summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/raw_tp_null.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-05-14tracepoint: Have tracepoints created with DECLARE_TRACE() have _tp suffixSteven Rostedt
Most tracepoints in the kernel are created with TRACE_EVENT(). The TRACE_EVENT() macro (and DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS() and DEFINE_EVENT() where in reality, TRACE_EVENT() is just a helper macro that calls those other two macros), will create not only a tracepoint (the function trace_<event>() used in the kernel), it also exposes the tracepoint to user space along with defining what fields will be saved by that tracepoint. There are a few places that tracepoints are created in the kernel that are not exposed to userspace via tracefs. They can only be accessed from code within the kernel. These tracepoints are created with DEFINE_TRACE() Most of these tracepoints end with "_tp". This is useful as when the developer sees that, they know that the tracepoint is for in-kernel only (meaning it can only be accessed inside the kernel, either directly by the kernel or indirectly via modules and BPF programs) and is not exposed to user space. Instead of making this only a process to add "_tp", enforce it by making the DECLARE_TRACE() append the "_tp" suffix to the tracepoint. This requires adding DECLARE_TRACE_EVENT() macros for the TRACE_EVENT() macro to use that keeps the original name. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250418083351.20a60e64@gandalf.local.home/ Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com> Cc: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> Cc: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250510163730.092fad5b@gandalf.local.home Acked-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2024-12-13bpf: Augment raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULLKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Arguments to a raw tracepoint are tagged as trusted, which carries the semantics that the pointer will be non-NULL. However, in certain cases, a raw tracepoint argument may end up being NULL. More context about this issue is available in [0]. Thus, there is a discrepancy between the reality, that raw_tp arguments can actually be NULL, and the verifier's knowledge, that they are never NULL, causing explicit NULL check branch to be dead code eliminated. A previous attempt [1], i.e. the second fixed commit, was made to simulate symbolic execution as if in most accesses, the argument is a non-NULL raw_tp, except for conditional jumps. This tried to suppress branch prediction while preserving compatibility, but surfaced issues with production programs that were difficult to solve without increasing verifier complexity. A more complete discussion of issues and fixes is available at [2]. Fix this by maintaining an explicit list of tracepoints where the arguments are known to be NULL, and mark the positional arguments as PTR_MAYBE_NULL. Additionally, capture the tracepoints where arguments are known to be ERR_PTR, and mark these arguments as scalar values to prevent potential dereference. Each hex digit is used to encode NULL-ness (0x1) or ERR_PTR-ness (0x2), shifted by the zero-indexed argument number x 4. This can be represented as follows: 1st arg: 0x1 2nd arg: 0x10 3rd arg: 0x100 ... and so on (likewise for ERR_PTR case). In the future, an automated pass will be used to produce such a list, or insert __nullable annotations automatically for tracepoints. Each compilation unit will be analyzed and results will be collated to find whether a tracepoint pointer is definitely not null, maybe null, or an unknown state where verifier conservatively marks it PTR_MAYBE_NULL. A proof of concept of this tool from Eduard is available at [3]. Note that in case we don't find a specification in the raw_tp_null_args array and the tracepoint belongs to a kernel module, we will conservatively mark the arguments as PTR_MAYBE_NULL. This is because unlike for in-tree modules, out-of-tree module tracepoints may pass NULL freely to the tracepoint. We don't protect against such tracepoints passing ERR_PTR (which is uncommon anyway), lest we mark all such arguments as SCALAR_VALUE. While we are it, let's adjust the test raw_tp_null to not perform dereference of the skb->mark, as that won't be allowed anymore, and make it more robust by using inline assembly to test the dead code elimination behavior, which should still stay the same. [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZrCZS6nisraEqehw@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241104171959.2938862-1-memxor@gmail.com [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241206161053.809580-1-memxor@gmail.com [3]: https://github.com/eddyz87/llvm-project/tree/nullness-for-tracepoint-params Reported-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> # original bug Reported-by: Manu Bretelle <chantra@meta.com> # bugs in masking fix Fixes: 3f00c5239344 ("bpf: Allow trusted pointers to be passed to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfuncs") Fixes: cb4158ce8ec8 ("bpf: Mark raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULL") Reviewed-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Co-developed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241213221929.3495062-3-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-11-04selftests/bpf: Add tests for raw_tp null handlingKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Ensure that trusted PTR_TO_BTF_ID accesses perform PROBE_MEM handling in raw_tp program. Without the previous fix, this selftest crashes the kernel due to a NULL-pointer dereference. Also ensure that dead code elimination does not kick in for checks on the pointer. Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241104171959.2938862-4-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>