diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/clk/clk_test.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/clk/clk_test.c | 3565 |
1 files changed, 3565 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..a268d7b5d4cb --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c @@ -0,0 +1,3565 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Kunit tests for clk framework + */ +#include <linux/clk.h> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h> +#include <linux/clk/clk-conf.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> + +/* Needed for clk_hw_get_clk() */ +#include "clk.h" + +#include <kunit/clk.h> +#include <kunit/of.h> +#include <kunit/platform_device.h> +#include <kunit/test.h> + +#include "kunit_clk_assigned_rates.h" +#include "clk_parent_data_test.h" + +static const struct clk_ops empty_clk_ops = { }; + +#define DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE (42 * 1000 * 1000) +#define DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 (142 * 1000 * 1000) +#define DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 (242 * 1000 * 1000) + +struct clk_dummy_context { + struct clk_hw hw; + unsigned long rate; +}; + +static unsigned long clk_dummy_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, + unsigned long parent_rate) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = + container_of(hw, struct clk_dummy_context, hw); + + return ctx->rate; +} + +static int clk_dummy_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, + struct clk_rate_request *req) +{ + /* Just return the same rate without modifying it */ + return 0; +} + +static int clk_dummy_maximize_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, + struct clk_rate_request *req) +{ + /* + * If there's a maximum set, always run the clock at the maximum + * allowed. + */ + if (req->max_rate < ULONG_MAX) + req->rate = req->max_rate; + + return 0; +} + +static int clk_dummy_minimize_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, + struct clk_rate_request *req) +{ + /* + * If there's a minimum set, always run the clock at the minimum + * allowed. + */ + if (req->min_rate > 0) + req->rate = req->min_rate; + + return 0; +} + +static int clk_dummy_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, + unsigned long rate, + unsigned long parent_rate) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = + container_of(hw, struct clk_dummy_context, hw); + + ctx->rate = rate; + return 0; +} + +static int clk_dummy_single_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index) +{ + if (index >= clk_hw_get_num_parents(hw)) + return -EINVAL; + + return 0; +} + +static u8 clk_dummy_single_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw) +{ + return 0; +} + +static const struct clk_ops clk_dummy_rate_ops = { + .recalc_rate = clk_dummy_recalc_rate, + .determine_rate = clk_dummy_determine_rate, + .set_rate = clk_dummy_set_rate, +}; + +static const struct clk_ops clk_dummy_maximize_rate_ops = { + .recalc_rate = clk_dummy_recalc_rate, + .determine_rate = clk_dummy_maximize_rate, + .set_rate = clk_dummy_set_rate, +}; + +static const struct clk_ops clk_dummy_minimize_rate_ops = { + .recalc_rate = clk_dummy_recalc_rate, + .determine_rate = clk_dummy_minimize_rate, + .set_rate = clk_dummy_set_rate, +}; + +static const struct clk_ops clk_dummy_single_parent_ops = { + /* + * FIXME: Even though we should probably be able to use + * __clk_mux_determine_rate() here, if we use it and call + * clk_round_rate() or clk_set_rate() with a rate lower than + * what all the parents can provide, it will return -EINVAL. + * + * This is due to the fact that it has the undocumented + * behaviour to always pick up the closest rate higher than the + * requested rate. If we get something lower, it thus considers + * that it's not acceptable and will return an error. + * + * It's somewhat inconsistent and creates a weird threshold + * between rates above the parent rate which would be rounded to + * what the parent can provide, but rates below will simply + * return an error. + */ + .determine_rate = __clk_mux_determine_rate_closest, + .set_parent = clk_dummy_single_set_parent, + .get_parent = clk_dummy_single_get_parent, +}; + +struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx { + struct clk_dummy_context parents_ctx[2]; + struct clk_hw hw; + u8 current_parent; +}; + +static int clk_multiple_parents_mux_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index) +{ + struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = + container_of(hw, struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx, hw); + + if (index >= clk_hw_get_num_parents(hw)) + return -EINVAL; + + ctx->current_parent = index; + + return 0; +} + +static u8 clk_multiple_parents_mux_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw) +{ + struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = + container_of(hw, struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx, hw); + + return ctx->current_parent; +} + +static const struct clk_ops clk_multiple_parents_mux_ops = { + .get_parent = clk_multiple_parents_mux_get_parent, + .set_parent = clk_multiple_parents_mux_set_parent, + .determine_rate = __clk_mux_determine_rate_closest, +}; + +static const struct clk_ops clk_multiple_parents_no_reparent_mux_ops = { + .determine_rate = clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent, + .get_parent = clk_multiple_parents_mux_get_parent, + .set_parent = clk_multiple_parents_mux_set_parent, +}; + +static int clk_test_init_with_ops(struct kunit *test, const struct clk_ops *ops) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx; + struct clk_init_data init = { }; + int ret; + + ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ctx) + return -ENOMEM; + ctx->rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE; + test->priv = ctx; + + init.name = "test_dummy_rate"; + init.ops = ops; + ctx->hw.init = &init; + + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + return 0; +} + +static int clk_test_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + return clk_test_init_with_ops(test, &clk_dummy_rate_ops); +} + +static int clk_maximize_test_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + return clk_test_init_with_ops(test, &clk_dummy_maximize_rate_ops); +} + +static int clk_minimize_test_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + return clk_test_init_with_ops(test, &clk_dummy_minimize_rate_ops); +} + +static void clk_test_exit(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + + clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->hw); +} + +/* + * Test that the actual rate matches what is returned by clk_get_rate() + */ +static void clk_test_get_rate(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + unsigned long rate; + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, ctx->rate); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that, after a call to clk_set_rate(), the rate returned by + * clk_get_rate() matches. + * + * This assumes that clk_ops.determine_rate or clk_ops.round_rate won't + * modify the requested rate, which is our case in clk_dummy_rate_ops. + */ +static void clk_test_set_get_rate(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + unsigned long rate; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that, after several calls to clk_set_rate(), the rate returned + * by clk_get_rate() matches the last one. + * + * This assumes that clk_ops.determine_rate or clk_ops.round_rate won't + * modify the requested rate, which is our case in clk_dummy_rate_ops. + */ +static void clk_test_set_set_get_rate(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + unsigned long rate; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1), + 0); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that clk_round_rate and clk_set_rate are consistent and will + * return the same frequency. + */ +static void clk_test_round_set_get_rate(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + unsigned long set_rate; + long rounded_rate; + + rounded_rate = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rounded_rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rounded_rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1), + 0); + + set_rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, set_rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rounded_rate, set_rate); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +static struct kunit_case clk_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_get_rate), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_set_get_rate), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_set_set_get_rate), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_round_set_get_rate), + {} +}; + +/* + * Test suite for a basic rate clock, without any parent. + * + * These tests exercise the rate API with simple scenarios + */ +static struct kunit_suite clk_test_suite = { + .name = "clk-test", + .init = clk_test_init, + .exit = clk_test_exit, + .test_cases = clk_test_cases, +}; + +static int clk_uncached_test_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx; + int ret; + + ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ctx) + return -ENOMEM; + test->priv = ctx; + + ctx->rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE; + ctx->hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("test-clk", + &clk_dummy_rate_ops, + CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE); + + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + return 0; +} + +/* + * Test that for an uncached clock, the clock framework doesn't cache + * the rate and clk_get_rate() will return the underlying clock rate + * even if it changed. + */ +static void clk_test_uncached_get_rate(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + unsigned long rate; + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE); + + /* We change the rate behind the clock framework's back */ + ctx->rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1; + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that for an uncached clock, clk_set_rate_range() will work + * properly if the rate hasn't changed. + */ +static void clk_test_uncached_set_range(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + unsigned long rate; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that for an uncached clock, clk_set_rate_range() will work + * properly if the rate has changed in hardware. + * + * In this case, it means that if the rate wasn't initially in the range + * we're trying to set, but got changed at some point into the range + * without the kernel knowing about it, its rate shouldn't be affected. + */ +static void clk_test_uncached_updated_rate_set_range(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + unsigned long rate; + + /* We change the rate behind the clock framework's back */ + ctx->rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000; + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +static struct kunit_case clk_uncached_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_uncached_get_rate), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_uncached_set_range), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_uncached_updated_rate_set_range), + {} +}; + +/* + * Test suite for a basic, uncached, rate clock, without any parent. + * + * These tests exercise the rate API with simple scenarios + */ +static struct kunit_suite clk_uncached_test_suite = { + .name = "clk-uncached-test", + .init = clk_uncached_test_init, + .exit = clk_test_exit, + .test_cases = clk_uncached_test_cases, +}; + +static int +clk_multiple_parents_mux_test_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx; + const char *parents[2] = { "parent-0", "parent-1"}; + int ret; + + ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ctx) + return -ENOMEM; + test->priv = ctx; + + ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-0", + &clk_dummy_rate_ops, + 0); + ctx->parents_ctx[0].rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1; + ret = clk_hw_register_kunit(test, NULL, &ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-1", + &clk_dummy_rate_ops, + 0); + ctx->parents_ctx[1].rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2; + ret = clk_hw_register_kunit(test, NULL, &ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ctx->current_parent = 0; + ctx->hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_PARENTS("test-mux", parents, + &clk_multiple_parents_mux_ops, + CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT); + ret = clk_hw_register_kunit(test, NULL, &ctx->hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + return 0; +} + +/* + * Test that for a clock with multiple parents, clk_get_parent() + * actually returns the current one. + */ +static void +clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_get_parent(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + struct clk *parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw, NULL); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_is_match(clk_get_parent(clk), parent)); + + clk_put(parent); + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that for a clock with a multiple parents, clk_has_parent() + * actually reports all of them as parents. + */ +static void +clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_has_parent(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + struct clk *parent; + + parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw, NULL); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_has_parent(clk, parent)); + clk_put(parent); + + parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_has_parent(clk, parent)); + clk_put(parent); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that for a clock with a multiple parents, if we set a range on + * that clock and the parent is changed, its rate after the reparenting + * is still within the range we asked for. + * + * FIXME: clk_set_parent() only does the reparenting but doesn't + * reevaluate whether the new clock rate is within its boundaries or + * not. + */ +static void +clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_set_range_set_parent_get_rate(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk_kunit(test, hw, NULL); + struct clk *parent1, *parent2; + unsigned long rate; + int ret; + + kunit_skip(test, "This needs to be fixed in the core."); + + parent1 = clk_hw_get_clk_kunit(test, &ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent1); + KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, clk_is_match(clk_get_parent(clk), parent1)); + + parent2 = clk_hw_get_clk_kunit(test, &ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent2); + + ret = clk_set_rate(parent1, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + ret = clk_set_rate(parent2, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + ret = clk_set_parent(clk, parent2); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000); +} + +static struct kunit_case clk_multiple_parents_mux_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_get_parent), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_has_parent), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_set_range_set_parent_get_rate), + {} +}; + +/* + * Test suite for a basic mux clock with two parents, with + * CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT on the child. + * + * These tests exercise the consumer API and check that the state of the + * child and parents are sane and consistent. + */ +static struct kunit_suite +clk_multiple_parents_mux_test_suite = { + .name = "clk-multiple-parents-mux-test", + .init = clk_multiple_parents_mux_test_init, + .test_cases = clk_multiple_parents_mux_test_cases, +}; + +static int +clk_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_test_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx; + const char *parents[2] = { "missing-parent", "proper-parent"}; + int ret; + + ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ctx) + return -ENOMEM; + test->priv = ctx; + + ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("proper-parent", + &clk_dummy_rate_ops, + 0); + ctx->parents_ctx[1].rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE; + ret = clk_hw_register_kunit(test, NULL, &ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ctx->hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_PARENTS("test-orphan-mux", parents, + &clk_multiple_parents_mux_ops, + CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT); + ret = clk_hw_register_kunit(test, NULL, &ctx->hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + return 0; +} + +/* + * Test that, for a mux whose current parent hasn't been registered yet and is + * thus orphan, clk_get_parent() will return NULL. + */ +static void +clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_get_parent(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, clk_get_parent(clk), NULL); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that, for a mux whose current parent hasn't been registered yet, + * calling clk_set_parent() to a valid parent will properly update the + * mux parent and its orphan status. + */ +static void +clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + struct clk *parent, *new_parent; + int ret; + + parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent); + + ret = clk_set_parent(clk, parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + new_parent = clk_get_parent(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_is_match(parent, new_parent)); + + clk_put(parent); + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that, for a mux that started orphan but got switched to a valid + * parent, calling clk_drop_range() on the mux won't affect the parent + * rate. + */ +static void +clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_drop_range(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + struct clk *parent; + unsigned long parent_rate, new_parent_rate; + int ret; + + parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent); + + parent_rate = clk_get_rate(parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, parent_rate, 0); + + ret = clk_set_parent(clk, parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + ret = clk_drop_range(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + new_parent_rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, new_parent_rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, parent_rate, new_parent_rate); + + clk_put(parent); + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that, for a mux that started orphan but got switched to a valid + * parent, the rate of the mux and its new parent are consistent. + */ +static void +clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_get_rate(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + struct clk *parent; + unsigned long parent_rate, rate; + int ret; + + parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent); + + parent_rate = clk_get_rate(parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, parent_rate, 0); + + ret = clk_set_parent(clk, parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, parent_rate, rate); + + clk_put(parent); + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that, for a mux that started orphan but got switched to a valid + * parent, calling clk_put() on the mux won't affect the parent rate. + */ +static void +clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_put(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk *clk, *parent; + unsigned long parent_rate, new_parent_rate; + int ret; + + parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent); + + clk = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, clk); + + parent_rate = clk_get_rate(parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, parent_rate, 0); + + ret = clk_set_parent(clk, parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + clk_put(clk); + + new_parent_rate = clk_get_rate(parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, new_parent_rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, parent_rate, new_parent_rate); + + clk_put(parent); +} + +/* + * Test that, for a mux that started orphan but got switched to a valid + * parent, calling clk_set_rate_range() will affect the parent state if + * its rate is out of range. + */ +static void +clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_set_range_modified(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + struct clk *parent; + unsigned long rate; + int ret; + + parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent); + + ret = clk_set_parent(clk, parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + + clk_put(parent); + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that, for a mux that started orphan but got switched to a valid + * parent, calling clk_set_rate_range() won't affect the parent state if + * its rate is within range. + */ +static void +clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_set_range_untouched(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + struct clk *parent; + unsigned long parent_rate, new_parent_rate; + int ret; + + parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent); + + parent_rate = clk_get_rate(parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, parent_rate, 0); + + ret = clk_set_parent(clk, parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE - 1000, + DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE + 1000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + new_parent_rate = clk_get_rate(parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, new_parent_rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, parent_rate, new_parent_rate); + + clk_put(parent); + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that, for a mux whose current parent hasn't been registered yet, + * calling clk_set_rate_range() will succeed, and will be taken into + * account when rounding a rate. + */ +static void +clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + long rate; + int ret; + + ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + rate = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that, for a mux that started orphan, was assigned and rate and + * then got switched to a valid parent, its rate is eventually within + * range. + * + * FIXME: Even though we update the rate as part of clk_set_parent(), we + * don't evaluate whether that new rate is within range and needs to be + * adjusted. + */ +static void +clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_range_set_parent_get_rate(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk_kunit(test, hw, NULL); + struct clk *parent; + unsigned long rate; + int ret; + + kunit_skip(test, "This needs to be fixed in the core."); + + clk_hw_set_rate_range(hw, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + + parent = clk_hw_get_clk_kunit(test, &ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent); + + ret = clk_set_parent(clk, parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); +} + +static struct kunit_case clk_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_get_parent), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_drop_range), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_get_rate), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_put), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_set_range_modified), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_set_range_untouched), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_range_set_parent_get_rate), + {} +}; + +/* + * Test suite for a basic mux clock with two parents. The default parent + * isn't registered, only the second parent is. By default, the clock + * will thus be orphan. + * + * These tests exercise the behaviour of the consumer API when dealing + * with an orphan clock, and how we deal with the transition to a valid + * parent. + */ +static struct kunit_suite clk_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_test_suite = { + .name = "clk-orphan-transparent-multiple-parent-mux-test", + .init = clk_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_test_init, + .test_cases = clk_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_test_cases, +}; + +struct clk_single_parent_ctx { + struct clk_dummy_context parent_ctx; + struct clk_hw hw; +}; + +static int clk_single_parent_mux_test_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx; + int ret; + + ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ctx) + return -ENOMEM; + test->priv = ctx; + + ctx->parent_ctx.rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE; + ctx->parent_ctx.hw.init = + CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-clk", + &clk_dummy_rate_ops, + 0); + + ret = clk_hw_register_kunit(test, NULL, &ctx->parent_ctx.hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ctx->hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT("test-clk", "parent-clk", + &clk_dummy_single_parent_ops, + CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT); + + ret = clk_hw_register_kunit(test, NULL, &ctx->hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + return 0; +} + +static void +clk_single_parent_mux_test_exit(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + + clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->hw); + clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->parent_ctx.hw); +} + +/* + * Test that for a clock with a single parent, clk_get_parent() actually + * returns the parent. + */ +static void +clk_test_single_parent_mux_get_parent(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + struct clk *parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parent_ctx.hw, NULL); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_is_match(clk_get_parent(clk), parent)); + + clk_put(parent); + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that for a clock with a single parent, clk_has_parent() actually + * reports it as a parent. + */ +static void +clk_test_single_parent_mux_has_parent(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + struct clk *parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parent_ctx.hw, NULL); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_has_parent(clk, parent)); + + clk_put(parent); + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that for a clock that can't modify its rate and with a single + * parent, if we set disjoints range on the parent and then the child, + * the second will return an error. + * + * FIXME: clk_set_rate_range() only considers the current clock when + * evaluating whether ranges are disjoints and not the upstream clocks + * ranges. + */ +static void +clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_disjoint_child_last(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk_kunit(test, hw, NULL); + struct clk *parent; + int ret; + + kunit_skip(test, "This needs to be fixed in the core."); + + parent = clk_get_parent(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, parent, NULL); + + ret = clk_set_rate_range(parent, 1000, 2000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk, 3000, 4000); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, ret, 0); +} + +/* + * Test that for a clock that can't modify its rate and with a single + * parent, if we set disjoints range on the child and then the parent, + * the second will return an error. + * + * FIXME: clk_set_rate_range() only considers the current clock when + * evaluating whether ranges are disjoints and not the downstream clocks + * ranges. + */ +static void +clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_disjoint_parent_last(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk_kunit(test, hw, NULL); + struct clk *parent; + int ret; + + kunit_skip(test, "This needs to be fixed in the core."); + + parent = clk_get_parent(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, parent, NULL); + + ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk, 1000, 2000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + ret = clk_set_rate_range(parent, 3000, 4000); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, ret, 0); +} + +/* + * Test that for a clock that can't modify its rate and with a single + * parent, if we set a range on the parent and then call + * clk_round_rate(), the boundaries of the parent are taken into + * account. + */ +static void +clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate_parent_only(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + struct clk *parent; + long rate; + int ret; + + parent = clk_get_parent(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, parent, NULL); + + ret = clk_set_rate_range(parent, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + rate = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that for a clock that can't modify its rate and with a single + * parent, if we set a range on the parent and a more restrictive one on + * the child, and then call clk_round_rate(), the boundaries of the + * two clocks are taken into account. + */ +static void +clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate_child_smaller(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + struct clk *parent; + long rate; + int ret; + + parent = clk_get_parent(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, parent, NULL); + + ret = clk_set_rate_range(parent, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 - 1000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + rate = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 - 1000); + + rate = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 + 1000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 - 1000); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that for a clock that can't modify its rate and with a single + * parent, if we set a range on the child and a more restrictive one on + * the parent, and then call clk_round_rate(), the boundaries of the + * two clocks are taken into account. + */ +static void +clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate_parent_smaller(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + struct clk *parent; + long rate; + int ret; + + parent = clk_get_parent(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, parent, NULL); + + ret = clk_set_rate_range(parent, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 - 1000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + rate = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 - 1000); + + rate = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 + 1000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 - 1000); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +static struct kunit_case clk_single_parent_mux_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_get_parent), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_has_parent), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_disjoint_child_last), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_disjoint_parent_last), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate_child_smaller), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate_parent_only), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate_parent_smaller), + {} +}; + +/* + * Test suite for a basic mux clock with one parent, with + * CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT on the child. + * + * These tests exercise the consumer API and check that the state of the + * child and parent are sane and consistent. + */ +static struct kunit_suite +clk_single_parent_mux_test_suite = { + .name = "clk-single-parent-mux-test", + .init = clk_single_parent_mux_test_init, + .test_cases = clk_single_parent_mux_test_cases, +}; + +static int clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx; + struct clk_init_data init = { }; + const char * const parents[] = { "orphan_parent" }; + int ret; + + ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ctx) + return -ENOMEM; + test->priv = ctx; + + init.name = "test_orphan_dummy_parent"; + init.ops = &clk_dummy_single_parent_ops; + init.parent_names = parents; + init.num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(parents); + init.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT; + ctx->hw.init = &init; + + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + memset(&init, 0, sizeof(init)); + init.name = "orphan_parent"; + init.ops = &clk_dummy_rate_ops; + ctx->parent_ctx.hw.init = &init; + ctx->parent_ctx.rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE; + + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->parent_ctx.hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + return 0; +} + +/* + * Test that a mux-only clock, with an initial rate within a range, + * will still have the same rate after the range has been enforced. + * + * See: + * https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/7720158d-10a7-a17b-73a4-a8615c9c6d5c@collabora.com/ + */ +static void clk_test_orphan_transparent_parent_mux_set_range(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + unsigned long rate, new_rate; + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + ctx->parent_ctx.rate - 1000, + ctx->parent_ctx.rate + 1000), + 0); + + new_rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, new_rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, new_rate); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +static struct kunit_case clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_parent_mux_set_range), + {} +}; + +/* + * Test suite for a basic mux clock with one parent. The parent is + * registered after its child. The clock will thus be an orphan when + * registered, but will no longer be when the tests run. + * + * These tests make sure a clock that used to be orphan has a sane, + * consistent, behaviour. + */ +static struct kunit_suite clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_test_suite = { + .name = "clk-orphan-transparent-single-parent-test", + .init = clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_init, + .exit = clk_single_parent_mux_test_exit, + .test_cases = clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_cases, +}; + +struct clk_single_parent_two_lvl_ctx { + struct clk_dummy_context parent_parent_ctx; + struct clk_dummy_context parent_ctx; + struct clk_hw hw; +}; + +static int +clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_two_lvl_ctx *ctx; + int ret; + + ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ctx) + return -ENOMEM; + test->priv = ctx; + + ctx->parent_ctx.hw.init = + CLK_HW_INIT("intermediate-parent", + "root-parent", + &clk_dummy_single_parent_ops, + CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT); + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->parent_ctx.hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ctx->hw.init = + CLK_HW_INIT("test-clk", "intermediate-parent", + &clk_dummy_single_parent_ops, + CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT); + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ctx->parent_parent_ctx.rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE; + ctx->parent_parent_ctx.hw.init = + CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("root-parent", + &clk_dummy_rate_ops, + 0); + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->parent_parent_ctx.hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + return 0; +} + +static void +clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_exit(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_two_lvl_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + + clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->hw); + clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->parent_ctx.hw); + clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->parent_parent_ctx.hw); +} + +/* + * Test that, for a clock whose parent used to be orphan, clk_get_rate() + * will return the proper rate. + */ +static void +clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_get_rate(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_two_lvl_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + unsigned long rate; + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that, for a clock whose parent used to be orphan, + * clk_set_rate_range() won't affect its rate if it is already within + * range. + * + * See (for Exynos 4210): + * https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/366a0232-bb4a-c357-6aa8-636e398e05eb@samsung.com/ + */ +static void +clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_set_range(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_two_lvl_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + unsigned long rate; + int ret; + + ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE - 1000, + DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE + 1000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +static struct kunit_case +clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_get_rate), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_set_range), + {} +}; + +/* + * Test suite for a basic, transparent, clock with a parent that is also + * such a clock. The parent's parent is registered last, while the + * parent and its child are registered in that order. The intermediate + * and leaf clocks will thus be orphan when registered, but the leaf + * clock itself will always have its parent and will never be + * reparented. Indeed, it's only orphan because its parent is. + * + * These tests exercise the behaviour of the consumer API when dealing + * with an orphan clock, and how we deal with the transition to a valid + * parent. + */ +static struct kunit_suite +clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_suite = { + .name = "clk-orphan-two-level-root-last-test", + .init = clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_init, + .exit = clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_exit, + .test_cases = clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_cases, +}; + +/* + * Test that clk_set_rate_range won't return an error for a valid range + * and that it will make sure the rate of the clock is within the + * boundaries. + */ +static void clk_range_test_set_range(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + unsigned long rate; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that calling clk_set_rate_range with a minimum rate higher than + * the maximum rate returns an error. + */ +static void clk_range_test_set_range_invalid(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1), + 0); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that users can't set multiple, disjoints, range that would be + * impossible to meet. + */ +static void clk_range_test_multiple_disjoints_range(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *user1, *user2; + + user1 = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, user1); + + user2 = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, user2); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(user1, 1000, 2000), + 0); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, + clk_set_rate_range(user2, 3000, 4000), + 0); + + clk_put(user2); + clk_put(user1); +} + +/* + * Test that if our clock has some boundaries and we try to round a rate + * lower than the minimum, the returned rate will be within range. + */ +static void clk_range_test_set_range_round_rate_lower(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + long rate; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that if our clock has some boundaries and we try to set a rate + * higher than the maximum, the new rate will be within range. + */ +static void clk_range_test_set_range_set_rate_lower(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + unsigned long rate; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that if our clock has some boundaries and we try to round and + * set a rate lower than the minimum, the rate returned by + * clk_round_rate() will be consistent with the new rate set by + * clk_set_rate(). + */ +static void clk_range_test_set_range_set_round_rate_consistent_lower(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + long rounded; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rounded = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rounded, 0); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000), + 0); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rounded, clk_get_rate(clk)); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that if our clock has some boundaries and we try to round a rate + * higher than the maximum, the returned rate will be within range. + */ +static void clk_range_test_set_range_round_rate_higher(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + long rate; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 + 1000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that if our clock has some boundaries and we try to set a rate + * higher than the maximum, the new rate will be within range. + */ +static void clk_range_test_set_range_set_rate_higher(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + unsigned long rate; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 + 1000), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that if our clock has some boundaries and we try to round and + * set a rate higher than the maximum, the rate returned by + * clk_round_rate() will be consistent with the new rate set by + * clk_set_rate(). + */ +static void clk_range_test_set_range_set_round_rate_consistent_higher(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + long rounded; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rounded = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 + 1000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rounded, 0); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 + 1000), + 0); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rounded, clk_get_rate(clk)); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that if our clock has a rate lower than the minimum set by a + * call to clk_set_rate_range(), the rate will be raised to match the + * new minimum. + * + * This assumes that clk_ops.determine_rate or clk_ops.round_rate won't + * modify the requested rate, which is our case in clk_dummy_rate_ops. + */ +static void clk_range_test_set_range_get_rate_raised(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + unsigned long rate; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000), + 0); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that if our clock has a rate higher than the maximum set by a + * call to clk_set_rate_range(), the rate will be lowered to match the + * new maximum. + * + * This assumes that clk_ops.determine_rate or clk_ops.round_rate won't + * modify the requested rate, which is our case in clk_dummy_rate_ops. + */ +static void clk_range_test_set_range_get_rate_lowered(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + unsigned long rate; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 + 1000), + 0); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +static struct kunit_case clk_range_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_invalid), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_multiple_disjoints_range), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_round_rate_lower), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_set_rate_lower), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_set_round_rate_consistent_lower), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_round_rate_higher), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_set_rate_higher), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_set_round_rate_consistent_higher), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_get_rate_raised), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_get_rate_lowered), + {} +}; + +/* + * Test suite for a basic rate clock, without any parent. + * + * These tests exercise the rate range API: clk_set_rate_range(), + * clk_set_min_rate(), clk_set_max_rate(), clk_drop_range(). + */ +static struct kunit_suite clk_range_test_suite = { + .name = "clk-range-test", + .init = clk_test_init, + .exit = clk_test_exit, + .test_cases = clk_range_test_cases, +}; + +/* + * Test that if we have several subsequent calls to + * clk_set_rate_range(), the core will reevaluate whether a new rate is + * needed each and every time. + * + * With clk_dummy_maximize_rate_ops, this means that the rate will + * trail along the maximum as it evolves. + */ +static void clk_range_test_set_range_rate_maximized(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + unsigned long rate; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 + 1000), + 0); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 - 1000), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 - 1000); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that if we have several subsequent calls to + * clk_set_rate_range(), across multiple users, the core will reevaluate + * whether a new rate is needed each and every time. + * + * With clk_dummy_maximize_rate_ops, this means that the rate will + * trail along the maximum as it evolves. + */ +static void clk_range_test_multiple_set_range_rate_maximized(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + struct clk *user1, *user2; + unsigned long rate; + + user1 = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, user1); + + user2 = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, user2); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 + 1000), + 0); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(user1, + 0, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(user2, + 0, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_drop_range(user2), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + + clk_put(user2); + clk_put(user1); + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that if we have several subsequent calls to + * clk_set_rate_range(), across multiple users, the core will reevaluate + * whether a new rate is needed, including when a user drop its clock. + * + * With clk_dummy_maximize_rate_ops, this means that the rate will + * trail along the maximum as it evolves. + */ +static void clk_range_test_multiple_set_range_rate_put_maximized(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + struct clk *user1, *user2; + unsigned long rate; + + user1 = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, user1); + + user2 = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, user2); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 + 1000), + 0); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(user1, + 0, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(user2, + 0, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + + clk_put(user2); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + + clk_put(user1); + clk_put(clk); +} + +static struct kunit_case clk_range_maximize_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_rate_maximized), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_multiple_set_range_rate_maximized), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_multiple_set_range_rate_put_maximized), + {} +}; + +/* + * Test suite for a basic rate clock, without any parent. + * + * These tests exercise the rate range API: clk_set_rate_range(), + * clk_set_min_rate(), clk_set_max_rate(), clk_drop_range(), with a + * driver that will always try to run at the highest possible rate. + */ +static struct kunit_suite clk_range_maximize_test_suite = { + .name = "clk-range-maximize-test", + .init = clk_maximize_test_init, + .exit = clk_test_exit, + .test_cases = clk_range_maximize_test_cases, +}; + +/* + * Test that if we have several subsequent calls to + * clk_set_rate_range(), the core will reevaluate whether a new rate is + * needed each and every time. + * + * With clk_dummy_minimize_rate_ops, this means that the rate will + * trail along the minimum as it evolves. + */ +static void clk_range_test_set_range_rate_minimized(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + unsigned long rate; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000), + 0); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that if we have several subsequent calls to + * clk_set_rate_range(), across multiple users, the core will reevaluate + * whether a new rate is needed each and every time. + * + * With clk_dummy_minimize_rate_ops, this means that the rate will + * trail along the minimum as it evolves. + */ +static void clk_range_test_multiple_set_range_rate_minimized(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + struct clk *user1, *user2; + unsigned long rate; + + user1 = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, user1); + + user2 = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, user2); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(user1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + ULONG_MAX), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(user2, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2, + ULONG_MAX), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_drop_range(user2), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + + clk_put(user2); + clk_put(user1); + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that if we have several subsequent calls to + * clk_set_rate_range(), across multiple users, the core will reevaluate + * whether a new rate is needed, including when a user drop its clock. + * + * With clk_dummy_minimize_rate_ops, this means that the rate will + * trail along the minimum as it evolves. + */ +static void clk_range_test_multiple_set_range_rate_put_minimized(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + struct clk *user1, *user2; + unsigned long rate; + + user1 = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, user1); + + user2 = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, user2); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(user1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + ULONG_MAX), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(user2, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2, + ULONG_MAX), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + + clk_put(user2); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + + clk_put(user1); + clk_put(clk); +} + +static struct kunit_case