summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c30
1 files changed, 30 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
index 0b45eff6fed4..ab5ab969f711 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
*
* Copyright (c) 2007, 2010, 2012 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
* Copyright (c) 2009 MontaVista Software, Inc.
+ * Copyright 2020 NXP
*
* Authors: Xiaobo Xie <X.Xie@freescale.com>
* Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
@@ -19,6 +20,7 @@
#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/ktime.h>
#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
#include <linux/mmc/host.h>
#include <linux/mmc/mmc.h>
#include "sdhci-pltfm.h"
@@ -743,6 +745,21 @@ static void esdhc_of_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
if (host->mmc->actual_clock == MMC_HS200_MAX_DTR)
temp |= ESDHC_DLL_FREQ_SEL;
sdhci_writel(host, temp, ESDHC_DLLCFG0);
+
+ temp |= ESDHC_DLL_RESET;
+ sdhci_writel(host, temp, ESDHC_DLLCFG0);
+ udelay(1);
+ temp &= ~ESDHC_DLL_RESET;
+ sdhci_writel(host, temp, ESDHC_DLLCFG0);
+
+ /* Wait max 20 ms */
+ if (read_poll_timeout(sdhci_readl, temp,
+ temp & ESDHC_DLL_STS_SLV_LOCK,
+ 10, 20000, false,
+ host, ESDHC_DLLSTAT0))
+ pr_err("%s: timeout for delay chain lock.\n",
+ mmc_hostname(host->mmc));
+
temp = sdhci_readl(host, ESDHC_TBCTL);
sdhci_writel(host, temp | ESDHC_HS400_WNDW_ADJUST, ESDHC_TBCTL);
@@ -1052,6 +1069,17 @@ static int esdhc_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
esdhc_tuning_block_enable(host, true);
+ /*
+ * The eSDHC controller takes the data timeout value into account
+ * during tuning. If the SD card is too slow sending the response, the
+ * timer will expire and a "Buffer Read Ready" interrupt without data
+ * is triggered. This leads to tuning errors.
+ *
+ * Just set the timeout to the maximum value because the core will
+ * already take care of it in sdhci_send_tuning().
+ */
+ sdhci_writeb(host, 0xe, SDHCI_TIMEOUT_CONTROL);
+
hs400_tuning = host->flags & SDHCI_HS400_TUNING;
do {
@@ -1296,6 +1324,8 @@ static struct soc_device_attribute soc_fixup_sdhc_clkdivs[] = {
static struct soc_device_attribute soc_unreliable_pulse_detection[] = {
{ .family = "QorIQ LX2160A", .revision = "1.0", },
+ { .family = "QorIQ LX2160A", .revision = "2.0", },
+ { .family = "QorIQ LS1028A", .revision = "1.0", },
{ },
};