summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm64/include/asm/rsi_cmds.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-04-29arm64: Add missing includes for mem_encryptJason Gunthorpe
Doing: #include <linux/mem_encrypt.h> Causes a bunch of compiler failures due to missing implicit includes that don't happen on x86: ../arch/arm64/include/asm/rsi_cmds.h:117:2: error: call to undeclared library function 'memcpy' with type 'void *(void *, const void *, unsigned long)'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 117 | memcpy(&regs.a1, challenge, size); ../arch/arm64/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h:19:49: warning: declaration of 'struct device' will not be visible outside of this function [-Wvisibility] 19 | static inline bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev) ../arch/arm64/include/asm/rsi_cmds.h:44:38: error: call to undeclared function 'virt_to_phys'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 44 | arm_smccc_smc(SMC_RSI_REALM_CONFIG, virt_to_phys(cfg), Add the missing includes to the arch/arm headers to avoid this. Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0-v1-47aadfbd64cd+25795-arm_memenc_h_jgg@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2024-10-23arm64: rsi: Add support for checking whether an MMIO is protectedSuzuki K Poulose
On Arm CCA, with RMM-v1.0, all MMIO regions are shared. However, in the future, an Arm CCA-v1.0 compliant guest may be run in a lesser privileged partition in the Realm World (with Arm CCA-v1.1 Planes feature). In this case, some of the MMIO regions may be emulated by a higher privileged component in the Realm world, i.e, protected. Thus the guest must decide today, whether a given MMIO region is shared vs Protected and create the stage1 mapping accordingly. On Arm CCA, this detection is based on the "IPA State" (RIPAS == RIPAS_IO). Provide a helper to run this check on a given range of MMIO. Also, provide a arm64 helper which may be hooked in by other solutions. Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241017131434.40935-5-steven.price@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2024-10-23arm64: rsi: Add RSI definitionsSuzuki K Poulose
The RMM (Realm Management Monitor) provides functionality that can be accessed by a realm guest through SMC (Realm Services Interface) calls. The SMC definitions are based on DEN0137[1] version 1.0-rel0. [1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0137/1-0rel0/ Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241017131434.40935-2-steven.price@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>