summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-01-23selftests/bpf: Skip callback tests if jit is disabled in test_verifierTiezhu Yang
If CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is not set and bpf_jit_enable is 0, there exist 6 failed tests. [root@linux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable [root@linux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled [root@linux bpf]# ./test_verifier | grep FAIL #106/p inline simple bpf_loop call FAIL #107/p don't inline bpf_loop call, flags non-zero FAIL #108/p don't inline bpf_loop call, callback non-constant FAIL #109/p bpf_loop_inline and a dead func FAIL #110/p bpf_loop_inline stack locations for loop vars FAIL #111/p inline bpf_loop call in a big program FAIL Summary: 768 PASSED, 15 SKIPPED, 6 FAILED The test log shows that callbacks are not allowed in non-JITed programs, interpreter doesn't support them yet, thus these tests should be skipped if jit is disabled. Add an explicit flag F_NEEDS_JIT_ENABLED to those tests to mark that they require JIT enabled in bpf_loop_inline.c, check the flag and jit_disabled at the beginning of do_test_single() to handle this case. With this patch: [root@linux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable [root@linux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled [root@linux bpf]# ./test_verifier | grep FAIL Summary: 768 PASSED, 21 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240123090351.2207-3-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
2022-07-21selftests/bpf: Fix test_verifier failed test in unprivileged modeKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Loading the BTF won't be permitted without privileges, hence only test for privileged mode by setting the prog type. This makes the test_verifier show 0 failures when unprivileged BPF is enabled. Fixes: 41188e9e9def ("selftest/bpf: Test for use-after-free bug fix in inline_bpf_loop") Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220721134245.2450-14-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-06-24selftest/bpf: Test for use-after-free bug fix in inline_bpf_loopEduard Zingerman
This test verifies that bpf_loop() inlining works as expected when address of `env->prog` is updated. This address is updated upon BPF program reallocation. Reallocation is handled by bpf_prog_realloc(), which reuses old memory if page boundary is not crossed. The value of `len` in the test is chosen to cross this boundary on bpf_loop() patching. Verify that the use-after-free bug in inline_bpf_loop() reported by Dan Carpenter is fixed. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220624020613.548108-3-eddyz87@gmail.com
2022-06-20selftests/bpf: BPF test_verifier selftests for bpf_loop inliningEduard Zingerman
A number of test cases for BPF selftests test_verifier to check how bpf_loop inline transformation rewrites the BPF program. The following cases are covered: - happy path - no-rewrite when flags is non-zero - no-rewrite when callback is non-constant - subprogno in insn_aux is updated correctly when dead sub-programs are removed - check that correct stack offsets are assigned for spilling of R6-R8 registers Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220620235344.569325-5-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>