| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The selftests build four kernel modules which use copy-pasted Makefile
targets. This is a bit messy, and doesn't scale so well when we add more
modules, so let's consolidate these rules into a single rule generated
for each module name, and move the module sources into a single
directory.
To avoid parallel builds of the different modules stepping on each
other's toes during the 'modpost' phase of the Kbuild 'make modules',
the module files should really be a grouped target. However, make only
added explicit support for grouped targets in version 4.3, which is
newer than the minimum version supported by the kernel. However, make
implicitly treats pattern matching rules with multiple targets as a
grouped target, so we can work around this by turning the rule into a
pattern matching target. We do this by replacing '.ko' with '%ko' in the
targets with subst().
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241204-bpf-selftests-mod-compile-v5-1-b96231134a49@redhat.com
|
|
This patch adds test cases for iter next method returning valid
pointer, which can also used as usage examples.
Currently iter next method should return valid pointer.
iter_next_trusted is the correct usage and test if iter next method
return valid pointer. bpf_iter_task_vma_next has KF_RET_NULL flag,
so the returned pointer may be NULL. We need to check if the pointer
is NULL before using it.
iter_next_trusted_or_null is the incorrect usage. There is no checking
before using the pointer, so it will be rejected by the verifier.
iter_next_rcu and iter_next_rcu_or_null are similar test cases for
KF_RCU_PROTECTED iterators.
iter_next_rcu_not_trusted is used to test that the pointer returned by
iter next method of KF_RCU_PROTECTED iterator cannot be passed in
KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfuncs.
iter_next_ptr_mem_not_trusted is used to test that base type
PTR_TO_MEM should not be combined with type flag PTR_TRUSTED.
Signed-off-by: Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@outlook.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/AM6PR03MB5848709758F6922F02AF9F1F99962@AM6PR03MB5848.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
This test adds a new struct_ops "bpf_testmod_st_ops" in bpf_testmod.
The ops of the bpf_testmod_st_ops is triggered by new kfunc calls
"bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_*logue". These new kfunc calls are
primarily used by the SEC("syscall") program. The test triggering
sequence is like:
SEC("syscall")
syscall_prologue(struct st_ops_args *args)
bpf_kfunc_st_op_test_prologue(args)
st_ops->test_prologue(args)
.gen_prologue adds 1000 to args->a
.gen_epilogue adds 10000 to args->a
.gen_epilogue will also set the r0 to 2 * args->a.
The .gen_prologue and .gen_epilogue of the bpf_testmod_st_ops
will test the prog->aux->attach_func_name to decide if
it needs to generate codes.
The main programs of the pro_epilogue.c will call a
new kfunc bpf_kfunc_st_ops_inc10 which does "args->a += 10".
It will also call a subprog() which does "args->a += 1".
This patch uses the test_loader infra to check the __xlated
instructions patched after gen_prologue and/or gen_epilogue.
The __xlated check is based on Eduard's example (Thanks!) in v1.
args->a is returned by the struct_ops prog (either the main prog
or the epilogue). Thus, the __retval of the SEC("syscall") prog
is checked. For example, when triggering the ops in the
'SEC("struct_ops/test_epilogue") int test_epilogue'
The expected args->a is +1 (subprog call) + 10 (kfunc call)
+ 10000 (.gen_epilogue) = 10011.
The expected return value is 2 * 10011 (.gen_epilogue).
Suggested-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240829210833.388152-7-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
KF_ACQUIRE kfuncs argument
This patch adds test cases for zero offset (implicit cast) or non-zero
offset pointer as KF_ACQUIRE kfuncs argument. Currently KF_ACQUIRE
kfuncs should support passing in pointers like &sk->sk_write_queue
(non-zero offset) or &sk->__sk_common (zero offset) and not be rejected
by the verifier.
Signed-off-by: Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@outlook.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/AM6PR03MB5848CB6F0D4D9068669A905B99952@AM6PR03MB5848.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
add simple kfuncs to create/destroy a context type to bpf_testmod,
register them and add a kfunc_call test to use them. This provides
test coverage for registration of dtor kfuncs from modules.
By transferring the context pointer to a map value as a __kptr
we also trigger the map-based dtor cleanup logic, improving test
coverage.
Suggested-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240620091733.1967885-7-alan.maguire@oracle.com
|
|
Add special test to be sure that only __nullable BTF params can be
replaced by NULL. This patch adds fake kfuncs in bpf_testmod to
properly test different params.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@meta.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240613211817.1551967-6-vadfed@meta.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
This patch adds a set of kfuncs to bpf_testmod that can be used to
manipulate a socket from kernel space.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240429214529.2644801-3-jrife@google.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
|
|
We assign the callback and set everything up.
The actual tests of these callbacks will be done when bpf_wq_start() is
available.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240420-bpf_wq-v2-14-6c986a5a741f@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Adding test that puts kprobe on bpf_fentry_test1 that calls
bpf_kfunc_common_test kfunc, which has also kprobe on.
The latter won't get triggered due to kprobe recursion check
and kprobe missed counter is incremented.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230920213145.1941596-8-jolsa@kernel.org
|
|
Adding missing prototypes for several kfuncs that are used by
test_verifier tests. We don't really need kfunc prototypes for
these tests, but adding them to silence 'make W=1' build and
to have all test kfuncs declarations in bpf_testmod_kfunc.h.
Also moving __diag_pop for -Wmissing-prototypes to cover also
bpf_testmod_test_write and bpf_testmod_test_read and adding
bpf_fentry_shadow_test in there as well. All of them need to
be exported, but there's no need for declarations.
Fixes: 65eb006d85a2 ("bpf: Move kernel test kfuncs to bpf_testmod")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306051319.EihCQZPs-lkp@intel.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230607224046.236510-1-jolsa@kernel.org
|
|
Moving kernel test kfuncs into bpf_testmod kernel module, and adding
necessary init calls and BTF IDs records.
We need to keep following structs in kernel:
struct prog_test_ref_kfunc
struct prog_test_member (embedded in prog_test_ref_kfunc)
The reason is because they need to be marked as rcu safe (check test
prog mark_ref_as_untrusted_or_null) and such objects are being required
to be defined only in kernel at the moment (see rcu_safe_kptr check
in kernel).
We need to keep also dtor functions for both objects in kernel:
bpf_kfunc_call_test_release
bpf_kfunc_call_memb_release
We also keep the copy of these struct in bpf_testmod_kfunc.h, because
other test functions use them. This is unfortunate, but this is just
temporary solution until we are able to these structs them to bpf_testmod
completely.
As suggested by David adding bpf_testmod.ko make dependency for
bpf programs, so they are rebuilt if we change the bpf_testmod.ko
module.
Also adding missing __bpf_kfunc to bpf_kfunc_call_test4 functions.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230515133756.1658301-11-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
There's no need to keep the extern in kfuncs declarations.
Suggested-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230515133756.1658301-10-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Move all kfunc exports into separate bpf_testmod_kfunc.h header file
and include it in tests that need it.
We will move all test kfuncs into bpf_testmod in following change,
so it's convenient to have declarations in single place.
The bpf_testmod_kfunc.h is included by both bpf_testmod and bpf
programs that use test kfuncs.
As suggested by David, the bpf_testmod_kfunc.h includes vmlinux.h
and bpf/bpf_helpers.h for bpf programs build, so the declarations
have proper __ksym attribute and we can resolve all the structs.
Note in kfunc_call_test_subprog.c we can no longer use the sk_state
define from bpf_tcp_helpers.h (because it clashed with vmlinux.h)
and we need to address __sk_common.skc_state field directly.
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230515133756.1658301-3-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
