| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Add the following tests:
1. A test with an (unimportant) ldimm64 (16 byte insn) and a
Spectre-v4--induced nospec that clarifies and serves as a basic
Spectre v4 test.
2. Make sure a Spectre v4 nospec_result does not prevent a Spectre v1
nospec from being added before the dangerous instruction (tests that
[1] is fixed).
3. Combine the two, which is the combination that triggers the warning
in [2]. This is because the unanalyzed stack write has nospec_result
set, but the ldimm64 (which was just analyzed) had incremented
insn_idx by 2. That violates the assertion that nospec_result is only
used after insns that increment insn_idx by 1 (i.e., stack writes).
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/4266fd5de04092aa4971cbef14f1b4b96961f432.camel@gmail.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/685b3c1b.050a0220.2303ee.0010.GAE@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Luis Gerhorst <luis.gerhorst@fau.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250705190908.1756862-3-luis.gerhorst@fau.de
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Allow macro expansion for values passed to the `__retval` and
`__retval_unpriv` attributes. This is especially useful for testing
programs which return various error codes.
With this change, the code for parsing special literals can be made
simpler, as the literals are defined via macros. The only exception is
INT_MIN which expands to (-INT_MAX -1), which is not single number and
cannot be parsed by strtol. So, we instead use a prefixed literal
_INT_MIN in __retval and handle it separately (assign the expected
return to INT_MIN). Also, strtol cannot handle the "ll" suffix so change
the value of POINTER_VALUE from 0xcafe4all to 0xbadcafe.
Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a6c6b551ae0575351faa7b7a1df52f9341a5cbe8.1750917800.git.vmalik@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
This implements the core of the series and causes the verifier to fall
back to mitigating Spectre v1 using speculation barriers. The approach
was presented at LPC'24 [1] and RAID'24 [2].
If we find any forbidden behavior on a speculative path, we insert a
nospec (e.g., lfence speculation barrier on x86) before the instruction
and stop verifying the path. While verifying a speculative path, we can
furthermore stop verification of that path whenever we encounter a
nospec instruction.
A minimal example program would look as follows:
A = true
B = true
if A goto e
f()
if B goto e
unsafe()
e: exit
There are the following speculative and non-speculative paths
(`cur->speculative` and `speculative` referring to the value of the
push_stack() parameters):
- A = true
- B = true
- if A goto e
- A && !cur->speculative && !speculative
- exit
- !A && !cur->speculative && speculative
- f()
- if B goto e
- B && cur->speculative && !speculative
- exit
- !B && cur->speculative && speculative
- unsafe()
If f() contains any unsafe behavior under Spectre v1 and the unsafe
behavior matches `state->speculative &&
error_recoverable_with_nospec(err)`, do_check() will now add a nospec
before f() instead of rejecting the program:
A = true
B = true
if A goto e
nospec
f()
if B goto e
unsafe()
e: exit
Alternatively, the algorithm also takes advantage of nospec instructions
inserted for other reasons (e.g., Spectre v4). Taking the program above
as an example, speculative path exploration can stop before f() if a
nospec was inserted there because of Spectre v4 sanitization.
In this example, all instructions after the nospec are dead code (and
with the nospec they are also dead code speculatively).
For this, it relies on the fact that speculation barriers generally
prevent all later instructions from executing if the speculation was not
correct:
* On Intel x86_64, lfence acts as full speculation barrier, not only as
a load fence [3]:
An LFENCE instruction or a serializing instruction will ensure that
no later instructions execute, even speculatively, until all prior
instructions complete locally. [...] Inserting an LFENCE instruction
after a bounds check prevents later operations from executing before
the bound check completes.
This was experimentally confirmed in [4].
* On AMD x86_64, lfence is dispatch-serializing [5] (requires MSR
C001_1029[1] to be set if the MSR is supported, this happens in
init_amd()). AMD further specifies "A dispatch serializing instruction
forces the processor to retire the serializing instruction and all
previous instructions before the next instruction is executed" [8]. As
dispatch is not specific to memory loads or branches, lfence therefore
also affects all instructions there. Also, if retiring a branch means
it's PC change becomes architectural (should be), this means any
"wrong" speculation is aborted as required for this series.
