summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-regmap.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-regmap.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-regmap.c165
1 files changed, 126 insertions, 39 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-regmap.c b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-regmap.c
index 297491516a26..70d5ff0ae7ac 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-regmap.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-regmap.c
@@ -2,28 +2,20 @@
//
// mcp251xfd - Microchip MCP251xFD Family CAN controller driver
//
-// Copyright (c) 2019, 2020 Pengutronix,
-// Marc Kleine-Budde <kernel@pengutronix.de>
+// Copyright (c) 2019, 2020, 2021 Pengutronix,
+// Marc Kleine-Budde <kernel@pengutronix.de>
//
#include "mcp251xfd.h"
-#include <asm/unaligned.h>
+#include <linux/unaligned.h>
static const struct regmap_config mcp251xfd_regmap_crc;
static int
-mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_write(void *context, const void *data, size_t count)
-{
- struct spi_device *spi = context;
-
- return spi_write(spi, data, count);
-}
-
-static int
-mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_gather_write(void *context,
- const void *reg, size_t reg_len,
- const void *val, size_t val_len)
+_mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_gather_write(void *context,
+ const void *reg, size_t reg_len,
+ const void *val, size_t val_len)
{
struct spi_device *spi = context;
struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
@@ -47,22 +39,81 @@ mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_gather_write(void *context,
return spi_sync_transfer(spi, xfer, ARRAY_SIZE(xfer));
}
-static inline bool mcp251xfd_update_bits_read_reg(unsigned int reg)
+static int
+mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_gather_write(void *context,
+ const void *reg_p, size_t reg_len,
+ const void *val, size_t val_len)
+{
+ const u16 byte_exclude = MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON +
+ mcp251xfd_first_byte_set(MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON_GPIO_MASK);
+ u16 reg = be16_to_cpu(*(__be16 *)reg_p) & MCP251XFD_SPI_ADDRESS_MASK;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Never write to bits 16..23 of IOCON register to avoid clearing of LAT0/LAT1
+ *
+ * According to MCP2518FD Errata DS80000789E 5 writing IOCON register using one
+ * SPI write command clears LAT0/LAT1.
+ *
+ * Errata Fix/Work Around suggests to write registers with single byte
+ * write instructions. However, it seems that the byte at 0xe06(IOCON[23:16])
+ * is for read-only access and writing to it causes the clearing of LAT0/LAT1.
+ */
+ if (reg <= byte_exclude && reg + val_len > byte_exclude) {
+ size_t len = byte_exclude - reg;
+
+ /* Write up to 0xe05 */
+ ret = _mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_gather_write(context, reg_p, reg_len, val, len);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* Write from 0xe07 on */
+ reg += len + 1;
+ reg = (__force unsigned short)cpu_to_be16(MCP251XFD_SPI_INSTRUCTION_WRITE | reg);
+ return _mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_gather_write(context, &reg, reg_len,
+ val + len + 1,
+ val_len - len - 1);
+ }
+
+ return _mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_gather_write(context, reg_p, reg_len,
+ val, val_len);
+}
+
+static int
+mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_write(void *context, const void *data, size_t count)
+{
+ const size_t data_offset = sizeof(__be16);
+
+ return mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_gather_write(context, data, data_offset,
+ data + data_offset, count - data_offset);
+}
+
+static inline bool
+mcp251xfd_update_bits_read_reg(const struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv,
+ unsigned int reg)
{
+ struct mcp251xfd_rx_ring *ring;
+ int n;
+
switch (reg) {
case MCP251XFD_REG_INT:
case MCP251XFD_REG_TEFCON:
- case MCP251XFD_REG_FIFOCON(MCP251XFD_RX_FIFO(0)):
case MCP251XFD_REG_FLTCON(0):
case MCP251XFD_REG_ECCSTAT:
case MCP251XFD_REG_CRC:
return false;
case MCP251XFD_REG_CON:
- case MCP251XFD_REG_FIFOSTA(MCP251XFD_RX_FIFO(0)):
case MCP251XFD_REG_OSC:
case MCP251XFD_REG_ECCCON:
+ case MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON:
return true;
default:
+ mcp251xfd_for_each_rx_ring(priv, ring, n) {
+ if (reg == MCP251XFD_REG_FIFOCON(ring->fifo_nr))
+ return false;
+ if (reg == MCP251XFD_REG_FIFOSTA(ring->fifo_nr))
+ return true;
+ }
+
WARN(1, "Status of reg 0x%04x unknown.\n", reg);
}
@@ -92,7 +143,7 @@ mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_update_bits(void *context, unsigned int reg,
last_byte = mcp251xfd_last_byte_set(mask);
len = last_byte - first_byte + 1;
- if (mcp251xfd_update_bits_read_reg(reg)) {
+ if (mcp251xfd_update_bits_read_reg(priv, reg)) {
struct spi_transfer xfer[2] = { };
struct spi_message msg;
@@ -129,10 +180,9 @@ mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_update_bits(void *context, unsigned int reg,
