| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Don't re-walk the page tables if an SEA occurred during the faulting
page table walk to avoid taking a fatal exception in the hyp.
Additionally, check that FAR_EL2 is valid for SEAs not taken on PTW
as the architecture doesn't guarantee it contains the fault VA.
Finally, fix up the rest of the abort path by checking for SEAs early
and bugging the VM if we get further along with an UNKNOWN fault IPA.
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250402201725.2963645-4-oliver.upton@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
|
|
ESR_EL2 was defined as a 32-bit register in the initial release of the
ARM Architecture Manual for Armv8-A, and was later extended to 64 bits,
with bits [63:32] RES0. ARMv8.7 introduced FEAT_LS64, which makes use of
bits [36:32].
KVM treats ESR_EL1 as a 64-bit register when saving and restoring the
guest context, but ESR_EL2 is handled as a 32-bit register. Start
treating ESR_EL2 as a 64-bit register to allow KVM to make use of the
most significant 32 bits in the future.
The type chosen to represent ESR_EL2 is u64, as that is consistent with the
notation KVM overwhelmingly uses today (u32), and how the rest of the
registers are declared.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220425114444.368693-5-alexandru.elisei@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
To split up APEIs in_nmi() path, the caller needs to always be
in_nmi(). Add a helper to do the work and claim the notification.
When KVM or the arch code takes an exception that might be a RAS
notification, it asks the APEI firmware-first code whether it wants
to claim the exception. A future kernel-first mechanism may be queried
afterwards, and claim the notification, otherwise we fall through
to the existing default behaviour.
The NOTIFY_SEA code was merged before considering multiple, possibly
interacting, NMI-like notifications and the need to consider kernel
first in the future. Make the 'claiming' behaviour explicit.
Restructuring the APEI code to allow multiple NMI-like notifications
means any notification that might interrupt interrupts-masked
code must always be wrapped in nmi_enter()/nmi_exit(). This will
allow APEI to use in_nmi() to use the right fixmap entries.
Mask SError over this window to prevent an asynchronous RAS error
arriving and tripping 'nmi_enter()'s BUG_ON(in_nmi()).
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
To split up APEIs in_nmi() path, the caller needs to always be
in_nmi(). KVM shouldn't have to know about this, pull the RAS plumbing
out into a header file.
Currently guest synchronous external aborts are claimed as RAS
notifications by handle_guest_sea(), which is hidden in the arch codes
mm/fault.c. 32bit gets a dummy declaration in system_misc.h.
There is going to be more of this in the future if/when the kernel
supports the SError-based firmware-first notification mechanism and/or
kernel-first notifications for both synchronous external abort and
SError. Each of these will come with some Kconfig symbols and a
handful of header files.
Create a header file for all this.
This patch gives handle_guest_sea() a 'kvm_' prefix, and moves the
declarations to kvm_ras.h as preparation for a future patch that moves
the ACPI-specific RAS code out of mm/fault.c.
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
