM] = "imm",
[PTR_TO_PACKET] = "pkt",
[PTR_TO_PACKET_END] = "pkt_end",
};
@@ -221,32 +218,52 @@ static void print_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *state)
if (t == NOT_INIT)
continue;
verbose(" R%d=%s", i, reg_type_str[t]);
- if (t == CONST_IMM || t == PTR_TO_STACK)
- verbose("%lld", reg->imm);
- else if (t == PTR_TO_PACKET)
- verbose("(id=%d,off=%d,r=%d)",
- reg->id, reg->off, reg->range);
- else if (t == UNKNOWN_VALUE && reg->imm)
- verbose("%lld", reg->imm);
- else if (t == CONST_PTR_TO_MAP || t == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE ||
- t == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL ||
- t == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ)
- verbose("(ks=%d,vs=%d,id=%u)",
- reg->map_ptr->key_size,
- reg->map_ptr->value_size,
- reg->id);
- if (reg->min_value != BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE)
- verbose(",min_value=%lld",
- (long long)reg->min_value);
- if (reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE)
- verbose(",max_value=%llu",
- (unsigned long long)reg->max_value);
- if (reg->min_align)
- verbose(",min_align=%u", reg->min_align);
- if (reg->aux_off)
- verbose(",aux_off=%u", reg->aux_off);
- if (reg->aux_off_align)
- verbose(",aux_off_align=%u", reg->aux_off_align);
+ if ((t == SCALAR_VALUE || t == PTR_TO_STACK) &&
+ tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) {
+ /* reg->off should be 0 for SCALAR_VALUE */
+ verbose("%lld", reg->var_off.value + reg->off);
+ } else {
+ verbose("(id=%d", reg->id);
+ if (t != SCALAR_VALUE)
+ verbose(",off=%d", reg->off);
+ if (t == PTR_TO_PACKET)
+ verbose(",r=%d", reg->range);
+ else if (t == CONST_PTR_TO_MAP ||
+ t == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE ||
+ t == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL)
+ verbose(",ks=%d,vs=%d",
+ reg->map_ptr->key_size,
+ reg->map_ptr->value_size);
+ if (tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) {
+ /* Typically an immediate SCALAR_VALUE, but
+ * could be a pointer whose offset is too big
+ * for reg->off
+ */
+ verbose(",imm=%llx", reg->var_off.value);
+ } else {
+ if (reg->smin_value != reg->umin_value &&
+ reg->smin_value != S64_MIN)
+ verbose(",smin_value=%lld",
+ (long long)reg->smin_value);
+ if (reg->smax_value != reg->umax_value &&
+ reg->smax_value != S64_MAX)
+ verbose(",smax_value=%lld",
+ (long long)reg->smax_value);
+ if (reg->umin_value != 0)
+ verbose(",umin_value=%llu",
+ (unsigned long long)reg->umin_value);
+ if (reg->umax_value != U64_MAX)
+ verbose(",umax_value=%llu",
+ (unsigned long long)reg->umax_value);
+ if (!tnum_is_unknown(reg->var_off)) {
+ char tn_buf[48];
+
+ tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), reg->var_off);
+ verbose(",var_off=%s", tn_buf);
+ }
+ }
+ verbose(")");
+ }
}
for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i += BPF_REG_SIZE) {
if (state->stack_slot_type[i] == STACK_SPILL)
@@ -295,11 +312,15 @@ static const char *const bpf_jmp_string[16] = {
[BPF_JA >> 4] = "jmp",
[BPF_JEQ >> 4] = "==",
[BPF_JGT >> 4] = ">",
+ [BPF_JLT >> 4] = "<",
[BPF_JGE >> 4] = ">=",
+ [BPF_JLE >> 4] = "<=",
[BPF_JSET >> 4] = "&",
[BPF_JNE >> 4] = "!=",
[BPF_JSGT >> 4] = "s>",
+ [BPF_JSLT >> 4] = "s<",
[BPF_JSGE >> 4] = "s>=",
+ [BPF_JSLE >> 4] = "s<=",
[BPF_CALL >> 4] = "call",
[BPF_EXIT >> 4] = "exit",
};
@@ -463,56 +484,163 @@ static const int caller_saved[CALLER_SAVED_REGS] = {
BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_5
};
-static void mark_reg_not_init(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno)
+static void __mark_reg_not_init(struct bpf_reg_state *reg);
+
+/* Mark the unknown part of a register (variable offset or scalar value) as
+ * known to have the value @imm.
+ */
+static void __mark_reg_known(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, u64 imm)
{
- BUG_ON(regno >= MAX_BPF_REG);
+ reg->id = 0;
+ reg->var_off = tnum_const(imm);
+ reg->smin_value = (s64)imm;
+ reg->smax_value = (s64)imm;
+ reg->umin_value = imm;
+ reg->umax_value = imm;
+}
- memset(&regs[regno], 0, sizeof(regs[regno]));
- regs[regno].type = NOT_INIT;
- regs[regno].min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE;
- regs[regno].max_value = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE;
+/* Mark the 'variable offset' part of a register as zero. This should be
+ * used only on registers holding a pointer type.
+ */
+static void __mark_reg_known_zero(struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
+{
+ __mark_reg_known(reg, 0);
}
-static void init_reg_state(struct bpf_reg_state *regs)
+static void mark_reg_known_zero(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno)
{
- int i;
+ if (WARN_ON(regno >= MAX_BPF_REG)) {
+ verbose("mark_reg_known_zero(regs, %u)\n", regno);
+ /* Something bad happened, let's kill all regs */
+ for (regno = 0; regno < MAX_BPF_REG; regno++)
+ __mark_reg_not_init(regs + regno);
+ return;
+ }
+ __mark_reg_known_zero(regs + regno);
+}
- for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++)
- mark_reg_not_init(regs, i);
+/* Attempts to improve min/max values based on var_off information */
+static void __update_reg_bounds(struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
+{
+ /* min signed is max(sign bit) | min(other bits) */
+ reg->smin_value = max_t(s64, reg->smin_value,
+ reg->var_off.value | (reg->var_off.mask & S64_MIN));
+ /* max signed is min(sign bit) | max(other bits) */
+ reg->smax_value = min_t(s64, reg->smax_value,
+ reg->var_off.value | (reg->var_off.mask & S64_MAX));
+ reg->umin_value = max(reg->umin_value, reg->var_off.value);
+ reg->umax_value = min(reg->umax_value,
+ reg->var_off.value | reg->var_off.mask);
+}
- /* frame pointer */
- regs[BPF_REG_FP].type = FRAME_PTR;
+/* Uses signed min/max values to inform unsigned, and vice-versa */
+static void __reg_deduce_bounds(struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
+{
+ /* Learn sign from signed bounds.
+ * If we cannot cross the sign boundary, then signed and unsigned bounds
+ * are the same, so combine. This works even in the negative case, e.g.
+ * -3 s<= x s<= -1 implies 0xf...fd u<= x u<= 0xf...ff.
+ */
+ if (reg->smin_value >= 0 || reg->smax_value < 0) {
+ reg->smin_value = reg->umin_value = max_t(u64, reg->smin_value,
+ reg->umin_value);
+ reg->smax_value = reg->umax_value = min_t(u64, reg->smax_value,
+ reg->umax_value);
+ return;
+ }
+ /* Learn sign from unsigned bounds. Signed bounds cross the sign
+ * boundary, so we must be careful.
+ */
+ if ((s64)reg->umax_value >= 0) {
+ /* Positive. We can't learn anything from the smin, but smax
+ * is positive, hence safe.
+ */
+ reg->smin_value = reg->umin_value;
+ reg->smax_value = reg->umax_value = min_t(u64, reg->smax_value,
+ reg->umax_value);
+ } else if ((s64)reg->umin_value < 0) {
+ /* Negative. We can't learn anything from the smax, but smin
+ * is negative, hence safe.
+ */
+ reg->smin_value = reg->umin_value = max_t(u64, reg->smin_value,
+ reg->umin_value);
+ reg->smax_value = reg->umax_value;
+ }
+}
- /* 1st arg to a function */
- regs[BPF_REG_1].type = PTR_TO_CTX;
+/* Attempts to improve var_off based on unsigned min/max information */
+static void __reg_bound_offset(struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
+{
+ reg->var_off = tnum_intersect(reg->var_off,
+ tnum_range(reg->umin_value,
+ reg->umax_value));
}
-static void __mark_reg_unknown_value(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno)
+/* Reset the min/max bounds of a register */
+static void __mark_reg_unbounded(struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
{
- regs[regno].type = UNKNOWN_VALUE;
- regs[regno].id = 0;
- regs[regno].imm = 0;
+ reg->smin_value = S64_MIN;
+ reg->smax_value = S64_MAX;
+ reg->umin_value = 0;
+ reg->umax_value = U64_MAX;
}
-static void mark_reg_unknown_value(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno)
+/* Mark a register as having a completely unknown (scalar) value. */
+static void __mark_reg_unknown(struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
{
- BUG_ON(regno >= MAX_BPF_REG);
- __mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, regno);
+ reg->type = SCALAR_VALUE;
+ reg->id = 0;
+ reg->off = 0;
+ reg->var_off = tnum_unknown;
+ __mark_reg_unbounded(reg);
}
-static void reset_reg_range_values(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno)
+static void mark_reg_unknown(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno)
{
- regs[regno].min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE;
- regs[regno].max_value = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE;
- regs[regno].value_from_signed = false;
- regs[regno].min_align = 0;
+ if (WARN_ON(regno >= MAX_BPF_REG)) {
+ verbose("mark_reg_unknown(regs, %u)\n", regno);
+ /* Something bad happened, let's kill all regs */
+ for (regno = 0; regno < MAX_BPF_REG; regno++)
+ __mark_reg_not_init(regs + regno);
+ return;
+ }
+ __mark_reg_unknown(regs + regno);
}
-static void mark_reg_unknown_value_and_range(struct bpf_reg_state *regs,
- u32 regno)
+static void __mark_reg_not_init(struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
+{
+ __mark_reg_unknown(reg);
+ reg->type = NOT_INIT;
+}
+
+static void mark_reg_not_init(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno)
{
- mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, regno);
- reset_reg_range_values(regs, regno);
+ if (WARN_ON(regno >= MAX_BPF_REG)) {
+ verbose("mark_reg_not_init(regs, %u)\n", regno);
+ /* Something bad happened, let's kill all regs */
+ for (regno = 0; regno < MAX_BPF_REG; regno++)
+ __mark_reg_not_init(regs + regno);
+ return;
+ }
+ __mark_reg_not_init(regs + regno);
+}
+
+static void init_reg_state(struct bpf_reg_state *regs)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) {
+ mark_reg_not_init(regs, i);
+ regs[i].live = REG_LIVE_NONE;
+ }
+
+ /* frame pointer */
+ regs[BPF_REG_FP].type = PTR_TO_STACK;
+ mark_reg_known_zero(regs, BPF_REG_FP);
+
+ /* 1st arg to a function */
+ regs[BPF_REG_1].type = PTR_TO_CTX;
+ mark_reg_known_zero(regs, BPF_REG_1);
}
enum reg_arg_type {
@@ -521,9 +649,26 @@ enum reg_arg_type {
DST_OP_NO_MARK /* same as above, check only, don't mark */
};
-static int check_reg_arg(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno,
+static void mark_reg_read(const struct bpf_verifier_state *state, u32 regno)
+{
+ struct bpf_verifier_state *parent = state->parent;
+
+ while (parent) {
+ /* if read wasn't screened by an earlier write ... */
+ if (state->regs[regno].live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN)
+ break;
+ /* ... then we depend on parent's value */
+ parent->regs[regno].live |= REG_LIVE_READ;
+ state = parent;
+ parent = state->parent;
+ }
+}
+
+static int check_reg_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
enum reg_arg_type t)
{
+ struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs;
+
if (regno >= MAX_BPF_REG) {
verbose("R%d is invalid\n", regno);
return -EINVAL;
@@ -535,14 +680,16 @@ static int check_reg_arg(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno,
verbose("R%d !read_ok\n", regno);
return -EACCES;
}
+ mark_reg_read(&env->cur_state, regno);
} else {
/* check whether register used as dest operand can be written to */
if (regno == BPF_REG_FP) {
verbose("frame pointer is read only\n");
return -EACCES;
}
+ regs[regno].live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN;
if (t == DST_OP)
- mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, regno);
+ mark_reg_unknown(regs, regno);
}
return 0;
}
@@ -552,12 +699,10 @@ static bool is_spillable_regtype(enum bpf_reg_type type)
switch (type) {
case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE:
case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL:
- case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ:
case PTR_TO_STACK:
case PTR_TO_CTX:
case PTR_TO_PACKET:
case PTR_TO_PACKET_END:
- case FRAME_PTR:
case CONST_PTR_TO_MAP:
return true;
default:
@@ -571,7 +716,7 @@ static bool is_spillable_regtype(enum bpf_reg_type type)
static int check_stack_write(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int off,
int size, int value_regno)
{
- int i;
+ int i, spi = (MAX_BPF_STACK + off) / BPF_REG_SIZE;
/* caller checked that off % size == 0 and -MAX_BPF_STACK <= off < 0,
* so it's aligned access and [off, off + size) are within stack limits
*/
@@ -586,15 +731,14 @@ static int check_stack_write(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int off,
}
/* save register state */
- state->spilled_regs[(MAX_BPF_STACK + off) / BPF_REG_SIZE] =
- state->regs[value_regno];
+ state->spilled_regs[spi] = state->regs[value_regno];
+ state->spilled_regs[spi].live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN;
for (i = 0; i < BPF_REG_SIZE; i++)
state->stack_slot_type[MAX_BPF_STACK + off + i] = STACK_SPILL;
} else {
/* regular write of data into stack */
- state->spilled_regs[(MAX_BPF_STACK + off) / BPF_REG_SIZE] =
- (struct bpf_reg_state) {};
+ state->spilled_regs[spi] = (struct bpf_reg_state) {};
for (i = 0; i < size; i++)
state->stack_slot_type[MAX_BPF_STACK + off + i] = STACK_MISC;
@@ -602,11 +746,26 @@ static int check_stack_write(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int off,
return 0;
}
+static void mark_stack_slot_read(const struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int slot)
+{
+ struct bpf_verifier_state *parent = state->parent;
+
+ while (parent) {
+ /* if read wasn't screened by an earlier write ... */
+ if (state->spilled_regs[slot].live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN)
+ break;
+ /* ... then we depend on parent's value */
+ parent->spilled_regs[slot].live |= REG_LIVE_READ;
+ state = parent;
+ parent = state->parent;
+ }
+}
+
static int check_stack_read(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int off, int size,
int value_regno)
{
u8 *slot_type;
- int i;
+ int i, spi;
slot_type = &state->stack_slot_type[MAX_BPF_STACK + off];
@@ -622,10 +781,13 @@ static int check_stack_read(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int off, int size,
}
}
- if (value_regno >= 0)
+ spi = (MAX_BPF_STACK + off) / BPF_REG_SIZE;
+
+ if (value_regno >= 0) {
/* restore register state from stack */
- state->regs[value_regno] =
- state->spilled_regs[(MAX_BPF_STACK + off) / BPF_REG_SIZE];
+ state->regs[value_regno] = state->spilled_regs[spi];
+ mark_stack_slot_read(state, spi);
+ }
return 0;
} else {
for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
@@ -637,14 +799,13 @@ static int check_stack_read(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int off, int size,
}
if (value_regno >= 0)
/* have read misc data from the stack */
- mark_reg_unknown_value_and_range(state->regs,
- value_regno);
+ mark_reg_unknown(state->regs, value_regno);
return 0;
}
}
/* check read/write into map element returned by bpf_map_lookup_elem() */
-static int check_map_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off,
+static int __check_map_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off,
int size)
{
struct bpf_map *map = env->cur_state.regs[regno].map_ptr;
@@ -657,49 +818,50 @@ static int check_map_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off,
return 0;
}
-/* check read/write into an adjusted map element */
-static int check_map_access_adj(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
+/* check read/write into a map element with possible variable offset */
+static int check_map_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
int off, int size)
{
struct bpf_verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state;
struct bpf_reg_state *reg = &state->regs[regno];
int err;
- /* We adjusted the register to this map value, so we
- * need to change off and size to min_value and max_value
- * respectively to make sure our theoretical access will be
- * safe.