clk_range_minimize_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_rate_minimized), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_multiple_set_range_rate_minimized), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_multiple_set_range_rate_put_minimized), + {} +}; + +/* + * Test suite for a basic rate clock, without any parent. + * + * These tests exercise the rate range API: clk_set_rate_range(), + * clk_set_min_rate(), clk_set_max_rate(), clk_drop_range(), with a + * driver that will always try to run at the lowest possible rate. + */ +static struct kunit_suite clk_range_minimize_test_suite = { + .name = "clk-range-minimize-test", + .init = clk_minimize_test_init, + .exit = clk_test_exit, + .test_cases = clk_range_minimize_test_cases, +}; + +struct clk_leaf_mux_ctx { + struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx mux_ctx; + struct clk_hw hw; + struct clk_hw parent; + struct clk_rate_request *req; + int (*determine_rate_func)(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req); +}; + +static int clk_leaf_mux_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req) +{ + struct clk_leaf_mux_ctx *ctx = container_of(hw, struct clk_leaf_mux_ctx, hw); + int ret; + struct clk_rate_request *parent_req = ctx->req; + + clk_hw_forward_rate_request(hw, req, req->best_parent_hw, parent_req, req->rate); + ret = ctx->determine_rate_func(req->best_parent_hw, parent_req); + if (ret) + return ret; + + req->rate = parent_req->rate; + + return 0; +} + +static const struct clk_ops clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_ops = { + .determine_rate = clk_leaf_mux_determine_rate, + .set_parent = clk_dummy_single_set_parent, + .get_parent = clk_dummy_single_get_parent, +}; + +static int +clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_test_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_leaf_mux_ctx *ctx; + const char *top_parents[2] = { "parent-0", "parent-1" }; + int ret; + + ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ctx) + return -ENOMEM; + test->priv = ctx; + + ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[0].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-0", + &clk_dummy_rate_ops, + 0); + ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[0].rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1; + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[0].hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[1].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-1", + &clk_dummy_rate_ops, + 0); + ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[1].rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2; + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[1].hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ctx->mux_ctx.current_parent = 0; + ctx->mux_ctx.hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_PARENTS("test-mux", top_parents, + &clk_multiple_parents_mux_ops, + 0); + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->mux_ctx.hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ctx->parent.init = CLK_HW_INIT_HW("test-parent", &ctx->mux_ctx.hw, + &empty_clk_ops, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT); + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->parent); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ctx->hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_HW("test-clock", &ctx->parent, + &clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_ops, + CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT); + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + return 0; +} + +static void clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_test_exit(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_leaf_mux_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + + clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->hw); + clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->parent); + clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->mux_ctx.hw); + clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[0].hw); + clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[1].hw); +} + +struct clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_determine_rate_test_case { + const char *desc; + int (*determine_rate_func)(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req); +}; + +static void +clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_determine_rate_test_case_to_desc( + const struct clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_determine_rate_test_case *t, char *desc) +{ + strcpy(desc, t->desc); +} + +static const struct clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_determine_rate_test_case +clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_determine_rate_test_cases[] = { + { + /* + * Test that __clk_determine_rate() on the parent that can't + * change rate doesn't return a clk_rate_request structure with + * the best_parent_hw pointer pointing to the parent. + */ + .desc = "clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent__clk_determine_rate_proper_parent", + .determine_rate_func = __clk_determine_rate, + }, + { + /* + * Test that __clk_mux_determine_rate() on the parent that + * can't change rate doesn't return a clk_rate_request + * structure with the best_parent_hw pointer pointing to + * the parent. + */ + .desc = "clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent__clk_mux_determine_rate_proper_parent", + .determine_rate_func = __clk_mux_determine_rate, + }, + { + /* + * Test that __clk_mux_determine_rate_closest() on the parent + * that can't change rate doesn't return a clk_rate_request + * structure with the best_parent_hw pointer pointing to + * the parent. + */ + .desc = "clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent__clk_mux_determine_rate_closest_proper_parent", + .determine_rate_func = __clk_mux_determine_rate_closest, + }, + { + /* + * Test that clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent() on the parent + * that can't change rate doesn't return a clk_rate_request + * structure with the best_parent_hw pointer pointing to + * the parent. + */ + .desc = "clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent_proper_parent", + .determine_rate_func = clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent, + }, +}; + +KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_determine_rate_test, + clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_determine_rate_test_cases, + clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_determine_rate_test_case_to_desc) + +/* + * Test that when a clk that can't change rate itself calls a function like + * __clk_determine_rate() on its parent it doesn't get back a clk_rate_request + * structure that has the best_parent_hw pointer point to the clk_hw passed + * into the determine rate function. See commit 262ca38f4b6e ("clk: Stop + * forwarding clk_rate_requests to the parent") for more background. + */ +static void clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_determine_rate_test(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_leaf_mux_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + struct clk_rate_request req; + unsigned long rate; + const struct clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_determine_rate_test_case *test_param; + + test_param = test->param_value; + ctx->determine_rate_func = test_param->determine_rate_func; + + ctx->req = &req; + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2, clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2)); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, req.rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, req.best_parent_rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, req.best_parent_hw, &ctx->mux_ctx.hw); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +static struct kunit_case clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_determine_rate_test, + clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_determine_rate_test_gen_params), + {} +}; + +/* + * Test suite for a clock whose parent is a pass-through clk whose parent is a + * mux with multiple parents. The leaf and pass-through clocks have the + * CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag, and will forward rate requests to the mux, which + * will then select which parent is the best fit for a given rate. + * + * These tests exercise the behaviour of muxes, and the proper selection + * of parents. + */ +static struct kunit_suite clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_test_suite = { + .name = "clk-leaf-mux-set-rate-parent", + .init = clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_test_init, + .exit = clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_test_exit, + .test_cases = clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_test_cases, +}; + +struct clk_mux_notifier_rate_change { + bool done; + unsigned long old_rate; + unsigned long new_rate; + wait_queue_head_t wq; +}; + +struct clk_mux_notifier_ctx { + struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx mux_ctx; + struct clk *clk; + struct notifier_block clk_nb; + struct clk_mux_notifier_rate_change pre_rate_change; + struct clk_mux_notifier_rate_change post_rate_change; +}; + +#define NOTIFIER_TIMEOUT_MS 100 + +static int clk_mux_notifier_callback(struct notifier_block *nb, + unsigned long action, void *data) +{ + struct clk_notifier_data *clk_data = data; + struct clk_mux_notifier_ctx *ctx = container_of(nb, + struct clk_mux_notifier_ctx, + clk_nb); + + if (action & PRE_RATE_CHANGE) { + ctx->pre_rate_change.old_rate = clk_data->old_rate; + ctx->pre_rate_change.new_rate = clk_data->new_rate; + ctx->pre_rate_change.done = true; + wake_up_interruptible(&ctx->pre_rate_change.wq); + } + + if (action & POST_RATE_CHANGE) { + ctx->post_rate_change.old_rate = clk_data->old_rate; + ctx->post_rate_change.new_rate = clk_data->new_rate; + ctx->post_rate_change.done = true; + wake_up_interruptible(&ctx->post_rate_change.wq); + } + + return 0; +} + +static int clk_mux_notifier_test_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_mux_notifier_ctx *ctx; + const char *top_parents[2] = { "parent-0", "parent-1" }; + int ret; + + ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ctx) + return -ENOMEM; + test->priv = ctx; + ctx->clk_nb.notifier_call = clk_mux_notifier_callback; + init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->pre_rate_change.wq); + init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->post_rate_change.wq); + + ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[0].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-0", + &clk_dummy_rate_ops, + 0); + ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[0].rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1; + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[0].hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[1].