* ARM's SB speculation barrier instruction also affects "any instruction
that appears later in the program order than the barrier" [6].
* PowerPC's barrier also affects all subsequent instructions [7]:
[...] executing an ori R31,R31,0 instruction ensures that all
instructions preceding the ori R31,R31,0 instruction have completed
before the ori R31,R31,0 instruction completes, and that no
subsequent instructions are initiated, even out-of-order, until
after the ori R31,R31,0 instruction completes. The ori R31,R31,0
instruction may complete before storage accesses associated with
instructions preceding the ori R31,R31,0 instruction have been
performed
Regarding the example, this implies that `if B goto e` will not execute
before `if A goto e` completes. Once `if A goto e` completes, the CPU
should find that the speculation was wrong and continue with `exit`.
If there is any other path that leads to `if B goto e` (and therefore
`unsafe()`) without going through `if A goto e`, then a nospec will
still be needed there. However, this patch assumes this other path will
be explored separately and therefore be discovered by the verifier even
if the exploration discussed here stops at the nospec.
This patch furthermore has the unfortunate consequence that Spectre v1
mitigations now only support architectures which implement BPF_NOSPEC.
Before this commit, Spectre v1 mitigations prevented exploits by
rejecting the programs on all architectures. Because some JITs do not
implement BPF_NOSPEC, this patch therefore may regress unpriv BPF's
security to a limited extent:
* The regression is limited to systems vulnerable to Spectre v1, have
unprivileged BPF enabled, and do NOT emit insns for BPF_NOSPEC. The
latter is not the case for x86 64- and 32-bit, arm64, and powerpc
64-bit and they are therefore not affected by the regression.
According to commit a6f6a95f2580 ("LoongArch, bpf: Fix jit to skip
speculation barrier opcode"), LoongArch is not vulnerable to Spectre
v1 and therefore also not affected by the regression.
* To the best of my knowledge this regression may therefore only affect
MIPS. This is deemed acceptable because unpriv BPF is still disabled
there by default. As stated in a previous commit, BPF_NOSPEC could be
implemented for MIPS based on GCC's speculation_barrier
implementation.
* It is unclear which other architectures (besides x86 64- and 32-bit,
ARM64, PowerPC 64-bit, LoongArch, and MIPS) supported by the kernel
are vulnerable to Spectre v1. Also, it is not clear if barriers are
available on these architectures. Implementing BPF_NOSPEC on these
architectures therefore is non-trivial. Searching GCC and the kernel
for speculation barrier implementations for these architectures
yielded no result.
* If any of those regressed systems is also vulnerable to Spectre v4,
the system was already vulnerable to Spectre v4 attacks based on
unpriv BPF before this patch and the impact is therefore further
limited.
As an alternative to regressing security, one could still reject
programs if the architecture does not emit BPF_NOSPEC (e.g., by removing
the empty BPF_NOSPEC-case from all JITs except for LoongArch where it
appears justified). However, this will cause rejections on these archs
that are likely unfounded in the vast majority of cases.
In the tests, some are now successful where we previously had a
false-positive (i.e., rejection). Change them to reflect where the
nospec should be inserted (using __xlated_unpriv) and modify the error
message if the nospec is able to mitigate a problem that previously
shadowed another problem (in that case __xlated_unpriv does not work,
therefore just add a comment).
Define SPEC_V1 to avoid duplicating this ifdef whenever we check for
nospec insns using __xlated_unpriv, define it here once. This also
improves readability. PowerPC can probably also be added here. However,
omit it for now because the BPF CI currently does not include a test.
Limit it to EPERM, EACCES, and EINVAL (and not everything except for
EFAULT and ENOMEM) as it already has the desired effect for most
real-world programs. Briefly went through all the occurrences of EPERM,
EINVAL, and EACCESS in verifier.c to validate that catching them like
this makes sense.
Thanks to Dustin for their help in checking the vendor documentation.