+ /* We may have adjusted the register to this map value, so we
+ * need to try adding each of min_value and max_value to off
+ * to make sure our theoretical access will be safe.
*/
if (log_level)
print_verifier_state(state);
- env->varlen_map_value_access = true;
/* The minimum value is only important with signed
* comparisons where we can't assume the floor of a
* value is 0. If we are using signed variables for our
* index'es we need to make sure that whatever we use
* will have a set floor within our range.
*/
- if (reg->min_value < 0) {
+ if (reg->smin_value < 0) {
verbose("R%d min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.\n",
regno);
return -EACCES;
}
- err = check_map_access(env, regno, reg->min_value + off, size);
+ err = __check_map_access(env, regno, reg->smin_value + off, size);
if (err) {
- verbose("R%d min value is outside of the array range\n",
- regno);
+ verbose("R%d min value is outside of the array range\n", regno);
return err;
}
- /* If we haven't set a max value then we need to bail
- * since we can't be sure we won't do bad things.
+ /* If we haven't set a max value then we need to bail since we can't be
+ * sure we won't do bad things.
+ * If reg->umax_value + off could overflow, treat that as unbounded too.
*/
- if (reg->max_value == BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) {
+ if (reg->umax_value >= BPF_MAX_VAR_OFF) {
verbose("R%d unbounded memory access, make sure to bounds check any array access into a map\n",
regno);
return -EACCES;
}
- return check_map_access(env, regno, reg->max_value + off, size);
+ err = __check_map_access(env, regno, reg->umax_value + off, size);
+ if (err)
+ verbose("R%d max value is outside of the array range\n", regno);
+ return err;
}
#define MAX_PACKET_OFF 0xffff
@@ -719,6 +881,7 @@ static bool may_access_direct_pkt_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_ACT:
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP:
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT:
+ case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB:
if (meta)
return meta->pkt_access;
@@ -729,14 +892,13 @@ static bool may_access_direct_pkt_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
}
}
-static int check_packet_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off,
- int size)
+static int __check_packet_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
+ int off, int size)
{
struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs;
struct bpf_reg_state *reg = &regs[regno];
- off += reg->off;
- if (off < 0 || size <= 0 || off + size > reg->range) {
+ if (off < 0 || size <= 0 || (u64)off + size > reg->range) {
verbose("invalid access to packet, off=%d size=%d, R%d(id=%d,off=%d,r=%d)\n",
off, size, regno, reg->id, reg->off, reg->range);
return -EACCES;
@@ -744,7 +906,35 @@ static int check_packet_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off,
return 0;
}
-/* check access to 'struct bpf_context' fields */
+static int check_packet_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off,
+ int size)
+{
+ struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs;
+ struct bpf_reg_state *reg = &regs[regno];
+ int err;
+
+ /* We may have added a variable offset to the packet pointer; but any
+ * reg->range we have comes after that. We are only checking the fixed
+ * offset.
+ */
+
+ /* We don't allow negative numbers, because we aren't tracking enough
+ * detail to prove they're safe.
+ */
+ if (reg->smin_value < 0) {
+ verbose("R%d min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.\n",
+ regno);
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+ err = __check_packet_access(env, regno, off, size);
+ if (err) {
+ verbose("R%d offset is outside of the packet\n", regno);
+ return err;
+ }
+ return err;
+}
+
+/* check access to 'struct bpf_context' fields. Supports fixed offsets only */
static int check_ctx_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, int off, int size,
enum bpf_access_type t, enum bpf_reg_type *reg_type)
{
@@ -784,13 +974,7 @@ static bool __is_pointer_value(bool allow_ptr_leaks,
if (allow_ptr_leaks)
return false;
- switch (reg->type) {
- case UNKNOWN_VALUE:
- case CONST_IMM:
- return false;
- default:
- return true;
- }
+ return reg->type != SCALAR_VALUE;
}
static bool is_pointer_value(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno)
@@ -801,23 +985,13 @@ static bool is_pointer_value(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno)
static int check_pkt_ptr_alignment(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
int off, int size, bool strict)
{
+ struct tnum reg_off;
int ip_align;
- int reg_off;
/* Byte size accesses are always allowed. */
if (!strict || size == 1)
return 0;
- reg_off = reg->off;
- if (reg->id) {
- if (reg->aux_off_align % size) {
- verbose("Packet access is only %u byte aligned, %d byte access not allowed\n",
- reg->aux_off_align, size);
- return -EACCES;
- }
- reg_off += reg->aux_off;
- }
-
/* For platforms that do not have a Kconfig enabling
* CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS the value of
* NET_IP_ALIGN is universally set to '2'. And on platforms
@@ -827,20 +1001,37 @@ static int check_pkt_ptr_alignment(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
* unconditional IP align value of '2'.
*/
ip_align = 2;
- if ((ip_align + reg_off + off) % size != 0) {
- verbose("misaligned packet access off %d+%d+%d size %d\n",
- ip_align, reg_off, off, size);
+
+ reg_off = tnum_add(reg->var_off, tnum_const(ip_align + reg->off + off));
+ if (!tnum_is_aligned(reg_off, size)) {
+ char tn_buf[48];
+
+ tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), reg->var_off);
+ verbose("misaligned packet access off %d+%s+%d+%d size %d\n",
+ ip_align, tn_buf, reg->off, off, size);
return -EACCES;
}
return 0;
}
-static int check_val_ptr_alignment(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
- int size, bool strict)
+static int check_generic_ptr_alignment(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
+ const char *pointer_desc,
+ int off, int size, bool strict)
{
- if (strict && size != 1) {
- verbose("Unknown alignment. Only byte-sized access allowed in value access.\n");
+ struct tnum reg_off;
+
+ /* Byte size accesses are always allowed. */
+ if (!strict || size == 1)
+ return 0;
+
+ reg_off = tnum_add(reg->var_off, tnum_const(reg->off + off));
+ if (!tnum_is_aligned(reg_off, size)) {
+ char tn_buf[48];
+
+ tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), reg->var_off);
+ verbose("misaligned %saccess off %s+%d+%d size %d\n",
+ pointer_desc, tn_buf, reg->off, off, size);
return -EACCES;
}
@@ -852,21 +1043,25 @@ static int check_ptr_alignment(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
int off, int size)
{
bool strict = env->strict_alignment;
+ const char *pointer_desc = "";
switch (reg->type) {
case PTR_TO_PACKET:
+ /* special case, because of NET_IP_ALIGN */
return check_pkt_ptr_alignment(reg, off, size, strict);
- case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ:
- return check_val_ptr_alignment(reg, size, strict);
+ case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE:
+ pointer_desc = "value ";
+ break;
+ case PTR_TO_CTX:
+ pointer_desc = "context ";
+ break;
+ case PTR_TO_STACK:
+ pointer_desc = "stack ";
+ break;
default:
- if (off % size != 0) {
- verbose("misaligned access off %d size %d\n",
- off, size);
- return -EACCES;
- }
-
- return 0;
+ break;
}
+ return check_generic_ptr_alignment(reg, pointer_desc, off, size, strict);
}
/* check whether memory at (regno + off) is accessible for t = (read | write)
@@ -883,52 +1078,79 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn
struct bpf_reg_state *reg = &state->regs[regno];
int size, err = 0;
- if (reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK)
- off += reg->imm;
-
size = bpf_size_to_bytes(bpf_size);
if (size < 0)
return size;
+ /* alignment checks will add in reg->off themselves */
err = check_ptr_alignment(env, reg, off, size);
if (err)
return err;
- if (reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE ||
- reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ) {
+ /* for access checks, reg->off is just part of off */
+ off += reg->off;
+
+ if (reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE) {
if (t == BPF_WRITE && value_regno >= 0 &&
is_pointer_value(env, value_regno)) {
verbose("R%d leaks addr into map\n", value_regno);
return -EACCES;
}
- if (reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ)
- err = check_map_access_adj(env, regno, off, size);
- else
- err = check_map_access(env, regno, off, size);
+ err = check_map_access(env, regno, off, size);
if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0)
- mark_reg_unknown_value_and_range(state->regs,
- value_regno);
+ mark_reg_unknown(state->regs, value_regno);
} else if (reg->type == PTR_TO_CTX) {
- enum bpf_reg_type reg_type = UNKNOWN_VALUE;
+ enum bpf_reg_type reg_type = SCALAR_VALUE;
if (t == BPF_WRITE && value_regno >= 0 &&
is_pointer_value(env, value_regno)) {
verbose("R%d leaks addr into ctx\n", value_regno);
return -EACCES;
}
+ /* ctx accesses must be at a fixed offset, so that we can
+ * determine what type of data were returned.
+ */
+ if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) {
+ char tn_buf[48];
+
+ tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), reg->var_off);
+ verbose("variable ctx access var_off=%s off=%d size=%d",
+ tn_buf, off, size);
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+ off += reg->var_off.value;
err = check_ctx_access(env, insn_idx, off, size, t, &reg_type);
if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) {
- mark_reg_unknown_value_and_range(state->regs,
- value_regno);
- /* note that reg.[id|off|range] == 0 */
+ /* ctx access returns either a scalar, or a
+ * PTR_TO_PACKET[_END]. In the latter case, we know
+ * the offset is zero.
+ */
+ if (reg_type == SCALAR_VALUE)
+ mark_reg_unknown(state->regs, value_regno);
+ else
+ mark_reg_known_zero(state->regs, value_regno);
+ state->regs[value_regno].id = 0;
+ state->regs[value_regno].off = 0;
+ state->regs[value_regno].range = 0;
state->regs[value_regno].type = reg_type;
- state->regs[value_regno].aux_off = 0;
- state->regs[value_regno].aux_off_align = 0;
}
- } else if (reg->type == FRAME_PTR || reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK) {
+ } else if (reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK) {
+ /* stack accesses must be at a fixed offset, so that we can
+ * determine what type of data were returned.
+ * See check_stack_read().
+ */
+ if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) {
+ char tn_buf[48];
+
+ tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), reg->var_off);
+ verbose("variable stack access var_off=%s off=%d size=%d",
+ tn_buf, off, size);
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+ off += reg->var_off.value;
if (off >= 0 || off < -MAX_BPF_STACK) {
verbose("invalid stack off=%d size=%d\n", off, size);
return -EACCES;
@@ -948,7 +1170,7 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn
} else {
err = check_stack_read(state, off, size, value_regno);
}
- } else if (state->regs[regno].type == PTR_TO_PACKET) {
+ } else if (reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET) {
if (t == BPF_WRITE && !may_access_direct_pkt_data(env, NULL, t)) {
verbose("cannot write into packet\n");
return -EACCES;
@@ -960,28 +1182,25 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn
}
err = check_packet_access(env, regno, off, size);
if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0)
- mark_reg_unknown_value_and_range(state->regs,
- value_regno);
+ mark_reg_unknown(state->regs, value_regno);
} else {
verbose("R%d invalid mem access '%s'\n",
regno, reg_type_str[reg->type]);
return -EACCES;
}
- if (!err && size <= 2 && value_regno >= 0 && env->allow_ptr_leaks &&
- state->regs[value_regno].type == UNKNOWN_VALUE) {
- /* 1 or 2 byte load zero-extends, determine the number of
- * zero upper bits. Not doing it fo 4 byte load, since
- * such values cannot be added to ptr_to_packet anyway.
- */
- state->regs[value_regno].imm = 64 - size * 8;
+ if (!err && size < BPF_REG_SIZE && value_regno >= 0 && t == BPF_READ &&
+ state->regs[value_regno].type == SCALAR_VALUE) {
+ /* b/h/w load zero-extends, mark upper bits as known 0 */
+ state->regs[value_regno].var_off = tnum_cast(
+ state->regs[value_regno].var_off, size);
+ __update_reg_bounds(&state->regs[value_regno]);
}
return err;
}
static int check_xadd(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_insn *insn)
{
- struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs;
int err;
if ((BPF_SIZE(insn->code) != BPF_W && BPF_SIZE(insn->code) != BPF_DW) ||
@@ -991,12 +1210,12 @@ static int check_xadd(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_ins
}
/* check src1 operand */
- err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP);
+ err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP);
if (err)
return err;
/* check src2 operand */
- err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP);
+ err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -1016,9 +1235,17 @@ static int check_xadd(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_ins
BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, -1);
}
+/* Does this register contain a constant zero? */
+static bool register_is_null(struct bpf_reg_state reg)
+{
+ return reg.type == SCALAR_VALUE && tnum_equals_const(reg.var_off, 0);
+}
+
/* when register 'regno' is passed into function that will read 'access_size'
* bytes from that pointer, make sure that it's within stack boundary
- * and all elements of stack are initialized
+ * and all elements of stack are initialized.
+ * Unlike most pointer bounds-checking functions, this one doesn't take an
+ * 'off' argument, so it has to add in reg->off itself.
*/
static int check_stack_boundary(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
int access_size, bool zero_size_allowed,
@@ -1029,9 +1256,9 @@ static int check_stack_boundary(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
int off, i;
if (regs[regno].type != PTR_TO_STACK) {
+ /* Allow zero-byte read from NULL, regardless of pointer type */
if (zero_size_allowed && access_size == 0 &&
- regs[regno].type == CONST_IMM &&
- regs[regno].imm == 0)
+ register_is_null(regs[regno]))
return 0;
verbose("R%d type=%s expected=%s\n", regno,
@@ -1040,7 +1267,15 @@ static int check_stack_boundary(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
return -EACCES;
}
- off = regs[regno].imm;
+ /* Only allow fixed-offset stack reads */
+ if (!tnum_is_const(regs[regno].var_off)) {
+ char tn_buf[48];
+
+ tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), regs[regno].var_off);
+ verbose("invalid variable stack read R%d var_off=%s\n",
+ regno, tn_buf);
+ }
+ off = regs[regno].off + regs[regno].var_off.value;
if (off >= 0 || off < -MAX_BPF_STACK || off + access_size > 0 ||
access_size <= 0) {
verbose("invalid stack type R%d off=%d access_size=%d\n",
@@ -1071,16 +1306,14 @@ static int check_helper_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
int access_size, bool zero_size_allowed,
struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta)
{
- struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs;
+ struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs, *reg = &regs[regno];
- switch (regs[regno].type) {
+ switch (reg->type) {
case PTR_TO_PACKET:
- return check_packet_access(env, regno, 0, access_size);
+ return check_packet_access(env, regno, reg->off, access_size);
case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE:
- return check_map_access(env, regno, 0, access_size);
- case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ:
- return check_map_access_adj(env, regno, 0, access_size);
- default: /* const_imm|ptr_to_stack or invalid ptr */
+ return check_map_access(env, regno, reg->off, access_size);
+ default: /* scalar_value|ptr_to_stack or invalid ptr */
return check_stack_boundary(env, regno, access_size,
zero_size_allowed, meta);
}
@@ -1097,10 +1330,9 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
if (arg_type == ARG_DONTCARE)
return 0;
- if (type == NOT_INIT) {
- verbose("R%d !read_ok\n", regno);
- return -EACCES;
- }
+ err = check_reg_arg(env, regno, SRC_OP);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
if (arg_type == ARG_ANYTHING) {
if (is_pointer_value(env, regno)) {
@@ -1123,11 +1355,8 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
goto err_type;
} else if (arg_type == ARG_CONST_SIZE ||
arg_type == ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO) {
- expected_type = CONST_IMM;
- /* One exception. Allow UNKNOWN_VALUE registers when the
- * boundaries are known and don't cause unsafe memory accesses
- */
- if (type != UNKNOWN_VALUE && type != expected_type)
+ expected_type = SCALAR_VALUE;
+ if (type != expected_type)
goto err_type;
} else if (arg_type == ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR) {
expected_type = CONST_PTR_TO_MAP;
@@ -1141,13 +1370,13 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM) {
expected_type = PTR_TO_STACK;
/* One exception here. In case function allows for NULL to be
- * passed in as argument, it's a CONST_IMM type. Final test
+ * passed in as argument, it's a SCALAR_VALUE type. Final test
* happens during stack boundary checking.