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-1", + &clk_dummy_rate_ops, + 0); + ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[1].rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2; + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[1].hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ctx->mux_ctx.current_parent = 0; + ctx->mux_ctx.hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_PARENTS("test-mux", top_parents, + &clk_multiple_parents_mux_ops, + 0); + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->mux_ctx.hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ctx->clk = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->mux_ctx.hw, NULL); + ret = clk_notifier_register(ctx->clk, &ctx->clk_nb); + if (ret) + return ret; + + return 0; +} + +static void clk_mux_notifier_test_exit(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_mux_notifier_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk *clk = ctx->clk; + + clk_notifier_unregister(clk, &ctx->clk_nb); + clk_put(clk); + + clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->mux_ctx.hw); + clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[0].hw); + clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[1].hw); +} + +/* + * Test that if the we have a notifier registered on a mux, the core + * will notify us when we switch to another parent, and with the proper + * old and new rates. + */ +static void clk_mux_notifier_set_parent_test(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_mux_notifier_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->mux_ctx.hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + struct clk *new_parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL); + int ret; + + ret = clk_set_parent(clk, new_parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(ctx->pre_rate_change.wq, + ctx->pre_rate_change.done, + msecs_to_jiffies(NOTIFIER_TIMEOUT_MS)); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, ret, 0); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->pre_rate_change.old_rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->pre_rate_change.new_rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + + ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(ctx->post_rate_change.wq, + ctx->post_rate_change.done, + msecs_to_jiffies(NOTIFIER_TIMEOUT_MS)); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, ret, 0); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->post_rate_change.old_rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->post_rate_change.new_rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + + clk_put(new_parent); + clk_put(clk); +} + +static struct kunit_case clk_mux_notifier_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(clk_mux_notifier_set_parent_test), + {} +}; + +/* + * Test suite for a mux with multiple parents, and a notifier registered + * on the mux. + * + * These tests exercise the behaviour of notifiers. + */ +static struct kunit_suite clk_mux_notifier_test_suite = { + .name = "clk-mux-notifier", + .init = clk_mux_notifier_test_init, + .exit = clk_mux_notifier_test_exit, + .test_cases = clk_mux_notifier_test_cases, +}; + +static int +clk_mux_no_reparent_test_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx; + const char *parents[2] = { "parent-0", "parent-1"}; + int ret; + + ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ctx) + return -ENOMEM; + test->priv = ctx; + + ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-0", + &clk_dummy_rate_ops, + 0); + ctx->parents_ctx[0].rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1; + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-1", + &clk_dummy_rate_ops, + 0); + ctx->parents_ctx[1].rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2; + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ctx->current_parent = 0; + ctx->hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_PARENTS("test-mux", parents, + &clk_multiple_parents_no_reparent_mux_ops, + 0); + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + return 0; +} + +static void +clk_mux_no_reparent_test_exit(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + + clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->hw); + clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw); + clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw); +} + +/* + * Test that if the we have a mux that cannot change parent and we call + * clk_round_rate() on it with a rate that should cause it to change + * parent, it won't. + */ +static void clk_mux_no_reparent_round_rate(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + struct clk *other_parent, *parent; + unsigned long other_parent_rate; + unsigned long parent_rate; + long rounded_rate; + + parent = clk_get_parent(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, parent, NULL); + + parent_rate = clk_get_rate(parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, parent_rate, 0); + + other_parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, other_parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, clk_is_match(parent, other_parent)); + + other_parent_rate = clk_get_rate(other_parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, other_parent_rate, 0); + clk_put(other_parent); + + rounded_rate = clk_round_rate(clk, other_parent_rate); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rounded_rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rounded_rate, parent_rate); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* + * Test that if the we have a mux that cannot change parent and we call + * clk_set_rate() on it with a rate that should cause it to change + * parent, it won't. + */ +static void clk_mux_no_reparent_set_rate(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + struct clk *other_parent, *parent; + unsigned long other_parent_rate; + unsigned long parent_rate; + unsigned long rate; + int ret; + + parent = clk_get_parent(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, parent, NULL); + + parent_rate = clk_get_rate(parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, parent_rate, 0); + + other_parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, other_parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, clk_is_match(parent, other_parent)); + + other_parent_rate = clk_get_rate(other_parent); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, other_parent_rate, 0); + clk_put(other_parent); + + ret = clk_set_rate(clk, other_parent_rate); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, parent_rate); + + clk_put(clk); +} + +static struct kunit_case clk_mux_no_reparent_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(clk_mux_no_reparent_round_rate), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_mux_no_reparent_set_rate), + {} +}; + +/* + * Test suite for a clock mux that isn't allowed to change parent, using + * the clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent() helper. + * + * These tests exercise that helper, and the proper selection of + * rates and parents. + */ +static struct kunit_suite clk_mux_no_reparent_test_suite = { + .name = "clk-mux-no-reparent", + .init = clk_mux_no_reparent_test_init, + .exit = clk_mux_no_reparent_test_exit, + .test_cases = clk_mux_no_reparent_test_cases, +}; + +struct clk_register_clk_parent_data_test_case { + const char *desc; + struct clk_parent_data pdata; +}; + +static void +clk_register_clk_parent_data_test_case_to_desc( + const struct clk_register_clk_parent_data_test_case *t, char *desc) +{ + strcpy(desc, t->desc); +} + +static const struct clk_register_clk_parent_data_test_case +clk_register_clk_parent_data_of_cases[] = { + { + /* + * Test that a clk registered with a struct device_node can + * find a parent based on struct clk_parent_data::index. + */ + .desc = "clk_parent_data_of_index_test", + .pdata.index = 0, + }, + { + /* + * Test that a clk registered with a struct device_node can + * find a parent based on struct clk_parent_data::fwname. + */ + .desc = "clk_parent_data_of_fwname_test", + .pdata.fw_name = CLK_PARENT_DATA_PARENT1, + }, + { + /* + * Test that a clk registered with a struct device_node can + * find a parent based on struct clk_parent_data::name. + */ + .desc = "clk_parent_data_of_name_test", + /* The index must be negative to indicate firmware not used */ + .pdata.index = -1, + .pdata.name = CLK_PARENT_DATA_1MHZ_NAME, + }, + { + /* + * Test that a clk registered with a struct device_node can + * find a parent based on struct + * clk_parent_data::{fw_name,name}. + */ + .desc = "clk_parent_data_of_fwname_name_test", + .pdata.fw_name = CLK_PARENT_DATA_PARENT1, + .pdata.name = "not_matching", + }, + { + /* + * Test that a clk registered with a struct device_node can + * find a parent based on struct clk_parent_data::{index,name}. + * Index takes priority. + */ + .desc = "clk_parent_data_of_index_name_priority_test", + .pdata.index = 0, + .pdata.name = "not_matching", + }, + { + /* + * Test that a clk registered with a struct device_node can + * find a parent based on struct + * clk_parent_data::{index,fwname,name}. The fw_name takes + * priority over index and name. + */ + .desc = "clk_parent_data_of_index_fwname_name_priority_test", + .pdata.index = 1, + .pdata.fw_name = CLK_PARENT_DATA_PARENT1, + .pdata.name = "not_matching", + }, +}; + +KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(clk_register_clk_parent_data_of_test, clk_register_clk_parent_data_of_cases, + clk_register_clk_parent_data_test_case_to_desc) + +/** + * struct clk_register_clk_parent_data_of_ctx - Context for clk_parent_data OF tests + * @np: device node of clk under test + * @hw: clk_hw for clk under test + */ +struct clk_register_clk_parent_data_of_ctx { + struct device_node *np; + struct clk_hw hw; +}; + +static int clk_register_clk_parent_data_of_test_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_register_clk_parent_data_of_ctx *ctx; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, + of_overlay_apply_kunit(test, kunit_clk_parent_data_test)); + + ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ctx) + return -ENOMEM; + test->priv = ctx; + + ctx->np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "test,clk-parent-data"); + if (!ctx->np) + return -ENODEV; + + of_node_put_kunit(test, ctx->np); + + return 0; +} + +/* + * Test that a clk registered with a struct device_node can find a parent based on + * struct clk_parent_data when the hw member isn't set. + */ +static void clk_register_clk_parent_data_of_test(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_register_clk_parent_data_of_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *parent_hw; + const struct clk_register_clk_parent_data_test_case *test_param; + struct clk_init_data init = { }; + struct clk *expected_parent, *actual_parent; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx->np); + + expected_parent = of_clk_get_kunit(test, ctx->np, 0); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, expected_parent); + + test_param = test->param_value; + init.parent_data = &test_param->pdata; + init.num_parents = 1; + init.name = "parent_data_of_test_clk"; + init.ops = &clk_dummy_single_parent_ops; + ctx->hw.init = &init; + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, of_clk_hw_register_kunit(test, ctx->np, &ctx->hw)); + + parent_hw = clk_hw_get_parent(&ctx->hw); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent_hw); + + actual_parent = clk_hw_get_clk_kunit(test, parent_hw, __func__); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, actual_parent); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_is_match(expected_parent, actual_parent)); +} + +static struct kunit_case clk_register_clk_parent_data_of_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(clk_register_clk_parent_data_of_test, + clk_register_clk_parent_data_of_test_gen_params), + {} +}; + +/* + * Test suite for registering clks with struct clk_parent_data and a struct + * device_node. + */ +static struct kunit_suite clk_register_clk_parent_data_of_suite = { + .name = "clk_register_clk_parent_data_of", + .init = clk_register_clk_parent_data_of_test_init, + .test_cases = clk_register_clk_parent_data_of_test_cases, +}; + +/** + * struct platform_driver_dev_ctx - Context to stash platform device + * @dev: device under test + * @pdrv: driver to attach to find @dev + */ +struct platform_driver_dev_ctx { + struct device *dev; + struct platform_driver pdrv; +}; + +static inline struct platform_driver_dev_ctx * +pdev_to_platform_driver_dev_ctx(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + return container_of(to_platform_driver(pdev->dev.driver), + struct platform_driver_dev_ctx, pdrv); +} + +static int kunit_platform_driver_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct platform_driver_dev_ctx *ctx; + + ctx = pdev_to_platform_driver_dev_ctx(pdev); + ctx->dev = &pdev->dev; + + return 0; +} + +static struct device * +kunit_of_platform_driver_dev(struct kunit *test, const struct of_device_id *match_table) +{ + struct platform_driver_dev_ctx *ctx; + + ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx); + + ctx->pdrv.probe = kunit_platform_driver_dev_probe; + ctx->pdrv.driver.of_match_table = match_table; + ctx->pdrv.driver.name = __func__; + ctx->pdrv.driver.owner = THIS_MODULE; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, kunit_platform_driver_register(test, &ctx->pdrv)); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx->dev); + + return ctx->dev; +} + +static const struct clk_register_clk_parent_data_test_case +clk_register_clk_parent_data_device_cases[] = { + { + /* + * Test that a clk registered with a struct device can find a + * parent based on struct clk_parent_data::index. + */ + .desc = "clk_parent_data_device_index_test", + .pdata.index = 1, + }, + { + /* + * Test that a clk registered with a struct device can find a + * parent based on struct clk_parent_data::fwname. + */ + .desc = "clk_parent_data_device_fwname_test", + .pdata.fw_name = CLK_PARENT_DATA_PARENT2, + }, + { + /* + * Test that a clk registered with a struct device can find a + * parent based on struct clk_parent_data::name. + */ + .desc = "clk_parent_data_device_name_test", + /* The index must be negative to indicate firmware not used */ + .pdata.index = -1, + .pdata.name = CLK_PARENT_DATA_50MHZ_NAME, + }, + { + /* + * Test that a clk registered with a struct device can find a + * parent based on struct clk_parent_data::{fw_name,name}. + */ + .desc = "clk_parent_data_device_fwname_name_test", + .pdata.fw_name = CLK_PARENT_DATA_PARENT2, + .pdata.name = "not_matching", + }, + { + /* + * Test that a clk registered with a struct device can find a + * parent based on struct clk_parent_data::{index,name}. Index + * takes priority. + */ + .desc = "clk_parent_data_device_index_name_priority_test", + .pdata.index = 1, + .pdata.name = "not_matching", + }, + { + /* + * Test that a clk registered with a struct device can find a + * parent based on struct clk_parent_data::{index,fwname,name}. + * The fw_name takes priority over index and name. + */ + .desc = "clk_parent_data_device_index_fwname_name_priority_test", + .pdata.index = 0, + .pdata.fw_name = CLK_PARENT_DATA_PARENT2, + .pdata.name = "not_matching", + }, +}; + +KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(clk_register_clk_parent_data_device_test, + clk_register_clk_parent_data_device_cases, + clk_register_clk_parent_data_test_case_to_desc) + +/* + * Test that a clk registered with a struct device can find a parent based on + * struct clk_parent_data when the hw member isn't set. + */ +static void clk_register_clk_parent_data_device_test(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct device *dev; + struct clk_hw *hw; + const struct clk_register_clk_parent_data_test_case *test_param; + struct clk_hw *parent_hw; + struct clk_init_data init = { }; + struct clk *expected_parent, *actual_parent; + static const struct of_device_id match_table[] = { + { .compatible = "test,clk-parent-data" }, + { } + }; + + dev = kunit_of_platform_driver_dev(test, match_table); + + expected_parent = clk_get_kunit(test, dev, "50"); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, expected_parent); + + hw = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*hw), GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, hw); + + test_param = test->param_value; + init.parent_data = &test_param->pdata; + init.num_parents = 1; + init.name = "parent_data_device_test_clk"; + init.ops = &clk_dummy_single_parent_ops; + hw->init = &init; + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, clk_hw_register_kunit(test, dev, hw)); + + parent_hw = clk_hw_get_parent(hw); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent_hw); + + actual_parent = clk_hw_get_clk_kunit(test, parent_hw, __func__); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, actual_parent); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_is_match(expected_parent, actual_parent)); +} + +static const struct clk_register_clk_parent_data_test_case +clk_register_clk_parent_data_device_hw_cases[] = { + { + /* + * Test that a clk registered with a struct device can find a + * parent based on struct clk_parent_data::hw. + */ + .desc = "clk_parent_data_device_hw_index_test", + /* The index must be negative to indicate firmware not used */ + .pdata.index = -1, + }, + { + /* + * Test that a clk registered with a struct device can find a + * parent based on struct clk_parent_data::hw when + * struct clk_parent_data::fw_name is set. + */ + .desc = "clk_parent_data_device_hw_fwname_test", + .pdata.fw_name = CLK_PARENT_DATA_PARENT2, + }, + { + /* + * Test that a clk registered with a struct device can find a + * parent based on struct clk_parent_data::hw when struct + * clk_parent_data::name is set. + */ + .desc = "clk_parent_data_device_hw_name_test", + /* The index must be negative to indicate firmware not used */ + .pdata.index = -1, + .pdata.name = CLK_PARENT_DATA_50MHZ_NAME, + }, + { + /* + * Test that a clk registered with a struct device can find a + * parent based on struct clk_parent_data::hw when struct + * clk_parent_data::{fw_name,name} are set. + */ + .desc = "clk_parent_data_device_hw_fwname_name_test", + .pdata.fw_name = CLK_PARENT_DATA_PARENT2, + .pdata.name = "not_matching", + }, + { + /* + * Test that a clk registered with a struct device can find a + * parent based on struct clk_parent_data::hw when struct + * clk_parent_data::index is set. The hw pointer takes + * priority. + */ + .desc = "clk_parent_data_device_hw_index_priority_test", + .pdata.index = 0, + }, + { + /* + * Test that a clk registered with a struct device can find a + * parent based on struct clk_parent_data::hw when + * struct clk_parent_data::{index,fwname,name} are set. + * The hw pointer takes priority over everything else. + */ + .desc = "clk_parent_data_device_hw_index_fwname_name_priority_test", + .pdata.index = 0, + .pdata.fw_name = CLK_PARENT_DATA_PARENT2, + .pdata.name = "not_matching", + }, +}; + +KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(clk_register_clk_parent_data_device_hw_test, + clk_register_clk_parent_data_device_hw_cases, + clk_register_clk_parent_data_test_case_to_desc) + +/* + * Test that a clk registered with a struct device can find a + * parent based on struct clk_parent_data::hw. + */ +static void clk_register_clk_parent_data_device_hw_test(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct device *dev; + struct clk_hw *hw; + const struct clk_register_clk_parent_data_test_case *test_param; + struct clk_dummy_context *parent; + struct clk_hw *parent_hw; + struct clk_parent_data pdata = { }; + struct clk_init_data init = { }; + static const struct of_device_id match_table[] = { + { .compatible = "test,clk-parent-data" }, + { } + }; + + dev = kunit_of_platform_driver_dev(test, match_table); + + parent = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*parent), GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent); + + parent_hw = &parent->hw; + parent_hw->init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-clk", + &clk_dummy_rate_ops, 0); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, clk_hw_register_kunit(test, dev, parent_hw)); + + hw = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*hw), GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, hw); + + test_param = test->param_value; + memcpy(&pdata, &test_param->pdata, sizeof(pdata)); + pdata.hw = parent_hw; + init.parent_data = &pdata; + init.num_parents = 1; + init.ops = &clk_dummy_single_parent_ops; + init.name = "parent_data_device_hw_test_clk"; + hw->init = &init; + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, clk_hw_register_kunit(test, dev, hw)); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, parent_hw, clk_hw_get_parent(hw)); +} + +static struct kunit_case clk_register_clk_parent_data_device_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(clk_register_clk_parent_data_device_test, + clk_register_clk_parent_data_device_test_gen_params), + KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(clk_register_clk_parent_data_device_hw_test, + clk_register_clk_parent_data_device_hw_test_gen_params), + {} +}; + +static int clk_register_clk_parent_data_device_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, + of_overlay_apply_kunit(test, kunit_clk_parent_data_test)); + + return 0; +} + +/* + * Test suite for registering clks with struct clk_parent_data and a struct + * device. + */ +static struct kunit_suite clk_register_clk_parent_data_device_suite = { + .name = "clk_register_clk_parent_data_device", + .init = clk_register_clk_parent_data_device_init, + .test_cases = clk_register_clk_parent_data_device_test_cases, +}; + +struct clk_assigned_rates_context { + struct clk_dummy_context clk0; + struct clk_dummy_context clk1; +}; + +/* + * struct clk_assigned_rates_test_param - Test parameters for clk_assigned_rates test + * @desc: Test description + * @overlay_begin: Pointer to start of DT overlay to apply for test + * @overlay_end: Pointer to end of DT overlay to apply for test + * @rate0: Initial rate of first clk + * @rate1: Initial rate of second clk + * @consumer_test: true if a consumer is being tested + */ +struct clk_assigned_rates_test_param { + const char *desc; + u8 *overlay_begin; + u8 *overlay_end; + unsigned long rate0; + unsigned long rate1; + bool consumer_test; +}; + +#define TEST_PARAM_OVERLAY(overlay_name) \ + .overlay_begin = of_overlay_begin(overlay_name), \ + .overlay_end = of_overlay_end(overlay_name) + +static void +clk_assigned_rates_register_clk(struct kunit *test, + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx, + struct device_node *np, const char *name, + unsigned long rate) +{ + struct clk_init_data init = { }; + + init.name = name; + init.ops = &clk_dummy_rate_ops; + ctx->hw.init = &init; + ctx->rate = rate; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, of_clk_hw_register_kunit(test, np, &ctx->hw)); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ctx->rate, rate); +} + +/* + * Does most of the work of the test: + * + * 1. Apply the overlay to test + * 2. Register the clk or clks to test + * 3. Register the clk provider + * 4. Apply clk defaults to the consumer device if this is a consumer test + * + * The tests will set different test_param values to test different scenarios + * and validate that in their test functions. + */ +static int clk_assigned_rates_test_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct device_node *np, *consumer; + struct clk_hw_onecell_data *data; + struct clk_assigned_rates_context *ctx; + u32 clk_cells; + const struct clk_assigned_rates_test_param *test_param; + + test_param = test->param_value; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, __of_overlay_apply_kunit(test, + test_param->overlay_begin, + test_param->overlay_end)); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, + ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL)); + test->priv = ctx; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "test,clk-assigned-rates")); + of_node_put_kunit(test, np); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, of_property_read_u32(np, "#clock-cells", &clk_cells)); + /* Only support #clock-cells = <0> or <1> */ + KUNIT_ASSERT_LT(test, clk_cells, 2); + + clk_assigned_rates_register_clk(test, &ctx->clk0, np, + "test_assigned_rate0", test_param->rate0); + if (clk_cells == 0) { + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, + of_clk_add_hw_provider_kunit(test, np, of_clk_hw_simple_get, + &ctx->clk0.hw)); + } else if (clk_cells == 1) { + clk_assigned_rates_register_clk(test, &ctx->clk1, np, + "test_assigned_rate1", test_param->rate1); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, + data = kunit_kzalloc(test, struct_size(data, hws, 2), GFP_KERNEL)); + data->num = 2; + data->hws[0] = &ctx->clk0.hw; + data->hws[1] = &ctx->clk1.hw; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, + of_clk_add_hw_provider_kunit(test, np, of_clk_hw_onecell_get, data)); + } + + /* Consumers are optional */ + if (test_param->consumer_test) { + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, + consumer = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "test,clk-consumer")); + of_node_put_kunit(test, consumer); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, of_clk_set_defaults(consumer, false)); + } + + return 0; +} + +static void clk_assigned_rates_assigns_one(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_assigned_rates_context *ctx = test->priv; + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->clk0.rate, ASSIGNED_RATES_0_RATE); +} + +static void clk_assigned_rates_assigns_multiple(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_assigned_rates_context *ctx = test->priv; + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->clk0.rate, ASSIGNED_RATES_0_RATE); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->clk1.rate, ASSIGNED_RATES_1_RATE); +} + +static void clk_assigned_rates_skips(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_assigned_rates_context *ctx = test->priv; + const struct clk_assigned_rates_test_param *test_param = test->param_value; + + KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, ctx->clk0.rate, ASSIGNED_RATES_0_RATE); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->clk0.rate, test_param->rate0); +} + +OF_OVERLAY_DECLARE(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_one); +OF_OVERLAY_DECLARE(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_one_consumer); +OF_OVERLAY_DECLARE(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_u64_one); +OF_OVERLAY_DECLARE(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_u64_one_consumer); + +/* Test cases that assign one rate */ +static const struct clk_assigned_rates_test_param clk_assigned_rates_assigns_one_test_params[] = { + { + /* + * Test that a single cell assigned-clock-rates property + * assigns the rate when the property is in the provider. + */ + .desc = "provider assigns", + TEST_PARAM_OVERLAY(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_one), + }, + { + /* + * Test that a single cell assigned-clock-rates property + * assigns the rate when the property is in the consumer. + */ + .desc = "consumer assigns", + TEST_PARAM_OVERLAY(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_one_consumer), + .consumer_test = true, + }, + { + /* + * Test that a single cell assigned-clock-rates-u64 property + * assigns the rate when the property is in the provider. + */ + .desc = "provider assigns u64", + TEST_PARAM_OVERLAY(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_u64_one), + }, + { + /* + * Test that a single cell assigned-clock-rates-u64 property + * assigns the rate when the property is in the consumer. + */ + .desc = "consumer assigns u64", + TEST_PARAM_OVERLAY(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_u64_one_consumer), + .consumer_test = true, + }, +}; +KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM_DESC(clk_assigned_rates_assigns_one, + clk_assigned_rates_assigns_one_test_params, desc) + +OF_OVERLAY_DECLARE(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_multiple); +OF_OVERLAY_DECLARE(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_multiple_consumer); +OF_OVERLAY_DECLARE(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_u64_multiple); +OF_OVERLAY_DECLARE(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_u64_multiple_consumer); + +/* Test cases that assign multiple rates */ +static const struct clk_assigned_rates_test_param clk_assigned_rates_assigns_multiple_test_params[] = { + { + /* + * Test that a multiple cell assigned-clock-rates property + * assigns the rates when the property is in the provider. + */ + .desc = "provider assigns", + TEST_PARAM_OVERLAY(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_multiple), + }, + { + /* + * Test that a multiple cell assigned-clock-rates property + * assigns the rates when the property is in the consumer. + */ + .desc = "consumer assigns", + TEST_PARAM_OVERLAY(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_multiple_consumer), + .consumer_test = true, + }, + { + /* + * Test that a single cell assigned-clock-rates-u64 property + * assigns the rate when the property is in the provider. + */ + .desc = "provider assigns u64", + TEST_PARAM_OVERLAY(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_u64_multiple), + }, + { + /* + * Test that a multiple cell assigned-clock-rates-u64 property + * assigns the rates when the property is in the consumer. + */ + .desc = "consumer assigns u64", + TEST_PARAM_OVERLAY(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_u64_multiple_consumer), + .consumer_test = true, + }, +}; +KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM_DESC(clk_assigned_rates_assigns_multiple, + clk_assigned_rates_assigns_multiple_test_params, + desc) + +OF_OVERLAY_DECLARE(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_without); +OF_OVERLAY_DECLARE(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_without_consumer); +OF_OVERLAY_DECLARE(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_zero); +OF_OVERLAY_DECLARE(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_zero_consumer); +OF_OVERLAY_DECLARE(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_null); +OF_OVERLAY_DECLARE(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_null_consumer); + +/* Test cases that skip changing the rate due to malformed DT */ +static const struct clk_assigned_rates_test_param clk_assigned_rates_skips_test_params[] = { + { + /* + * Test that an assigned-clock-rates property without an assigned-clocks + * property fails when the property is in the provider. + */ + .desc = "provider missing assigned-clocks", + TEST_PARAM_OVERLAY(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_without), + .rate0 = 3000, + }, + { + /* + * Test that an assigned-clock-rates property without an assigned-clocks + * property fails when the property is in the consumer. + */ + .desc = "consumer missing assigned-clocks", + TEST_PARAM_OVERLAY(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_without_consumer), + .rate0 = 3000, + .consumer_test = true, + }, + { + /* + * Test that an assigned-clock-rates property of zero doesn't + * set a rate when the property is in the provider. + */ + .desc = "provider assigned-clock-rates of zero", + TEST_PARAM_OVERLAY(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_zero), + .rate0 = 3000, + }, + { + /* + * Test that an assigned-clock-rates property of zero doesn't + * set a rate when the property is in the consumer. + */ + .desc = "consumer assigned-clock-rates of zero", + TEST_PARAM_OVERLAY(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_zero_consumer), + .rate0 = 3000, + .consumer_test = true, + }, + { + /* + * Test that an assigned-clocks property with a null phandle + * doesn't set a rate when the property is in the provider. + */ + .desc = "provider assigned-clocks null phandle", + TEST_PARAM_OVERLAY(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_null), + .rate0 = 3000, + }, + { + /* + * Test that an assigned-clocks property with a null phandle + * doesn't set a rate when the property is in the consumer. + */ + .desc = "provider assigned-clocks null phandle", + TEST_PARAM_OVERLAY(kunit_clk_assigned_rates_null_consumer), + .rate0 = 3000, + .consumer_test = true, + }, +}; +KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM_DESC(clk_assigned_rates_skips, + clk_assigned_rates_skips_test_params, + desc) + +static struct kunit_case clk_assigned_rates_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(clk_assigned_rates_assigns_one, + clk_assigned_rates_assigns_one_gen_params), + KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(clk_assigned_rates_assigns_multiple, + clk_assigned_rates_assigns_multiple_gen_params), + KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(clk_assigned_rates_skips, + clk_assigned_rates_skips_gen_params), + {} +}; + +/* + * Test suite for assigned-clock-rates{-u64} DT property. + */ +static struct kunit_suite clk_assigned_rates_suite = { + .name = "clk_assigned_rates", + .test_cases = clk_assigned_rates_test_cases, + .init = clk_assigned_rates_test_init, +}; + +static const struct clk_init_data clk_hw_get_dev_of_node_init_data = { + .name = "clk_hw_get_dev_of_node", + .ops = &empty_clk_ops, +}; + +/* + * Test that a clk registered with a struct device returns the device from + * clk_hw_get_dev() and the node from clk_hw_get_of_node() + */ +static void clk_hw_register_dev_get_dev_returns_dev(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct device *dev; + struct clk_hw *hw; + static const struct of_device_id match_table[] = { + { .compatible = "test,clk-hw-get-dev-of-node" }, + { } + }; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, of_overlay_apply_kunit(test, kunit_clk_hw_get_dev_of_node)); + + dev = kunit_of_platform_driver_dev(test, match_table); + + hw = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*hw), GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, hw); + + hw->init = &clk_hw_get_dev_of_node_init_data; + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, clk_hw_register_kunit(test, dev, hw)); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, dev, clk_hw_get_dev(hw)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, dev_of_node(dev), clk_hw_get_of_node(hw)); +} + +/* + * Test that a clk registered with a struct device that's not associated with + * an OF node returns the device from clk_hw_get_dev() and NULL from + * clk_hw_get_of_node() + */ +static void clk_hw_register_dev_no_node_get_dev_returns_dev(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct platform_device *pdev; + struct device *dev; + struct clk_hw *hw; + + pdev = kunit_platform_device_alloc(test, "clk_hw_register_dev_no_node", -1); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, pdev); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, kunit_platform_device_add(test, pdev)); + dev = &pdev->dev; + + hw = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*hw), GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, hw); + + hw->init = &clk_hw_get_dev_of_node_init_data; + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, clk_hw_register_kunit(test, dev, hw)); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, dev, clk_hw_get_dev(hw)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, NULL, clk_hw_get_of_node(hw)); +} + +/* + * Test that a clk registered without a struct device returns NULL from + * clk_hw_get_dev() + */ +static void clk_hw_register_NULL_get_dev_of_node_returns_NULL(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_hw *hw; + + hw = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*hw), GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, hw); + + hw->init = &clk_hw_get_dev_of_node_init_data; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, clk_hw_register_kunit(test, NULL, hw)); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, NULL, clk_hw_get_dev(hw)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, NULL, clk_hw_get_of_node(hw)); +} + +/* + * Test that a clk registered with an of_node returns the node from + * clk_hw_get_of_node() and NULL from clk_hw_get_dev() + */ +static void of_clk_hw_register_node_get_of_node_returns_node(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct device_node *np; + struct clk_hw *hw; + + hw = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*hw), GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, hw); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, of_overlay_apply_kunit(test, kunit_clk_hw_get_dev_of_node)); + + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "test,clk-hw-get-dev-of-node"); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np); + of_node_put_kunit(test, np); + + hw->init = &clk_hw_get_dev_of_node_init_data; + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, of_clk_hw_register_kunit(test, np, hw)); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, NULL, clk_hw_get_dev(hw)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, np, clk_hw_get_of_node(hw)); +} + +/* + * Test that a clk registered without an of_node returns the node from + * clk_hw_get_of_node() and clk_hw_get_dev() + */ +static void of_clk_hw_register_NULL_get_of_node_returns_NULL(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_hw *hw; + + hw = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*hw), GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, hw); + + hw->init = &clk_hw_get_dev_of_node_init_data; + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, of_clk_hw_register_kunit(test, NULL, hw)); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, NULL, clk_hw_get_dev(hw)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, NULL, clk_hw_get_of_node(hw)); +} + +static struct kunit_case clk_hw_get_dev_of_node_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(clk_hw_register_dev_get_dev_returns_dev), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_hw_register_dev_no_node_get_dev_returns_dev), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_hw_register_NULL_get_dev_of_node_returns_NULL), + KUNIT_CASE(of_clk_hw_register_node_get_of_node_returns_node), + KUNIT_CASE(of_clk_hw_register_NULL_get_of_node_returns_NULL), + {} +}; + +/* + * Test suite to verify clk_hw_get_dev() and clk_hw_get_of_node() when clk + * registered with clk_hw_register() and of_clk_hw_register() + */ +static struct kunit_suite clk_hw_get_dev_of_node_test_suite = { + .name = "clk_hw_get_dev_of_node_test_suite", + .test_cases = clk_hw_get_dev_of_node_test_cases, +}; + + +kunit_test_suites( + &clk_assigned_rates_suite, + &clk_hw_get_dev_of_node_test_suite, + &clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_test_suite, + &clk_test_suite, + &clk_multiple_parents_mux_test_suite, + &clk_mux_no_reparent_test_suite, + &clk_mux_notifier_test_suite, + &clk_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_test_suite, + &clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_test_suite, + &clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_suite, + &clk_range_test_suite, + &clk_range_maximize_test_suite, + &clk_range_minimize_test_suite, + &clk_register_clk_parent_data_of_suite, + &clk_register_clk_parent_data_device_suite, + &clk_single_parent_mux_test_suite, + &clk_uncached_test_suite, +); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Kunit tests for clk framework"); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); |