summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h')
-rw-r--r--tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h32
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
index cd17f6d0791f..a50773d4616e 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
@@ -15,6 +15,14 @@
#define __array(name, val) typeof(val) *name[]
#define __ulong(name, val) enum { ___bpf_concat(__unique_value, __COUNTER__) = val } name
+#ifndef likely
+#define likely(x) (__builtin_expect(!!(x), 1))
+#endif
+
+#ifndef unlikely
+#define unlikely(x) (__builtin_expect(!!(x), 0))
+#endif
+
/*
* Helper macro to place programs, maps, license in
* different sections in elf_bpf file. Section names
@@ -137,7 +145,8 @@
/*
* Helper function to perform a tail call with a constant/immediate map slot.
*/
-#if __clang_major__ >= 8 && defined(__bpf__)
+#if (defined(__clang__) && __clang_major__ >= 8) || (!defined(__clang__) && __GNUC__ > 12)
+#if defined(__bpf__)
static __always_inline void
bpf_tail_call_static(void *ctx, const void *map, const __u32 slot)
{
@@ -165,6 +174,7 @@ bpf_tail_call_static(void *ctx, const void *map, const __u32 slot)
: "r0", "r1", "r2", "r3", "r4", "r5");
}
#endif
+#endif
enum libbpf_pin_type {
LIBBPF_PIN_NONE,
@@ -183,11 +193,23 @@ enum libbpf_tristate {
#define __kptr_untrusted __attribute__((btf_type_tag("kptr_untrusted")))
#define __kptr __attribute__((btf_type_tag("kptr")))
#define __percpu_kptr __attribute__((btf_type_tag("percpu_kptr")))
+#define __uptr __attribute__((btf_type_tag("uptr")))
-#define bpf_ksym_exists(sym) ({ \
- _Static_assert(!__builtin_constant_p(!!sym), #sym " should be marked as __weak"); \
- !!sym; \
+#if defined (__clang__)
+#define bpf_ksym_exists(sym) ({ \
+ _Static_assert(!__builtin_constant_p(!!sym), \
+ #sym " should be marked as __weak"); \
+ !!sym; \
+})
+#elif __GNUC__ > 8
+#define bpf_ksym_exists(sym) ({ \
+ _Static_assert(__builtin_has_attribute (*sym, __weak__), \
+ #sym " should be marked as __weak"); \
+ !!sym; \
})
+#else
+#define bpf_ksym_exists(sym) !!sym
+#endif
#define __arg_ctx __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("arg:ctx")))
#define __arg_nonnull __attribute((btf_decl_tag("arg:nonnull")))
@@ -328,7 +350,7 @@ extern void bpf_iter_num_destroy(struct bpf_iter_num *it) __weak __ksym;
* I.e., it looks almost like high-level for each loop in other languages,
* supports continue/break, and is verifiable by BPF verifier.
*
- * For iterating integers, the difference betwen bpf_for_each(num, i, N, M)
+ * For iterating integers, the difference between bpf_for_each(num, i, N, M)
* and bpf_for(i, N, M) is in that bpf_for() provides additional proof to
* verifier that i is in [N, M) range, and in bpf_for_each() case i is `int
* *`, not just `int`. So for integers bpf_for() is more convenient.