*/
- if (type == CONST_IMM && reg->imm == 0)
+ if (register_is_null(*reg))
/* final test in check_stack_boundary() */;
else if (type != PTR_TO_PACKET && type != PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE &&
- type != PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ && type != expected_type)
+ type != expected_type)
goto err_type;
meta->raw_mode = arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM;
} else {
@@ -1173,7 +1402,7 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
return -EACCES;
}
if (type == PTR_TO_PACKET)
- err = check_packet_access(env, regno, 0,
+ err = check_packet_access(env, regno, reg->off,
meta->map_ptr->key_size);
else
err = check_stack_boundary(env, regno,
@@ -1189,7 +1418,7 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
return -EACCES;
}
if (type == PTR_TO_PACKET)
- err = check_packet_access(env, regno, 0,
+ err = check_packet_access(env, regno, reg->off,
meta->map_ptr->value_size);
else
err = check_stack_boundary(env, regno,
@@ -1209,10 +1438,11 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
return -EACCES;
}
- /* If the register is UNKNOWN_VALUE, the access check happens
- * using its boundaries. Otherwise, just use its imm
+ /* The register is SCALAR_VALUE; the access check
+ * happens using its boundaries.
*/
- if (type == UNKNOWN_VALUE) {
+
+ if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off))
/* For unprivileged variable accesses, disable raw
* mode so that the program is required to
* initialize all the memory that the helper could
@@ -1220,35 +1450,28 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
*/
meta = NULL;
- if (reg->min_value < 0) {
- verbose("R%d min value is negative, either use unsigned or 'var &= const'\n",
- regno);
- return -EACCES;
- }
-
- if (reg->min_value == 0) {
- err = check_helper_mem_access(env, regno - 1, 0,
- zero_size_allowed,
- meta);
- if (err)
- return err;
- }
+ if (reg->smin_value < 0) {
+ verbose("R%d min value is negative, either use unsigned or 'var &= const'\n",
+ regno);
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
- if (reg->max_value == BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) {
- verbose("R%d unbounded memory access, use 'var &= const' or 'if (var < const)'\n",
- regno);
- return -EACCES;
- }
- err = check_helper_mem_access(env, regno - 1,
- reg->max_value,
- zero_size_allowed, meta);
+ if (reg->umin_value == 0) {
+ err = check_helper_mem_access(env, regno - 1, 0,
+ zero_size_allowed,
+ meta);
if (err)
return err;
- } else {
- /* register is CONST_IMM */
- err = check_helper_mem_access(env, regno - 1, reg->imm,
- zero_size_allowed, meta);
}
+
+ if (reg->umax_value >= BPF_MAX_VAR_SIZ) {
+ verbose("R%d unbounded memory access, use 'var &= const' or 'if (var < const)'\n",
+ regno);
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+ err = check_helper_mem_access(env, regno - 1,
+ reg->umax_value,
+ zero_size_allowed, meta);
}
return err;
@@ -1283,10 +1506,25 @@ static int check_map_func_compatibility(struct bpf_map *map, int func_id)
func_id != BPF_FUNC_current_task_under_cgroup)
goto error;
break;
+ /* devmap returns a pointer to a live net_device ifindex that we cannot
+ * allow to be modified from bpf side. So do not allow lookup elements
+ * for now.
+ */
+ case BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP:
+ if (func_id != BPF_FUNC_redirect_map)
+ goto error;
+ break;
case BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS:
case BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS:
if (func_id != BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem)
goto error;
+ break;
+ case BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP:
+ if (func_id != BPF_FUNC_sk_redirect_map &&
+ func_id != BPF_FUNC_sock_map_update &&
+ func_id != BPF_FUNC_map_delete_elem)
+ goto error;
+ break;
default:
break;
}
@@ -1311,6 +1549,18 @@ static int check_map_func_compatibility(struct bpf_map *map, int func_id)
if (map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_CGROUP_ARRAY)
goto error;
break;
+ case BPF_FUNC_redirect_map:
+ if (map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP)
+ goto error;
+ break;
+ case BPF_FUNC_sk_redirect_map:
+ if (map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP)
+ goto error;
+ break;
+ case BPF_FUNC_sock_map_update:
+ if (map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP)
+ goto error;
+ break;
default:
break;
}
@@ -1340,6 +1590,9 @@ static int check_raw_mode(const struct bpf_func_proto *fn)
return count > 1 ? -EINVAL : 0;
}
+/* Packet data might have moved, any old PTR_TO_PACKET[_END] are now invalid,
+ * so turn them into unknown SCALAR_VALUE.
+ */
static void clear_all_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
{
struct bpf_verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state;
@@ -1349,7 +1602,7 @@ static void clear_all_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++)
if (regs[i].type == PTR_TO_PACKET ||
regs[i].type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END)
- mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, i);
+ mark_reg_unknown(regs, i);
for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i += BPF_REG_SIZE) {
if (state->stack_slot_type[i] != STACK_SPILL)
@@ -1358,8 +1611,7 @@ static void clear_all_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
if (reg->type != PTR_TO_PACKET &&
reg->type != PTR_TO_PACKET_END)
continue;
- __mark_reg_unknown_value(state->spilled_regs,
- i / BPF_REG_SIZE);
+ __mark_reg_unknown(reg);
}
}
@@ -1434,19 +1686,24 @@ static int check_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn_idx)
}
/* reset caller saved regs */
- for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++) {
mark_reg_not_init(regs, caller_saved[i]);
+ check_reg_arg(env, caller_saved[i], DST_OP_NO_MARK);
+ }
- /* update return register */
+ /* update return register (already marked as written above) */
if (fn->ret_type == RET_INTEGER) {
- regs[BPF_REG_0].type = UNKNOWN_VALUE;
+ /* sets type to SCALAR_VALUE */
+ mark_reg_unknown(regs, BPF_REG_0);
} else if (fn->ret_type == RET_VOID) {
regs[BPF_REG_0].type = NOT_INIT;
} else if (fn->ret_type == RET_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL) {
struct bpf_insn_aux_data *insn_aux;
regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL;
- regs[BPF_REG_0].max_value = regs[BPF_REG_0].min_value = 0;
+ /* There is no offset yet applied, variable or fixed */
+ mark_reg_known_zero(regs, BPF_REG_0);
+ regs[BPF_REG_0].off = 0;
/* remember map_ptr, so that check_map_access()
* can check 'value_size' boundary of memory access
* to map element returned from bpf_map_lookup_elem()
@@ -1477,494 +1734,551 @@ static int check_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn_idx)
return 0;
}
-static int check_packet_ptr_add(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
- struct bpf_insn *insn)
+static void coerce_reg_to_32(struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
{
- struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs;
- struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg = &regs[insn->dst_reg];
- struct bpf_reg_state *src_reg = &regs[insn->src_reg];
- struct bpf_reg_state tmp_reg;
- s32 imm;
-
- if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) {
- /* pkt_ptr += imm */
- imm = insn->imm;
-
-add_imm:
- if (imm < 0) {
- verbose("addition of negative constant to packet pointer is not allowed\n");
- return -EACCES;
- }
- if (imm >= MAX_PACKET_OFF ||
- imm + dst_reg->off >= MAX_PACKET_OFF) {
- verbose("constant %d is too large to add to packet pointer\n",
- imm);
- return -EACCES;
- }
- /* a constant was added to pkt_ptr.
- * Remember it while keeping the same 'id'
- */
- dst_reg->off += imm;
- } else {
- bool had_id;
-
- if (src_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET) {
- /* R6=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=62) R7=imm22; r7 += r6 */
- tmp_reg = *dst_reg; /* save r7 state */
- *dst_reg = *src_reg; /* copy pkt_ptr state r6 into r7 */
- src_reg = &tmp_reg; /* pretend it's src_reg state */
- /* if the checks below reject it, the copy won't matter,
- * since we're rejecting the whole program. If all ok,
- * then imm22 state will be added to r7
- * and r7 will be pkt(id=0,off=22,r=62) while
- * r6 will stay as pkt(id=0,off=0,r=62)
- */
- }
+ /* clear high 32 bits */
+ reg->var_off = tnum_cast(reg->var_off, 4);
+ /* Update bounds */
+ __update_reg_bounds(reg);
+}
- if (src_reg->type == CONST_IMM) {
- /* pkt_ptr += reg where reg is known constant */
- imm = src_reg->imm;
- goto add_imm;
- }
- /* disallow pkt_ptr += reg
- * if reg is not uknown_value with guaranteed zero upper bits
- * otherwise pkt_ptr may overflow and addition will become
- * subtraction which is not allowed
- */
- if (src_reg->type != UNKNOWN_VALUE) {
- verbose("cannot add '%s' to ptr_to_packet\n",
- reg_type_str[src_reg->type]);
- return -EACCES;
- }
- if (src_reg->imm < 48) {
- verbose("cannot add integer value with %lld upper zero bits to ptr_to_packet\n",
- src_reg->imm);
- return -EACCES;
- }
+static bool signed_add_overflows(s64 a, s64 b)
+{
+ /* Do the add in u64, where overflow is well-defined */
+ s64 res = (s64)((u64)a + (u64)b);
- had_id = (dst_reg->id != 0);
+ if (b < 0)
+ return res > a;
+ return res < a;
+}
- /* dst_reg stays as pkt_ptr type and since some positive
- * integer value was added to the pointer, increment its 'id'
- */
- dst_reg->id = ++env->id_gen;
-
- /* something was added to pkt_ptr, set range to zero */
- dst_reg->aux_off += dst_reg->off;
- dst_reg->off = 0;
- dst_reg->range = 0;
- if (had_id)
- dst_reg->aux_off_align = min(dst_reg->aux_off_align,
- src_reg->min_align);
- else
- dst_reg->aux_off_align = src_reg->min_align;
- }
- return 0;
+static bool signed_sub_overflows(s64 a, s64 b)
+{
+ /* Do the sub in u64, where overflow is well-defined */
+ s64 res = (s64)((u64)a - (u64)b);
+
+ if (b < 0)
+ return res < a;
+ return res > a;
}
-static int evaluate_reg_alu(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
+/* Handles arithmetic on a pointer and a scalar: computes new min/max and var_off.
+ * Caller should also handle BPF_MOV case separately.
+ * If we return -EACCES, caller may want to try again treating pointer as a
+ * scalar. So we only emit a diagnostic if !env->allow_ptr_leaks.
+ */
+static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+ struct bpf_insn *insn,
+ const struct bpf_reg_state *ptr_reg,
+ const struct bpf_reg_state *off_reg)
{
- struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs;
- struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg = &regs[insn->dst_reg];
+ struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs, *dst_reg;
+ bool known = tnum_is_const(off_reg->var_off);
+ s64 smin_val = off_reg->smin_value, smax_val = off_reg->smax_value,
+ smin_ptr = ptr_reg->smin_value, smax_ptr = ptr_reg->smax_value;
+ u64 umin_val = off_reg->umin_value, umax_val = off_reg->umax_value,
+ umin_ptr = ptr_reg->umin_value, umax_ptr = ptr_reg->umax_value;
u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code);
- s64 imm_log2;
+ u32 dst = insn->dst_reg;
- /* for type == UNKNOWN_VALUE:
- * imm > 0 -> number of zero upper bits
- * imm == 0 -> don't track which is the same as all bits can be non-zero
- */
+ dst_reg = &regs[dst];
- if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) {
- struct bpf_reg_state *src_reg = &regs[insn->src_reg];
-
- if (src_reg->type == UNKNOWN_VALUE && src_reg->imm > 0 &&
- dst_reg->imm && opcode == BPF_ADD) {
- /* dreg += sreg
- * where both have zero upper bits. Adding them
- * can only result making one more bit non-zero
- * in the larger value.
- * Ex. 0xffff (imm=48) + 1 (imm=63) = 0x10000 (imm=47)
- * 0xffff (imm=48) + 0xffff = 0x1fffe (imm=47)
- */
- dst_reg->imm = min(dst_reg->imm, src_reg->imm);
- dst_reg->imm--;
- return 0;
- }
- if (src_reg->type == CONST_IMM && src_reg->imm > 0 &&
- dst_reg->imm && opcode == BPF_ADD) {
- /* dreg += sreg
- * where dreg has zero upper bits and sreg is const.
- * Adding them can only result making one more bit
- * non-zero in the larger value.
- */
- imm_log2 = __ilog2_u64((long long)src_reg->imm);
- dst_reg->imm = min(dst_reg->imm, 63 - imm_log2);
- dst_reg->imm--;
- return 0;
- }
- /* all other cases non supported yet, just mark dst_reg */
- dst_reg->imm = 0;
- return 0;
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(known && (smin_val != smax_val))) {
+ print_verifier_state(&env->cur_state);
+ verbose("verifier internal error: known but bad sbounds\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(known && (umin_val != umax_val))) {
+ print_verifier_state(&env->cur_state);
+ verbose("verifier internal error: known but bad ubounds\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
}
- /* sign extend 32-bit imm into 64-bit to make sure that
- * negative values occupy bit 63. Note ilog2() would have
- * been incorrect, since sizeof(insn->imm) == 4
- */
- imm_log2 = __ilog2_u64((long long)insn->imm);
-
- if (dst_reg->imm && opcode == BPF_LSH) {
- /* reg <<= imm
- * if reg was a result of 2 byte load, then its imm == 48
- * which means that upper 48 bits are zero and shifting this reg
- * left by 4 would mean that upper 44 bits are still zero
- */
- dst_reg->imm -= insn->imm;
- } else if (dst_reg->imm && opcode == BPF_MUL) {
- /* reg *= imm
- * if multiplying by 14 subtract 4
- * This is conservative calculation of upper zero bits.
