diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 75 |
1 files changed, 42 insertions, 33 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c index 63f7c219062b..1a7fcaf39cc9 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(gov_dbs_data_mutex); /* Common sysfs tunables */ /* - * store_sampling_rate - update sampling rate effective immediately if needed. + * sampling_rate_store - update sampling rate effective immediately if needed. * * If new rate is smaller than the old, simply updating * dbs.sampling_rate might not be appropriate. For example, if the @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(gov_dbs_data_mutex); * This must be called with dbs_data->mutex held, otherwise traversing * policy_dbs_list isn't safe. */ -ssize_t store_sampling_rate(struct gov_attr_set *attr_set, const char *buf, +ssize_t sampling_rate_store(struct gov_attr_set *attr_set, const char *buf, size_t count) { struct dbs_data *dbs_data = to_dbs_data(attr_set); @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ ssize_t store_sampling_rate(struct gov_attr_set *attr_set, const char *buf, return count; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(store_sampling_rate); +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sampling_rate_store); /** * gov_update_cpu_data - Update CPU load data. @@ -145,7 +145,23 @@ unsigned int dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) time_elapsed = update_time - j_cdbs->prev_update_time; j_cdbs->prev_update_time = update_time; - idle_time = cur_idle_time - j_cdbs->prev_cpu_idle; + /* + * cur_idle_time could be smaller than j_cdbs->prev_cpu_idle if + * it's obtained from get_cpu_idle_time_jiffy() when NOHZ is + * off, where idle_time is calculated by the difference between + * time elapsed in jiffies and "busy time" obtained from CPU + * statistics. If a CPU is 100% busy, the time elapsed and busy + * time should grow with the same amount in two consecutive + * samples, but in practice there could be a tiny difference, + * making the accumulated idle time decrease sometimes. Hence, + * in this case, idle_time should be regarded as 0 in order to + * make the further process correct. + */ + if (cur_idle_time > j_cdbs->prev_cpu_idle) + idle_time = cur_idle_time - j_cdbs->prev_cpu_idle; + else + idle_time = 0; + j_cdbs->prev_cpu_idle = cur_idle_time; if (ignore_nice) { @@ -162,7 +178,7 @@ unsigned int dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) * calls, so the previous load value can be used then. */ load = j_cdbs->prev_load; - } else if (unlikely((int)idle_time > 2 * sampling_rate && + } else if (unlikely(idle_time > 2 * sampling_rate && j_cdbs->prev_load)) { /* * If the CPU had gone completely idle and a task has @@ -189,30 +205,15 @@ unsigned int dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) load = j_cdbs->prev_load; j_cdbs->prev_load = 0; } else { - if (time_elapsed >= idle_time) { + if (time_elapsed > idle_time) load = 100 * (time_elapsed - idle_time) / time_elapsed; - } else { - /* - * That can happen if idle_time is returned by - * get_cpu_idle_time_jiffy(). In that case - * idle_time is roughly equal to the difference - * between time_elapsed and "busy time" obtained - * from CPU statistics. Then, the "busy time" - * can end up being greater than time_elapsed - * (for example, if jiffies_64 and the CPU - * statistics are updated by different CPUs), - * so idle_time may in fact be negative. That - * means, though, that the CPU was busy all - * the time (on the rough average) during the - * last sampling interval and 100 can be - * returned as the load. - */ - load = (int)idle_time < 0 ? 100 : 0; - } + else + load = 0; + j_cdbs->prev_load = load; } - if (unlikely((int)idle_time > 2 * sampling_rate)) { + if (unlikely(idle_time > 2 * sampling_rate)) { unsigned int periods = idle_time / sampling_rate; if (periods < idle_periods) @@ -388,6 +389,15 @@ static void free_policy_dbs_info(struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs, gov->free(policy_dbs); } +static void cpufreq_dbs_data_release(struct kobject *kobj) +{ + struct dbs_data *dbs_data = to_dbs_data(to_gov_attr_set(kobj)); + struct dbs_governor *gov = dbs_data->gov; + + gov->exit(dbs_data); + kfree(dbs_data); +} + int cpufreq_dbs_governor_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { struct dbs_governor *gov = dbs_governor_of(policy); @@ -425,11 +435,12 @@ int cpufreq_dbs_governor_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) goto free_policy_dbs_info; } + dbs_data->gov = gov; gov_attr_set_init(&dbs_data->attr_set, &policy_dbs->list); ret = gov->init(dbs_data); if (ret) - goto free_policy_dbs_info; + goto free_dbs_data; /* * The sampling interval should not be less than the transition latency @@ -447,6 +458,7 @@ int cpufreq_dbs_governor_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) policy->governor_data = policy_dbs; gov->kobj_type.sysfs_ops = &governor_sysfs_ops; + gov->kobj_type.release = cpufreq_dbs_data_release; ret = kobject_init_and_add(&dbs_data->attr_set.kobj, &gov->kobj_type, get_governor_parent_kobj(policy), "%s", gov->gov.name); @@ -463,6 +475,8 @@ int cpufreq_dbs_governor_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) if (!have_governor_per_policy()) gov->gdbs_data = NULL; gov->exit(dbs_data); + +free_dbs_data: kfree(dbs_data); free_policy_dbs_info: @@ -488,13 +502,8 @@ void cpufreq_dbs_governor_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) policy->governor_data = NULL; - if (!count) { - if (!have_governor_per_policy()) - gov->gdbs_data = NULL; - - gov->exit(dbs_data); - kfree(dbs_data); - } + if (!count && !have_governor_per_policy()) + gov->gdbs_data = NULL; free_policy_dbs_info(policy_dbs, gov); |