summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c9
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
index 72299a08af44..ed9e56de5a9b 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ struct sdma_script_start_addrs {
/* End of v3 array */
union { s32 v3_end; s32 mcu_2_zqspi_addr; };
/* End of v4 array */
- s32 v4_end[0];
+ s32 v4_end[];
};
/*
@@ -1459,9 +1459,8 @@ static int sdma_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
* dmatest, thus create 'struct imx_dma_data mem_data' for this case.
* Please note in any other slave case, you have to setup chan->private
* with 'struct imx_dma_data' in your own filter function if you want to
- * request dma channel by dma_request_channel() rather than
- * dma_request_slave_channel(). Othwise, 'MEMCPY in case?' will appear
- * to warn you to correct your filter function.
+ * request DMA channel by dma_request_channel(), otherwise, 'MEMCPY in
+ * case?' will appear to warn you to correct your filter function.
*/
if (!data) {
dev_dbg(sdmac->sdma->dev, "MEMCPY in case?\n");
@@ -2440,7 +2439,7 @@ static struct platform_driver sdma_driver = {
.name = "imx-sdma",
.of_match_table = sdma_dt_ids,
},
- .remove_new = sdma_remove,
+ .remove = sdma_remove,
.probe = sdma_probe,
};