summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/ucall.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-06-06KVM: selftests: Fix RISC-V compilationAndrew Jones
Due to commit 2b7deea3ec7c ("Revert "kvm: selftests: move base kvm_util.h declarations to kvm_util_base.h"") kvm selftests now requires explicitly including ucall_common.h when needed. The commit added the directives everywhere they were needed at the time, but, by merge time, new places had been merged for RISC-V. Add those now to fix RISC-V's compilation. Fixes: dee7ea42a1eb ("Merge tag 'kvm-x86-selftests_utils-6.10' of https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux into HEAD") Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240603122045.323064-2-ajones@ventanamicro.com Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
2023-12-30RISC-V: KVM: selftests: Move sbi_ecall to processor.cAndrew Jones
sbi_ecall() isn't ucall specific and its prototype is already in processor.h. Move its implementation to processor.c. Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
2023-08-02KVM: selftests: Add arch ucall.h and inline simple arch hooksSean Christopherson
Add an architecture specific ucall.h and inline the simple arch hooks, e.g. the init hook for everything except ARM, and the actual "do ucall" hook for everything except x86 (which should be simple, but temporarily isn't due to carrying a workaround). Having a per-arch ucall header will allow adding a #define for the expected KVM exit reason for a ucall that is colocated (for everything except x86) with the ucall itself. Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230731203026.1192091-2-seanjc@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2022-11-16KVM: selftests: Add ucall pool based implementationPeter Gonda
To play nice with guests whose stack memory is encrypted, e.g. AMD SEV, introduce a new "ucall pool" implementation that passes the ucall struct via dedicated memory (which can be mapped shared, a.k.a. as plain text). Because not all architectures have access to the vCPU index in the guest, use a bitmap with atomic accesses to track which entries in the pool are free/used. A list+lock could also work in theory, but synchronizing the individual pointers to the guest would be a mess. Note, there's no need to rewalk the bitmap to ensure success. If all vCPUs are simply allocating, success is guaranteed because there are enough entries for all vCPUs. If one or more vCPUs are freeing and then reallocating, success is guaranteed because vCPUs _always_ walk the bitmap from 0=>N; if vCPU frees an entry and then wins a race to re-allocate, then either it will consume the entry it just freed (bit is the first free bit), or the losing vCPU is guaranteed to see the freed bit (winner consumes an earlier bit, which the loser hasn't yet visited). Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com> Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221006003409.649993-8-seanjc@google.com
2022-11-16KVM: selftests: Drop now-unnecessary ucall_uninit()Sean Christopherson
Drop ucall_uninit() and ucall_arch_uninit() now that ARM doesn't modify the host's copy of ucall_exit_mmio_addr, i.e. now that there's no need to reset the pointer before potentially creating a new VM. The few calls to ucall_uninit() are all immediately followed by kvm_vm_free(), and that is likely always going to hold true, i.e. it's extremely unlikely a test will want to effectively disable ucall in the middle of a test. Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev> Tested-by: Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221006003409.649993-7-seanjc@google.com
2022-11-16KVM: selftests: Automatically do init_ucall() for non-barebones VMsSean Christopherson
Do init_ucall() automatically during VM creation to kill two (three?) birds with one stone. First, initializing ucall immediately after VM creations allows forcing aarch64's MMIO ucall address to immediately follow memslot0. This is still somewhat fragile as tests could clobber the MMIO address with a new memslot, but it's safe-ish since tests have to be conversative when accounting for memslot0. And this can be hardened in the future by creating a read-only memslot for the MMIO page (KVM ARM exits with MMIO if the guest writes to a read-only memslot). Add a TODO to document that selftests can and should use a memslot for the ucall MMIO (doing so requires yet more rework because tests assumes thay can use all memslots except memslot0). Second, initializing ucall for all VMs prepares for making ucall initialization meaningful on all architectures. aarch64 is currently the only arch that needs to do any setup, but that will change in the future by switching to a pool-based implementation (instead of the current stack-based approach). Lastly, defining the ucall MMIO address from common code will simplify switching all architectures (except s390) to a common MMIO-based ucall implementation (if there's ever sufficient motivation to do so). Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev> Tested-by: Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221006003409.649993-4-seanjc@google.com
