| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
In a future patch, mlxsw will start adding RIFs to uppers of front panel
port netdevices, if they have an IP address.
At the time that the front panel port is enslaved to the bridge, the bridge
MAC address does not have the same prefix as other interfaces in the
system. On Nvidia Spectrum-1 machines all the RIFs have to have the same
38-bit MAC address prefix. Since the bridge does not obey this limitation,
the RIF cannot be created, and the enslavement attempt is vetoed on the
grounds of the configuration not being offloadable.
The selftest itself however checks DCB DSCP-based prioritization, and the
bridge serves for its L2 forwarding capabilities, and does not need to
participate in routing traffic. The IP address or the RIF are irrelevant.
Fix by disabling automatic IPv6 address generation for the HW-offloaded
bridge in this selftest, thus exempting it from mlxsw router attention.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Set up DSCP prioritization through the iproute2 dcb tool, which is easier
to understand and manage.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Several tests do not set some ports down as part of their cleanup(),
resulting in IPv6 link-local addresses and associated routes not being
deleted.
These leaks were found using a BPF tool that monitors ASIC resources.
Solve this by setting the ports down at the end of the tests.
Signed-off-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
These two tests have some problems in the global scope pollution and on
contrary, contain unnecessary local declarations. Fix them.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
The current ping intervals are too short for running mirroring tests in
simulator. This leads to ping sending a follow-up ping before the reply
arrives, thus sending more than the requested 10 ICMP requests. This
traffic is seen at the counters, and causes spurious failures.
Bump interval and timeout numbers 5x in mirroring tests to address the
spurious failures.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
The current timeout (2 seconds) proved to be too low for some (emulated)
systems where we run the tests.
Make the timeout configurable and default to 5 seconds.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
dscp_capture_install() and dscp_capture_uninstall() are going to be
useful for a test added by a following patch, move them therefore to
lib.sh together with related helpers.
While doing so, change the rule preference from mere DSCP value to
DSCP+100 in order to support adding captures of packets with DSCP of 0.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
The function lldpad_wait() will be useful for a test added by a
following patch. Likewise would the "sleep 5" with its extensive
comment.
Therefore move lldpad_wait() to lib.sh in order to allow reuse. Rename
it to lldpad_app_wait_set() to recognize that what this is intended to
wait on are the pending APP sets.
For the sleeping, add a function lldpad_app_wait_del(). That will serve
to hold the related explanatory comment (which edit for clarity), and as
a token in the caller to identify the sites where this sort of waiting
takes place. That will serve when/if a better way to handle this
business is found.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
There are two problems in this test case:
- When indexing in bash associative array, the subscript is interpreted as
string, not as a variable name to be expanded.
- The keys stored to t0s and t1s are not DSCP values, but priority +
base (i.e. the logical DSCP value, not the full bitfield value).
In combination these two bugs conspire to make the test just work,
except it doesn't really test anything and always passes.
Fix the above two problems in obvious manner.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Add a test that exercises the new code. Send DSCP-tagged packets, and
observe how they are prioritized in the switch and the DSCP is updated
on egress again.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