tmp_le32 = orig_le32 & ~mask_le32;
tmp_le32 |= val_le32 & mask_le32;
- mcp251xfd_spi_cmd_write_nocrc(&buf_tx->cmd, reg + first_byte);
- memcpy(buf_tx->data, &tmp_le32, len);
-
- return spi_write(spi, buf_tx, sizeof(buf_tx->cmd) + len);
+ reg += first_byte;
+ mcp251xfd_spi_cmd_write_nocrc(&buf_tx->cmd, reg);
+ return mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_gather_write(context, &buf_tx->cmd, 2, &tmp_le32, len);
}
static int
@@ -186,9 +236,9 @@ mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_read(void *context,
}
static int
-mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_gather_write(void *context,
- const void *reg_p, size_t reg_len,
- const void *val, size_t val_len)
+_mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_gather_write(void *context,
+ const void *reg_p, size_t reg_len,
+ const void *val, size_t val_len)
{
struct spi_device *spi = context;
struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
@@ -220,6 +270,44 @@ mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_gather_write(void *context,
}
static int
+mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_gather_write(void *context,
+ const void *reg_p, size_t reg_len,
+ const void *val, size_t val_len)
+{
+ const u16 byte_exclude = MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON +
+ mcp251xfd_first_byte_set(MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON_GPIO_MASK);
+ u16 reg = *(u16 *)reg_p;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Never write to bits 16..23 of IOCON register to avoid clearing of LAT0/LAT1
+ *
+ * According to MCP2518FD Errata DS80000789E 5 writing IOCON register using one
+ * SPI write command clears LAT0/LAT1.
+ *
+ * Errata Fix/Work Around suggests to write registers with single byte
+ * write instructions. However, it seems that the byte at 0xe06(IOCON[23:16])
+ * is for read-only access and writing to it causes the clearing of LAT0/LAT1.
+ */
+ if (reg <= byte_exclude && reg + val_len > byte_exclude) {
+ size_t len = byte_exclude - reg;
+
+ /* Write up to 0xe05 */
+ ret = _mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_gather_write(context, &reg, reg_len, val, len);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* Write from 0xe07 on */
+ reg += len + 1;
+ return _mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_gather_write(context, &reg, reg_len,
+ val + len + 1,
+ val_len - len - 1);
+ }
+
+ return _mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_gather_write(context, reg_p, reg_len,
+ val, val_len);
+}
+
+static int
mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_write(void *context,
const void *data, size_t count)
{
@@ -250,7 +338,6 @@ mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_read_check_crc(const struct mcp251xfd_map_buf_crc * const b
return 0;
}
-
static int
mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_read_one(struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv,
struct spi_message *msg, unsigned int data_len)
@@ -325,19 +412,21 @@ mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_read(void *context,
* register. It increments once per SYS clock tick,
* which is 20 or 40 MHz.
*
- * Observation shows that if the lowest byte (which is
- * transferred first on the SPI bus) of that register
- * is 0x00 or 0x80 the calculated CRC doesn't always
- * match the transferred one.
+ * Observation on the mcp2518fd shows that if the
+ * lowest byte (which is transferred first on the SPI
+ * bus) of that register is 0x00 or 0x80 the
+ * calculated CRC doesn't always match the transferred
+ * one. On the mcp2517fd this problem is not limited
+ * to the first byte being 0x00 or 0x80.
*
* If the highest bit in the lowest byte is flipped
* the transferred CRC matches the calculated one. We
- * assume for now the CRC calculation in the chip
- * works on wrong data and the transferred data is
- * correct.
+ * assume for now the CRC operates on the correct
+ * data.
*/
if (reg == MCP251XFD_REG_TBC &&
- (buf_rx->data[0] == 0x0 || buf_rx->data[0] == 0x80)) {
+ ((buf_rx->data[0] & 0xf8) == 0x0 ||
+ (buf_rx->data[0] & 0xf8) == 0x80)) {
/* Flip highest bit in lowest byte of le32 */
buf_rx->data[0] ^= 0x80;
@@ -347,10 +436,8 @@ mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_read(void *context,
val_len);
if (!err) {
/* If CRC is now correct, assume
- * transferred data was OK, flip bit
- * back to original value.
+ * flipped data is OK.
*/
- buf_rx->data[0] ^= 0x80;
goto out;
}
}
@@ -369,7 +456,7 @@ mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_read(void *context,
* to the caller. It will take care of both cases.
*
*/
- if (reg == MCP251XFD_REG_OSC) {
+ if (reg == MCP251XFD_REG_OSC && val_len == sizeof(__le32)) {
err = 0;
goto out;
}
@@ -388,7 +475,7 @@ mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_read(void *context,
return err;
}
- out:
+out:
memcpy(val_buf, buf_rx->data, val_len);
return 0;