2022-11-16KVM: selftests: Consolidate boilerplate code in get_ucall()Sean Christopherson
Consolidate the actual copying of a ucall struct from guest=>host into the common get_ucall(). Return a host virtual address instead of a guest virtual address even though the addr_gva2hva() part could be moved to get_ucall() too. Conceptually, get_ucall() is invoked from the host and should return a host virtual address (and returning NULL for "nothing to see here" is far superior to returning 0). Use pointer shenanigans instead of an unnecessary bounce buffer when the caller of get_ucall() provides a valid pointer. Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev> Tested-by: Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221006003409.649993-3-seanjc@google.com
2022-11-16KVM: selftests: Consolidate common code for populating ucall structSean Christopherson
Make ucall() a common helper that populates struct ucall, and only calls into arch code to make the actually call out to userspace. Rename all arch-specific helpers to make it clear they're arch-specific, and to avoid collisions with common helpers (one more on its way...) Add WRITE_ONCE() to stores in ucall() code (as already done to aarch64 code in commit 9e2f6498efbb ("selftests: KVM: Handle compiler optimizations in ucall")) to prevent clang optimizations breaking ucalls. Cc: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev> Tested-by: Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221006003409.649993-2-seanjc@google.com
2022-06-11KVM: selftests: Purge vm+vcpu_id == vcpu sillinessSean Christopherson
Take a vCPU directly instead of a VM+vcpu pair in all vCPU-scoped helpers and ioctls. Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2022-06-11KVM: selftests: Get rid of kvm_util_internal.hSean Christopherson
Fold kvm_util_internal.h into kvm_util_base.h, i.e. make all KVM utility stuff "public". Hiding struct implementations from tests has been a massive failure, as it has led to pointless and poorly named wrappers, unnecessarily opaque code, etc... Not to mention that the approach was a complete failure as evidenced by the non-zero number of tests that were including kvm_util_internal.h. Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2022-06-08selftests: kvm: replace ternary operator with min()Guo Zhengkui
Fix the following coccicheck warnings: tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/ucall.c:25:15-17: WARNING opportunity for min() tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/ucall.c:27:15-17: WARNING opportunity for min() tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/ucall.c:56:15-17: WARNING opportunity for min() tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/ucall.c:82:15-17: WARNING opportunity for min() tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/ucall.c:55:20-21: WARNING opportunity for min() min() is defined in tools/include/linux/kernel.h. Signed-off-by: Guo Zhengkui <guozhengkui@vivo.com> Acked-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> Message-Id: <20220511120621.36956-1-guozhengkui@vivo.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2022-05-20KVM: selftests: riscv: Improve unexpected guest trap handlingAnup Patel
Currently, we simply hang using "while (1) ;" upon any unexpected guest traps because the default guest trap handler is guest_hang(). The above approach is not useful to anyone because KVM selftests users will only see a hung application upon any unexpected guest trap. This patch improves unexpected guest trap handling for KVM RISC-V selftests by doing the following: 1) Return to host user-space 2) Dump VCPU registers 3) Die using TEST_ASSERT(0, ...) Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com> Tested-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@ventanamicro.com> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
2022-01-06KVM: selftests: Add initial support for RISC-V 64-bitAnup Patel
We add initial support for RISC-V 64-bit in KVM selftests using which we can cross-compile and run arch independent tests such as: demand_paging_test dirty_log_test kvm_create_max_vcpus, kvm_page_table_test set_memory_region_test kvm_binary_stats_test All VM guest modes defined in kvm_util.h require at least 48-bit guest virtual address so to use KVM RISC-V selftests hardware need to support at least Sv48 MMU for guest (i.e. VS-mode). Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>