diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-regmap.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-regmap.c | 165 |
1 files changed, 126 insertions, 39 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-regmap.c b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-regmap.c index 297491516a26..70d5ff0ae7ac 100644 --- a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-regmap.c +++ b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-regmap.c @@ -2,28 +2,20 @@ // // mcp251xfd - Microchip MCP251xFD Family CAN controller driver // -// Copyright (c) 2019, 2020 Pengutronix, -// Marc Kleine-Budde <kernel@pengutronix.de> +// Copyright (c) 2019, 2020, 2021 Pengutronix, +// Marc Kleine-Budde <kernel@pengutronix.de> // #include "mcp251xfd.h" -#include <asm/unaligned.h> +#include <linux/unaligned.h> static const struct regmap_config mcp251xfd_regmap_crc; static int -mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_write(void *context, const void *data, size_t count) -{ - struct spi_device *spi = context; - - return spi_write(spi, data, count); -} - -static int -mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_gather_write(void *context, - const void *reg, size_t reg_len, - const void *val, size_t val_len) +_mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_gather_write(void *context, + const void *reg, size_t reg_len, + const void *val, size_t val_len) { struct spi_device *spi = context; struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv = spi_get_drvdata(spi); @@ -47,22 +39,81 @@ mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_gather_write(void *context, return spi_sync_transfer(spi, xfer, ARRAY_SIZE(xfer)); } -static inline bool mcp251xfd_update_bits_read_reg(unsigned int reg) +static int +mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_gather_write(void *context, + const void *reg_p, size_t reg_len, + const void *val, size_t val_len) +{ + const u16 byte_exclude = MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON + + mcp251xfd_first_byte_set(MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON_GPIO_MASK); + u16 reg = be16_to_cpu(*(__be16 *)reg_p) & MCP251XFD_SPI_ADDRESS_MASK; + int ret; + + /* Never write to bits 16..23 of IOCON register to avoid clearing of LAT0/LAT1 + * + * According to MCP2518FD Errata DS80000789E 5 writing IOCON register using one + * SPI write command clears LAT0/LAT1. + * + * Errata Fix/Work Around suggests to write registers with single byte + * write instructions. However, it seems that the byte at 0xe06(IOCON[23:16]) + * is for read-only access and writing to it causes the clearing of LAT0/LAT1. + */ + if (reg <= byte_exclude && reg + val_len > byte_exclude) { + size_t len = byte_exclude - reg; + + /* Write up to 0xe05 */ + ret = _mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_gather_write(context, reg_p, reg_len, val, len); + if (ret) + return ret; + + /* Write from 0xe07 on */ + reg += len + 1; + reg = (__force unsigned short)cpu_to_be16(MCP251XFD_SPI_INSTRUCTION_WRITE | reg); + return _mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_gather_write(context, ®, reg_len, + val + len + 1, + val_len - len - 1); + } + + return _mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_gather_write(context, reg_p, reg_len, + val, val_len); +} + +static int +mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_write(void *context, const void *data, size_t count) +{ + const size_t data_offset = sizeof(__be16); + + return mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_gather_write(context, data, data_offset, + data + data_offset, count - data_offset); +} + +static inline bool +mcp251xfd_update_bits_read_reg(const struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv, + unsigned int reg) { + struct mcp251xfd_rx_ring *ring; + int n; + switch (reg) { case MCP251XFD_REG_INT: case MCP251XFD_REG_TEFCON: - case MCP251XFD_REG_FIFOCON(MCP251XFD_RX_FIFO(0)): case MCP251XFD_REG_FLTCON(0): case MCP251XFD_REG_ECCSTAT: case MCP251XFD_REG_CRC: return false; case MCP251XFD_REG_CON: - case MCP251XFD_REG_FIFOSTA(MCP251XFD_RX_FIFO(0)): case MCP251XFD_REG_OSC: case MCP251XFD_REG_ECCCON: + case MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON: return true; default: + mcp251xfd_for_each_rx_ring(priv, ring, n) { + if (reg == MCP251XFD_REG_FIFOCON(ring->fifo_nr)) + return false; + if (reg == MCP251XFD_REG_FIFOSTA(ring->fifo_nr)) + return true; + } + WARN(1, "Status of reg 0x%04x unknown.