- * It's not trying to special case insn->imm == 1 or 0 cases
- */
- dst_reg->imm -= imm_log2 + 1;
- } else if (opcode == BPF_AND) {
- /* reg &= imm */
- dst_reg->imm = 63 - imm_log2;
- } else if (dst_reg->imm && opcode == BPF_ADD) {
- /* reg += imm */
- dst_reg->imm = min(dst_reg->imm, 63 - imm_log2);
- dst_reg->imm--;
- } else if (opcode == BPF_RSH) {
- /* reg >>= imm
- * which means that after right shift, upper bits will be zero
- * note that verifier already checked that
- * 0 <= imm < 64 for shift insn
- */
- dst_reg->imm += insn->imm;
- if (unlikely(dst_reg->imm > 64))
- /* some dumb code did:
- * r2 = *(u32 *)mem;
- * r2 >>= 32;
- * and all bits are zero now */
- dst_reg->imm = 64;
- } else {
- /* all other alu ops, means that we don't know what will
- * happen to the value, mark it with unknown number of zero bits
- */
- dst_reg->imm = 0;
+ if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) != BPF_ALU64) {
+ /* 32-bit ALU ops on pointers produce (meaningless) scalars */
+ if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks)
+ verbose("R%d 32-bit pointer arithmetic prohibited\n",
+ dst);
+ return -EACCES;
}
- if (dst_reg->imm < 0) {
- /* all 64 bits of the register can contain non-zero bits
- * and such value cannot be added to ptr_to_packet, since it
- * may overflow, mark it as unknown to avoid further eval
- */
- dst_reg->imm = 0;
+ if (ptr_reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL) {
+ if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks)
+ verbose("R%d pointer arithmetic on PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL prohibited, null-check it first\n",
+ dst);
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+ if (ptr_reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_MAP) {
+ if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks)
+ verbose("R%d pointer arithmetic on CONST_PTR_TO_MAP prohibited\n",
+ dst);
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+ if (ptr_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END) {
+ if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks)
+ verbose("R%d pointer arithmetic on PTR_TO_PACKET_END prohibited\n",
+ dst);
+ return -EACCES;
}
- return 0;
-}
-static int evaluate_reg_imm_alu_unknown(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
- struct bpf_insn *insn)
-{
- struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs;
- struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg = &regs[insn->dst_reg];
- struct bpf_reg_state *src_reg = &regs[insn->src_reg];
- u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code);
- s64 imm_log2 = __ilog2_u64((long long)dst_reg->imm);
-
- /* BPF_X code with src_reg->type UNKNOWN_VALUE here. */
- if (src_reg->imm > 0 && dst_reg->imm) {
- switch (opcode) {
- case BPF_ADD:
- /* dreg += sreg
- * where both have zero upper bits. Adding them
- * can only result making one more bit non-zero
- * in the larger value.
- * Ex. 0xffff (imm=48) + 1 (imm=63) = 0x10000 (imm=47)
- * 0xffff (imm=48) + 0xffff = 0x1fffe (imm=47)
- */
- dst_reg->imm = min(src_reg->imm, 63 - imm_log2);
- dst_reg->imm--;
- break;
- case BPF_AND:
- /* dreg &= sreg
- * AND can not extend zero bits only shrink
- * Ex. 0x00..00ffffff
- * & 0x0f..ffffffff
- * ----------------
- * 0x00..00ffffff
- */
- dst_reg->imm = max(src_reg->imm, 63 - imm_log2);
+ /* In case of 'scalar += pointer', dst_reg inherits pointer type and id.
+ * The id may be overwritten later if we create a new variable offset.
+ */
+ dst_reg->type = ptr_reg->type;
+ dst_reg->id = ptr_reg->id;
+
+ switch (opcode) {
+ case BPF_ADD:
+ /* We can take a fixed offset as long as it doesn't overflow
+ * the s32 'off' field
+ */
+ if (known && (ptr_reg->off + smin_val ==
+ (s64)(s32)(ptr_reg->off + smin_val))) {
+ /* pointer += K. Accumulate it into fixed offset */
+ dst_reg->smin_value = smin_ptr;
+ dst_reg->smax_value = smax_ptr;
+ dst_reg->umin_value = umin_ptr;
+ dst_reg->umax_value = umax_ptr;
+ dst_reg->var_off = ptr_reg->var_off;
+ dst_reg->off = ptr_reg->off + smin_val;
+ dst_reg->range = ptr_reg->range;
break;
- case BPF_OR:
- /* dreg |= sreg
- * OR can only extend zero bits
- * Ex. 0x00..00ffffff
- * | 0x0f..ffffffff
- * ----------------
- * 0x0f..00ffffff
- */
- dst_reg->imm = min(src_reg->imm, 63 - imm_log2);
+ }
+ /* A new variable offset is created. Note that off_reg->off
+ * == 0, since it's a scalar.
+ * dst_reg gets the pointer type and since some positive
+ * integer value was added to the pointer, give it a new 'id'
+ * if it's a PTR_TO_PACKET.
+ * this creates a new 'base' pointer, off_reg (variable) gets
+ * added into the variable offset, and we copy the fixed offset
+ * from ptr_reg.
+ */
+ if (signed_add_overflows(smin_ptr, smin_val) ||
+ signed_add_overflows(smax_ptr, smax_val)) {
+ dst_reg->smin_value = S64_MIN;
+ dst_reg->smax_value = S64_MAX;
+ } else {
+ dst_reg->smin_value = smin_ptr + smin_val;
+ dst_reg->smax_value = smax_ptr + smax_val;
+ }
+ if (umin_ptr + umin_val < umin_ptr ||
+ umax_ptr + umax_val < umax_ptr) {
+ dst_reg->umin_value = 0;
+ dst_reg->umax_value = U64_MAX;
+ } else {
+ dst_reg->umin_value = umin_ptr + umin_val;
+ dst_reg->umax_value = umax_ptr + umax_val;
+ }
+ dst_reg->var_off = tnum_add(ptr_reg->var_off, off_reg->var_off);
+ dst_reg->off = ptr_reg->off;
+ if (ptr_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET) {
+ dst_reg->id = ++env->id_gen;
+ /* something was added to pkt_ptr, set range to zero */
+ dst_reg->range = 0;
+ }
+ break;
+ case BPF_SUB:
+ if (dst_reg == off_reg) {
+ /* scalar -= pointer. Creates an unknown scalar */
+ if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks)
+ verbose("R%d tried to subtract pointer from scalar\n",
+ dst);
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+ /* We don't allow subtraction from FP, because (according to
+ * test_verifier.c test "invalid fp arithmetic", JITs might not
+ * be able to deal with it.
+ */
+ if (ptr_reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK) {
+ if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks)
+ verbose("R%d subtraction from stack pointer prohibited\n",
+ dst);
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+ if (known && (ptr_reg->off - smin_val ==
+ (s64)(s32)(ptr_reg->off - smin_val))) {
+ /* pointer -= K. Subtract it from fixed offset */
+ dst_reg->smin_value = smin_ptr;
+ dst_reg->smax_value = smax_ptr;
+ dst_reg->umin_value = umin_ptr;
+ dst_reg->umax_value = umax_ptr;
+ dst_reg->var_off = ptr_reg->var_off;
+ dst_reg->id = ptr_reg->id;
+ dst_reg->off = ptr_reg->off - smin_val;
+ dst_reg->range = ptr_reg->range;
break;
- case BPF_SUB:
- case BPF_MUL:
- case BPF_RSH:
- case BPF_LSH:
- /* These may be flushed out later */
- default:
- mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, insn->dst_reg);
}
- } else {
- mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, insn->dst_reg);
+ /* A new variable offset is created. If the subtrahend is known
+ * nonnegative, then any reg->range we had before is still good.
+ */
+ if (signed_sub_overflows(smin_ptr, smax_val) ||
+ signed_sub_overflows(smax_ptr, smin_val)) {
+ /* Overflow possible, we know nothing */
+ dst_reg->smin_value = S64_MIN;
+ dst_reg->smax_value = S64_MAX;
+ } else {
+ dst_reg->smin_value = smin_ptr - smax_val;
+ dst_reg->smax_value = smax_ptr - smin_val;
+ }
+ if (umin_ptr < umax_val) {
+ /* Overflow possible, we know nothing */
+ dst_reg->umin_value = 0;
+ dst_reg->umax_value = U64_MAX;
+ } else {
+ /* Cannot overflow (as long as bounds are consistent) */
+ dst_reg->umin_value = umin_ptr - umax_val;
+ dst_reg->umax_value = umax_ptr - umin_val;
+ }
+ dst_reg->var_off = tnum_sub(ptr_reg->var_off, off_reg->var_off);
+ dst_reg->off = ptr_reg->off;
+ if (ptr_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET) {
+ dst_reg->id = ++env->id_gen;
+ /* something was added to pkt_ptr, set range to zero */
+ if (smin_val < 0)
+ dst_reg->range = 0;
+ }
+ break;
+ case BPF_AND:
+ case BPF_OR:
+ case BPF_XOR:
+ /* bitwise ops on pointers are troublesome, prohibit for now.
+ * (However, in principle we could allow some cases, e.g.
+ * ptr &= ~3 which would reduce min_value by 3.)
+ */
+ if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks)
+ verbose("R%d bitwise operator %s on pointer prohibited\n",
+ dst, bpf_alu_string[opcode >> 4]);
+ return -EACCES;
+ default:
+ /* other operators (e.g. MUL,LSH) produce non-pointer results */
+ if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks)
+ verbose("R%d pointer arithmetic with %s operator prohibited\n",
+ dst, bpf_alu_string[opcode >> 4]);
+ return -EACCES;
}
- dst_reg->type = UNKNOWN_VALUE;
+ __update_reg_bounds(dst_reg);
+ __reg_deduce_bounds(dst_reg);
+ __reg_bound_offset(dst_reg);
return 0;
}
-static int evaluate_reg_imm_alu(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
- struct bpf_insn *insn)
+static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+ struct bpf_insn *insn,
+ struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg,
+ struct bpf_reg_state src_reg)
{
struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs;
- struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg = &regs[insn->dst_reg];
- struct bpf_reg_state *src_reg = &regs[insn->src_reg];
u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code);
- u64 dst_imm = dst_reg->imm;
-
- if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && src_reg->type == UNKNOWN_VALUE)
- return evaluate_reg_imm_alu_unknown(env, insn);
-
- /* dst_reg->type == CONST_IMM here. Simulate execution of insns
- * containing ALU ops. Don't care about overflow or negative
- * values, just add/sub/... them; registers are in u64.
- */
- if (opcode == BPF_ADD && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) {
- dst_imm += insn->imm;
- } else if (opcode == BPF_ADD && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X &&
- src_reg->type == CONST_IMM) {
- dst_imm += src_reg->imm;
- } else if (opcode == BPF_SUB && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) {
- dst_imm -= insn->imm;
- } else if (opcode == BPF_SUB && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X &&
- src_reg->type == CONST_IMM) {
- dst_imm -= src_reg->imm;
- } else if (opcode == BPF_MUL && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) {
- dst_imm *= insn->imm;
- } else if (opcode == BPF_MUL && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X &&
- src_reg->type == CONST_IMM) {
- dst_imm *= src_reg->imm;
- } else if (opcode == BPF_OR && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) {
- dst_imm |= insn->imm;
- } else if (opcode == BPF_OR && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X &&
- src_reg->type == CONST_IMM) {
- dst_imm |= src_reg->imm;
- } else if (opcode == BPF_AND && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) {
- dst_imm &= insn->imm;
- } else if (opcode == BPF_AND && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X &&
- src_reg->type == CONST_IMM) {
- dst_imm &= src_reg->imm;
- } else if (opcode == BPF_RSH && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) {
- dst_imm >>= insn->imm;
- } else if (opcode == BPF_RSH && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X &&
- src_reg->type == CONST_IMM) {
- dst_imm >>= src_reg->imm;
- } else if (opcode == BPF_LSH && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) {
- dst_imm <<= insn->imm;
- } else if (opcode == BPF_LSH && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X &&
- src_reg->type == CONST_IMM) {
- dst_imm <<= src_reg->imm;
- } else {
- mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, insn->dst_reg);
- goto out;
- }
-
- dst_reg->imm = dst_imm;
-out:
- return 0;
-}
-
-static void check_reg_overflow(struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
-{
- if (reg->max_value > BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE)
- reg->max_value = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE;
- if (reg->min_value < BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE ||
- reg->min_value > BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE)
- reg->min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE;
-}
-
-static u32 calc_align(u32 imm)
-{
- if (!imm)
- return 1U << 31;
- return imm - ((imm - 1) & imm);
-}
-
-static void adjust_reg_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
- struct bpf_insn *insn)
-{
- struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs, *dst_reg;
- s64 min_val = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE;
- u64 max_val = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE;
- u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code);
- u32 dst_align, src_align;
-
- dst_reg = &regs[insn->dst_reg];
- src_align = 0;
- if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) {
- check_reg_overflow(&regs[insn->src_reg]);
- min_val = regs[insn->src_reg].min_value;
- max_val = regs[insn->src_reg].max_value;
-
- /* If the source register is a random pointer then the
- * min_value/max_value values represent the range of the known
- * accesses into that value, not the actual min/max value of the
- * register itself. In this case we have to reset the reg range
- * values so we know it is not safe to look at.
- */
- if (regs[insn->src_reg].type != CONST_IMM &&
- regs[insn->src_reg].type != UNKNOWN_VALUE) {
- min_val = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE;
- max_val = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE;
- src_align = 0;
- } else {
- src_align = regs[insn->src_reg].min_align;
- }
- } else if (insn->imm < BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE &&
- (s64)insn->imm > BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE) {
- min_val = max_val = insn->imm;
- src_align = calc_align(insn->imm);
- }
-
- dst_align = dst_reg->min_align;
-
- /* We don't know anything about what was done to this register, mark it
- * as unknown. Also, if both derived bounds came from signed/unsigned
- * mixed compares and one side is unbounded, we cannot really do anything
- * with them as boundaries cannot be trusted. Thus, arithmetic of two
- * regs of such kind will get invalidated bounds on the dst side.
- */
- if ((min_val == BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE &&
- max_val == BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) ||
- (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X &&
- ((min_val != BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE &&
- max_val == BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) ||
- (min_val == BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE &&
- max_val != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) ||
- (dst_reg->min_value != BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE &&
- dst_reg->max_value == BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) ||
- (dst_reg->min_value == BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE &&
- dst_reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE)) &&
- regs[insn->dst_reg].value_from_signed !=
- regs[insn->src_reg].value_from_signed)) {
- reset_reg_range_values(regs, insn->dst_reg);
- return;
- }
-
- /* If one of our values was at the end of our ranges then we can't just
- * do our normal operations to the register, we need to set the values
- * to the min/max since they are undefined.
