summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c')
-rw-r--r--security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c32
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 915f5572c6ff..d89bebf85421 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry dont_measure_rules[] __ro_after_init = {
{.action = DONT_MEASURE, .fsmagic = BINFMTFS_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
{.action = DONT_MEASURE, .fsmagic = SECURITYFS_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
{.action = DONT_MEASURE, .fsmagic = SELINUX_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
+ {.action = DONT_MEASURE, .fsmagic = SMACK_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
{.action = DONT_MEASURE, .fsmagic = CGROUP_SUPER_MAGIC,
.flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
{.action = DONT_MEASURE, .fsmagic = CGROUP2_SUPER_MAGIC,
@@ -141,6 +142,7 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry default_appraise_rules[] __ro_after_init = {
{.action = DONT_APPRAISE, .fsmagic = BINFMTFS_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
{.action = DONT_APPRAISE, .fsmagic = SECURITYFS_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
{.action = DONT_APPRAISE, .fsmagic = SELINUX_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
+ {.action = DONT_APPRAISE, .fsmagic = SMACK_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
{.action = DONT_APPRAISE, .fsmagic = NSFS_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
{.action = DONT_APPRAISE, .fsmagic = CGROUP_SUPER_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
{.action = DONT_APPRAISE, .fsmagic = CGROUP2_SUPER_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
@@ -188,6 +190,7 @@ __setup("ima_tcb", default_measure_policy_setup);
static bool ima_use_appraise_tcb __initdata;
static bool ima_use_secure_boot __initdata;
+static bool ima_fail_unverifiable_sigs __ro_after_init;
static int __init policy_setup(char *str)
{
char *p;
@@ -201,6 +204,8 @@ static int __init policy_setup(char *str)
ima_use_appraise_tcb = true;
else if (strcmp(p, "secure_boot") == 0)
ima_use_secure_boot = true;
+ else if (strcmp(p, "fail_securely") == 0)
+ ima_fail_unverifiable_sigs = true;
}
return 1;
@@ -243,16 +248,17 @@ static void ima_lsm_update_rules(void)
* ima_match_rules - determine whether an inode matches the measure rule.
* @rule: a pointer to a rule
* @inode: a pointer to an inode
+ * @cred: a pointer to a credentials structure for user validation
+ * @secid: the secid of the task to be validated
* @func: LIM hook identifier
* @mask: requested action (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_APPEND | MAY_EXEC)
*
* Returns true on rule match, false on failure.
*/
static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
+ const struct cred *cred, u32 secid,
enum ima_hooks func, int mask)
{
- struct task_struct *tsk = current;
- const struct cred *cred = current_cred();
int i;
if ((rule->flags & IMA_FUNC) &&
@@ -287,7 +293,7 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
return false;
for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
int rc = 0;
- u32 osid, sid;
+ u32 osid;
int retried = 0;
if (!rule->lsm[i].rule)
@@ -307,8 +313,7 @@ retry:
case LSM_SUBJ_USER:
case LSM_SUBJ_ROLE:
case LSM_SUBJ_TYPE:
- security_task_getsecid(tsk, &sid);
- rc = security_filter_rule_match(sid,
+ rc = security_filter_rule_match(secid,
rule->lsm[i].type,
Audit_equal,
rule->lsm[i].rule,
@@ -341,6 +346,8 @@ static int get_subaction(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, enum ima_hooks func)
return IMA_MMAP_APPRAISE;
case BPRM_CHECK:
return IMA_BPRM_APPRAISE;
+ case CREDS_CHECK:
+ return IMA_CREDS_APPRAISE;
case FILE_CHECK:
case POST_SETATTR:
return IMA_FILE_APPRAISE;
@@ -353,6 +360,9 @@ static int get_subaction(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, enum ima_hooks func)
/**
* ima_match_policy - decision based on LSM and other conditions
* @inode: pointer to an inode for which the policy decision is being made
+ * @cred: pointer to a credentials structure for which the policy decision is
+ * being made
+ * @secid: LSM secid of the task to be validated
* @func: IMA hook identifier
* @mask: requested action (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_APPEND | MAY_EXEC)
* @pcr: set the pcr to extend
@@ -364,8 +374,8 @@ static int get_subaction(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, enum ima_hooks func)
* list when walking it. Reads are many orders of magnitude more numerous
* than writes so ima_match_policy() is classical RCU candidate.
*/
-int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, enum ima_hooks func, int mask,
- int flags, int *pcr)
+int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid,
+ enum ima_hooks func, int mask, int flags, int *pcr)
{
struct ima_rule_entry *entry;
int action = 0, actmask = flags | (flags << 1);
@@ -376,7 +386,7 @@ int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, enum ima_hooks func, int mask,
if (!(entry->action & actmask))
continue;
- if (!ima_match_rules(entry, inode, func, mask))
+ if (!ima_match_rules(entry, inode, cred, secid, func, mask))
continue;
action |= entry->flags & IMA_ACTION_FLAGS;
@@ -384,7 +394,9 @@ int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, enum ima_hooks func, int mask,
action |= entry->action & IMA_DO_MASK;
if (entry->action & IMA_APPRAISE) {
action |= get_subaction(entry, func);
- action ^= IMA_HASH;
+ action &= ~IMA_HASH;
+ if (ima_fail_unverifiable_sigs)
+ action |= IMA_FAIL_UNVERIFIABLE_SIGS;
}
if (entry->action & IMA_DO_MASK)
@@ -713,6 +725,8 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
entry->func = MMAP_CHECK;
else if (strcmp(args[0].from, "BPRM_CHECK") == 0)
entry->func = BPRM_CHECK;
+ else if (strcmp(args[0].from, "CREDS_CHECK") == 0)
+ entry->func = CREDS_CHECK;
else if (strcmp(args[0].from, "KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK") ==
0)
entry->func = KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK;