Merge tag 'ipsec-2023-05-16' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/klassert/ipsec

Steffen Klassert says:

====================
pull request (net): ipsec 2023-05-16

1) Don't check the policy default if we have an allow
   policy. Fix from Sabrina Dubroca.

2) Fix netdevice refount usage on offload.
   From Leon Romanovsky.

3) Use netdev_put instead of dev_puti to correctly release
   the netdev on failure in xfrm_dev_policy_add.
   From Leon Romanovsky.

4) Revert "Fix XFRM-I support for nested ESP tunnels"
   This broke Netfilter policy matching.
   From Martin Willi.

5) Reject optional tunnel/BEET mode templates in outbound policies
   on netlink and pfkey sockets. From Tobias Brunner.

6) Check if_id in inbound policy/secpath match to make
   it symetric to the outbound codepath.
   From Benedict Wong.

* tag 'ipsec-2023-05-16' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/klassert/ipsec:
  xfrm: Check if_id in inbound policy/secpath match
  af_key: Reject optional tunnel/BEET mode templates in outbound policies
  xfrm: Reject optional tunnel/BEET mode templates in outbound policies
  Revert "Fix XFRM-I support for nested ESP tunnels"
  xfrm: Fix leak of dev tracker
  xfrm: release all offloaded policy memory
  xfrm: don't check the default policy if the policy allows the packet
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230516052405.2677554-1-steffen.klassert@secunet.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 10 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index d720e163ae6e..c34a2a06ca94 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -1770,7 +1770,7 @@ static void copy_templates(struct xfrm_policy *xp, struct xfrm_user_tmpl *ut,
 }
 
 static int validate_tmpl(int nr, struct xfrm_user_tmpl *ut, u16 family,
-			 struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+			 int dir, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
 {
 	u16 prev_family;
 	int i;
@@ -1796,6 +1796,10 @@ static int validate_tmpl(int nr, struct xfrm_user_tmpl *ut, u16 family,
 		switch (ut[i].mode) {
 		case XFRM_MODE_TUNNEL:
 		case XFRM_MODE_BEET:
+			if (ut[i].optional && dir == XFRM_POLICY_OUT) {
+				NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Mode in optional template not allowed in outbound policy");
+				return -EINVAL;
+			}
 			break;
 		default:
 			if (ut[i].family != prev_family) {
@@ -1833,7 +1837,7 @@ static int validate_tmpl(int nr, struct xfrm_user_tmpl *ut, u16 family,
 }
 
 static int copy_from_user_tmpl(struct xfrm_policy *pol, struct nlattr **attrs,
-			       struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+			       int dir, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
 {
 	struct nlattr *rt = attrs[XFRMA_TMPL];
 
@@ -1844,7 +1848,7 @@ static int copy_from_user_tmpl(struct xfrm_policy *pol, struct nlattr **attrs,
 		int nr = nla_len(rt) / sizeof(*utmpl);
 		int err;
 
-		err = validate_tmpl(nr, utmpl, pol->family, extack);
+		err = validate_tmpl(nr, utmpl, pol->family, dir, extack);
 		if (err)
 			return err;
 
@@ -1921,7 +1925,7 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_policy_construct(struct net *net,
 	if (err)
 		goto error;
 
-	if (!(err = copy_from_user_tmpl(xp, attrs, extack)))
+	if (!(err = copy_from_user_tmpl(xp, attrs, p->dir, extack)))
 		err = copy_from_user_sec_ctx(xp, attrs);
 	if (err)
 		goto error;
@@ -1980,6 +1984,7 @@ static int xfrm_add_policy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 
 	if (err) {
 		xfrm_dev_policy_delete(xp);
+		xfrm_dev_policy_free(xp);
 		security_xfrm_policy_free(xp->security);
 		kfree(xp);
 		return err;
@@ -3499,7 +3504,7 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_compile_policy(struct sock *sk, int opt,
 		return NULL;
 
 	nr = ((len - sizeof(*p)) / sizeof(*ut));
-	if (validate_tmpl(nr, ut, p->sel.family, NULL))
+	if (validate_tmpl(nr, ut, p->sel.family, p->dir, NULL))
 		return NULL;
 
 	if (p->dir > XFRM_POLICY_OUT)