diff options
author | Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com> | 2024-12-11 23:01:43 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> | 2024-12-17 14:23:18 -0800 |
commit | 498d5b14db8c9118be139f668720c67bea2dc344 (patch) | |
tree | 17a05304f9bebb47fd5cb8f84f0a2578ec12c08b /tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c | |
parent | 78d4f34e2115b517bcbfe7ec0d018bbbb6f9b0b8 (diff) |
riscv: selftests: Fix warnings pointer masking test
When compiling the pointer masking tests with -Wall this warning
is present:
pointer_masking.c: In function ‘test_tagged_addr_abi_sysctl’:
pointer_masking.c:203:9: warning: ignoring return value of ‘pwrite’
declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result]
203 | pwrite(fd, &value, 1, 0); |
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ pointer_masking.c:208:9: warning:
ignoring return value of ‘pwrite’ declared with attribute
‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result]
208 | pwrite(fd, &value, 1, 0);
I came across this on riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu
11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04).
Fix this by checking that the number of bytes written equal the expected
number of bytes written.
Fixes: 7470b5afd150 ("riscv: selftests: Add a pointer masking test")
Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241211-fix_warnings_pointer_masking_tests-v6-1-c7ae708fbd2f@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c')
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c | 28 |
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c index dee41b7ee3e3..059d2e87eb1f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c @@ -185,8 +185,20 @@ static void test_fork_exec(void) } } +static bool pwrite_wrapper(int fd, void *buf, size_t count, const char *msg) +{ + int ret = pwrite(fd, buf, count, 0); + + if (ret != count) { + ksft_perror(msg); + return false; + } + return true; +} + static void test_tagged_addr_abi_sysctl(void) { + char *err_pwrite_msg = "failed to write to /proc/sys/abi/tagged_addr_disabled\n"; char value; int fd; @@ -200,14 +212,18 @@ static void test_tagged_addr_abi_sysctl(void) } value = '1'; - pwrite(fd, &value, 1, 0); - ksft_test_result(set_tagged_addr_ctrl(min_pmlen, true) == -EINVAL, - "sysctl disabled\n"); + if (!pwrite_wrapper(fd, &value, 1, "write '1'")) + ksft_test_result_fail(err_pwrite_msg); + else + ksft_test_result(set_tagged_addr_ctrl(min_pmlen, true) == -EINVAL, + "sysctl disabled\n"); value = '0'; - pwrite(fd, &value, 1, 0); - ksft_test_result(set_tagged_addr_ctrl(min_pmlen, true) == 0, - "sysctl enabled\n"); + if (!pwrite_wrapper(fd, &value, 1, "write '0'")) + ksft_test_result_fail(err_pwrite_msg); + else + ksft_test_result(set_tagged_addr_ctrl(min_pmlen, true) == 0, + "sysctl enabled\n"); set_tagged_addr_ctrl(0, false); |