- */
- if (opcode != BPF_SUB) {
- if (min_val == BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE)
- dst_reg->min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE;
- if (max_val == BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE)
- dst_reg->max_value = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE;
+ bool src_known, dst_known;
+ s64 smin_val, smax_val;
+ u64 umin_val, umax_val;
+
+ if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) != BPF_ALU64) {
+ /* 32-bit ALU ops are (32,32)->64 */
+ coerce_reg_to_32(dst_reg);
+ coerce_reg_to_32(&src_reg);
}
+ smin_val = src_reg.smin_value;
+ smax_val = src_reg.smax_value;
+ umin_val = src_reg.umin_value;
+ umax_val = src_reg.umax_value;
+ src_known = tnum_is_const(src_reg.var_off);
+ dst_known = tnum_is_const(dst_reg->var_off);
switch (opcode) {
case BPF_ADD:
- if (dst_reg->min_value != BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE)
- dst_reg->min_value += min_val;
- if (dst_reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE)
- dst_reg->max_value += max_val;
- dst_reg->min_align = min(src_align, dst_align);
+ if (signed_add_overflows(dst_reg->smin_value, smin_val) ||
+ signed_add_overflows(dst_reg->smax_value, smax_val)) {
+ dst_reg->smin_value = S64_MIN;
+ dst_reg->smax_value = S64_MAX;
+ } else {
+ dst_reg->smin_value += smin_val;
+ dst_reg->smax_value += smax_val;
+ }
+ if (dst_reg->umin_value + umin_val < umin_val ||
+ dst_reg->umax_value + umax_val < umax_val) {
+ dst_reg->umin_value = 0;
+ dst_reg->umax_value = U64_MAX;
+ } else {
+ dst_reg->umin_value += umin_val;
+ dst_reg->umax_value += umax_val;
+ }
+ dst_reg->var_off = tnum_add(dst_reg->var_off, src_reg.var_off);
break;
case BPF_SUB:
- /* If one of our values was at the end of our ranges, then the
- * _opposite_ value in the dst_reg goes to the end of our range.
- */
- if (min_val == BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE)
- dst_reg->max_value = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE;
- if (max_val == BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE)
- dst_reg->min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE;
- if (dst_reg->min_value != BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE)
- dst_reg->min_value -= max_val;
- if (dst_reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE)
- dst_reg->max_value -= min_val;
- dst_reg->min_align = min(src_align, dst_align);
+ if (signed_sub_overflows(dst_reg->smin_value, smax_val) ||
+ signed_sub_overflows(dst_reg->smax_value, smin_val)) {
+ /* Overflow possible, we know nothing */
+ dst_reg->smin_value = S64_MIN;
+ dst_reg->smax_value = S64_MAX;
+ } else {
+ dst_reg->smin_value -= smax_val;
+ dst_reg->smax_value -= smin_val;
+ }
+ if (dst_reg->umin_value < umax_val) {
+ /* Overflow possible, we know nothing */
+ dst_reg->umin_value = 0;
+ dst_reg->umax_value = U64_MAX;
+ } else {
+ /* Cannot overflow (as long as bounds are consistent) */
+ dst_reg->umin_value -= umax_val;
+ dst_reg->umax_value -= umin_val;
+ }
+ dst_reg->var_off = tnum_sub(dst_reg->var_off, src_reg.var_off);
break;
case BPF_MUL:
- if (dst_reg->min_value != BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE)
- dst_reg->min_value *= min_val;
- if (dst_reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE)
- dst_reg->max_value *= max_val;
- dst_reg->min_align = max(src_align, dst_align);
+ dst_reg->var_off = tnum_mul(dst_reg->var_off, src_reg.var_off);
+ if (smin_val < 0 || dst_reg->smin_value < 0) {
+ /* Ain't nobody got time to multiply that sign */
+ __mark_reg_unbounded(dst_reg);
+ __update_reg_bounds(dst_reg);
+ break;
+ }
+ /* Both values are positive, so we can work with unsigned and
+ * copy the result to signed (unless it exceeds S64_MAX).
+ */
+ if (umax_val > U32_MAX || dst_reg->umax_value > U32_MAX) {
+ /* Potential overflow, we know nothing */
+ __mark_reg_unbounded(dst_reg);
+ /* (except what we can learn from the var_off) */
+ __update_reg_bounds(dst_reg);
+ break;
+ }
+ dst_reg->umin_value *= umin_val;
+ dst_reg->umax_value *= umax_val;
+ if (dst_reg->umax_value > S64_MAX) {
+ /* Overflow possible, we know nothing */
+ dst_reg->smin_value = S64_MIN;
+ dst_reg->smax_value = S64_MAX;
+ } else {
+ dst_reg->smin_value = dst_reg->umin_value;
+ dst_reg->smax_value = dst_reg->umax_value;
+ }
break;
case BPF_AND:
- /* Disallow AND'ing of negative numbers, ain't nobody got time
- * for that. Otherwise the minimum is 0 and the max is the max
- * value we could AND against.
+ if (src_known && dst_known) {
+ __mark_reg_known(dst_reg, dst_reg->var_off.value &
+ src_reg.var_off.value);
+ break;
+ }
+ /* We get our minimum from the var_off, since that's inherently
+ * bitwise. Our maximum is the minimum of the operands' maxima.
*/
- if (min_val < 0)
- dst_reg->min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE;
- else
- dst_reg->min_value = 0;
- dst_reg->max_value = max_val;
- dst_reg->min_align = max(src_align, dst_align);
+ dst_reg->var_off = tnum_and(dst_reg->var_off, src_reg.var_off);
+ dst_reg->umin_value = dst_reg->var_off.value;
+ dst_reg->umax_value = min(dst_reg->umax_value, umax_val);
+ if (dst_reg->smin_value < 0 || smin_val < 0) {
+ /* Lose signed bounds when ANDing negative numbers,
+ * ain't nobody got time for that.
+ */
+ dst_reg->smin_value = S64_MIN;
+ dst_reg->smax_value = S64_MAX;
+ } else {
+ /* ANDing two positives gives a positive, so safe to
+ * cast result into s64.
+ */
+ dst_reg->smin_value = dst_reg->umin_value;
+ dst_reg->smax_value = dst_reg->umax_value;
+ }
+ /* We may learn something more from the var_off */
+ __update_reg_bounds(dst_reg);
break;
- case BPF_LSH:
- /* Gotta have special overflow logic here, if we're shifting
- * more than MAX_RANGE then just assume we have an invalid
- * range.
+ case BPF_OR:
+ if (src_known && dst_known) {
+ __mark_reg_known(dst_reg, dst_reg->var_off.value |
+ src_reg.var_off.value);
+ break;
+ }
+ /* We get our maximum from the var_off, and our minimum is the
+ * maximum of the operands' minima
*/
- if (min_val > ilog2(BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE)) {
- dst_reg->min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE;
- dst_reg->min_align = 1;
+ dst_reg->var_off = tnum_or(dst_reg->var_off, src_reg.var_off);
+ dst_reg->umin_value = max(dst_reg->umin_value, umin_val);
+ dst_reg->umax_value = dst_reg->var_off.value |
+ dst_reg->var_off.mask;
+ if (dst_reg->smin_value < 0 || smin_val < 0) {
+ /* Lose signed bounds when ORing negative numbers,
+ * ain't nobody got time for that.
+ */
+ dst_reg->smin_value = S64_MIN;
+ dst_reg->smax_value = S64_MAX;
} else {
- if (dst_reg->min_value != BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE)
- dst_reg->min_value <<= min_val;
- if (!dst_reg->min_align)
- dst_reg->min_align = 1;
- dst_reg->min_align <<= min_val;
- }
- if (max_val > ilog2(BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE))
- dst_reg->max_value = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE;
- else if (dst_reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE)
- dst_reg->max_value <<= max_val;
+ /* ORing two positives gives a positive, so safe to
+ * cast result into s64.
+ */
+ dst_reg->smin_value = dst_reg->umin_value;
+ dst_reg->smax_value = dst_reg->umax_value;
+ }
+ /* We may learn something more from the var_off */
+ __update_reg_bounds(dst_reg);
break;
- case BPF_RSH:
- /* RSH by a negative number is undefined, and the BPF_RSH is an
- * unsigned shift, so make the appropriate casts.
+ case BPF_LSH:
+ if (umax_val > 63) {
+ /* Shifts greater than 63 are undefined. This includes
+ * shifts by a negative number.
+ */
+ mark_reg_unknown(regs, insn->dst_reg);
+ break;
+ }
+ /* We lose all sign bit information (except what we can pick
+ * up from var_off)
*/
- if (min_val < 0 || dst_reg->min_value < 0) {
- dst_reg->min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE;
+ dst_reg->smin_value = S64_MIN;
+ dst_reg->smax_value = S64_MAX;
+ /* If we might shift our top bit out, then we know nothing */
+ if (dst_reg->umax_value > 1ULL << (63 - umax_val)) {
+ dst_reg->umin_value = 0;
+ dst_reg->umax_value = U64_MAX;
} else {
- dst_reg->min_value =
- (u64)(dst_reg->min_value) >> min_val;
+ dst_reg->umin_value <<= umin_val;
+ dst_reg->umax_value <<= umax_val;
+ }
+ if (src_known)
+ dst_reg->var_off = tnum_lshift(dst_reg->var_off, umin_val);
+ else
+ dst_reg->var_off = tnum_lshift(tnum_unknown, umin_val);
+ /* We may learn something more from the var_off */
+ __update_reg_bounds(dst_reg);
+ break;
+ case BPF_RSH:
+ if (umax_val > 63) {
+ /* Shifts greater than 63 are undefined. This includes
+ * shifts by a negative number.
+ */
+ mark_reg_unknown(regs, insn->dst_reg);
+ break;
}
- if (min_val < 0) {
- dst_reg->min_align = 1;
+ /* BPF_RSH is an unsigned shift, so make the appropriate casts */
+ if (dst_reg->smin_value < 0) {
+ if (umin_val) {
+ /* Sign bit will be cleared */
+ dst_reg->smin_value = 0;
+ } else {
+ /* Lost sign bit information */
+ dst_reg->smin_value = S64_MIN;
+ dst_reg->smax_value = S64_MAX;
+ }
} else {
- dst_reg->min_align >>= (u64) min_val;
- if (!dst_reg->min_align)
- dst_reg->min_align = 1;
+ dst_reg->smin_value =
+ (u64)(dst_reg->smin_value) >> umax_val;
}
- if (dst_reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE)
- dst_reg->max_value >>= max_val;
+ if (src_known)
+ dst_reg->var_off = tnum_rshift(dst_reg->var_off,
+ umin_val);
+ else
+ dst_reg->var_off = tnum_rshift(tnum_unknown, umin_val);
+ dst_reg->umin_value >>= umax_val;
+ dst_reg->umax_value >>= umin_val;
+ /* We may learn something more from the var_off */
+ __update_reg_bounds(dst_reg);
break;
default:
- reset_reg_range_values(regs, insn->dst_reg);
+ mark_reg_unknown(regs, insn->dst_reg);
break;
}
- check_reg_overflow(dst_reg);
+ __reg_deduce_bounds(dst_reg);
+ __reg_bound_offset(dst_reg);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* Handles ALU ops other than BPF_END, BPF_NEG and BPF_MOV: computes new min/max
+ * and var_off.
+ */
+static int adjust_reg_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+ struct bpf_insn *insn)
+{
+ struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs, *dst_reg, *src_reg;
+ struct bpf_reg_state *ptr_reg = NULL, off_reg = {0};
+ u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code);
+ int rc;
+
+ dst_reg = &regs[insn->dst_reg];
+ src_reg = NULL;
+ if (dst_reg->type != SCALAR_VALUE)
+ ptr_reg = dst_reg;
+ if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) {
+ src_reg = &regs[insn->src_reg];
+ if (src_reg->type != SCALAR_VALUE) {
+ if (dst_reg->type != SCALAR_VALUE) {
+ /* Combining two pointers by any ALU op yields
+ * an arbitrary scalar.
+ */
+ if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks) {
+ verbose("R%d pointer %s pointer prohibited\n",
+ insn->dst_reg,
+ bpf_alu_string[opcode >> 4]);
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+ mark_reg_unknown(regs, insn->dst_reg);
+ return 0;
+ } else {
+ /* scalar += pointer
+ * This is legal, but we have to reverse our
+ * src/dest handling in computing the range
+ */
+ rc = adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(env, insn,
+ src_reg, dst_reg);
+ if (rc == -EACCES && env->allow_ptr_leaks) {
+ /* scalar += unknown scalar */
+ __mark_reg_unknown(&off_reg);
+ return adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(
+ env, insn,
+ dst_reg, off_reg);
+ }
+ return rc;
+ }
+ } else if (ptr_reg) {
+ /* pointer += scalar */
+ rc = adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(env, insn,
+ dst_reg, src_reg);
+ if (rc == -EACCES && env->allow_ptr_leaks) {
+ /* unknown scalar += scalar */
+ __mark_reg_unknown(dst_reg);
+ return adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(
+ env, insn, dst_reg, *src_reg);
+ }
+ return rc;
+ }
+ } else {
+ /* Pretend the src is a reg with a known value, since we only
+ * need to be able to read from this state.
+ */
+ off_reg.type = SCALAR_VALUE;
+ __mark_reg_known(&off_reg, insn->imm);
+ src_reg = &off_reg;
+ if (ptr_reg) { /* pointer += K */
+ rc = adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(env, insn,
+ ptr_reg, src_reg);
+ if (rc == -EACCES && env->allow_ptr_leaks) {
+ /* unknown scalar += K */
+ __mark_reg_unknown(dst_reg);
+ return adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(
+ env, insn, dst_reg, off_reg);
+ }
+ return rc;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Got here implies adding two SCALAR_VALUEs */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ptr_reg)) {
+ print_verifier_state(&env->cur_state);
+ verbose("verifier internal error: unexpected ptr_reg\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ if (WARN_ON(!src_reg)) {
+ print_verifier_state(&env->cur_state);
+ verbose("verifier internal error: no src_reg\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ return adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(env, insn, dst_reg, *src_reg);
}
/* check validity of 32-bit and 64-bit arithmetic operations */
static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
{
- struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs, *dst_reg;
+ struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs;
u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code);
int err;
@@ -1985,7 +2299,7 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
}
/* check src operand */
- err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP);
+ err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -1996,7 +2310,7 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
}
/* check dest operand */
- err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP);
+ err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -2009,7 +2323,7 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
}
/* check src operand */
- err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP);
+ err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP);
if (err)
return err;
} else {
@@ -2020,15 +2334,10 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
}
/* check dest operand */
- err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP);
+ err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP);
if (err)
return err;
- /* we are setting our register to something new, we need to
- * reset its range values.
