summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/rust
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBenno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>2024-04-03 19:43:37 +0000
committerMiguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>2024-05-05 18:05:00 +0200
commit9218cf826f1dbacbb857e6eabfae164d8ba05dea (patch)
tree907d661b0600f5fa83e91d97daaddb2e13f146f5 /rust
parenta0a4e17013f68739733028bba89673cdbb9caabd (diff)
rust: init: change the generated name of guard variables
The initializers created by the `[try_][pin_]init!` macros utilize the guard pattern to drop already initialized fields, when initialization fails mid-way. These guards are generated to have the same name as the field that they handle. To prevent namespacing issues [1] when the field name is the same as e.g. a constant name, add `__` as a prefix and `_guard` as the suffix. [ Gary says: "Here's the simplified example: ``` macro_rules! f { () => { let a = 1; let _: u32 = a; } } const a: u64 = 1; fn main() { f!(); } ``` The `a` in `f` have a different hygiene so normally it is scoped to the macro expansion and wouldn't escape. Interestingly a constant is still preferred despite the hygiene so constants escaped into the macro, leading to the error." - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/1e8a2a1f-abbf-44ba-8344-705a9cbb1627@proton.me/ [1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240403194321.88716-1-benno.lossin@proton.me [ Added Benno's link and Gary's simplified example. - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'rust')
-rw-r--r--rust/kernel/init/macros.rs28
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/rust/kernel/init/macros.rs b/rust/kernel/init/macros.rs
index 624e9108e3b4..02ecedc4ae7a 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/init/macros.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/init/macros.rs
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@
//! // error type is `Infallible`) we will need to drop this field if there
//! // is an error later. This `DropGuard` will drop the field when it gets
//! // dropped and has not yet been forgotten.
-//! let t = unsafe {
+//! let __t_guard = unsafe {
//! ::pinned_init::__internal::DropGuard::new(::core::addr_of_mut!((*slot).t))
//! };
//! // Expansion of `x: 0,`:
@@ -261,14 +261,14 @@
//! unsafe { ::core::ptr::write(::core::addr_of_mut!((*slot).x), x) };
//! }
//! // We again create a `DropGuard`.
-//! let x = unsafe {
+//! let __x_guard = unsafe {
//! ::kernel::init::__internal::DropGuard::new(::core::addr_of_mut!((*slot).x))
//! };
//! // Since initialization has successfully completed, we can now forget
//! // the guards. This is not `mem::forget`, since we only have
//! // `&DropGuard`.
-//! ::core::mem::forget(x);
-//! ::core::mem::forget(t);
+//! ::core::mem::forget(__x_guard);
+//! ::core::mem::forget(__t_guard);
//! // Here we use the type checker to ensure that every field has been
//! // initialized exactly once, since this is `if false` it will never get
//! // executed, but still type-checked.
@@ -461,16 +461,16 @@
//! {
//! unsafe { ::core::ptr::write(::core::addr_of_mut!((*slot).a), a) };
//! }
-//! let a = unsafe {
+//! let __a_guard = unsafe {
//! ::kernel::init::__internal::DropGuard::new(::core::addr_of_mut!((*slot).a))
//! };
//! let init = Bar::new(36);
//! unsafe { data.b(::core::addr_of_mut!((*slot).b), b)? };
-//! let b = unsafe {
+//! let __b_guard = unsafe {
//! ::kernel::init::__internal::DropGuard::new(::core::addr_of_mut!((*slot).b))
//! };
-//! ::core::mem::forget(b);
-//! ::core::mem::forget(a);
+//! ::core::mem::forget(__b_guard);
+//! ::core::mem::forget(__a_guard);
//! #[allow(unreachable_code, clippy::diverging_sub_expression)]
//! let _ = || {
//! unsafe {
@@ -1209,14 +1209,14 @@ macro_rules! __init_internal {
// We use `paste!` to create new hygiene for `$field`.
::kernel::macros::paste! {
// SAFETY: We forget the guard later when initialization has succeeded.
- let [<$field>] = unsafe {
+ let [< __ $field _guard >] = unsafe {
$crate::init::__internal::DropGuard::new(::core::ptr::addr_of_mut!((*$slot).$field))
};
$crate::__init_internal!(init_slot($use_data):
@data($data),
@slot($slot),
- @guards([<$field>], $($guards,)*),
+ @guards([< __ $field _guard >], $($guards,)*),
@munch_fields($($rest)*),
);
}
@@ -1240,14 +1240,14 @@ macro_rules! __init_internal {
// We use `paste!` to create new hygiene for `$field`.
::kernel::macros::paste! {
// SAFETY: We forget the guard later when initialization has succeeded.
- let [<$field>] = unsafe {
+ let [< __ $field _guard >] = unsafe {
$crate::init::__internal::DropGuard::new(::core::ptr::addr_of_mut!((*$slot).$field))
};
$crate::__init_internal!(init_slot():
@data($data),
@slot($slot),
- @guards([<$field>], $($guards,)*),
+ @guards([< __ $field _guard >], $($guards,)*),
@munch_fields($($rest)*),
);
}
@@ -1272,14 +1272,14 @@ macro_rules! __init_internal {
// We use `paste!` to create new hygiene for `$field`.
::kernel::macros::paste! {
// SAFETY: We forget the guard later when initialization has succeeded.
- let [<$field>] = unsafe {
+ let [< __ $field _guard >] = unsafe {
$crate::init::__internal::DropGuard::new(::core::ptr::addr_of_mut!((*$slot).$field))
};
$crate::__init_internal!(init_slot($($use_data)?):
@data($data),
@slot($slot),
- @guards([<$field>], $($guards,)*),
+ @guards([< __ $field _guard >], $($guards,)*),
@munch_fields($($rest)*),
);
}