[1] https://lpc.events/event/18/contributions/1954/ ("Mitigating
Spectre-PHT using Speculation Barriers in Linux eBPF")
[2] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.00078 ("VeriFence: Lightweight and
Precise Spectre Defenses for Untrusted Linux Kernel Extensions")
[3] https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/technical-documentation/runtime-speculative-side-channel-mitigations.html
("Managed Runtime Speculative Execution Side Channel Mitigations")
[4] https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3359789.3359837 ("Speculator: a
tool to analyze speculative execution attacks and mitigations" -
Section 4.6 "Stopping Speculative Execution")
[5] https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/processor-tech-docs/programmer-references/software-techniques-for-managing-speculation.pdf
("White Paper - SOFTWARE TECHNIQUES FOR MANAGING SPECULATION ON AMD
PROCESSORS - REVISION 5.09.23")
[6] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0597/2020-12/Base-Instructions/SB--Speculation-Barrier-
("SB - Speculation Barrier - Arm Armv8-A A32/T32 Instruction Set
Architecture (2020-12)")
[7] https://wiki.raptorcs.com/w/images/5/5f/OPF_PowerISA_v3.1C.pdf
("Power ISA™ - Version 3.1C - May 26, 2024 - Section 9.2.1 of Book
III")
[8] https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/processor-tech-docs/programmer-references/40332.pdf
("AMD64 Architecture Programmer’s Manual Volumes 1–5 - Revision 4.08
- April 2024 - 7.6.4 Serializing Instructions")
Signed-off-by: Luis Gerhorst <luis.gerhorst@fau.de>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Henriette Herzog <henriette.herzog@rub.de>
Cc: Dustin Nguyen <nguyen@cs.fau.de>
Cc: Maximilian Ott <ott@cs.fau.de>
Cc: Milan Stephan <milan.stephan@fau.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250603212428.338473-1-luis.gerhorst@fau.de
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
For riscv64, enable all BPF_{LOAD_ACQ,STORE_REL} selftests except the
arena_atomics/* ones (not guarded behind CAN_USE_LOAD_ACQ_STORE_REL),
since arena access is not yet supported.
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com> # QEMU/RVA23
Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye <yepeilin@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9d878fa99a72626208a8eed3c04c4140caf77fda.1746588351.git.yepeilin@google.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Make sure that CAN_USE_BPF_ST test (compute_live_registers/store) is
enabled when __clang_major__ >= 18.
Fixes: 2ea8f6a1cda7 ("selftests/bpf: test cases for compute_live_registers()")
Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye <yepeilin@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250425213712.1542077-1-yepeilin@google.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Cover instructions from each kind:
- assignment
- arithmetic
- store/load
- endian conversion
- atomics
- branches, conditional branches, may_goto, calls
- LD_ABS/LD_IND
- address_space_cast
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250304195024.2478889-6-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
In some cases, the verification logic under the interpreter and JIT
differs, such as may_goto, and the test program behaves differently under
different runtime modes, requiring separate verification logic for each
result.
Introduce __load_if_JITed and __load_if_no_JITed annotation for tests.
Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@163.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250214091823.46042-3-mrpre@163.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Since commit 7e92e01b7245 ("powerpc: Provide syscall wrapper")
landed in v6.1, syscall wrapper is enabled on powerpc. Commit
94746890202c ("powerpc: Don't add __powerpc_ prefix to syscall
entry points") , that drops the prefix to syscall entry points,
also landed in the same release. So, add the missing empty
SYS_PREFIX prefix definition for powerpc, to fix some fentry
and kprobe selftests.
Signed-off-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/7192d6aa9501115dc242435970df82b3d190f257.1738302337.git.skb99@linux.ibm.com
|
|
Add a __caps_unpriv annotation so that tests requiring specific
capabilities while dropping the rest can conveniently specify them
during selftest declaration instead of munging with capabilities at
runtime from the testing binary.
While at it, let us convert test_verifier_mtu to use this new support
instead.
Since we do not want to include linux/capability.h, we only defined the
four main capabilities BPF subsystem deals with in bpf_misc.h for use in
tests. If the user passes a CAP_SYS_NICE or anything else that's not
defined in the header, capability parsing code will return a warning.
Also reject strtol returning 0. CAP_CHOWN = 0 but we'll never need to
use it, and strtol doesn't errno on failed conversion. Fail the test in
such a case.
The original diff for this idea is available at link [0].
[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/a1e48f5d9ae133e19adc6adf27e19d585e06bab4.camel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
[ Kartikeya: rebase on bpf-next, add warn to parse_caps, convert test_verifier_mtu ]
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241204044757.1483141-4-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Allow to verify jit behaviour by writing tests as below:
SEC("tp")
__arch_x86_64
__jited(" endbr64")
__jited(" nopl (%rax,%rax)")
__jited(" xorq %rax, %rax")
...
__naked void some_test(void)
{
asm volatile (... ::: __clobber_all);
}
Allow regular expressions in patterns, same way as in __msg.
By default assume that each __jited pattern has to be matched on the
next consecutive line of the disassembly, e.g.:
__jited(" endbr64") # matched on line N
__jited(" nopl (%rax,%rax)") # matched on line N+1
If match occurs on a wrong line an error is reported.
To override this behaviour use __jited("..."), e.g.:
__jited(" endbr64") # matched on line N
__jited("...") # not matched
__jited(" nopl (%rax,%rax)") # matched on any line >= N
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240820102357.3372779-7-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Upcoming changes require a notation to specify regular expression
matches for regular verifier log messages, disassembly of BPF
instructions, disassembly of jited instructions.
Neither basic nor extended POSIX regular expressions w/o additional
escaping are good for this role because of wide use of special
characters in disassembly, for example:
movq -0x10(%rbp), %rax ;; () are special characters
cmpq $0x21, %rax ;; $ is a special character
*(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r1 ;; * and () are special characters
This commit borrows syntax from LLVM's FileCheck utility.
It replaces __regex macro with ability to embed regular expressions
in __msg patters using "{{" "}}" pairs for escaping.
Syntax for __msg patterns:
pattern := (<verbatim text> | regex)*
regex := "{{" <posix extended regular expression> "}}"
For example, pattern "foo{{[0-9]+}}" matches strings like
"foo0", "foo007", etc.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240820102357.3372779-5-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
__msg, __regex and __xlated tags are based on
__attribute__((btf_decl_tag("..."))) annotations.
Clang de-duplicates such annotations, e.g. the following
two sequences of tags are identical in final BTF:
/* seq A */ /* seq B */
__tag("foo") __tag("foo")
__tag("bar") __tag("bar")
__tag("foo")
Fix this by adding a unique suffix for each tag using __COUNTER__
pre-processor macro. E.g. here is a new definition for __msg:
#define __msg(msg) \
__attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_expect_msg=" XSTR(__COUNTER__) "=" msg)))
Using this definition the "seq A" from example above is translated to
BTF as follows:
[..] DECL_TAG 'comment:test_expect_msg=0=foo' type_id=X component_idx=-1
[..] DECL_TAG 'comment:test_expect_msg=1=bar' type_id=X component_idx=-1
[..] DECL_TAG 'comment:test_expect_msg=2=foo' type_id=X component_idx=-1
Surprisingly, this bug affects a single existing test:
verifier_spill_fill/old_stack_misc_vs_cur_ctx_ptr,
where sequence of identical messages was expected in the log.
Fixes: 537c3f66eac1 ("selftests/bpf: add generic BPF program tester-loader")
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240820102357.3372779-4-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Add annotations __arch_x86_64, __arch_arm64, __arch_riscv64
to specify on which architecture the test case should be tested.
Several __arch_* annotations could be specified at once.
When test case is not run on current arch it is marked as skipped.
For example, the following would be tested only on arm64 and riscv64:
SEC("raw_tp")
__arch_arm64
__arch_riscv64
__xlated("1: *(u64 *)(r10 - 16) = r1")
__xlated("2: call")
__xlated("3: r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 16);")
__success
__naked void canary_arm64_riscv64(void)
{
asm volatile (
"r1 = 1;"
"*(u64 *)(r10 - 16) = r1;"
"call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];"
"r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 16);"
"exit;"
:
: __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
: __clobber_all);
}
On x86 it would be skipped:
#467/2 verifier_nocsr/canary_arm64_riscv64:SKIP
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240722233844.1406874-10-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
|
|
Add a macro __xlated("...") for use with test_loader tests.
When such annotations are present for the test case:
- bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd() is used to get BPF program after all
rewrites are applied by verifier.
- the program is disassembled and patterns specified in __xlated are
searched for in the disassembly text.
__xlated matching follows the same mechanics as __msg:
each subsequent pattern is matched from the point where
previous pattern ended.
This allows to write tests like below, where the goal is to verify the
behavior of one of the of the transformations applied by verifier:
SEC("raw_tp")
__xlated("1: w0 = ")
__xlated("2: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
__xlated("3: r0 = *(u32 *)(r0 +0)")
__xlated("4: exit")
__success __naked void simple(void)
{
asm volatile (
"call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];"
"exit;"
:
: __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
: __clobber_all);
}
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240722233844.1406874-9-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
|
|
ARRAY_SIZE is used on multiple places, move its definition in
bpf_misc.h header.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240626134719.3893748-1-jolsa@kernel.org
|
|
Add support for __regex and __regex_unpriv macros to check the test
execution output against a regular expression. This is similar to __msg
and __msg_unpriv, however those expect do substring matching.
Signed-off-by: Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240617141458.471620-2-cupertino.miranda@oracle.com
|
|
Some of the BPF selftests use the "p" constraint in inline assembly
snippets, for input operands for MOV (rN = rM) instructions.
This is mainly done via the __imm_ptr macro defined in
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h:
#define __imm_ptr(name) [name]"p"(&name)
Example:
int consume_first_item_only(void *ctx)
{
struct bpf_iter_num iter;
asm volatile (
/* create iterator */
"r1 = %[iter];"
[...]
:
: __imm_ptr(iter)
: CLOBBERS);
[...]
}
The "p" constraint is a tricky one. It is documented in the GCC manual
section "Simple Constraints":
An operand that is a valid memory address is allowed. This is for
``load address'' and ``push address'' instructions.
p in the constraint must be accompanied by address_operand as the
predicate in the match_operand. This predicate interprets the mode
specified in the match_operand as the mode of the memory reference for
which the address would be valid.
There are two problems:
1. It is questionable whether that constraint was ever intended to be
used in inline assembly templates, because its behavior really
depends on compiler internals. A "memory address" is not the same
than a "memory operand" or a "memory reference" (constraint "m"), and
in fact its usage in the template above results in an error in both
x86_64-linux-gnu and bpf-unkonwn-none:
foo.c: In function ‘bar’:
foo.c:6:3: error: invalid 'asm': invalid expression as operand
6 | asm volatile ("r1 = %[jorl]" : : [jorl]"p"(&jorl));
| ^~~
I would assume the same happens with aarch64, riscv, and most/all
other targets in GCC, that do not accept operands of the form A + B
that are not wrapped either in a const or in a memory reference.
To avoid that error, the usage of the "p" constraint in internal GCC
instruction templates is supposed to be complemented by the 'a'
modifier, like in:
asm volatile ("r1 = %a[jorl]" : : [jorl]"p"(&jorl));
Internally documented (in GCC's final.cc) as:
%aN means expect operand N to be a memory address
(not a memory reference!) and print a reference
to that address.
That works because when the modifier 'a' is found, GCC prints an
"operand address", which is not the same than an "operand".
But...
2. Even if we used the internal 'a' modifier (we shouldn't) the 'rN =
rM' instruction really requires a register argument. In cases
involving automatics, like in the examples above, we easily end with:
bar:
#APP
r1 = r10-4
#NO_APP
In other cases we could conceibly also end with a 64-bit label that
may overflow the 32-bit immediate operand of `rN = imm32'
instructions:
r1 = foo
All of which is clearly wrong.
clang happens to do "the right thing" in the current usage of __imm_ptr
in the BPF tests, because even with -O2 it seems to "reload" the
fp-relative address of the automatic to a register like in:
bar:
r1 = r10
r1 += -4
#APP
r1 = r1
#NO_APP
Which is what GCC would generate with -O0. Whether this is by chance
or by design, the compiler shouln't be expected to do that reload
driven by the "p" constraint.
This patch changes the usage of the "p" constraint in the BPF
selftests macros to use the "r" constraint instead. If a register is
what is required, we should let the compiler know.
Previous discussion in bpf@vger:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/87h6p5ebpb.fsf@oracle.com/T/#ef0df83d6975c34dff20bf0dd52e078f5b8ca2767
Tested in bpf-next master.
No regressions.
Signed-off-by: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240123181309.19853-1-jose.marchesi@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
This commit adds support for per-prog btf_custom_path. This is necessary
for testing CO-RE relocations on non-vmlinux types using test_loader
infrastructure.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/660ea7f2fdbdd5103bc1af87c9fc931f05327926.1702325874.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
|
|
SYS_PREFIX was missing for a RISC-V, which made a couple of kprobe
tests fail.
Add missing SYS_PREFIX for RISC-V.
Fixes: 08d0ce30e0e4 ("riscv: Implement syscall wrappers")
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231004110905.49024-3-bjorn@kernel.org
|
|
Add a bunch of tests validating verifier's precision backpropagation
logic in the presence of subprog calls and/or callback-calling
helpers/kfuncs.
We validate the following conditions:
- subprog_result_precise: static subprog r0 result precision handling;
- global_subprog_result_precise: global subprog r0 precision
shortcutting, similar to BPF helper handling;
- callback_result_precise: similarly r0 marking precise for
callback-calling helpers;
- parent_callee_saved_reg_precise, parent_callee_saved_reg_precise_global:
propagation of precision for callee-saved registers bypassing
static/global subprogs;
- parent_callee_saved_reg_precise_with_callback: same as above, but in
the presence of callback-calling helper;
- parent_stack_slot_precise, parent_stack_slot_precise_global:
similar to above, but instead propagating precision of stack slot
(spilled SCALAR reg);
- parent_stack_slot_precise_with_callback: same as above, but in the
presence of callback-calling helper;
- subprog_arg_precise: propagation of precision of static subprog's
input argument back to caller;
- subprog_spill_into_parent_stack_slot_precise: negative test
validating that verifier currently can't support backtracking of stack
access with non-r10 register, we validate that we fallback to
forcing precision for all SCALARs.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230505043317.3629845-10-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
In order to express test cases that use bpf_tail_call() intrinsic it
is necessary to have several programs to be loaded at a time.
This commit adds __auxiliary annotation to the set of annotations
supported by test_loader.c. Programs marked as auxiliary are always
loaded but are not treated as a separate test.
For example:
void dummy_prog1(void);
struct {
__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY);
__uint(max_entries, 4);
__uint(key_size, sizeof(int));
__array(values, void (void));
} prog_map SEC(".maps") = {
.values = {
[0] = (void *) &dummy_prog1,
},
};
SEC("tc")
__auxiliary
__naked void dummy_prog1(void) {
asm volatile ("r0 = 42; exit;");
}
SEC("tc")
__description("reference tracking: check reference or tail call")
__success __retval(0)
__naked void check_reference_or_tail_call(void)
{
asm volatile (
"r2 = %[prog_map] ll;"
"r3 = 0;"
"call %[bpf_tail_call];"
"r0 = 0;"
"exit;"
:: __imm(bpf_tail_call),
: __clobber_all);
}
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230421174234.2391278-2-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
To make it easier for bleeding-edge BPF applications, such as sched_ext,
to utilize open-coded iterators, move bpf_for(), bpf_for_each(), and
bpf_repeat() macros from selftests/bpf-internal bpf_misc.h helper, to
libbpf-provided bpf_helpers.h header.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230418002148.3255690-6-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Extends test_loader.c:test_loader__run_subtests() by allowing to
execute BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN bpf command for selected programs.
This is similar to functionality provided by test_verifier.
Adds the following new attributes controlling test_loader behavior:
__retval(...)
__retval_unpriv(...)
* If any of these attributes is present, the annotated program would
be executed using libbpf's bpf_prog_test_run_opts() function.
* If __retval is present, the test run would be done for program
loaded in privileged mode.
* If __retval_unpriv is present, the test run would be done for
program loaded in unprivileged mode.
* To mimic test_verifier behavior, the actual run is initiated in
privileged mode.
* The value returned by a test run is compared against retval
parameter.
The retval attribute takes one of the following parameters:
- a decimal number
- a hexadecimal number (must start from '0x')
- any of a three special literals (provided for compatibility with
test_verifier):
- INT_MIN
- POINTER_VALUE
- TEST_DATA_LEN
An example of the attribute usage:
SEC("socket")
__description("return 42")
__success __success_unpriv __retval(42)
__naked void the_42_test(void)
{
asm volatile (" \
r0 = 42; \
exit; \
" ::: __clobber_all);
}
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230325025524.144043-5-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Extends test_loader.c:test_loader__run_subtests() by allowing to
execute tests in unprivileged mode, similar to test_verifier.c.