\n", reg); } @@ -92,7 +143,7 @@ mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_update_bits(void *context, unsigned int reg, last_byte = mcp251xfd_last_byte_set(mask); len = last_byte - first_byte + 1; - if (mcp251xfd_update_bits_read_reg(reg)) { + if (mcp251xfd_update_bits_read_reg(priv, reg)) { struct spi_transfer xfer[2] = { }; struct spi_message msg; @@ -129,10 +180,9 @@ mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_update_bits(void *context, unsigned int reg, tmp_le32 = orig_le32 & ~mask_le32; tmp_le32 |= val_le32 & mask_le32; - mcp251xfd_spi_cmd_write_nocrc(&buf_tx->cmd, reg + first_byte); - memcpy(buf_tx->data, &tmp_le32, len); - - return spi_write(spi, buf_tx, sizeof(buf_tx->cmd) + len); + reg += first_byte; + mcp251xfd_spi_cmd_write_nocrc(&buf_tx->cmd, reg); + return mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_gather_write(context, &buf_tx->cmd, 2, &tmp_le32, len); } static int @@ -186,9 +236,9 @@ mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_read(void *context, } static int -mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_gather_write(void *context, - const void *reg_p, size_t reg_len, - const void *val, size_t val_len) +_mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_gather_write(void *context, + const void *reg_p, size_t reg_len, + const void *val, size_t val_len) { struct spi_device *spi = context; struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv = spi_get_drvdata(spi); @@ -220,6 +270,44 @@ mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_gather_write(void *context, } static int +mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_gather_write(void *context, + const void *reg_p, size_t reg_len, + const void *val, size_t val_len) +{ + const u16 byte_exclude = MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON + + mcp251xfd_first_byte_set(MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON_GPIO_MASK); + u16 reg = *(u16 *)reg_p; + int ret; + + /* Never write to bits 16..23 of IOCON register to avoid clearing of LAT0/LAT1 + * + * According to MCP2518FD Errata DS80000789E 5 writing IOCON register using one + * SPI write command clears LAT0/LAT1. + * + * Errata Fix/Work Around suggests to write registers with single byte + * write instructions. However, it seems that the byte at 0xe06(IOCON[23:16]) + * is for read-only access and writing to it causes the clearing of LAT0/LAT1. + */ + if (reg <= byte_exclude && reg + val_len > byte_exclude) { + size_t len = byte_exclude - reg; + + /* Write up to 0xe05 */ + ret = _mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_gather_write(context, ®, reg_len, val, len); + if (ret) + return ret; + + /* Write from 0xe07 on */ + reg += len + 1; + return _mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_gather_write(context, ®, reg_len, + val + len + 1, + val_len - len - 1); + } + + return _mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_gather_write(context, reg_p, reg_len, + val, val_len); +} + +static int mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_write(void *context, const void *data, size_t count) { @@ -250,7 +338,6 @@ mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_read_check_crc(const struct mcp251xfd_map_buf_crc * const b return 0; } - static int mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_read_one(struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv, struct spi_message *msg, unsigned int data_len) @@ -325,19 +412,21 @@ mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_read(void *context, * register. It increments once per SYS clock tick, * which is 20 or 40 MHz. * - * Observation shows that if the lowest byte (which is - * transferred first on the SPI bus) of that register - * is 0x00 or 0x80 the calculated CRC doesn't always - * match the transferred one. + * Observation on the mcp2518fd shows that if the + * lowest byte (which is transferred first on the SPI + * bus) of that register is 0x00 or 0x80 the + * calculated CRC doesn't always match the transferred + * one. On the mcp2517fd this problem is not limited + * to the first byte being 0x00 or 0x80. * * If the highest bit in the lowest byte is flipped * the transferred CRC matches the calculated one. We - * assume for now the CRC calculation in the chip - * works on wrong data and the transferred data is - * correct. + * assume for now the CRC operates on the correct + * data. */ if (reg == MCP251XFD_REG_TBC && - (buf_rx->data[0] == 0x0 || buf_rx->data[0] == 0x80)) { + ((buf_rx->data[0] & 0xf8) == 0x0 || + (buf_rx->data[0] & 0xf8) == 0x80)) { /* Flip highest bit in lowest byte of le32 */ buf_rx->data[0] ^= 0x80; @@ -347,10 +436,8 @@ mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_read(void *context, val_len); if (!err) { /* If CRC is now correct, assume - * transferred data was OK, flip bit - * back to original value. + * flipped data is OK. */ - buf_rx->data[0] ^= 0x80; goto out; } } @@ -369,7 +456,7 @@ mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_read(void *context, * to the caller. It will take care of both cases. * */ - if (reg == MCP251XFD_REG_OSC) { + if (reg == MCP251XFD_REG_OSC && val_len == sizeof(__le32)) { err = 0; goto out; } @@ -388,7 +475,7 @@ mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_read(void *context, return err; } - out: +out: memcpy(val_buf, buf_rx->data, val_len); return 0; |