- */
- reset_reg_range_values(regs, insn->dst_reg);
-
if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) {
if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64) {
/* case: R1 = R2
@@ -2036,24 +2345,24 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
*/
regs[insn->dst_reg] = regs[insn->src_reg];
} else {
+ /* R1 = (u32) R2 */
if (is_pointer_value(env, insn->src_reg)) {
verbose("R%d partial copy of pointer\n",
insn->src_reg);
return -EACCES;
}
- mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, insn->dst_reg);
+ mark_reg_unknown(regs, insn->dst_reg);
+ /* high 32 bits are known zero. */
+ regs[insn->dst_reg].var_off = tnum_cast(
+ regs[insn->dst_reg].var_off, 4);
+ __update_reg_bounds(&regs[insn->dst_reg]);
}
} else {
/* case: R = imm
* remember the value we stored into this reg
*/
- regs[insn->dst_reg].type = CONST_IMM;
- regs[insn->dst_reg].imm = insn->imm;
- regs[insn->dst_reg].id = 0;
- regs[insn->dst_reg].max_value = insn->imm;
- regs[insn->dst_reg].min_value = insn->imm;
- regs[insn->dst_reg].min_align = calc_align(insn->imm);
- regs[insn->dst_reg].value_from_signed = false;
+ regs[insn->dst_reg].type = SCALAR_VALUE;
+ __mark_reg_known(regs + insn->dst_reg, insn->imm);
}
} else if (opcode > BPF_END) {
@@ -2068,7 +2377,7 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
return -EINVAL;
}
/* check src1 operand */
- err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP);
+ err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP);
if (err)
return err;
} else {
@@ -2079,7 +2388,7 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
}
/* check src2 operand */
- err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP);
+ err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -2100,72 +2409,11 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
}
/* check dest operand */
- err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP_NO_MARK);
+ err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP_NO_MARK);
if (err)
return err;
- dst_reg = &regs[insn->dst_reg];
-
- /* first we want to adjust our ranges. */
- adjust_reg_min_max_vals(env, insn);
-
- /* pattern match 'bpf_add Rx, imm' instruction */
- if (opcode == BPF_ADD && BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 &&
- dst_reg->type == FRAME_PTR && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) {
- dst_reg->type = PTR_TO_STACK;
- dst_reg->imm = insn->imm;
- return 0;
- } else if (opcode == BPF_ADD &&
- BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 &&
- dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK &&
- ((BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X &&
- regs[insn->src_reg].type == CONST_IMM) ||
- BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K)) {
- if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X)
- dst_reg->imm += regs[insn->src_reg].imm;
- else
- dst_reg->imm += insn->imm;
- return 0;
- } else if (opcode == BPF_ADD &&
- BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 &&
- (dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET ||
- (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X &&
- regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET))) {
- /* ptr_to_packet += K|X */
- return check_packet_ptr_add(env, insn);
- } else if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 &&
- dst_reg->type == UNKNOWN_VALUE &&
- env->allow_ptr_leaks) {
- /* unknown += K|X */
- return evaluate_reg_alu(env, insn);
- } else if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 &&
- dst_reg->type == CONST_IMM &&
- env->allow_ptr_leaks) {
- /* reg_imm += K|X */
- return evaluate_reg_imm_alu(env, insn);
- } else if (is_pointer_value(env, insn->dst_reg)) {
- verbose("R%d pointer arithmetic prohibited\n",
- insn->dst_reg);
- return -EACCES;
- } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X &&
- is_pointer_value(env, insn->src_reg)) {
- verbose("R%d pointer arithmetic prohibited\n",
- insn->src_reg);
- return -EACCES;
- }
-
- /* If we did pointer math on a map value then just set it to our
- * PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ type so we can deal with any stores or
- * loads to this register appropriately, otherwise just mark the
- * register as unknown.
- */
- if (env->allow_ptr_leaks &&
- BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 && opcode == BPF_ADD &&
- (dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE ||
- dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ))
- dst_reg->type = PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ;
- else
- mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, insn->dst_reg);
+ return adjust_reg_min_max_vals(env, insn);
}
return 0;
@@ -2177,27 +2425,48 @@ static void find_good_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_state *state,
struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs, *reg;
int i;
- /* LLVM can generate two kind of checks:
+ if (dst_reg->off < 0)
+ /* This doesn't give us any range */
+ return;
+
+ if (dst_reg->umax_value > MAX_PACKET_OFF ||
+ dst_reg->umax_value + dst_reg->off > MAX_PACKET_OFF)
+ /* Risk of overflow. For instance, ptr + (1<<63) may be less
+ * than pkt_end, but that's because it's also less than pkt.
+ */
+ return;
+
+ /* LLVM can generate four kind of checks:
*
- * Type 1:
+ * Type 1/2:
*
* r2 = r3;
* r2 += 8;
* if (r2 > pkt_end) goto <handle exception>
* <access okay>
*
+ * r2 = r3;
+ * r2 += 8;
+ * if (r2 < pkt_end) goto <access okay>
+ * <handle exception>
+ *
* Where:
* r2 == dst_reg, pkt_end == src_reg
* r2=pkt(id=n,off=8,r=0)
* r3=pkt(id=n,off=0,r=0)
*
- * Type 2:
+ * Type 3/4:
*
* r2 = r3;
* r2 += 8;
* if (pkt_end >= r2) goto <access okay>
* <handle exception>
*
+ * r2 = r3;
+ * r2 += 8;
+ * if (pkt_end <= r2) goto <handle exception>
+ * <access okay>
+ *
* Where:
* pkt_end == dst_reg, r2 == src_reg
* r2=pkt(id=n,off=8,r=0)
@@ -2207,193 +2476,247 @@ static void find_good_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_state *state,
* so that range of bytes [r3, r3 + 8) is safe to access.
*/
+ /* If our ids match, then we must have the same max_value. And we
+ * don't care about the other reg's fixed offset, since if it's too big
+ * the range won't allow anything.
+ * dst_reg->off is known < MAX_PACKET_OFF, therefore it fits in a u16.
+ */
for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++)
if (regs[i].type == PTR_TO_PACKET && regs[i].id == dst_reg->id)
/* keep the maximum range already checked */
- regs[i].range = max(regs[i].range, dst_reg->off);
+ regs[i].range = max_t(u16, regs[i].range, dst_reg->off);
for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i += BPF_REG_SIZE) {
if (state->stack_slot_type[i] != STACK_SPILL)
continue;
reg = &state->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE];
if (reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && reg->id == dst_reg->id)
- reg->range = max(reg->range, dst_reg->off);
+ reg->range = max_t(u16, reg->range, dst_reg->off);
}
}
/* Adjusts the register min/max values in the case that the dst_reg is the
* variable register that we are working on, and src_reg is a constant or we're
* simply doing a BPF_K check.
+ * In JEQ/JNE cases we also adjust the var_off values.
*/
static void reg_set_min_max(struct bpf_reg_state *true_reg,
struct bpf_reg_state *false_reg, u64 val,
u8 opcode)
{
- bool value_from_signed = true;
- bool is_range = true;
+ /* If the dst_reg is a pointer, we can't learn anything about its
+ * variable offset from the compare (unless src_reg were a pointer into
+ * the same object, but we don't bother with that.
+ * Since false_reg and true_reg have the same type by construction, we
+ * only need to check one of them for pointerness.
+ */
+ if (__is_pointer_value(false, false_reg))
+ return;
switch (opcode) {
case BPF_JEQ:
/* If this is false then we know nothing Jon Snow, but if it is
* true then we know for sure.
*/
- true_reg->max_value = true_reg->min_value = val;
- is_range = false;
+ __mark_reg_known(true_reg, val);
break;
case BPF_JNE:
/* If this is true we know nothing Jon Snow, but if it is false
* we know the value for sure;
*/
- false_reg->max_value = false_reg->min_value = val;
- is_range = false;
+ __mark_reg_known(false_reg, val);
break;
case BPF_JGT:
- value_from_signed = false;
- /* fallthrough */
+ false_reg->umax_value = min(false_reg->umax_value, val);
+ true_reg->umin_value = max(true_reg->umin_value, val + 1);
+ break;
case BPF_JSGT:
- if (true_reg->value_from_signed != value_from_signed)
- reset_reg_range_values(true_reg, 0);
- if (false_reg->value_from_signed != value_from_signed)
- reset_reg_range_values(false_reg, 0);
- if (opcode == BPF_JGT) {
- /* Unsigned comparison, the minimum value is 0. */
- false_reg->min_value = 0;
- }
- /* If this is false then we know the maximum val is val,
- * otherwise we know the min val is val+1.
- */
- false_reg->max_value = val;
- false_reg->value_from_signed = value_from_signed;
- true_reg->min_value = val + 1;
- true_reg->value_from_signed = value_from_signed;
+ false_reg->smax_value = min_t(s64, false_reg->smax_value, val);
+ true_reg->smin_value = max_t(s64, true_reg->smin_value, val + 1);
+ break;
+ case BPF_JLT:
+ false_reg->umin_value = max(false_reg->umin_value, val);
+ true_reg->umax_value = min(true_reg->umax_value, val - 1);
+ break;
+ case BPF_JSLT:
+ false_reg->smin_value = max_t(s64, false_reg->smin_value, val);
+ true_reg->smax_value = min_t(s64, true_reg->smax_value, val - 1);
break;
case BPF_JGE:
- value_from_signed = false;
- /* fallthrough */
+ false_reg->umax_value = min(false_reg->umax_value, val - 1);
+ true_reg->umin_value = max(true_reg->umin_value, val);
+ break;
case BPF_JSGE:
- if (true_reg->value_from_signed != value_from_signed)
- reset_reg_range_values(true_reg, 0);
- if (false_reg->value_from_signed != value_from_signed)
- reset_reg_range_values(false_reg, 0);
- if (opcode == BPF_JGE) {
- /* Unsigned comparison, the minimum value is 0. */
- false_reg->min_value = 0;
- }
- /* If this is false then we know the maximum value is val - 1,
- * otherwise we know the mimimum value is val.
- */
- false_reg->max_value = val - 1;
- false_reg->value_from_signed = value_from_signed;
- true_reg->min_value = val;
- true_reg->value_from_signed = value_from_signed;
+ false_reg->smax_value = min_t(s64, false_reg->smax_value, val - 1);
+ true_reg->smin_value = max_t(s64, true_reg->smin_value, val);
+ break;
+ case BPF_JLE:
+ false_reg->umin_value = max(false_reg->umin_value, val + 1);
+ true_reg->umax_value = min(true_reg->umax_value, val);
+ break;
+ case BPF_JSLE:
+ false_reg->smin_value = max_t(s64, false_reg->smin_value, val + 1);
+ true_reg->smax_value = min_t(s64, true_reg->smax_value, val);
break;
default:
break;
}
- check_reg_overflow(false_reg);
- check_reg_overflow(true_reg);
- if (is_range) {
- if (__is_pointer_value(false, false_reg))
- reset_reg_range_values(false_reg, 0);
- if (__is_pointer_value(false, true_reg))
- reset_reg_range_values(true_reg, 0);
- }
+ __reg_deduce_bounds(false_reg);
+ __reg_deduce_bounds(true_reg);
+ /* We might have learned some bits from the bounds. */
+ __reg_bound_offset(false_reg);
+ __reg_bound_offset(true_reg);
+ /* Intersecting with the old var_off might have improved our bounds
+ * slightly. e.g. if umax was 0x7f...f and var_off was (0; 0xf...fc),
+ * then new var_off is (0; 0x7f...fc) which improves our umax.
+ */
+ __update_reg_bounds(false_reg);
+ __update_reg_bounds(true_reg);
}
-/* Same as above, but for the case that dst_reg is a CONST_IMM reg and src_reg
- * is the variable reg.
+/* Same as above, but for the case that dst_reg holds a constant and src_reg is
+ * the variable reg.
*/
static void reg_set_min_max_inv(struct bpf_reg_state *true_reg,
struct bpf_reg_state *false_reg, u64 val,
u8 opcode)
{
- bool value_from_signed = true;
- bool is_range = true;
+ if (__is_pointer_value(false, false_reg))
+ return;
switch (opcode) {
case BPF_JEQ:
/* If this is false then we know nothing Jon Snow, but if it is
* true then we know for sure.
*/
- true_reg->max_value = true_reg->min_value = val;
- is_range = false;
+ __mark_reg_known(true_reg, val);
break;
case BPF_JNE:
/* If this is true we know nothing Jon Snow, but if it is false
* we know the value for sure;
*/
- false_reg->max_value = false_reg->min_value = val;
- is_range = false;
+ __mark_reg_known(false_reg, val);
break;
case BPF_JGT:
- value_from_signed = false;
- /* fallthrough */
+ true_reg->umax_value = min(true_reg->umax_value, val - 1);
+ false_reg->umin_value = max(false_reg->umin_value, val);
+ break;
case BPF_JSGT:
- if (true_reg->value_from_signed != value_from_signed)
- reset_reg_range_values(true_reg, 0);
- if (false_reg->value_from_signed != value_from_signed)
- reset_reg_range_values(false_reg, 0);
- if (opcode == BPF_JGT) {
- /* Unsigned comparison, the minimum value is 0. */
- true_reg->min_value = 0;
- }
- /*
- * If this is false, then the val is <= the register, if it is
- * true the register <= to the val.
- */
- false_reg->min_value = val;
- false_reg->value_from_signed = value_from_signed;
- true_reg->max_value = val - 1;
- true_reg->value_from_signed = value_from_signed;
+ true_reg->smax_value = min_t(s64, true_reg->smax_value, val - 1);
+ false_reg->smin_value = max_t(s64, false_reg->smin_value, val);
+ break;
+ case BPF_JLT:
+ true_reg->umin_value = max(true_reg->umin_value, val + 1);
+ false_reg->umax_value = min(false_reg->umax_value, val);
+ break;
+ case BPF_JSLT:
+ true_reg->smin_value = max_t(s64, true_reg->smin_value, val + 1);
+ false_reg->smax_value = min_t(s64, false_reg->smax_value, val);
break;
case BPF_JGE:
- value_from_signed = false;
- /* fallthrough */
+ true_reg->umax_value = min(true_reg->umax_value, val);
+ false_reg->umin_value = max(false_reg->umin_value, val + 1);
+ break;
case BPF_JSGE:
- if (true_reg->value_from_signed != value_from_signed)
- reset_reg_range_values(true_reg, 0);
- if (false_reg->value_from_signed != value_from_signed)
- reset_reg_range_values(false_reg, 0);
- if (opcode == BPF_JGE) {
- /* Unsigned comparison, the minimum value is 0. */
- true_reg->min_value = 0;
- }
- /* If this is false then constant < register, if it is true then
- * the register < constant.
- */
- false_reg->min_value = val + 1;
- false_reg->value_from_signed = value_from_signed;
- true_reg->max_value = val;
- true_reg->value_from_signed = value_from_signed;
+ true_reg->smax_value = min_t(s64, true_reg->smax_value, val);
+ false_reg->smin_value = max_t(s64, false_reg->smin_value, val + 1);
+ break;
+ case BPF_JLE:
+ true_reg->umin_value = max(true_reg->umin_value, val);
+ false_reg->umax_value = min(false_reg->umax_value, val - 1);
+ break;
+ case BPF_JSLE:
+ true_reg->smin_value = max_t(s64, true_reg->smin_value, val);
+ false_reg->smax_value = min_t(s64, false_reg->smax_value, val - 1);
break;
default:
break;
}
- check_reg_overflow(false_reg);
- check_reg_overflow(true_reg);
- if (is_range) {
- if (__is_pointer_value(false, false_reg))
- reset_reg_range_values(false_reg, 0);
- if (__is_pointer_value(false, true_reg))
- reset_reg_range_values(true_reg, 0);
+ __reg_deduce_bounds(false_reg);
+ __reg_deduce_bounds(true_reg);
+ /* We might have learned some bits from the bounds. */
+ __reg_bound_offset(false_reg);
+ __reg_bound_offset(true_reg);
+ /* Intersecting with the old var_off might have improved our bounds
+ * slightly. e.g. if umax was 0x7f...f and var_off was (0; 0xf...fc),
+ * then new var_off is (0; 0x7f...fc) which improves our umax.