Adds the following new attributes controlling test_loader behavior:
__msg_unpriv
__success_unpriv
__failure_unpriv
* If any of these attributes is present the test would be loaded in
unprivileged mode.
* If only "privileged" attributes are present the test would be loaded
only in privileged mode.
* If both "privileged" and "unprivileged" attributes are present the
test would be loaded in both modes.
* If test has to be executed in both modes, __msg(text) is specified
and __msg_unpriv is not specified the behavior is the same as if
__msg_unpriv(text) is specified.
* For test filtering purposes the name of the program loaded in
unprivileged mode is derived from the usual program name by adding
`@unpriv' suffix.
Also adds attribute '__description'. This attribute specifies text to
be used instead of a program name for display and filtering purposes.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230325025524.144043-4-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Add two convenience macro for BPF test cases,
allowing the following usage:
#include <linux/filter.h>
...
asm volatile (
...
".8byte %[raw_insn];"
...
"r1 += %[st_foo_offset];"
...
:
: __imm_insn(raw_insn, BPF_RAW_INSN(...)),
__imm_const(st_foo_offset, offsetof(struct st, foo))
: __clobber_all);
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230325025524.144043-3-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Add __sink(expr) macro that forces compiler to believe that passed in
expression is both read and written. It used a simple embedded asm for
this. This is useful in a lot of tests where we assign value to some variable
to trigger some action, but later don't read variable, causing compiler
to complain (if corresponding compiler warnings are turned on, which
we'll do in the next patch).
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230309054015.4068562-3-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Add __attribute__((unused)) to inner __p variable inside bpf_for(),
bpf_for_each(), and bpf_repeat() macros to avoid compiler warnings about
unused variable.
Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230309054015.4068562-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Add various tests for open-coded iterators. Some of them excercise
various possible coding patterns in C, some go down to low-level
assembly for more control over various conditions, especially invalid
ones.
We also make use of bpf_for(), bpf_for_each(), bpf_repeat() macros in
some of these tests.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308184121.1165081-7-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Add bpf_for_each(), bpf_for(), and bpf_repeat() macros that make writing
open-coded iterator-based loops much more convenient and natural. These
macros utilize cleanup attribute to ensure proper destruction of the
iterator and thanks to that manage to provide the ergonomics that is
very close to C language's for() construct. Typical loop would look like:
int i;
int arr[N];
bpf_for(i, 0, N) {
/* verifier will know that i >= 0 && i < N, so could be used to
* directly access array elements with no extra checks
*/
arr[i] = i;
}
bpf_repeat() is very similar, but it doesn't expose iteration number and
is meant as a simple "repeat action N times" loop:
bpf_repeat(N) { /* whatever, N times */ }
Note that `break` and `continue` statements inside the {} block work as
expected.
bpf_for_each() is a generalization over any kind of BPF open-coded
iterator allowing to use for-each-like approach instead of calling
low-level bpf_iter_<type>_{new,next,destroy}() APIs explicitly. E.g.:
struct cgroup *cg;
bpf_for_each(cgroup, cg, some, input, args) {
/* do something with each cg */
}
would call (not-yet-implemented) bpf_iter_cgroup_{new,next,destroy}()
functions to form a loop over cgroups, where `some, input, args` are
passed verbatim into constructor as
bpf_iter_cgroup_new(&it, some, input, args).
As a first demonstration, add pyperf variant based on the bpf_for() loop.
Also clean up a few tests that either included bpf_misc.h header
unnecessarily from the user-space, which is unsupported, or included it
before any common types are defined (and thus leading to unnecessary
compilation warnings, potentially).
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308184121.1165081-6-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Extend __flag attribute by allowing to specify one of the following:
* BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT
* BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT
* BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32
* BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ
* BPF_F_SLEEPABLE
* BPF_F_XDP_HAS_FRAGS
* Some numeric value
Extend __msg attribute by allowing to specify multiple exepcted messages.
All messages are expected to be present in the verifier log in the
order of application.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230301175417.3146070-2-eddyz87@gmail.com
[ Eduard: added commit message, formatting, comments ]
|
|
Update uprobe_autoattach selftest to validate architecture-specific
argument passing through registers. Use new BPF_UPROBE and
BPF_URETPROBE, and construct both BPF-side and user-space side in such
a way that for different architectures we are fetching and checking
different number of arguments, matching architecture-specific limit of
how many registers are available for argument passing.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> # arm64
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> # s390x
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230120200914.3008030-12-andrii@kernel.org
|
|
A set of macros useful for writing naked BPF functions using inline
assembly. E.g. as follows:
struct map_struct {
...
} map SEC(".maps");
SEC(...)
__naked int foo_test(void)
{
asm volatile(
"r0 = 0;"
"*(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r0;"
"r1 = %[map] ll;"
"r2 = r10;"
"r2 += -8;"
"call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem];"
"r0 = 0;"
"exit;"
:
: __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
__imm_addr(map)
: __clobber_all);
}
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
[ Kartikeya: Add acks, include __clobber_common from Andrii ]
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230121002241.2113993-9-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
It's become a common pattern to have a collection of small BPF programs
in one BPF object file, each representing one test case. On user-space
side of such tests we maintain a table of program names and expected
failure or success, along with optional expected verifier log message.
This works, but each set of tests reimplement this mundane code over and
over again, which is a waste of time for anyone trying to add a new set
of tests. Furthermore, it's quite error prone as it's way too easy to miss
some entries in these manually maintained test tables (as evidences by
dynptr_fail tests, in which ringbuf_release_uninit_dynptr subtest was
accidentally missed; this is fixed in next patch).
So this patch implements generic test_loader, which accepts skeleton
name and handles the rest of details: opens and loads BPF object file,
making sure each program is tested in isolation. Optionally each test
case can specify expected BPF verifier log message. In case of failure,
tester makes sure to report verifier log, but it also reports verifier
log in verbose mode unconditionally.
Now, the interesting deviation from existing custom implementations is
the use of btf_decl_tag attribute to specify expected-to-fail vs
expected-to-succeed markers and, optionally, expected log message
directly next to BPF program source code, eliminating the need to
manually create and update table of tests.
We define few macros wrapping btf_decl_tag with a convention that all
values of btf_decl_tag start with "comment:" prefix, and then utilizing
a very simple "just_some_text_tag" or "some_key_name=<value>" pattern to
define things like expected success/failure, expected verifier message,
extra verifier log level (if necessary). This approach is demonstrated
by next patch in which two existing sets of failure tests are converted.
Tester supports both expected-to-fail and expected-to-succeed programs,
though this patch set didn't convert any existing expected-to-succeed
programs yet, as existing tests couple BPF program loading with their
further execution through attach or test_prog_run. One way to allow
testing scenarios like this would be ability to specify custom callback,
executed for each successfully loaded BPF program. This is left for
follow up patches, after some more analysis of existing test cases.
This test_loader is, hopefully, a start of a test_verifier-like runner,
but integrated into test_progs infrastructure. It will allow much better
"user experience" of defining low-level verification tests that can take
advantage of all the libbpf-provided nicety features on BPF side: global
variables, declarative maps, etc. All while having a choice of defining
it in C or as BPF assembly (through __attribute__((naked)) functions and
using embedded asm), depending on what makes most sense in each
particular case. This will be explored in follow up patches as well.
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221207201648.2990661-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
On architectures that don't use a syscall wrapper, sys_* function names
are set as an alias of __se_sys_* functions. Due to this, there is no
BTF associated with sys_* function names. This results in some of the
test progs failing to load. Set the SYS_PREFIX to "__se_" to fix this
issue.
Fixes: 38261f369fb905 ("selftests/bpf: Fix probe_user test failure with clang build kernel")
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/013d632aacd3e41290445c0025db6a7055ec6e18.1643973917.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
|
|
Extract the helper to set up SYS_PREFIX for fentry and kprobe selftests
that use __x86_sys_* attach functions.
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kenta Tada <Kenta.Tada@sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220124141622.4378-2-Kenta.Tada@sony.com
|