+ */
+ __update_reg_bounds(false_reg);
+ __update_reg_bounds(true_reg);
+}
+
+/* Regs are known to be equal, so intersect their min/max/var_off */
+static void __reg_combine_min_max(struct bpf_reg_state *src_reg,
+ struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg)
+{
+ src_reg->umin_value = dst_reg->umin_value = max(src_reg->umin_value,
+ dst_reg->umin_value);
+ src_reg->umax_value = dst_reg->umax_value = min(src_reg->umax_value,
+ dst_reg->umax_value);
+ src_reg->smin_value = dst_reg->smin_value = max(src_reg->smin_value,
+ dst_reg->smin_value);
+ src_reg->smax_value = dst_reg->smax_value = min(src_reg->smax_value,
+ dst_reg->smax_value);
+ src_reg->var_off = dst_reg->var_off = tnum_intersect(src_reg->var_off,
+ dst_reg->var_off);
+ /* We might have learned new bounds from the var_off. */
+ __update_reg_bounds(src_reg);
+ __update_reg_bounds(dst_reg);
+ /* We might have learned something about the sign bit. */
+ __reg_deduce_bounds(src_reg);
+ __reg_deduce_bounds(dst_reg);
+ /* We might have learned some bits from the bounds. */
+ __reg_bound_offset(src_reg);
+ __reg_bound_offset(dst_reg);
+ /* Intersecting with the old var_off might have improved our bounds
+ * slightly. e.g. if umax was 0x7f...f and var_off was (0; 0xf...fc),
+ * then new var_off is (0; 0x7f...fc) which improves our umax.
+ */
+ __update_reg_bounds(src_reg);
+ __update_reg_bounds(dst_reg);
+}
+
+static void reg_combine_min_max(struct bpf_reg_state *true_src,
+ struct bpf_reg_state *true_dst,
+ struct bpf_reg_state *false_src,
+ struct bpf_reg_state *false_dst,
+ u8 opcode)
+{
+ switch (opcode) {
+ case BPF_JEQ:
+ __reg_combine_min_max(true_src, true_dst);
+ break;
+ case BPF_JNE:
+ __reg_combine_min_max(false_src, false_dst);
+ break;
}
}
static void mark_map_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno, u32 id,
- enum bpf_reg_type type)
+ bool is_null)
{
struct bpf_reg_state *reg = &regs[regno];
if (reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL && reg->id == id) {
- if (type == UNKNOWN_VALUE) {
- __mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, regno);
+ /* Old offset (both fixed and variable parts) should
+ * have been known-zero, because we don't allow pointer
+ * arithmetic on pointers that might be NULL.
+ */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(reg->smin_value || reg->smax_value ||
+ !tnum_equals_const(reg->var_off, 0) ||
+ reg->off)) {
+ __mark_reg_known_zero(reg);
+ reg->off = 0;
+ }
+ if (is_null) {
+ reg->type = SCALAR_VALUE;
} else if (reg->map_ptr->inner_map_meta) {
reg->type = CONST_PTR_TO_MAP;
reg->map_ptr = reg->map_ptr->inner_map_meta;
} else {
- reg->type = type;
+ reg->type = PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE;
}
/* We don't need id from this point onwards anymore, thus we
* should better reset it, so that state pruning has chances
@@ -2407,19 +2730,19 @@ static void mark_map_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno, u32 id,
* be folded together at some point.
*/
static void mark_map_regs(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, u32 regno,
- enum bpf_reg_type type)
+ bool is_null)
{
struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs;
u32 id = regs[regno].id;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++)
- mark_map_reg(regs, i, id, type);
+ mark_map_reg(regs, i, id, is_null);
for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i += BPF_REG_SIZE) {
if (state->stack_slot_type[i] != STACK_SPILL)
continue;
- mark_map_reg(state->spilled_regs, i / BPF_REG_SIZE, id, type);
+ mark_map_reg(state->spilled_regs, i / BPF_REG_SIZE, id, is_null);
}
}
@@ -2431,7 +2754,7 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code);
int err;
- if (opcode > BPF_EXIT) {
+ if (opcode > BPF_JSLE) {
verbose("invalid BPF_JMP opcode %x\n", opcode);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -2443,7 +2766,7 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
}
/* check src1 operand */
- err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP);
+ err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -2460,7 +2783,7 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
}
/* check src2 operand */
- err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP);
+ err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -2469,7 +2792,8 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
/* detect if R == 0 where R was initialized to zero earlier */
if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K &&
(opcode == BPF_JEQ || opcode == BPF_JNE) &&
- dst_reg->type == CONST_IMM && dst_reg->imm == insn->imm) {
+ dst_reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE &&
+ tnum_equals_const(dst_reg->var_off, insn->imm)) {
if (opcode == BPF_JEQ) {
/* if (imm == imm) goto pc+off;
* only follow the goto, ignore fall-through
@@ -2491,17 +2815,30 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
/* detect if we are comparing against a constant value so we can adjust
* our min/max values for our dst register.
+ * this is only legit if both are scalars (or pointers to the same
+ * object, I suppose, but we don't support that right now), because
+ * otherwise the different base pointers mean the offsets aren't
+ * comparable.
*/
if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) {
- if (regs[insn->src_reg].type == CONST_IMM)
- reg_set_min_max(&other_branch->regs[insn->dst_reg],
- dst_reg, regs[insn->src_reg].imm,
- opcode);
- else if (dst_reg->type == CONST_IMM)
- reg_set_min_max_inv(&other_branch->regs[insn->src_reg],
- &regs[insn->src_reg], dst_reg->imm,
- opcode);
- } else {
+ if (dst_reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE &&
+ regs[insn->src_reg].type == SCALAR_VALUE) {
+ if (tnum_is_const(regs[insn->src_reg].var_off))
+ reg_set_min_max(&other_branch->regs[insn->dst_reg],
+ dst_reg, regs[insn->src_reg].var_off.value,
+ opcode);
+ else if (tnum_is_const(dst_reg->var_off))
+ reg_set_min_max_inv(&other_branch->regs[insn->src_reg],
+ &regs[insn->src_reg],
+ dst_reg->var_off.value, opcode);
+ else if (opcode == BPF_JEQ || opcode == BPF_JNE)
+ /* Comparing for equality, we can combine knowledge */
+ reg_combine_min_max(&other_branch->regs[insn->src_reg],
+ &other_branch->regs[insn->dst_reg],
+ &regs[insn->src_reg],
+ &regs[insn->dst_reg], opcode);
+ }
+ } else if (dst_reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE) {
reg_set_min_max(&other_branch->regs[insn->dst_reg],
dst_reg, insn->imm, opcode);
}
@@ -2513,18 +2850,24 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
/* Mark all identical map registers in each branch as either
* safe or unknown depending R == 0 or R != 0 conditional.
*/
- mark_map_regs(this_branch, insn->dst_reg,
- opcode == BPF_JEQ ? PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE : UNKNOWN_VALUE);
- mark_map_regs(other_branch, insn->dst_reg,
- opcode == BPF_JEQ ? UNKNOWN_VALUE : PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE);
+ mark_map_regs(this_branch, insn->dst_reg, opcode == BPF_JNE);
+ mark_map_regs(other_branch, insn->dst_reg, opcode == BPF_JEQ);
} else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JGT &&
dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET &&
regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END) {
find_good_pkt_pointers(this_branch, dst_reg);
+ } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JLT &&
+ dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET &&
+ regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END) {
+ find_good_pkt_pointers(other_branch, dst_reg);
} else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JGE &&
dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END &&
regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET) {
find_good_pkt_pointers(other_branch, &regs[insn->src_reg]);
+ } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JLE &&
+ dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END &&
+ regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET) {
+ find_good_pkt_pointers(this_branch, &regs[insn->src_reg]);
} else if (is_pointer_value(env, insn->dst_reg)) {
verbose("R%d pointer comparison prohibited\n", insn->dst_reg);
return -EACCES;
@@ -2557,16 +2900,15 @@ static int check_ld_imm(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
return -EINVAL;
}
- err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP);
+ err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP);
if (err)
return err;
if (insn->src_reg == 0) {
u64 imm = ((u64)(insn + 1)->imm << 32) | (u32)insn->imm;
- regs[insn->dst_reg].type = CONST_IMM;
- regs[insn->dst_reg].imm = imm;
- regs[insn->dst_reg].id = 0;
+ regs[insn->dst_reg].type = SCALAR_VALUE;
+ __mark_reg_known(&regs[insn->dst_reg], imm);
return 0;
}
@@ -2624,7 +2966,7 @@ static int check_ld_abs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
}
/* check whether implicit source operand (register R6) is readable */
- err = check_reg_arg(regs, BPF_REG_6, SRC_OP);
+ err = check_reg_arg(env, BPF_REG_6, SRC_OP);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -2635,19 +2977,22 @@ static int check_ld_abs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
if (mode == BPF_IND) {
/* check explicit source operand */
- err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP);
+ err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP);
if (err)
return err;
}
/* reset caller saved regs to unreadable */
- for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++) {
mark_reg_not_init(regs, caller_saved[i]);
+ check_reg_arg(env, caller_saved[i], DST_OP_NO_MARK);
+ }
/* mark destination R0 register as readable, since it contains
- * the value fetched from the packet
+ * the value fetched from the packet.
+ * Already marked as written above.
*/
- regs[BPF_REG_0].type = UNKNOWN_VALUE;
+ mark_reg_unknown(regs, BPF_REG_0);
return 0;
}
@@ -2850,57 +3195,144 @@ err_free:
return ret;
}
-/* the following conditions reduce the number of explored insns
- * from ~140k to ~80k for ultra large programs that use a lot of ptr_to_packet
+/* check %cur's range satisfies %old's */
+static bool range_within(struct bpf_reg_state *old,
+ struct bpf_reg_state *cur)
+{
+ return old->umin_value <= cur->umin_value &&
+ old->umax_value >= cur->umax_value &&
+ old->smin_value <= cur->smin_value &&
+ old->smax_value >= cur->smax_value;
+}
+
+/* Maximum number of register states that can exist at once */
+#define ID_MAP_SIZE (MAX_BPF_REG + MAX_BPF_STACK / BPF_REG_SIZE)
+struct idpair {
+ u32 old;
+ u32 cur;
+};
+
+/* If in the old state two registers had the same id, then they need to have
+ * the same id in the new state as well. But that id could be different from
+ * the old state, so we need to track the mapping from old to new ids.
+ * Once we have seen that, say, a reg with old id 5 had new id 9, any subsequent
+ * regs with old id 5 must also have new id 9 for the new state to be safe. But
+ * regs with a different old id could still have new id 9, we don't care about
+ * that.
+ * So we look through our idmap to see if this old id has been seen before. If
+ * so, we require the new id to match; otherwise, we add the id pair to the map.
*/
-static bool compare_ptrs_to_packet(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
- struct bpf_reg_state *old,
- struct bpf_reg_state *cur)
+static bool check_ids(u32 old_id, u32 cur_id, struct idpair *idmap)
{
- if (old->id != cur->id)
- return false;
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ID_MAP_SIZE; i++) {
+ if (!idmap[i].old) {
+ /* Reached an empty slot; haven't seen this id before */
+ idmap[i].old = old_id;
+ idmap[i].cur = cur_id;
+ return true;
+ }
+ if (idmap[i].old == old_id)
+ return idmap[i].cur == cur_id;
+ }
+ /* We ran out of idmap slots, which should be impossible */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ return false;
+}
- /* old ptr_to_packet is more conservative, since it allows smaller
- * range. Ex:
- * old(off=0,r=10) is equal to cur(off=0,r=20), because
- * old(off=0,r=10) means that with range=10 the verifier proceeded
- * further and found no issues with the program. Now we're in the same
- * spot with cur(off=0,r=20), so we're safe too, since anything further
- * will only be looking at most 10 bytes after this pointer.
- */
- if (old->off == cur->off && old->range < cur->range)
+/* Returns true if (rold safe implies rcur safe) */
+static bool regsafe(struct bpf_reg_state *rold, struct bpf_reg_state *rcur,
+ struct idpair *idmap)
+{
+ if (!(rold->live & REG_LIVE_READ))
+ /* explored state didn't use this */
return true;
- /* old(off=20,r=10) is equal to cur(off=22,re=22 or 5 or 0)
- * since both cannot be used for packet access and safe(old)
- * pointer has smaller off that could be used for further
- * 'if (ptr > data_end)' check
- * Ex:
- * old(off=20,r=10) and cur(off=22,r=22) and cur(off=22,r=0) mean
- * that we cannot access the packet.
- * The safe range is:
- * [ptr, ptr + range - off)
- * so whenever off >=range, it means no safe bytes from this pointer.
- * When comparing old->off <= cur->off, it means that older code
- * went with smaller offset and that offset was later
- * used to figure out the safe range after 'if (ptr > data_end)' check
- * Say, 'old' state was explored like:
- * ... R3(off=0, r=0)
- * R4 = R3 + 20
- * ... now R4(off=20,r=0) <-- here
- * if (R4 > data_end)
- * ... R4(off=20,r=20), R3(off=0,r=20) and R3 can be used to access.
- * ... the code further went all the way to bpf_exit.
- * Now the 'cur' state at the mark 'here' has R4(off=30,r=0).
- * old_R4(off=20,r=0) equal to cur_R4(off=30,r=0), since if the verifier
- * goes further, such cur_R4 will give larger safe packet range after
- * 'if (R4 > data_end)' and all further insn were already good with r=20,
- * so they will be good with r=30 and we can prune the search.
- */
- if (!env->strict_alignment && old->off <= cur->off &&
- old->off >= old->range && cur->off >= cur->range)
+ if (memcmp(rold, rcur, offsetof(struct bpf_reg_state, live)) == 0)
return true;
+ if (rold->type == NOT_INIT)
+ /* explored state can't have used this */
+ return true;
+ if (rcur->type == NOT_INIT)
+ return false;
+ switch (rold->type) {
+ case SCALAR_VALUE:
+ if (rcur->type == SCALAR_VALUE) {
+ /* new val must satisfy old val knowledge */
+ return range_within(rold, rcur) &&
+ tnum_in(rold->var_off, rcur->var_off);
+ } else {
+ /* if we knew anything about the old value, we're not
+ * equal, because we can't know anything about the
+ * scalar value of the pointer in the new value.
+ */
+ return rold->umin_value == 0 &&
+ rold->umax_value == U64_MAX &&
+ rold->smin_value == S64_MIN &&
+ rold->smax_value == S64_MAX &&
+ tnum_is_unknown(rold->var_off);
+ }
+ case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE:
+ /* If the new min/max/var_off satisfy the old ones and
+ * everything else matches, we are OK.
+ * We don't care about the 'id' value, because nothing
+ * uses it for PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE (only for ..._OR_NULL)
+ */
+ return memcmp(rold, rcur, offsetof(struct bpf_reg_state, id)) == 0 &&
+ range_within(rold, rcur) &&
+ tnum_in(rold->var_off, rcur->var_off);
+ case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL:
+ /* a PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE could be safe to use as a
+ * PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL into the same map.
+ * However, if the old PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL then got NULL-
+ * checked, doing so could have affected others with the same
+ * id, and we can't check for that because we lost the id when
+ * we converted to a PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE.
+ */
+ if (rcur->type != PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL)
+ return false;
+ if (memcmp(rold, rcur, offsetof(struct bpf_reg_state, id)))
+ return false;
+ /* Check our ids match any regs they're supposed to */
+ return check_ids(rold->id, rcur->id, idmap);
+ case PTR_TO_PACKET:
+ if (rcur->type != PTR_TO_PACKET)
+ return false;
+ /* We must have at least as much range as the old ptr
+ * did, so that any accesses which were safe before are
+ * still safe. This is true even if old range < old off,
+ * since someone could have accessed through (ptr - k), or
+ * even done ptr -= k in a register, to get a safe access.
+ */
+ if (rold->range > rcur->range)
+ return false;
+ /* If the offsets don't match, we can't trust our alignment;
+ * nor can we be sure that we won't fall out of range.
+ */
+ if (rold->off != rcur->off)
+ return false;
+ /* id relations must be preserved */
+ if (rold->id && !check_ids(rold->id, rcur->id, idmap))
+ return false;
+ /* new val must satisfy old val knowledge */
+ return range_within(rold, rcur) &&
+ tnum_in(rold->var_off, rcur->var_off);
+ case PTR_TO_CTX:
+ case CONST_PTR_TO_MAP:
+ case PTR_TO_STACK:
+ case PTR_TO_PACKET_END:
+ /* Only valid matches are exact, which memcmp() above
+ * would have accepted
+ */
+ default:
+ /* Don't know what's going on, just say it's not safe */
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ /* Shouldn't get here; if we do, say it's not safe */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
return false;
}
@@ -2934,44 +3366,18 @@ static bool states_equal(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
struct bpf_verifier_state *old,
struct bpf_verifier_state *cur)
{
- bool varlen_map_access = env->varlen_map_value_access;
- struct bpf_reg_state *rold, *rcur;
+ struct idpair *idmap;
+ bool ret = false;
int i;
- for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) {
- rold = &old->regs[i];
- rcur = &cur->regs[i];
-
- if (memcmp(rold, rcur, sizeof(*rold)) == 0)
- continue;
-
- /* If the ranges were not the same, but everything else was and
- * we didn't do a variable access into a map then we are a-ok.
- */
- if (!varlen_map_access &&
- memcmp(rold, rcur, offsetofend(struct bpf_reg_state, id)) == 0)
- continue;
-
- /* If we didn't map access then again we don't care about the
- * mismatched range values and it's ok if our old type was
- * UNKNOWN and we didn't go to a NOT_INIT'ed reg.
- */
- if (rold->type == NOT_INIT ||
- (!varlen_map_access && rold->type == UNKNOWN_VALUE &&
- rcur->type != NOT_INIT))
- continue;
-
- /* Don't care about the reg->id in this case. */
- if (rold->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL &&
- rcur->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL &&
- rold->map_ptr == rcur->map_ptr)
- continue;
-
- if (rold->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && rcur->type == PTR_TO_PACKET &&
- compare_ptrs_to_packet(env, rold, rcur))
- continue;
-
+ idmap = kcalloc(ID_MAP_SIZE, sizeof(struct idpair), GFP_KERNEL);
+ /* If we failed to allocate the idmap, just say it's not safe */
+ if (!idmap)
return false;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) {
+ if (!regsafe(&old->regs[i], &cur->regs[i], idmap))
+ goto out_free;
}
for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i++) {
@@ -2983,35 +3389,104 @@ static bool states_equal(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
* this verifier states are not equivalent,
* return false to continue verification of this path
*/
- return false;
+ goto out_free;
if (i % BPF_REG_SIZE)
continue;
if (old->stack_slot_type[i] != STACK_SPILL)
continue;
- if (memcmp(&old->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE],
- &cur->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE],
- sizeof(old->spilled_regs[0])))
- /* when explored and current stack slot types are
- * the same, check that stored pointers types
+ if (!regsafe(&old->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE],
+ &cur->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE],
+ idmap))
+ /* when explored and current stack slot are both storing
+ * spilled registers, check that stored pointers types
* are the same as well.
* Ex: explored safe path could have stored
- * (bpf_reg_state) {.type = PTR_TO_STACK, .imm = -8}
+ * (bpf_reg_state) {.type = PTR_TO_STACK, .off = -8}
* but current path has stored:
- * (bpf_reg_state) {.type = PTR_TO_STACK, .imm = -16}
+ * (bpf_reg_state) {.type = PTR_TO_STACK, .off = -16}
* such verifier states are not equivalent.
* return false to continue verification of this path
*/
- return false;
+ goto out_free;
else
continue;
}
- return true;
+ ret = true;
+out_free:
+ kfree(idmap);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/* A write screens off any subsequent reads; but write marks come from the
+ * straight-line code between a state and its parent. When we arrive at a
+ * jump target (in the first iteration of the propagate_liveness() loop),
+ * we didn't arrive by the straight-line code, so read marks in state must
+ * propagate to parent regardless of state's write marks.
+ */
+static bool do_propagate_liveness(const struct bpf_verifier_state *state,
+ struct bpf_verifier_state *parent)
+{
+ bool writes = parent == state->parent; /* Observe write marks */
+ bool touched = false; /* any changes made? */
+ int i;
+
+ if (!parent)
+ return touched;
+ /* Propagate read liveness of registers... */
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(BPF_REG_FP + 1 != MAX_BPF_REG);
+ /* We don't need to worry about FP liveness because it's read-only */
+ for (i = 0; i < BPF_REG_FP; i++) {
+ if (parent->regs[i].live & REG_LIVE_READ)
+ continue;
+ if (writes && (state->regs[i].live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN))
+ continue;
+ if (state->regs[i].live & REG_LIVE_READ) {
+ parent->regs[i].live |= REG_LIVE_READ;
+ touched = true;
+ }
+ }
+ /* ... and stack slots */
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) {
+ if (parent->stack_slot_type[i * BPF_REG_SIZE] != STACK_SPILL)
+ continue;
+ if (state->stack_slot_type[i * BPF_REG_SIZE] != STACK_SPILL)
+ continue;
+ if (parent->spilled_regs[i].live & REG_LIVE_READ)
+ continue;
+ if (writes && (state->spilled_regs[i].live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN))
+ continue;
+ if (state->spilled_regs[i].live & REG_LIVE_READ) {
+ parent->spilled_regs[i].live |= REG_LIVE_READ;
+ touched = true;
+ }
+ }
+ return touched;
+}
+
+/* "parent" is "a state from which we reach the current state", but initially
+ * it is not the state->parent (i.e. "the state whose straight-line code leads
+ * to the current state"), instead it is the state that happened to arrive at
+ * a (prunable) equivalent of the current state. See comment above
+ * do_propagate_liveness() for consequences of this.
+ * This function is just a more efficient way of calling mark_reg_read() or
+ * mark_stack_slot_read() on each reg in "parent" that is read in "state",
+ * though it requires that parent != state->parent in the call arguments.
+ */
+static void propagate_liveness(const struct bpf_verifier_state *state,
+ struct bpf_verifier_state *parent)
+{
+ while (do_propagate_liveness(state, parent)) {
+ /* Something changed, so we need to feed those changes onward */
+ state = parent;
+ parent = state->parent;
+ }
}
static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx)
{
struct bpf_verifier_state_list *new_sl;
struct bpf_verifier_state_list *sl;
+ int i;
sl = env->explored_states[insn_idx];
if (!sl)
@@ -3021,11 +3496,20 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx)
return 0;
while (sl != STATE_LIST_MARK) {
- if (states_equal(env, &sl->state, &env->cur_state))
+ if (states_equal(env, &sl->state, &env->cur_state)) {
/* reached equivalent register/stack state,
- * prune the search
+ * prune the search.
+ * Registers read by the continuation are read by us.
+ * If we have any write marks in env->cur_state, they
+ * will prevent corresponding reads in the continuation
+ * from reaching our parent (an explored_state). Our
+ * own state will get the read marks recorded, but
+ * they'll be immediately forgotten as we're pruning
+ * this state and will pop a new one.
*/
+ propagate_liveness(&sl->state, &env->cur_state);
return 1;
+ }
sl = sl->next;
}
@@ -3043,6 +3527,19 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx)
memcpy(&new_sl->state, &env->cur_state, sizeof(env->cur_state));
new_sl->next = env->explored_states[insn_idx];
env->explored_states[insn_idx] = new_sl;
+ /* connect new state to parentage chain */
+ env->cur_state.parent = &new_sl->state;
+ /* clear write marks in current state: the writes we did are not writes
+ * our child did, so they don't screen off its reads from us.
+ * (There are no read marks in current state, because reads always mark
+ * their parent and current state never has children yet. Only
+ * explored_states can get read marks.)
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < BPF_REG_FP; i++)
+ env->cur_state.regs[i].live = REG_LIVE_NONE;
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++)
+ if (env->cur_state.stack_slot_type[i * BPF_REG_SIZE] == STACK_SPILL)
+ env->cur_state.spilled_regs[i].live = REG_LIVE_NONE;
return 0;
}
@@ -3066,8 +3563,8 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
bool do_print_state = false;
init_reg_state(regs);
+ state->parent = NULL;
insn_idx = 0;
- env->varlen_map_value_access = false;
for (;;) {
struct bpf_insn *insn;
u8 class;
@@ -3136,11 +3633,11 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
/* check for reserved fields is already done */
/* check src operand */
- err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP);
+ err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP);
if (err)
return err;
- err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP_NO_MARK);
+ err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP_NO_MARK);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -3190,11 +3687,11 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
}
/* check src1 operand */
- err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP);
+ err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP);
if (err)
return err;
/* check src2 operand */
- err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP);
+ err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -3225,7 +3722,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
return -EINVAL;
}
/* check src operand */
- err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP);
+ err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -3279,7 +3776,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
* of bpf_exit, which means that program wrote
* something into it earlier
*/
- err = check_reg_arg(regs, BPF_REG_0, SRC_OP);
+ err = check_reg_arg(env, BPF_REG_0, SRC_OP);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -3319,7 +3816,6 @@ process_bpf_exit:
verbose("invalid BPF_LD mode\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
- reset_reg_range_values(regs, insn->dst_reg);
} else {
verbose("unknown insn class %d\n", class);
return -EINVAL;
@@ -3678,7 +4174,11 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
continue;
}
- if (ebpf_jit_enabled() && insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem) {
+ /* BPF_EMIT_CALL() assumptions in some of the map_gen_lookup
+ * handlers are currently limited to 64 bit only.
+ */
+ if (ebpf_jit_enabled() && BITS_PER_LONG == 64 &&
+ insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem) {
map_ptr = env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].map_ptr;
if (map_ptr == BPF_MAP_PTR_POISON ||
!map_ptr->ops->map_gen_lookup)
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 294f1927f944..fb415e3d824b 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -8134,7 +8134,7 @@ static void perf_event_free_bpf_handler(struct perf_event *event)
static int perf_event_set_bpf_prog(struct perf_event *event, u32 prog_fd)
{
- bool is_kprobe, is_tracepoint;
+ bool is_kprobe, is_tracepoint, is_syscall_tp;
struct bpf_prog *prog;
if (event->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT)
@@ -8145,7 +8145,8 @@ static int perf_event_set_bpf_prog(struct perf_event *event, u32 prog_fd)
is_kprobe = event->tp_event->flags & TRACE_EVENT_FL_UKPROBE;
is_tracepoint = event->tp_event->flags & TRACE_EVENT_FL_TRACEPOINT;
- if (!is_kprobe && !is_tracepoint)
+ is_syscall_tp = is_syscall_trace_event(event->tp_event);
+ if (!is_kprobe && !is_tracepoint && !is_syscall_tp)
/* bpf programs can only be attached to u/kprobe or tracepoint */
return -EINVAL;
@@ -8154,13 +8155,14 @@ static int perf_event_set_bpf_prog(struct perf_event *event, u32 prog_fd)
return PTR_ERR(prog);
if ((is_kprobe && prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE) ||
- (is_tracepoint && prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT)) {
+ (is_tracepoint && prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT) ||
+ (is_syscall_tp && prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT)) {
/* valid fd, but invalid bpf program type */
bpf_prog_put(prog);
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (is_tracepoint) {
+ if (is_tracepoint || is_syscall_tp) {
int off = trace_event_get_offsets(event->tp_event);
if (prog->aux->max_ctx_offset > off) {
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c b/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
index 74d9a86eccc0..9c4eef20301c 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
@@ -559,11 +559,29 @@ static DECLARE_BITMAP(enabled_perf_exit_syscalls, NR_syscalls);
static int sys_perf_refcount_enter;
static int sys_perf_refcount_exit;
+static int perf_call_bpf_enter(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct pt_regs *regs,
+ struct syscall_metadata *sys_data,
+ struct syscall_trace_enter *rec) {
+ struct syscall_tp_t {
+ unsigned long long regs;
+ unsigned long syscall_nr;
+ unsigned long args[sys_data->nb_args];
+ } param;
+ int i;
+
+ *(struct pt_regs **)&param = regs;
+ param.syscall_nr = rec->nr;
+ for (i = 0; i < sys_data->nb_args; i++)
+ param.args[i] = rec->args[i];
+ return trace_call_bpf(prog, &param);
+}
+
static void perf_syscall_enter(void *ignore, struct pt_regs *regs, long id)
{
struct syscall_metadata *sys_data;
struct syscall_trace_enter *rec;
struct hlist_head *head;
+ struct bpf_prog *prog;
int syscall_nr;
int rctx;
int size;
@@ -578,8 +596,9 @@ static void perf_syscall_enter(void *ignore, struct pt_regs *regs, long id)
if (!sys_data)
return;
+ prog = READ_ONCE(sys_data->enter_event->prog);
head = this_cpu_ptr(sys_data->enter_event->perf_events);
- if (hlist_empty(head))
+ if (!prog && hlist_empty(head))
return;
/* get the size after alignment with the u32 buffer size field */
@@ -594,6 +613,13 @@ static void perf_syscall_enter(void *ignore, struct pt_regs *regs, long id)
rec->nr = syscall_nr;
syscall_get_arguments(current, regs, 0, sys_data->nb_args,
(unsigned long *)&rec->args);
+
+ if ((prog && !perf_call_bpf_enter(prog, regs, sys_data, rec)) ||
+ hlist_empty(head)) {
+ perf_swevent_put_recursion_context(rctx);
+ return;
+ }
+
perf_trace_buf_submit(rec, size, rctx,
sys_data->enter_event->event.type, 1, regs,
head, NULL, NULL);
@@ -633,11 +659,26 @@ static void perf_sysenter_disable(struct trace_event_call *call)
mutex_unlock(&syscall_trace_lock);
}
+static int perf_call_bpf_exit(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct pt_regs *regs,
+ struct syscall_trace_exit *rec) {
+ struct syscall_tp_t {
+ unsigned long long regs;
+ unsigned long syscall_nr;
+ unsigned long ret;
+ } param;
+
+ *(struct pt_regs **)&param = regs;
+ param.syscall_nr = rec->nr;
+ param.ret = rec->ret;
+ return trace_call_bpf(prog, &param);
+}
+
static void perf_syscall_exit(void *ignore, struct pt_regs *regs, long ret)
{
struct syscall_metadata *sys_data;
struct syscall_trace_exit *rec;
struct hlist_head *head;
+ struct bpf_prog *prog;
int syscall_nr;
int rctx;
int size;
@@ -652,8 +693,9 @@ static void perf_syscall_exit(void *ignore, struct pt_regs *regs, long ret)
if (!sys_data)
return;
+ prog = READ_ONCE(sys_data->exit_event->prog);
head = this_cpu_ptr(sys_data->exit_event->perf_events);
- if (hlist_empty(head))
+ if (!prog && hlist_empty(head))
return;
/* We can probably do that at build time */
@@ -666,6 +708,13 @@ static void perf_syscall_exit(void *ignore, struct pt_regs *regs, long ret)
rec->nr = syscall_nr;
rec->ret = syscall_get_return_value(current, regs);
+
+ if ((prog && !perf_call_bpf_exit(prog, regs, rec)) ||
+ hlist_empty(head)) {
+ perf_swevent_put_recursion_context(rctx);
+ return;
+ }
+
perf_trace_buf_submit(rec, size, rctx, sys_data->exit_event->event.type,
1, regs, head, NULL, NULL);
}